Herbal Medicines for Gastrointestinal Disorders in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review
- Dennis Anheyer, MA, BSca,
- Jane Frawley, PhDb,
- Anna Katharina Koch, MSca,c,
- Romy Lauche, PhDa,b,
- Jost Langhorst, MDa,c,
- Gustav Dobos, MDa, and
- Holger Cramer, PhDa,b
- aDepartment of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, and
- cDepartment of Integrative Gastroenterology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; and
- bAustralian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Mr Anheyer conceptualized and designed the study, conducted the literature review, collected the data, created the tables and figures, and drafted the initial manuscript; Drs Cramer and Lauche participated in conceptualizing and designing the review, participated in collecting the data, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Frawley and Ms Koch participated in drafting the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Drs Dobos and Langhorst critically reviewed the manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.
CONTEXT: Gastrointestinal disorders are common childhood complaints. Particular types of complementary and alternative medicine, such as herbal medicine, are commonly used among children. Research information on efficacy, safety, or dosage forms is still lacking.
OBJECTIVES: To systematically summarize effectiveness and safety of different herbal treatment options for gastrointestinal disorders in children.
DATA SOURCES: Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched through July 15, 2016.
STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials comparing herbal therapy with no treatment, placebo, or any pharmaceutical medication in children and adolescents (aged 0–18 years) with gastrointestinal disorders were eligible.
DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors extracted data on study design, patients, interventions, control interventions, results, adverse events, and risk of bias.
RESULTS: Fourteen trials with 1927 participants suffering from different acute and functional gastrointestinal disorders were included in this review. Promising evidence for effectiveness was found for Potentilla erecta, carob bean juice, and an herbal compound preparation including Matricaria chamomilla in treating diarrhea. Moreover, evidence was found for peppermint oil in decreasing duration, frequency, and severity of pain in children suffering from undifferentiated functional abdominal pain. Furthermore, evidence for effectiveness was found for different fennel preparations (eg, oil, tea, herbal compound) in treating children with infantile colic. No serious adverse events were reported.
LIMITATIONS: Few studies on specific indications, single herbs, or herbal preparations could be identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the limited number of studies, results have to be interpreted carefully. To underpin evidence outlined in this review, more rigorous clinical trials are needed.
- CAM —
- complementary and alternative medicine
- IBS —
- irritable bowel syndrome
- RCT —
- randomized controlled trial
Functional gastrointestinal disorders like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional abdominal pain, constipation, and infantile colic as well as acute gastrointestinal disorders like gastroenteritis are common childhood complaints that affect a large proportion of children and adolescents.1–4 Beside the painful impacts for the child, gastrointestinal disorders can lead to lower quality of life, school absenteeism, and a higher risk of depression and anxiety.5,6 Parents are also affected not only because they commiserate with their offspring but also because of the time needed to care for their child. Therefore, gastrointestinal disorders in children and adolescents may lead to both major reductions in quality of life for the child and parents and major socioeconomic impacts for the family and wider society.5–7
The management of gastrointestinal disorders in children and adolescents, especially functional gastrointestinal disorders, can be challenging.8,9 Parents often visit different practitioners in search of a reliable diagnosis or therapy. Many available treatments are either effective but yield potential for undesirable adverse effects, or safe but might lack effectiveness.10 This may lead to conflicting advice, different prescribed treatments, and high direct and indirect costs.7,11,12 In this context, a high prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use can be observed among patients suffering from gastrointestinal disorders.13–16 Research suggests that parents often favor CAM products, such as herbal medicine, in the belief they are natural and therefore safe.17 In addition to this, evidence suggests some parents may also be dissatisfied or fear the side effects of conventional medication.18 As a result, parents often do not disclose the use of CAM to the attending pediatrician.19–23
Whereas ∼52% of all children in Europe are using some kind of CAM, the use of particular types of CAM, such as herbal medicine, is increasingly common among children.20,24–27 Although herbal medicines are commonly used, research detailing information on efficacy, safety, dosage forms, and dose quantities is still lacking. In response, the scope of this review is to systematically summarize the effectiveness and safety of different herbal treatment options for gastrointestinal disorders in children and adolescents.
Types of Studies
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), randomized cross-over trials, and cluster-randomized trials were eligible. Trials were included if they were published in English or German.
Types of Participants
Only studies on children (0–12 years of age) or adolescents (13–18 years of age) were included if patients suffered from gastrointestinal complaints such as diarrhea, constipation, colic, IBS, inflammatory bowel diseases, and other disorders of the gastrointestinal tract.
Types of Interventions
Studies that compared herbal medicines with treatment-as-usual or other active comparators, placebo, or no treatment were eligible. If the herbal drug was applied only in homeopathic potency or if the herb is exclusively used in traditional Chinese medicine (so-called Chinese herbal medicine often includes ingredients of animal or mineral origin), the study was not included in this review. No other dosage restrictions were made.
Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) were searched from their inception dates to July 15, 2016. Embase was not searched separately because it is included in Scopus. Because this article is part of a major project to identify evidence for herbal therapy in children, the literature search was widely constructed around basic search terms for “children” and search terms for “herbal therapy.” The complete search strategy for PubMed/Medline is shown in Supplemental Information. For each database, the search strategy was adapted as necessary. Abstracts identified during the literature search were screened, and potentially eligible articles were read in full independently by 3 review authors (DA, HC, and RL) to determine if they met eligibility criteria. After identifying the literature in the field of interest, only these articles with children and adolescents suffering from gastrointestinal complaints as mentioned above were taken into account.
Data Extraction and Management
Extraction of data on methods, patients (eg, age, sex, diagnosis), interventions (herbs, dose, etc), control interventions, and results was performed by 2 review authors (DA and RL) independently by using an a priori-developed data extraction form. Discrepancies were rechecked with a third reviewer (HC) and discussed until consensus was achieved.
Risk of Bias in Individual Studies
By using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, the risk of bias of each included study was assessed by 2 authors (DA and HC) independently. This tool assesses risk of bias by using 7 criteria (rating: low, unclear, or high risk of bias): random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases. Discrepancies were rechecked with a third reviewer and discussed until consensus was achieved. Trial authors were contacted for further details if necessary.
Literature search retrieved 10 083 nonduplicate records, of which 259 full texts were assessed for eligibility. Eighty-six of them were considered to be eligible for the whole field of herbal medicine in children and adolescents, whereas 173 full texts were excluded for the following reasons: they were not RCTs, the investigated herbs were exclusively used in traditional Chinese medicine, the herbal drug was applied only in homeopathic potency, or the study had no participants between 0 and 18 years exclusively. Finally, 14 full-text articles involving a total of 1927 participants suffering from gastrointestinal disorders were included in this review (Fig 1).
Study Characteristics and Intervention Characteristics
Detailed characteristics of samples sizes, interventions, outcome assessments, and results are shown in Table 1.
Risk of Bias in Individual Studies
The risk of biased judgment in individual studies is shown in Figs 2 and 3. Researchers for 8 studies had reported adequate random sequence generation, whereas for 6 RCTs the randomization procedure remained unclear. Researchers for only 5 of the included studies reported adequate allocation concealment. Researchers for 3 of the included trials did not report blinding of patients and personnel, and 2 studies did not reveal adequate blinding of outcome assessment. Three of the 14 trials had high risk of attrition bias, and 2 were not free of suspected selective reporting. Because of multiple primary outcomes without performing an α-correction, a high risk of other bias has to be suspected for 2 RCTs.
Researchers in 4 studies with a total of 424 participants researched the efficacy of herbal medicine for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. Two studies observed an herbal compound preparation (Diarrhoesan) containing apple pectin and M chamomilla.32,33 Both studies demonstrated a significant reduction in the duration of diarrhea compared with placebo. Additionally, Becker et al32 showed that the herbal compound significantly reduced stool frequency in comparison with placebo.
Subbotina et al31 investigated the effectiveness of P erecta in treating children with diarrhea due to a rotavirus infection. The duration of diarrhea, abnormal stool, and hospitalization, as well as stool output was decreased significantly compared with placebo.
Researchers in another study observed carob bean juice as an add-on therapy compared with standard therapy alone.30 The duration of diarrhea, stool output, and the intake of a standard rehydration solution was decreased significantly if carob bean juice was given additionally.
Dehydration due to Gastroenteritis
Freedman et al34 investigated the effectiveness of half-strength apple juice as a rehydration strategy in 647 children with mild gastroenteritis. The results revealed that apple juice intake provoked significantly fewer treatment failures, defined as a composite score of intravenous rehydration or hospitalization, subsequent unscheduled physician encounter, and protracted symptoms or significant weight loss occurring within 7 days of enrollment when compared with a standard rehydration solution.
Freedman et al34 reported that 2 children were hyponatremic at the time of intravenous insertion (1 in the apple juice group and 1 in the usual care group). No other serious adverse events were reported.
Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
Researchers in 5 studies with a total of 491 participants investigated the efficacy of herbal medicine in infants suffering from colic. One study37 demonstrated that a tea of Foeniculum vulgare could significantly decrease the crying time (hours) when compared with usual care, whereas an herbal tea preparation containing M chamomilla, Verbena officinalis, Glycyrrhiza glabra, F vulgare, and Melissa officinalis was superior in elimination of colic and colic improvement in comparison with a placebo tea preparation.39 Similar results were shown by Alexandrovich et al35 for an emulsion of 0.1% of fennel (F vulgare) seed oil. After a 7-day trial, a significant improvement in colic symptoms and cumulative crying time could be observed when compared with placebo. Also, an herbal compound preparation (ColiMil) containing F vulgare, M chamomilla, and M officinalis could reduce the crying time significantly compared with placebo.38 However, no significant group differences for treatment response, daily episodes of colic, and crying time could be shown for peppermint oil drops in comparison with usual care (Simethicone drops).36
Researchers for 4 of the 5 studies reported that no side effects or adverse events were observed during the study period,35–37,39 whereas Savino et al38 reported side effects such as vomiting, sleepiness, and constipation. None of these side effects were severe, and there was no significant difference between the herbal compound preparation and placebo in the occurrence of side effects.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Two RCTs with a total of 145 participants were conducted to research herbal medicine for the treatment of IBS in children and adolescents. Although capsules of peppermint oil (Colpermin) did not show any significant differences when compared with the placebo,40 psyllium fiber powder41 significantly reduced the number of abdominal pain episodes in comparison with the placebo (maltodextrin powder).
The authors of both trials reported that no side effects or adverse events were observed by investigators or parents during the treatment period.
Functional Abdominal Pain
Asgarshirazi et al42 investigated the efficacy of peppermint oil in the treatment of functional abdominal pain disorders. A total of 120 participants were treated either with Colpermin capsules or probiotic tablets, or folic acid tablets as the placebo. When compared with the placebo, peppermint oil significantly reduced the duration of pain (minutes/day), frequency of pain (episodes per week), and severity of pain. In comparison with probiotics, peppermint oil significantly reduced the duration of pain (minutes/day) and the severity of pain.
Asgarshirazi et al42 stated that no adverse events or side effects occurred as a result of peppermint oil use and probiotics during the study period.
Quitadamo et al43 studied an herbal compound of acacia fiber and psyllium fiber versus a solution of polyethylene glycol and electrolytes in the treatment of constipation in 100 children. Compliance rates were significantly higher in children treated with the solution of polyethylene glycol and electrolytes (96%) compared with children treated with the herbal compound (72%). No significant differences between both groups were observed in primary or secondary study outcomes.
No serious side effects or adverse events were observed by the authors during the study period.
Summary of Evidence
This analysis indicates an emerging evidence base for the use of certain herbal medicines for conditions such as diarrhea, dehydration, infantile colic, IBS, and functional abdominal pain. P erecta, carob bean juice, and an herbal compound preparation including M chamomilla and apple pectin (Diarrhoesan) were shown to significantly reduce the duration of symptoms in children suffering from diarrhea. This review also demonstrated that peppermint oil (Colpermin) can decrease duration, frequency, and severity of pain in children suffering from undifferentiated functional abdominal pain, whereas Colpermin showed no effects in treating children and adolescents with IBS exclusively. Furthermore, evidence was found for different fennel preparations (eg, oil, tea, herbal compound ColiMil) in treating children with infantile colic. This review also found that psyllium fiber may be a useful adjunct in treating children with constipation and in decreasing pain episodes in patients with IBS. However, research evaluating the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine for gastrointestinal disorders in children is in its infancy. Because the number of included RCTs for the different herbs and indications was small, future rigorous RCTs might change the existing conclusions.
Agreements With Previous Systematic Reviews
Two previously conducted systematic reviews failed to locate any systematic reviews on the use of herbal medicine for gastrointestinal disorders in children.44,45 A previous literature review of herbal medicine use in children included 90 clinical studies, of which one-third were conducted in China in children with respiratory disorders.46 A further 18 studies were located that investigated the use of herbal medicine for gastrointestinal disorders, however only 2 clinical studies of garlic for diarrhea were mentioned in the results. Although the review found that RCTs are feasible with children, the authors noted that few high-quality trials were identified.46
Strengths and Weaknesses
There are several limitations to this systematic review. Although aligning our methodology with guidelines from the Cochrane Collaboration strengthens rigor overall and decreases risk of bias, it also means that early-stage, non-RCTs of herbal medicines were not captured. Although this was the intent, it was designed to exclude trial designs that may give preliminary insights into an understudied area and emerging field of research. Secondly, many RCTs that were included in this systematic review were small trials with between 30 and 100 participants and larger trials are warranted to further examine efficacy and safety of herbal medicine for gastrointestinal disorders in the pediatric population. Thirdly, most of the studies revealed no adverse events, calling into question the way that adverse events information was collected and recorded. A number of studies did not indicate whether information on adverse events was collected.
Implications for Further Research
It is difficult to make a strong recommendation for the use of herbal medicine for gastrointestinal disorders in children when the evidence base is only just emerging. Large-scale trials are needed to further investigate early positive results presented here; however, research in herbal medicine faces many challenges when compared with the study of synthetic drugs. Many herbal medicines are not standardized with batch-to-batch and label-to-label variations because of various elements such as growing conditions, manufacturing processes, and differing formulations. In addition to this, there are many ethical47 and clinical hurdles involved in studying the use of herbal medicine in children. Despite these challenges, additional well-designed trials are required to build an adequate evidence base and give accurate information on dosing to assist clinical decision-making and ensure the safe use of herbal medicine for children.
Implications for Clinical Practice
A recent study found that over two-thirds of children attending gastroenterology outpatient clinics at a tertiary pediatric hospital were using complementary medicine including herbal medicine.48 The vast majority of parents surveyed (80%) felt that medical professionals should support the use of CAM.48 Medical professionals could recommend the use of herbal medicines that have been shown to be safe and effective as a first-line measure to parents who have expressed interest in trying CAM for their children. Herbal medicines such as P erecta (tormentil), carob bean juice, and Diarrhoesan for diarrhea; peppermint oil (Colpermin) for functional abdominal pain; fennel preparations (eg, oil, tea, herbal compound ColiMil) for treating infantile colic; and psyllium fiber can be used as an adjunct while treating constipation in children with IBS. Currently, most herbal medicine used by children is parent initiated and often not disclosed to a primary health care professional, leading to concerns about safety, herb–drug interactions and inadequate treatment.49 This revelation underscores the need to have open and nonjudgmental conversations with parents about the use of herbal medicine to ensure safe, coordinated patient care.
- Accepted March 22, 2017.
- Address correspondence to Dennis Anheyer, MA, BSc, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Naturheilkunde und Integrative Medizin, Knappschafts-Krankenhaus, Am Deimelsberg 34a, 45276 Essen, Germany. E-mail:
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
FUNDING: This review was supported by a grant from the Karl and Veronica-Carstens Foundation and the Rut- and Klaus-Bahlsen Foundation. The funding sources had no influence on the design or conduct of the review; the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Langhorst has received grants from Schwabe Pharma, Steigerwald and Repha; the other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
- Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics