Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics

This policy is a revision of the policy in

  • 119(2):401
American Academy of Pediatrics

The Initiation or Withdrawal of Treatment for High-Risk Newborns

Committee on Fetus and Newborn, 1994 to 1995
Pediatrics August 1995, 96 (2) 362-363;
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

As medical technology has advanced, outcomes for high-risk newborns have greatly improved. With advanced technology such as assisted ventilation, it is now possible to keep some terminal, severely ill, or extremely premature infants alive for long periods of time. The result of such treatment is that dying may be prolonged or that the infant will survive with profound neurologic or other debilitating problems.1 The medical treatment of infants should be based on what is in their best interest. However, because the infant's "best interest" is not always clear, parents and health care givers are often faced with difficult treatment decisions when faced with the situation of a severely ill, extremely premature, or terminally ill infant.

The Treatment Dilemma

If intensive treatment uniformly resulted in saving infants at risk, it would be the obvious choice for all severely ill infants. This outcome, of course, does not always occur. If intensive treatment is not provided to very ill infants, most of them will die, but some may survive with significant neurodevelopmental disability, in part because specific treatments were withheld. The following dilemma therefore exists: intensive treatment of all severely ill infants sometimes results in prolongation of dying or occasionally iatrogenic illness; nonintensive treatment results in increased mortality and unnecessary morbidity. The overall outcomes of either approach are disappointing.

Strategy for Care

A reasonably acceptable approach to this dilemma is an individualized prognostic strategy.2,3 In this setting, care is provided for the individual infant at the appropriate level based on the expected outcome at the time care is initiated.

  • Copyright © 1995 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics
Vol. 96, Issue 2
1 Aug 1995
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Initiation or Withdrawal of Treatment for High-Risk Newborns
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The Initiation or Withdrawal of Treatment for High-Risk Newborns
Committee on Fetus and Newborn, 1994 to 1995
Pediatrics Aug 1995, 96 (2) 362-363;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Initiation or Withdrawal of Treatment for High-Risk Newborns
Committee on Fetus and Newborn, 1994 to 1995
Pediatrics Aug 1995, 96 (2) 362-363;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • Noninitiation or Withdrawal of Intensive Care for High-Risk Newborns
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The End at the Beginning
  • End-of-life Care in the NICU: A Family-centered Approach
  • Treatment Decisions for Disabled Infants: Balancing Benefits & Burdens
  • Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?
  • Baby Doe Rules: In Reply
  • Baby Doe Rules
  • Baby Doe Rules Have Been Interpreted and Applied by an Appellate Court: In Reply
  • Are the 21-Year-Old Baby Doe Rules Misunderstood or Mistaken?
  • Follow-up Care of High-Risk Infants
  • Prenatal Consultation at the Limits of Viability
  • Implementing Potentially Better Practices for Improving Family-Centered Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Successes and Challenges
  • End-of-Life Care for Neonates and Infants: The Experience and Effects of a Palliative Care Consultation Service
  • No easy answers in care of premature infants: Best' interest tough to define
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Disaster Planning for Schools
  • Exposure to Nontraditional Pets at Home and to Animals in Public Settings: Risks to Children
  • Medical Emergencies Occurring at School
Show more AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

Similar Articles

  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Open Access
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
  • RSS
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics