TABLE 3

Logistic Regression Analyses Results for Associations Between Mother-Adolescent and Father-Adolescent Attachment Relationship at T1 and Early Sexual Intercourse Between T1 and T2, Stratified by Sex

Crude Model, Mothers,a OR (95% CI)Crude Model, Fathers,b OR (95% CI)Full Model, Mothers and Fathers,c OR (95% CI)
Boys, n = 1481Girls, n = 1443Boys, n = 1481Girls, n = 1443Boys, n = 1481Girls, n = 1443
Sociodemographics
 Age1.38 (1.04–1.83)*1.28 (0.87–1.90)1.39 (1.05–1.83)*1.26 (0.86–1.85)1.39 (1.05–1.84)*1.27 (0.86–1.88)
 Educational level, 0 = high2.18 (1.49–3.19)***1.22 (0.72–2.07)2.18 (1.49–3.20)***1.28 (0.75–2.16)2.18 (1.49–3.20)***1.23 (0.72–2.08)
 Ethnic background, 0 = Dutch1.44 (1.00–2.07)0.68 (0.40–1.14)1.43 (0.99–2.06)0.63 (0.37–1.05)1.43 (0.99–2.06)0.67 (0.40–1.12)
Family environment
 Family structure, 0 = Living with both biological parents2.49 (1.70–3.64)***3.22 (1.96–5.28)***2.45 (1.67–3.60)***3.09 (1.87–5.10)***2.44 (1.66–3.59)***3.14 (1.90–5.18)***
 Parental monitoring0.63 (0.48–0.83)***0.63 (0.40–0.97)*0.64 (0.48–0.84)***0.50 (0.34–0.77)***0.63 (0.47–0.84)***0.63 (0.40–0.98)*
 Mother-adolescent attachment relationship0.95 (0.67–1.35)0.43 (0.28–0.64)***1.04 (0.66–1.63)0.45 (0.29–0.70)***
 Father-adolescent attachment relationship0.90 (0.66–1.22)0.69 (0.49–0.97)*0.88 (0.60–1.30)0.88 (0.60–1.30)
  • Reference groups are equal to 0.

  • a Crude Model, Mothers, included sociodemographics (ie, age, educational level, and ethnic background), family variables (ie, family structure, parental monitoring), and mother-adolescent attachment relationship.

  • b Crude Model, Fathers, included sociodemographics, family environment variables, and father-adolescent attachment relationship.

  • c Full Model included sociodemographics, family environment variables, and mother-adolescent and father-adolescent attachment relationship simultaneously.

  • * P < .05;

  • *** P < .001.