Abstract
While the article of Conners et al. (Pediatrics 58:154, August 1976) is not the worst you have published, it is surely in active competition. The fundamental point relates to the diets. In what real sense is the second diet a "control" so as to permit the appellation "double blind"?
I list in the Table the principal foods to he omitted in each diet. Dr. Conners et al. do not tell us what their 15 children did eat, before or during the diets.
- Copyright © 1978 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
Individual Login
Institutional Login
You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your librarian or administrator if you do not have a username and password.
Log in through your institution
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 days for US$25.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.