Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Pediatrics Perspective

Implications of the 21st Century Cures Act in Pediatrics

Natalie M. Pageler, Emily C. Webber and Dennis P. Lund
Pediatrics March 2021, 147 (3) e2020034199; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-034199
Natalie M. Pageler
aStanford Children’s Hospital, Stanford, California;
bDepartments of Pediatrics and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: npageler@stanford.edu
Emily C. Webber
cRiley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana; and
dDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis P. Lund
aStanford Children’s Hospital, Stanford, California;
eSurgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF
  • Abbreviations:
    EHI —
    electronic health information
    EHR —
    electronic health record
  • In March 2020, unrelated to but somewhat obscured by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at the US Department of Health and Human Services announced a new landmark medical information–sharing rule, referred to as the 21st Century Cures Act final rule.1 The rule is complex and governs many facets of health information technology, including electronic health records (EHRs). One aspect, regarding the need for pediatric certification aspects of EHRs, brings a welcome acknowledgment of the unique needs of children.

    The first part of the rule is currently scheduled to go into effect on April 5, 2021, and has the potential to significantly empower patients and their families and increase their engagement in their own health care; however, there are specific pediatric implications and challenges. The pediatric health care provider community must play a critical role in implementing these rules in a safe and meaningful way for children and their guardians.

    In brief, the new rules provide a framework to facilitate patient, family, and provider access to medical records, significantly increasing the types of electronic health information (EHI) that must be easily and electronically accessible to patients and guardians and to providers who care for those patients. The rules also require health providers to send this EHI to third-party applications (apps) upon a patient’s (or patient guardian’s) request and authorization. The types of data that must initially be shared are covered in the new US Core Data for Interoperability and include clinical notes, immunizations, laboratory test results, medications, demographics, problems, and vital signs data, including growth curve data.1 In 2022, the data that must be shared are supposed to expand to all EHI.1

    These new rules create a fine line for the pediatric community to walk to reap the potential benefits while avoiding harmful unintended consequences. The positive implications of this rule include increased access to pediatric health information that could enhance engagement of guardians (biological, adoptive, and foster parents) in their child’s health care and equip them with critical data to share with other health providers or schools. These rules could also empower and enable adolescents to start managing their own health needs as they transition into adulthood.

    The potential harmful unintended consequences for children and adolescents relate primarily to the risk of having their health data inappropriately exposed or shared in ways that can compromise their privacy and even their safety.2 This inappropriate exposure could come in the form of (1) guardians inappropriately getting access to private or protected adolescent data,3,4 (2) guardians sharing children’s health data broadly before the children are of the age to control their own data,2 (3) patients or guardians providing data to a third-party app that gets compromised or inappropriately shares data, or (4) adolescents sharing their own data without fully understanding the lifelong implications.

    When faced with the challenge of managing this new complexity in stewardship of child and adolescent data, there is also the risk that health systems, governments, and companies may respond by limiting the application of the new information-sharing rules in pediatric populations. This could result in excluding children and their guardians from the development and adoption of new patient engagement tools.

    For example, the new federal information-sharing rules appropriately defer to state adolescent privacy and data-sharing laws, which vary significantly across the country.5,6 In many cases, there is technically not a solution within current EHR software to allow clinicians and health systems to fully comply with both state adolescent privacy laws and the full intention of the federal information-sharing rules. Pediatric health providers are forced to turn to “infeasibility” and “content and manner” exceptions in the rollout of the rule,1 which may significantly limit access to health data for adolescents and their guardians.

    Perhaps the most controversial and potentially concerning aspect of the new rules is the requirement for providing health data in an easy-to-download manner for third-party apps. Depending on one’s perspective, the good and the bad news is that right now, there are no third-party health care apps in the market that meaningfully enable this data sharing for pediatrics. There are several third-party apps available for downloading and aggregating EHI (eg, Apple Health Records [Apple Inc, Cupertino, CA], CommonHealth [The Commons Project, New York, NY], MyFHR [CareEvolution, Inc, Ann Arbor, MI]). However, these apps have yet to fully develop appropriate pediatric workflows.

    There are several specific potential issues with third-party apps that deserve consideration. First, third-party apps do not fall under the protections of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act but instead fall under regulation from the Federal Trade Commission. Most patients and families are unlikely to appreciate this difference in how their health information is protected. Second, third-party health apps do not have clear security requirements or standardized requirements for consent to share health data, which makes it challenging to judge the trustworthiness of the app and creates risk for unintended sharing of health data. Third, health apps may have different standards for how they aggregate health data from different sources (duplicate medications, generic versus brand names, laboratory values with different units, etc), which could be confusing for patients and families. Fourth, most existing health apps are not yet able to reliably segregate and store data for the guardian and the children on the same mobile device, which is particularly important for meaningful use in pediatrics. Additionally, third-party apps may not follow best practice standards for display of pediatric health information,7,8 such as display of height and weight data on a growth curve, leading to the potential loss of valuable contextual information as the data are downloaded. Finally, there are specific challenges in how third-party apps segregate and protect sensitive adolescent data from a guardian that may violate recommended best practices for adolescents.3,4,9

    There are promising developments in industry that have the potential to allow children and their proxies to benefit from the data access, transparency, and engagement opportunities being ushered in with these new rules. However, pediatric health care providers have a responsibility to help educate pediatric guardians and adolescents about these tools and to advocate for continued development of appropriate pediatric functionality and safeguards. The immediate steps that the pediatric health care community should take are to (1) become familiar with these new rules and help educate other frontline clinicians; (2) work with American Academy of Pediatrics councils and local chapters to understand and inform state laws that may limit the implementation of these federal rules in pediatrics; (3) engage in education and advocacy directly with children, adolescents, and their families to enable and ensure meaningful advances in health care transparency and engagement10; and (4) continue to help educate industry partners to develop appropriate pediatric functionality in EHRs and third-party apps7–9 (see Table 1).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Education and Advocacy for Safe and Meaningful Pediatric EHI Sharing

    As champions of concepts such as the medical home and family-centered care, pediatric providers have long embraced the fundamental ideas of participatory care. The new federal rules place health care on the brink of an exciting shift, and as always, the pediatric provider community has a critical responsibility to help children, adolescents, and families navigate their way safely into this new era.

    Footnotes

      • Accepted December 3, 2020.
    • Address correspondence to Natalie M. Pageler, MD, Department of Information Services, Stanford Children’s Health, 4100 Bohannon Dr, M/C 5522, Menlo Park, CA 94025. E-mail: npageler{at}stanford.edu
    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: No external funding.

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    References

    1. 1.↵
      1. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Department of Health and Human Services
      . 21st Century Cures Act: interoperability, information blocking, and the ONC Health IT Certification Program. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/05/01/2020-07419/21st-century-cures-act-interoperability-information-blocking-and-the-onc-health-it-certification. Accessed November 15, 2020
    2. 2.↵
      1. Bala N
      . Why are you publicly sharing your child’s DNA information? The New York Times. January 2, 2020. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/02/opinion/dna-test-privacy-children.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage. Accessed September 21, 2020
    3. 3.↵
      Confidentiality in adolescent health care: ACOG committee opinion, number 803. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(4):e171–e177
      OpenUrl
    4. 4.↵
      1. Committee on Adolescence
      . Achieving quality health services for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20161347
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. 5.↵
      Guttmacher Institute. An overview of consent to reproductive health services by young people. 2020. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-minors-consent-law. Accessed September 21, 2020
    6. 6.↵
      1. English A,
      2. Bass L,
      3. Dame Boyle A,
      4. Eshragh F
      . State Minor Consent Laws: A Summary, 3rd ed. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Adolescent Health & the Law; 2010
    7. 7.↵
      1. Wald JS,
      2. Haque SN,
      3. Rizk S, et al
      . Enhancing health IT functionality for children: the 2015 children’s EHR format. Pediatrics. 2018;141(4):e20163894
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. 8.↵
      1. Spooner SA; Council on Clinical Information Technology, American Academy of Pediatrics
      . Special requirements of electronic health record systems in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2007;119(3):631–637
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. 9.↵
      1. Blythe MJ,
      2. Del Beccaro MA; Committee on Adolescence; Council on Clinical and Information Technology
      . Standards for health information technology to ensure adolescent privacy. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):987–990. Reaffirmed December 2018
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. 10.↵
      1. Webber EC,
      2. Brick D,
      3. Scibilia JP,
      4. Dehnel P; Council on Clinical Information Technology; Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management; Section on Telehealth Care
      . Electronic communication of the health record and information with pediatric patients and their guardians. Pediatrics. 2019;144(1):e20191359
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    • Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 147, Issue 3
    1 Mar 2021
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Implications of the 21st Century Cures Act in Pediatrics
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Implications of the 21st Century Cures Act in Pediatrics
    Natalie M. Pageler, Emily C. Webber, Dennis P. Lund
    Pediatrics Mar 2021, 147 (3) e2020034199; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-034199

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Implications of the 21st Century Cures Act in Pediatrics
    Natalie M. Pageler, Emily C. Webber, Dennis P. Lund
    Pediatrics Mar 2021, 147 (3) e2020034199; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-034199
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Recognizing the Role of Health Care Providers in Dismantling the Trauma-to-Prison Pipeline
    • Parents of Children With Medical Complexity Are Essential Health Care Personnel
    • A 2020 Executive Order That Threatens Progress in Shared Decision-Making
    Show more Pediatrics Perspectives

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Health Information Technology
      • Health Information Technology
      • Electronic Health Records
    • Adolescent Health/Medicine
      • Adolescent Health/Medicine
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics