Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Article

Dietary Fiber Intake in Young Adults and Breast Cancer Risk

Maryam S. Farvid, A. Heather Eliassen, Eunyoung Cho, Xiaomei Liao, Wendy Y. Chen and Walter C. Willett
Pediatrics February 2016, peds.2015-1226; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1226
Maryam S. Farvid
aDepartments of Nutrition,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Heather Eliassen
bEpidemiology, and
cChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eunyoung Cho
cChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
dDepartment of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaomei Liao
bEpidemiology, and
cChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
eBiostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendy Y. Chen
cChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
fDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter C. Willett
aDepartments of Nutrition,
bEpidemiology, and
cChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated fiber intake during adolescence and early adulthood in relation to breast cancer (BC) risk in the Nurses’ Health Study II.

METHODS: Among 90 534 premenopausal women who completed a dietary questionnaire in 1991, we documented 2833 invasive BC cases during 20 years of follow-up. In 1998, 44 263 of these women also completed a questionnaire about their diet during high school; among these women, we documented 1118 cases of BC by end of follow-up. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for BC across categories of dietary fiber.

RESULTS: Among all women, early adulthood total dietary fiber intake was associated with significantly lower BC risk (RR for highest versus lowest quintile 0.81; 95% CI 0.72–0.91; Ptrend = .002). Higher intakes of soluble fiber (RR for highest versus lowest quintile 0.86; 95% CI 0.77–0.97; Ptrend = .02) and insoluble fiber (RR for highest versus lowest quintile 0.80; 95% CI 0.71–0.90; Ptrend < .001) were each associated with lower BC risk. Total dietary fiber intake in adolescence was also associated with lower BC risk (RR for highest versus lowest quintile 0.84; 95% CI 0.70–1.01; Ptrend = .04). For the average of fiber intake during adolescence and early adult life, the RR comparing highest with lowest quintiles was 0.75 (95% CI 0.62–0.91, Ptrend = .004).

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that higher fiber intakes reduce BC risk and suggest that intake during adolescence and early adulthood may be particularly important.

  • Abbreviations:
    BBD —
    benign breast disease
    BC —
    breast cancer
    CI —
    confidence interval
    ER —
    estrogen receptor
    FFQ —
    food frequency questionnaire
    HS-FFQ —
    high school food frequency questionnaire
    NHSII —
    Nurses’ Health Study II
    PR —
    progesterone receptor
    RR —
    relative risk
  • What’s Known on This Subject:

    Previous studies of fiber intake and breast cancer (BC) have almost all been nonsignificant, but none of them examined diet during adolescence or early adulthood, a period when BC risk factors appear to be particularly important.

    What This Study Adds:

    This study adds to the few potentially modifiable risk factors for BC. Higher fiber intake was associated with lower BC risk and suggests that intake during adolescence and early adulthood may be particularly important.

    Sex steroid hormone levels are strongly related to breast cancer (BC) development,1,2 and a diet high in fiber has been hypothesized to reduce BC incidence by inhibiting reabsorption of estrogen, thus decreasing circulating levels.3–5 In most prospective studies,6–22 including the Nurses’ Health Study,23 no significant associations have been seen between fiber intake and BC risk. In a recent meta-analysis of 16 prospective studies, a weak inverse association was found; for an increment of 10 g fiber per day, a 5% lower BC risk was seen.24 Notably, most previous evidence on fiber intake and BC has been from studies in which women were enrolled during midlife or later; the effects of fiber during adolescence or early adulthood on BC incidence have been minimally studied. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and radiation treatment of Hodgkin’s lymphoma indicate that breast tissue may be particularly susceptible to carcinogenic exposures during childhood and early adult life.25–27 Furthermore, in the Nurses’ Health Study II (NHSII) cohort, fiber intake during adolescence was inversely associated with proliferative benign breast disease (BBD), which is thought to reflect an early step in breast carcinogenesis. Women in the highest quintile of fiber intake had a 25% lower proliferative BBD risk than women in the lowest quintile,28 suggesting the importance of investigating dietary factors during this period of life.

    In a previous analysis of NHSII,29,30 fiber intakes during adolescence or early adulthood were not significantly associated with premenopausal BC risk. Updating these analyses with longer follow-up and a substantially larger number of cases, we were able to examine fiber intakes during adolescence and early adulthood in relation to BC diagnosed before and after menopause. In addition, we investigated the associations between fiber intake and BC by hormone receptor status.

    Methods

    Study Population

    The NHSII is an ongoing prospective cohort study of 116 430 female registered nurses aged 25 to 42 years at enrollment in 1989. For this analysis, follow-up began in 1991 when diet was first measured. From the 97 813 women who returned the 1991 food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), we excluded women who had an implausible total energy intake (<600 or >3500 kcal/day); were postmenopausal in 1991; or had reported a previous diagnosis of cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer) before returning the 1991 questionnaire. After exclusions, data from 90 534 women were available for the early adulthood fiber intake analysis.

    In 1997, participants were asked about their willingness to complete a supplemental FFQ about diet during high school (HS-FFQ). Of the 64 380 women (55% of the entire cohort) who indicated willingness to do so, 47 355 returned the questionnaire in 1998.They were 33 to 52 years of age at that time (1997-99). There were minimal differences in baseline demographic characteristics and BC rates between participants who completed the HS-FFQ and women who did not provide information on high school diet.29

    After excluding women who had any cancer except nonmelanoma skin cancer before 1998 or who reported implausible daily caloric intake during adolescence (<600 or ≥5000 kcal), 44 263 women were available for the adolescent fiber intake analysis.

    This study was approved by the Human Subjects Committee at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (Boston, Massachusetts).

    Dietary Assessment

    Dietary intake was obtained from NHSII participants via validated semiquantitative FFQ with ∼130 items about usual dietary intake and alcohol consumption during the past year (available at http://www.channing.harvard.edu/nhs/?page_id=246) in 1991 and every 4 years thereafter. Validity of the questionnaire to assess long-term intake was assessed by comparison with weighed diet records collected 3 to 4 years earlier; the correlation for dietary fiber intake, adjusted for energy intake, was 0.56.31 It is modest to good correlation, although it does cause attenuation of an association. The impact of this degree of measurement error is shown by the change in relative risk (RR) when we corrected for measurement error. Also, fiber intake assessed by this questionnaire has robustly predicted lower risks of coronary heart disease,32 type 2 diabetes,33 and constipation.34

    Food intakes during adolescence were evaluated using a semiquantitative 124-item HS-FFQ that included food items typically consumed between 1960 and 1980 when the participants were in high school. Frequency of consumption was classified into 9 categories ranging from “never or less than once per month” to “6 or more per day.” The validity of the HS-FFQ was evaluated among 80 young women by comparing their responses to HS-FFQ with three 24-hour recalls 10 years apart; the mean of corrected correlation coefficients for energy-adjusted nutrient intakes was 0.45 (range 0.16–0.68).35

    Nutrient values in foods were obtained from the US Department of Agriculture, food manufacturers, and independent academic sources.36–38 The food composition database was updated every 4 years to account for changes in the food supply. Fiber intakes were energy-adjusted by using the residuals from the regression of nutrient intake on total energy intake.39

    Documentation of BC

    Biennial NHSII questionnaires were used to identify newly diagnosed invasive BC. Deaths in this cohort were reported through family members and the postal service in response to the follow-up questionnaires or identified through annual review of the National Death Index. When a case of BC was identified, we asked the participant (or next of kin for those who had died) for diagnosis confirmation and for permission to obtain relevant hospital records and pathology reports. Pathology reports confirmed 99% of the self-reported diagnoses of BC. Because the degree of self-reporting accuracy was high, diagnoses confirmed by participants with missing medical record information (n = 344) were included in the analysis. Information on estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PR) status of the BC was obtained from pathology reports.

    Assessment of Other Variables

    Data on potential risk factors for BC were obtained from the biennial NHSII questionnaires and updated to the most recent information before date of diagnosis, if available. Data on BMI at age 18 and alcohol consumption during adolescence were obtained from the 1989 questionnaire. Weight change from age 18 was calculated by taking the difference between current weight and recalled weight at age 18. Women missing menopausal status were considered premenopausal if they were <46 (smokers) or <48 (nonsmokers) years old and postmenopausal after a hysterectomy/bilateral oophorectomy or if they were <54 (smokers) or <56 (nonsmokers) years old.40

    Statistical Analysis

    The primary analysis used the 1991 baseline diet, as this represents diet earliest in adult life. For early adulthood fiber intake, participants contributed person-years from the date of return of the 1991 questionnaire until the date of any cancer diagnosis, death, or end of follow-up period (June 1, 2011), whichever came first. For adolescent fiber intake, follow-up time began with return of the baseline questionnaire in 1998 with the same follow-up period. Participants were divided into quintiles according to their dietary intake. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate RR and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each category, by using the lowest quintile of intake as the reference category. We replaced missing covariate data with carried-forward method for continuous variables and missing indicator method for categorical variables. To control for confounding by age or calendar time, or any possible 2-way interactions between these 2 time scales, the regression models included age in months as the time scale, stratified by calendar year of the current questionnaire cycle. Multivariable models also simultaneously adjusted for race, family history of BC in mother or sisters, history of BBD, smoking, height, BMI at age 18, weight change since age 18, age at menarche, parity and age at first birth, oral contraceptive use, menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use, age at menopause, and early adulthood intakes of alcohol and energy. For adolescent fiber intake and BC risk, multivariable models additionally adjusted for adolescent alcohol intake and adolescent energy intake (instead of early adulthood energy intake). The median value for each quintile was used for tests for trend, modeled as a continuous variable.

    We further examined whether the associations of fiber intake with BC risk depended on the other dietary factors and healthy eating. We therefore evaluated the influence of adjustment for alternate healthy eating index score41 as well as red meat, animal fat, or β-carotene. Because longer menstrual cycles have been associated with lower BC risk42 and higher dietary fiber intake may affect BC risk by increasing menstrual cycle length,43 we examined the association between dietary fiber intake and BC risk after further adjustment for menstrual cycle length. Because dietary intake has been hypothesized to affect breast carcinogenesis over an extended period of time, for a sensitivity analyses, we calculated premenopausal cumulative average fiber intake (by using the 1991, 1995, 1999, 2003, and 2007 dietary data), stopping updating when a woman reached menopause. We also calculated average of adolescent and adult (1991) fiber intake. Because associations are affected by imperfect assessment of diet, the association between early adulthood fiber intake and BC was also corrected for measurement error using the regression calibration method.44–46 For the calibration of our dietary questionnaire, we used multiple weighted diet records as the true intake based on an earlier validation study in the Nurses’ Health Study.31 To examine whether the associations between fiber intake and BC risk were modified by BMI at age 18, a cross-product term of the ordinal score for BMI at age 18 and fiber intake expressed as a continuous variable was included in the multivariable model. P values for tests for interactions were obtained from a likelihood ratio test. To examine differential associations of dietary fiber intake with BC risk by hormone receptor status, we used Cox proportional cause-specific hazards regression model with a duplication method for competing risk data.47 All P values were 2-sided. SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.

    Results

    During 1 725 295 person-years of follow-up of 90 534 women, 2833 women were diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma. The age range of the participants at baseline in 1991 was 27 to 44 years (mean 36.4 ± 4.6 years). Among 44 263 women with data on adolescent fiber intake, 1118 women were diagnosed with invasive BC from 1998 to 2011. Table 1 presents the distribution of risk factors for BC by quintiles of dietary fiber intake in 1991 and adolescence. Women with a higher fiber intake during either early adulthood or adolescence were less likely to be smokers and more likely to have earlier age at menarche, to be nulliparous, and to be older at first birth. Higher fiber intake during early adulthood was also associated with lower alcohol consumption and lower adulthood BMI as well as slightly higher rates of mammography screening (50% in quintile 5 of fiber intake and 46% in quintile 1) (Table 1).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Age-Standardized Characteristics According to Intake of Energy-Adjusted Dietary Fiber in Adolescence and Early Adulthood Among Women Enrolled in the NHSII

    Among all women, early adulthood total fiber intake was associated with significantly lower BC risk. In multivariable model, compared with the lowest quintile, RRs of BC across increasing quintiles of fiber intake were significantly lower by 17%, 12%, 18%, and 19% (Ptrend = .002) (Table 2). This association was materially unchanged with adjustment for red meat intake, animal fat, or alternate healthy eating index (data not shown). Additional adjustment for β-carotene intake or menstrual cycle length did not change the association between fiber intake and BC (data not shown). We also observed a significant inverse association between fiber intake and premenopausal BC incidence (highest versus lowest quintile; RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66–0.90; Ptrend = .008). A slightly weaker association was observed among postmenopausal women, though this did not reach statistical significance (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.70–1.07; Ptrend = .29).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    RR and 95% CI for BC According to Quintile of Dietary Fiber Intake in Adolescence and Early Adulthood Among Women in the NHSII

    In a sensitivity analysis using the cumulative average of premenopausal fiber intake, similar results were found (among all women: RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.75–0.95, Ptrend = .004; among premenopausal women: RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71–0.97; Ptrend = .008; and among postmenopausal women: RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.71–1.08, Ptrend = .46; highest versus lowest quintile) (P = .67 for differences in RRs). After correction for measurement error in measuring adulthood fiber intake, treated as a continuous variable, the RR was deattenuated from 0.91 (0.85–0.98) to 0.81 (0.69–0.96) for each 10 g/day of fiber intake in the age-adjusted model.

    Adolescent fiber intake was only modestly correlated with early adult (1991) fiber intake (r = 0.34). Higher fiber intake during adolescence was associated with lower BC risk (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.70–1.01; Ptrend = .04; highest versus lowest quintile) among all women. This association was minimally changed after additional adjustment for red meat intake (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.71–1.04; Ptrend = .08; highest versus lowest quintile) and animal fat intake (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.66–0.99; Ptrend = .03; highest versus lowest quintile). Controlling for β-carotene or adult fiber intake minimally affected the RR, but the CI widened slightly so the trend was marginally significant (comparing the highest versus lowest quintiles, adjusting for β-carotene: RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.67–1.05; Ptrend = .11; adjusting for early adulthood fiber: RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.73–1.07; Ptrend = .17). In this model with both adolescent and early adulthood fiber intake, the RR for adult fiber was 0.81 (95% CI 0.66–1.00, Ptrend = .07). Similar associations with adolescent fiber intake were observed among premenopausal and postmenopausal women, though they did not reach statistical significance for postmenopausal BC (Table 2).

    Among women with both early adulthood and adolescent dietary data (n = 41 092), for the average of intakes at both times, the RR of BC overall was 0.75 (95% CI 0.62–0.91, Ptrend = .004) comparing the highest versus lowest quintile. A somewhat stronger association was seen for premenopausal than for postmenopausal BC (highest versus lowest quintile, among premenopausal women: RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.50–0.89; Ptrend = .001; among postmenopausal women: RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.63–1.14; Ptrend = .44). However, this difference was not significant (P = .25 for differences in RRs) (Fig 1).

    FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Multivariable* RR of BC (and 95% CI) associated with average intake of fiber in adolescence and early adulthood among women in the NHSII. Categories are quintiles of intake. Multivariable model was stratified by age in months at start of follow-up and calendar year of the current questionnaire cycle and was simultaneously adjusted for race (white, nonwhite), family history of BC in mother or sisters (yes, no), history of BBD (yes, no), smoking (never, past, current 1–14/day, current 15–24/day, current ≥25/day), height (<62, 62 to <65, 65 to <68, ≥68 inches), BMI at age 18 years (<18.5, 18.5 to <20.0, 20.0 to <22.5, 22.5 to <25.0, 25.0 to <30.0, ≥30.0), weight change since age 18 (continuous), age at menarche (<12, 12, 13, ≥14 years), parity and age at first birth (nulliparous, parity ≤2 and age at first birth <25 years, parity ≤2 and age at first birth 25 to <30 years, parity ≤2 and age at first birth ≥30 years, parity 3 to 4 and age at first birth <25 years, parity 3 to 4 and age at first birth 25 to <30 years, parity 3 to 4 and age at first birth ≥30 years, parity ≥5 and age at first birth <25 years, parity ≥5 and age at first birth ≥25 years), oral contraceptive use (never, past, current), adolescent alcohol intake (nondrinker, <1.5, 1.5 to <5, 5 to <10, ≥10 g/day), adult alcohol intake (nondrinker, <5, 5 to <15, ≥15 g/day), and adolescent energy intake (quintile). In postmenopausal women, we additionally adjusted for hormone use (postmenopausal never users, postmenopausal past users, postmenopausal current users) and age at menopause (<45, 45–46, 47–48, 49–50, 51–52, ≥53 years). Among all women, we additionally adjusted for hormone use and menopausal status (premenopausal, postmenopausal never users, postmenopausal past users, postmenopausal current users, unknown menopausal status) and age at menopause (premenopausal, unknown menopause, <45, 45–46, 47–48, 49–50, 51–52, ≥53 years). Median of fiber intake for each quintile are 14.8, 17.3, 19.2, 21.4, and 25.3 g/day for all women and premenopausal women; 14.7, 17.2, 19.2, 21.4, and 25.3 g/day for postmenopausal women.

    When evaluating types of fiber, among all women, we observed a lower BC risk with higher early adulthood intake of fruit fiber and vegetable fiber (Table 3). Early adulthood soluble fiber (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.77–0.97; Ptrend = .02) and insoluble fiber (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71–0.90; Ptrend < .001) were each associated with lower BC risk among all women.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    RR and 95% CI for BC According to Quintile of Types of Fiber Intake in Early Adulthood Among All Women in the NHSII

    When total dietary fiber intake was modeled as a continuous variable, each 10 g/day increase in fiber intake during early adulthood was associated with a 13% decrease in BC risk among all women (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.80–0.95) (Table 4). While high fiber intake during early adulthood was associated with lower risk of premenopausal ER+/PR+ BC (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.58–0.79; for 10 g/day), high fiber intake during adolescence was associated with lower risk of premenopausal ER−/PR− BC (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29–0.85; for 10 g/day). However, the test for heterogeneity was not significant (for early adulthood fiber: Pheterogeneity = .08; for adolescent fiber: Pheterogeneity = .07). We also did not observe significant heterogeneity between adolescent and early adulthood fiber intake and tumor receptor status in overall or postmenopausal BC (Table 4).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Risk of BC by ER/PR Status and Adolescent and Early Adulthood Total Fiber Intake Among Women in the NHSII

    We also examined whether association between early adult fiber intake and BC risk differed by BMI at age 18. No significant interactions were noted (data not shown).

    Discussion

    Our findings suggest that higher fiber intakes during adolescence and early adulthood are associated with reduced BC incidence in women. The associations were apparent for most sources of fiber and were independent of other dietary factors and healthy eating behavior.

    Although no significant association was observed in nearly all prospective studies of dietary fiber and BC incidence,6–11,14,16,19–23 in a recently published meta-analysis of 16 prospective studies24 a5% lower BC risk was seen for each 10 g/day increment of fiber intake. Our results are consistent, although stronger, with a 13% lower BC risk per 10 g/day fiber increment during early adulthood and 14% lower BC risk per 10 g/day fiber increment during adolescence. Although a stronger association between soluble fiber and BC was observed in the meta-analysis,24 we noted an inverse association for both soluble and insoluble fibers. In addition, despite no association between specific fiber sources and BC in the meta-analysis, we observed inverse significant associations between fiber from fruits or vegetables and BC overall. In recent studies,48–50 we observed a positive association between red meat and animal fat intake and BC risk, but we found no appreciable difference in the results when additionally adjusted for them, suggesting that other dietary factors are not a plausible explanation of the inverse associations observed with fiber intake.

    Several biological mechanisms support the beneficial role of dietary fiber on BC risk. Fiber may reduce BC risk through improving insulin sensitivity51, and decreasing insulin-like growth factors.52 Furthermore, dietary fiber may decrease plasma levels of estrogen by inhibiting colonic β-d-glucuronidase activity, resulting in decreased deconjugation and reabsorption of estrogen and thereby increased fecal excretion.4,53,54

    This study has several limitations. This cohort does not represent random samples of US women, but it is unlikely that biological relations among women in this cohort will differ substantially from women in general. Women reported their adolescent diet when they were at age 33 to 52 years. However, the recalled adolescent diet was largely independent of current adult diet, and further evidence of validity came from the comparison of recalled adolescent diet and our questionnaire administered 10 years later.35 Residual confounding is always of concern in any observational studies. Although we adjusted for a wide range of potential confounders for BC, we still could not rule out the possibility that other unmeasured or inadequately measured factors have confounded the true association. However, adjustment for confounders made the association stronger. Because foods high in fiber contain many other biologically active constituents, we cannot exclude the possibility that these contribute to lower BC incidence.

    Our study has several strengths. To evaluate the importance of timing, we assessed the association between fiber intake during specific life periods (adolescence, early adulthood, and cumulative average of the premenopausal period). The dietary questionnaire used to assess fiber intake has documented validity, and we evaluated the association between fiber intake and BC after correction for measurement error as well as using the cumulative averages of repeated dietary assessments. Dietary information was evaluated before BC diagnosis, minimizing the possibility of recall bias. The large number of cases afforded adequate power to detect modest differences in risk, as well as the ability to examine BCs before and after menopause and by hormone receptor status. Detailed prospective and updated assessments of diet and other lifestyle factors reduced the likelihood of residual confounding.

    Conclusions

    The findings in this large prospective study support the hypothesis that consumption of foods high in fiber reduce BC risk. These results also suggest that dietary fiber intake during adolescence and early adulthood may be particularly important. Our findings are in line with the American Cancer Society guidelines55 to consume foods rich in fiber such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, and indicate the importance of adopting these food choices during childhood and early adult life.

    Acknowledgments

    The study sponsors were not involved in the study design and collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of the article or the decision to submit it for publication. The authors were independent from study sponsors. We thank the participants and staff of the NHS II for their valuable contributions, as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, and WY.

    Footnotes

      • Accepted November 12, 2015.
    • Address correspondence to Maryam S. Farvid, PhD, Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: mfarvid{at}hsph.harvard.edu
    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: The study was supported by NIH grants (R01 CA050385, UM1 CA176726) and a grant from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. Dr Farvid was supported by the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    • COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds2015-4376.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Colditz GA
      . Relationship between estrogen levels, use of hormone replacement therapy, and breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(11):814–823pmid:9625169
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. Green LE,
      2. Dinh TA,
      3. Smith RA
      . An estrogen model: the relationship between body mass index, menopausal status, estrogen replacement therapy, and breast cancer risk. Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:792375
    3. ↵
      1. Maskarinec G,
      2. Morimoto Y,
      3. Takata Y,
      4. Murphy SP,
      5. Stanczyk FZ
      . Alcohol and dietary fibre intakes affect circulating sex hormones among premenopausal women. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(7):875–881pmid:17010253
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Rose DP,
      2. Goldman M,
      3. Connolly JM,
      4. Strong LE
      . High-fiber diet reduces serum estrogen concentrations in premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54(3):520–525pmid:1652197
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Gaskins AJ,
      2. Mumford SL,
      3. Zhang C, et al; BioCycle Study Group
      . Effect of daily fiber intake on reproductive function: the BioCycle Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(4):1061–1069pmid:19692496
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Kushi LH,
      2. Sellers TA,
      3. Potter JD, et al
      . Dietary fat and postmenopausal breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84(14):1092–1099pmid:1619683
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Graham S,
      2. Zielezny M,
      3. Marshall J, et al
      . Diet in the epidemiology of postmenopausal breast cancer in the New York State Cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136(11):1327–1337pmid:1336931
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Verhoeven DT,
      2. Assen N,
      3. Goldbohm RA, et al
      . Vitamins C and E, retinol, beta-carotene and dietary fibre in relation to breast cancer risk: a prospective cohort study. Br J Cancer. 1997;75(1):149–155pmid:9000614
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Terry P,
      2. Jain M,
      3. Miller AB,
      4. Howe GR,
      5. Rohan TE
      . No association among total dietary fiber, fiber fractions, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(11):1507–1508pmid:12433738
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
      1. Sieri S,
      2. Krogh V,
      3. Muti P, et al
      . Fat and protein intake and subsequent breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Nutr Cancer. 2002;42(1):10–17pmid:12235640
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Horn-Ross PL,
      2. Hoggatt KJ,
      3. West DW, et al
      . Recent diet and breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study (USA). Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13(5):407–415pmid:12146845
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Giles GG,
      2. Simpson JA,
      3. English DR, et al
      . Dietary carbohydrate, fibre, glycaemic index, glycaemic load and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(7):1843–1847pmid:16217755
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Cade JE,
      2. Burley VJ,
      3. Greenwood DC; UK Women’s Cohort Study Steering Group
      . Dietary fibre and risk of breast cancer in the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(2):431–438pmid:17251246
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Sonestedt E,
      2. Gullberg B,
      3. Wirfält E
      . Both food habit change in the past and obesity status may influence the association between dietary factors and postmenopausal breast cancer. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10(8):769–779pmid:17381916
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Suzuki R,
      2. Rylander-Rudqvist T,
      3. Ye W,
      4. Saji S,
      5. Adlercreutz H,
      6. Wolk A
      . Dietary fiber intake and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status—a prospective cohort study among Swedish women. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(2):403–412pmid:17764112
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Maruti SS,
      2. Lampe JW,
      3. Potter JD,
      4. Ready A,
      5. White E
      . A prospective study of bowel motility and related factors on breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(7):1746–1750pmid:18628427
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Park Y,
      2. Brinton LA,
      3. Subar AF,
      4. Hollenbeck A,
      5. Schatzkin A
      . Dietary fiber intake and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(3):664–671pmid:19625685
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Ferrari P,
      2. Rinaldi S,
      3. Jenab M, et al
      . Dietary fiber intake and risk of hormonal receptor-defined breast cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(2):344–353pmid:23269820
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Wen W,
      2. Shu XO,
      3. Li H, et al
      . Dietary carbohydrates, fiber, and breast cancer risk in Chinese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(1):283–289pmid:19056583
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Shikany JM,
      2. Redden DT,
      3. Neuhouser ML, et al
      . Dietary glycemic load, glycemic index, and carbohydrate and risk of breast cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative. Nutr Cancer. 2011;63(6):899–907pmid:21714685
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Belle FN,
      2. Kampman E,
      3. McTiernan A, et al
      . Dietary fiber, carbohydrates, glycemic index, and glycemic load in relation to breast cancer prognosis in the HEAL cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(5):890–899pmid:21430298
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Deschasaux M,
      2. Zelek L,
      3. Pouchieu C, et al
      . Prospective association between dietary fiber intake and breast cancer risk. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79718pmid:24244548
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Holmes MD,
      2. Liu S,
      3. Hankinson SE,
      4. Colditz GA,
      5. Hunter DJ,
      6. Willett WC
      . Dietary carbohydrates, fiber, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(8):732–739pmid:15051582
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      1. Aune D,
      2. Chan DS,
      3. Greenwood DC, et al
      . Dietary fiber and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(6):1394–1402pmid:22234738
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      1. Land CE,
      2. Tokunaga M,
      3. Koyama K, et al
      . Incidence of female breast cancer among atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1950-1990. Radiat Res. 2003;160(6):707–717pmid:14640793
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Swerdlow AJ,
      2. Barber JA,
      3. Hudson GV, et al
      . Risk of second malignancy after Hodgkin’s disease in a collaborative British cohort: the relation to age at treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(3):498–509pmid:10653865
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Wahner-Roedler DL,
      2. Nelson DF,
      3. Croghan IT, et al
      . Risk of breast cancer and breast cancer characteristics in women treated with supradiaphragmatic radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma: Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(6):708–715pmid:12934780
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Su X,
      2. Tamimi RM,
      3. Collins LC, et al
      . Intake of fiber and nuts during adolescence and incidence of proliferative benign breast disease. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(7):1033–1046pmid:20229245
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Linos E,
      2. Willett WC,
      3. Cho E,
      4. Frazier L
      . Adolescent diet in relation to breast cancer risk among premenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(3):689–696pmid:20200427
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Cho E,
      2. Spiegelman D,
      3. Hunter DJ,
      4. Chen WY,
      5. Colditz GA,
      6. Willett WC
      . Premenopausal dietary carbohydrate, glycemic index, glycemic load, and fiber in relation to risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(11 pt 1):1153–1158pmid:14652274
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Willett W,
      2. Lenart E
      . Reproducibility and validity of food frequency questionnaires. In: Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2013:96–141
    20. ↵
      1. Wolk A,
      2. Manson JE,
      3. Stampfer MJ, et al
      . Long-term intake of dietary fiber and decreased risk of coronary heart disease among women. JAMA. 1999;281(21):1998–2004pmid:10359388
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Hu FB,
      2. Manson JE,
      3. Stampfer MJ, et al
      . Diet, lifestyle, and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(11):790–797pmid:11556298
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Dukas L,
      2. Willett WC,
      3. Giovannucci EL
      . Association between physical activity, fiber intake, and other lifestyle variables and constipation in a study of women. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(8):1790–1796pmid:12907334
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Maruti SS,
      2. Feskanich D,
      3. Rockett HR,
      4. Colditz GA,
      5. Sampson LA,
      6. Willett WC
      . Validation of adolescent diet recalled by adults. Epidemiology. 2006;17(2):226–229pmid:16477265
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Nutrient Database for Standard Reference
      , Release 14. Department of Agriculture ARS, 2001. Available at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=21215. Accessed January 3, 2016
      1. Holland GWA,
      2. Unwin ID,
      3. Buss DH,
      4. Paul AA,
      5. Dat S
      . The Composition of Foods. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food; 1991
    25. ↵
      1. Dial S,
      2. Eitenmiller RR
      . Tocopherols and tocotrienols in key foods in the US diet.. In: Ong ASH, Niki E, Packer L, eds. Nutrition, Lipids, Health, and Disease. Champaign, IL: AOCS Press; 1995:327–342
    26. ↵
      1. Willett W,
      2. Lenart E
      . Implications of total energy intake for epidemiologic analyses. In: Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2013:261–283
    27. ↵
      1. Colditz GA,
      2. Stampfer MJ,
      3. Willett WC, et al
      . Reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126(2):319–325pmid:3605058
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    28. ↵
      1. Chiuve SE,
      2. Fung TT,
      3. Rimm EB, et al
      . Alternative dietary indices both strongly predict risk of chronic disease. J Nutr. 2012;142(6):1009–1018pmid:22513989
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      1. Terry KL,
      2. Willett WC,
      3. Rich-Edwards JW,
      4. Hunter DJ,
      5. Michels KB
      . Menstrual cycle characteristics and incidence of premenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(6):1509–1513pmid:15941964
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      1. Nagata C,
      2. Oba S,
      3. Shimizu H
      . Associations of menstrual cycle length with intake of soy, fat, and dietary fiber in Japanese women. Nutr Cancer. 2006;54(2):166–170pmid:16898860
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Willett W,
      2. Lenart E
      . Correction for the effects of measurement error. In: Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2013:286–304
      1. Spiegelman D,
      2. McDermott A,
      3. Rosner B
      . Regression calibration method for correcting measurement-error bias in nutritional epidemiology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(4 suppl):1179S–1186Spmid:9094918
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    32. ↵
      1. Rosner B,
      2. Willett WC,
      3. Spiegelman D
      . Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within-person measurement error. Stat Med. 1989;8(9):1051–1069, discussion 1071–1073pmid:2799131
      OpenUrlPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Glynn RJ,
      2. Rosner B
      . Methods to evaluate risks for composite end points and their individual components. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(2):113–122pmid:15125620
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Farvid MS,
      2. Cho E,
      3. Chen WY,
      4. Eliassen AH,
      5. Willett WC
      . Adolescent meat intake and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136(8):1909–1920pmid:25220168
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Farvid MS,
      2. Cho E,
      3. Chen WY,
      4. Eliassen AH,
      5. Willett WC
      . Dietary protein sources in early adulthood and breast cancer incidence: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014;348:g3437pmid:24916719
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. ↵
      1. Farvid MS,
      2. Cho E,
      3. Chen WY,
      4. Eliassen AH,
      5. Willett WC
      . Premenopausal dietary fat in relation to pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;145(1):255–265pmid:24715379
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Breneman CB,
      2. Tucker L
      . Dietary fibre consumption and insulin resistance—the role of body fat and physical activity. Br J Nutr. 2013;110(2):375–383pmid:23218116
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    37. ↵
      1. Barnard RJ,
      2. Gonzalez JH,
      3. Liva ME,
      4. Ngo TH
      . Effects of a low-fat, high-fiber diet and exercise program on breast cancer risk factors in vivo and tumor cell growth and apoptosis in vitro. Nutr Cancer. 2006;55:28–34
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    38. ↵
      1. Gerber M
      . Fiber and breast cancer: another piece of the puzzle—but still an incomplete picture. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88(13):857–858pmid:8656432
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Goldin BR
      2. Adlercreutz H
      3. Gorbach SL, et al
      . Estrogen excretion patterns and plasma levels in vegetarian and omnivorous women. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1542–7
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    40. ↵
      1. Kushi LH,
      2. Doyle C,
      3. McCullough M, et al; American Cancer Society 2010 Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee
      . American Cancer Society Guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):30–67pmid:22237782
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    • Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    Next
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 147, Issue 3
    1 Mar 2021
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    Next
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Dietary Fiber Intake in Young Adults and Breast Cancer Risk
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Dietary Fiber Intake in Young Adults and Breast Cancer Risk
    Maryam S. Farvid, A. Heather Eliassen, Eunyoung Cho, Xiaomei Liao, Wendy Y. Chen, Walter C. Willett
    Pediatrics Feb 2016, peds.2015-1226; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-1226

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Dietary Fiber Intake in Young Adults and Breast Cancer Risk
    Maryam S. Farvid, A. Heather Eliassen, Eunyoung Cho, Xiaomei Liao, Wendy Y. Chen, Walter C. Willett
    Pediatrics Feb 2016, peds.2015-1226; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-1226
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Conclusions
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • Postdiagnostic Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Breast Cancer Survival: Prospective Analyses in the Nurses' Health Studies
    • Dairy Consumption in Adolescence and Early Adulthood and Risk of Breast Cancer
    • Increased Fiber Intake Decreases Premenopausal Breast Cancer Risk
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Evaluation of an Emergency Department High-risk Bruising Screening Protocol
    • National Perinatal Hepatitis B Prevention Program: 2009–2017
    • Time to First Onset of Chest Binding–Related Symptoms in Transgender Youth
    Show more Article

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Nutrition
      • Nutrition
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics