Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Article

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: An International Survey

Carles Bautista-Rodriguez, Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo, Bradley C. Clark, Jethro Herberg, Fanny Bajolle, Paula C. Randanne, Diana Salas-Mera, Sandrine Foldvari, Devyani Chowdhury, Ricardo Munoz, Francesco Bianco, Yogen Singh, Michael Levin, Damien Bonnet and Alain Fraisse
Pediatrics February 2021, 147 (2) e2020024554; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-024554
Carles Bautista-Rodriguez
aPaediatric Cardiology Services, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
bNational Heart and Lung Institute and
∗Contributed equally as co-first authors
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo
cDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain;
dDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburg Medical Center Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
∗Contributed equally as co-first authors
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bradley C. Clark
eDivision of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore, New York, New York;
fDepartment of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jethro Herberg
gDepartment of Paediatrics, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom;
hSection of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fanny Bajolle
iM3C-Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France;
jUniversité de Paris, Paris, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula C. Randanne
cDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diana Salas-Mera
kDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandrine Foldvari
aPaediatric Cardiology Services, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
bNational Heart and Lung Institute and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Devyani Chowdhury
lCardiology Care for Children, Lancaster, Pennsylvania;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo Munoz
mCardiac Critical Care Medicine, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Bianco
nAOU Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yogen Singh
oNICU, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and
pSchool of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Levin
gDepartment of Paediatrics, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom;
hSection of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damien Bonnet
iM3C-Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France;
jUniversité de Paris, Paris, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Fraisse
aPaediatric Cardiology Services, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
bNational Heart and Lung Institute and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe presentation, hospital course, and predictors of bad outcome in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).

METHODS: Retrospective data review of a case series of children meeting the published definition for MIS-C who were discharged or died between March 1, 2020, and June 15, 2020, from 33 participating European, Asian, and American hospitals. Data were collected through a Web-based survey and included clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic findings and treatment management.

RESULTS: We included 183 patients with MIS-C: male sex, 109 (59.6%); mean age 7.0 ± 4.7 years; Black race, 56 (30.6%); obesity, 48 (26.2%). Overall, 114 of 183 (62.3%) had evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. All presented with fever, 117 of 183 (63.9%) with gastrointestinal symptoms, and 79 of 183 (43.2%) with shock, which was associated with Black race, higher inflammation, and imaging abnormalities. Twenty-seven patients (14.7%) fulfilled criteria for Kawasaki disease. These patients were younger and had no shock and fewer gastrointestinal, cardiorespiratory, and neurologic symptoms. The remaining 77 patients (49.3%) had mainly fever and inflammation. Inotropic support, mechanical ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were indicated in 72 (39.3%), 43 (23.5%), and 4 (2.2%) patients, respectively. A shorter duration of symptoms before admission was found to be associated with poor patient outcome and for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and/or death, with 72.3% (95% confidence interval: 0.56–0.90; P = .006) increased risk per day reduction and 63.3% (95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.82; P < .0001) increased risk per day reduction respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, children with MIS-C presented with a wide clinical spectrum, including Kawasaki disease–like, life-threatening shock and milder forms with mainly fever and inflammation. A shorter duration of symptoms before admission was associated with a worse outcome.

  • Abbreviations:
    CAA —
    coronary artery abnormality
    CRP —
    C-reactive protein
    ECMO —
    extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
    KD —
    Kawasaki disease
    MIS-C —
    multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
    NT-proBNP —
    N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide
    PCR —
    polymerase chain reaction
    PIMS-TS —
    pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
    SARS-CoV-2 —
    severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
  • What’s Known on This Subject:

    Clinical, laboratory, imaging, and treatment characteristics at presentation of children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome have been reported in specific cohorts from the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, and France.

    What This Study Adds:

    In this international case series, we report the wide clinical spectrum of this emerging disease associated with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic.

    After the coronavirus 2019 pandemic hit Europe and America, several centers reported children presenting with an acute febrile illness accompanied by inflammation, gastrointestinal symptoms, and cardiac complications. This new condition has features similar to those of Kawasaki disease (KD) and toxic shock syndrome.1–14 Whereas the clinical course of coronavirus 2019 is milder in children compared with adults, this pediatric inflammatory disease often leads to multiorgan failure and shock requiring admission to ICUs.15,16 A case definition of pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (PIMS-TS) was proposed by the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health in the United Kingdom.17 The World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Europe and the United States also issued their overlapping definitions and named the disorder multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).18–20 The etiopathogenesis of this syndrome and mechanisms of tissue damage are still unknown.13,21,22

    Several initial studies have already been published on PIMS-TS and MIS-C. In multicenter studies, large cohorts of patients from US centers were described.8–11 However, despite worldwide distribution of this new disease, an international study is lacking. Moreover, no predictors of adverse outcome have been so far identified.

    Our aim in this study was to describe the presentation and hospital course of MIS-C from an international cohort and to identify clinical and biological markers that predicted severe disease.

    Methods

    Patients and Data Collection

    We conducted a retrospective data review of children aged ≤18 years who fulfilled the case definition of MIS-C17 and had been discharged or died between March 1, 2020, and June 15, 2020, from 13 participating European, Asian, and American countries. Participating institutions obtained local institutional review board approval with a waiver of informed consent to collect and share deidentified data that did not include dates of birth, admission, discharge, or death.

    Patient data and outcomes were collected through a standardized, secured, case study Web-based survey tool (SurveyMonkey, San Mateo, CA) between May 9, 2020, and June 16, 2020. Patients were included through 3 different types of presentation, which were mutually exclusive: (1) KD-like illness, patients with typical KD (presence of ≥4 of 5 principal features)23,24; (2) incomplete KD-like illness, patients not fulfilling typical KD criteria; and (3) shock, patients who required >20 mL/kg fluid boluses at admission. Because there are similarities between MIS-C and KD, we aimed to compare rates of coronary artery abnormalities (CAAs) in patients with MIS-C with classic 4 of 5 diagnostic features of KD, and in those without. We therefore did not use the presence of CAAs as part of the diagnosis of KD in children with incomplete KD-like presentation with <4 of 5 features. Instead, we explored the occurrence of CAAs in both groups.

    Patients’ data included age, sex, race, height, weight, and comorbidities. Main clinical symptoms at presentation, including fever, mucocutaneous involvement, presence of nonsuppurative laterocervical lymphadenopathy, conjunctivitis, and gastrointestinal, respiratory, cardiovascular and neurologic symptoms were also collected. The time between onset of symptoms and admission was included in the analysis.

    Main laboratory findings including platelet count (×109 per liter), lactate (millimoles per liter), C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter), ferritin (micrograms per liter), N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and/or B-type natriuretic peptide (picograms per milliliter), and troponin I (nanograms per liter), and D-dimer (nanograms per liter) reported at patient’s admission were also included in the survey. Electrocardiogram data at admission, including abnormal PR and QT intervals and ST- and T-wave changes, were recorded to describe arrhythmia and/or ischemic changes. Echocardiography findings within 24 hours of admission were reported, including assessment of the coronary arteries, ventricular function, valvulitis (nonphysiologic valve regurgitation) and pericardial effusion.25,26

    Information about outcome measures, including admission to ICU, inotropic support, renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and death at time of admission and during hospital course were also collected, as was information about medications used to treat the inflammatory syndrome or potential severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Some of the patients included in this study have been previously published in early reports.6,7,14

    Confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

    We surveyed test results from SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal swab samples and detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G).

    Statistical Analysis

    Continuous variables were summarized as either means and SDs or medians with interquartile ranges, when appropriate. Student’s t test, the ×2 method, or Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon tests, and Kruskal-Wallis were performed when appropriate. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of bad outcome for those who deteriorated after admission, as defined by the following: transfer to intensive care, mechanical ventilation, inotropic support, renal replacement therapy, ECMO, or death. The following criteria were analyzed: age, sex, race, clinical symptoms, and laboratory and echocardiographic findings. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. Data were analyzed with R (version 3.6; The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria).

    Results

    Clinical Presentation

    The survey included 183 pediatric patients with MIS-C at a mean age of 7.0 ± 4.7 years (range: 1.2 months–18 years old). Patients were from the United Kingdom (n = 56), France (n = 52), Spain (n = 32), the United States (n = 14), Italy (n = 8), Sweden (n = 6), Pakistan (n = 4), Belgium (n = 3), Peru (n = 2), Germany (n = 1), Russia (n = 1), Portugal (n = 1), Mexico (n = 1), and Chile (n = 1). Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The distribution of patients’ baseline variables according to their country of origin was not statistically different except for race. The percentage of Black patients was significantly higher in the United Kingdom (52.7%), France (63.4%), and the United States (33.3%) (P < .001). Those 3 countries also have higher rates of Black people in their population according to official government data (the United Kingdom: 14%, France: 15%, the United States: 20.6%). In our cohort, there was a predominance of male sex (59.6%) and Black race (30.6%). Obesity was the most frequent comorbidity (48 of 183; 26.9%). All patients presented with fever and most with gastrointestinal symptoms (63.9%). SARS-CoV-2 PCR results were positive in 43 of 114 (37.7%) tested patients, and SARS-CoV-2 serology test results were positive in 95 of 110 (86.3%) tested patients. In total, 114 of 183 (62.3%) patients had evidence of current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Characteristics of the 183 Children With MIS-C

    Patients presenting with shock (n = 78 of 183; 42.6%) were older (9.2 ± 4.0 vs 3.8 ± 3.6 years in patients with KD-like illness and 5.9 ± 4.6 years in patients with incomplete KD-like illness; P < .001). Patients presenting with shock were associated with Black race and had a significantly higher rate of gastrointestinal, cardiorespiratory, and neurologic symptoms. Such findings also apply to incomplete KD presentation, although with a lower percentage. Positive SARS-CoV-2 serology test results were significantly higher in patients who presented with shock (65.4% vs 14.8% in patients with KD-like illness and 51.3% in patients with incomplete KD-like illness; P < .001).

    In Fig 1 and Table 2, the main clinical characteristics for the 3 types of presentation (KD-like, incomplete KD-like, and shock) are illustrated, and the close similarity between incomplete KD-like and shock presentation is demonstrated.

    FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Clinical profiles at presentation for patients MIS-C with KD-like, incomplete KD-like, and shock presentations represented in a radar chart. The radar chart represents the symptoms for each clinical profile. Each spoke represents one of the variables, and its length is proportional to the magnitude of the percentage of the variable at presentation. A line is drawn connecting the data values for each spoke related to the same type of clinical profile.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Demographics, Clinical Presentation, Electrocardiographic, and Echocardiographic Comparison Between KD-Like, Incomplete KD-Like, and Shock Presentation at Admission

    All patients had NT-proBNP, troponin, D-dimer, CRP, and ferritin levels higher than normal. However, patients who presented with shock had significantly lower platelet count and higher NT-proBNP, D-dimer, CRP, and ferritin levels. Electrocardiogram abnormalities were not different among groups. Ischemic changes, arrhythmia (mainly first degree atrioventricular block), and abnormal repolarization were the most common findings.

    Echocardiography at admission was often abnormal (121 of 183; 66.1%) with dilated coronaries, pericardial effusion, and valvulitis across all types of presentation. Dilated coronaries at admission were seen in 25.9% of patients with KD-like illness, 27.3% of incomplete KD-like, and 12.8% of those presenting with shock (P = .06). Shock was associated with a significantly higher rate of pericardial effusion, valvulitis, and left ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography.

    Hospital Course

    Treatment

    Intravenous immunoglobulin was used in 26 of 7 (96.2%) patients with KD-like illness and in 137 of 156 (87.8%) of the remaining patients; 15 of 27 (55.6%) patients with KD-like illness and 90 of 156 (57.7%) of the remaining patients received steroids. Azithromycin was prescribed in 3 of 27 (11.1%) patients with KD-like illness and in 11 of 156 (7.0%) of the remaining patients with MIS-C. Anakinra, infliximab, and hydroxychloroquine were administered in 8, 10, and 5 patients of the total cohort, respectively, especially in patients with incomplete KD-like and shock presentations. Aspirin was used in 20 of 27 (74.1%) patients with KD-like illness and in 104 of 156 (66.7%) of the other patients with MIS-C. Anticoagulation with heparin was used in 9 of 27 (33.3%) patients with KD-like illness and in 69 of 156 (44.2%) of the patients with non-KD MIS-C.

    Outcome of The Patients

    Overall, 72 of 183 (39.3%) patients required intravenous inotropic support, 43 of 183 (23.5%) required mechanical ventilation, and 4 of 183 (2.2%) required ECMO (Table 3). Three patients died: 1 8-month-old boy with typical KD was admitted after 4 days of symptoms. Echocardiography revealed preserved left ventricular function and normal coronary arteries. He was treated with 2 doses of intravenous immunoglobulin and aspirin but continued to be febrile and was started on steroids and infliximab. On day 11, echocardiography revealed dilated right and left coronaries. Clopidogrel and heparin were added to the treatment. He abruptly deteriorated 2 weeks after admission. He developed giant coronary aneurysms in all 3 vessels and experienced fatal cardiac arrest because of massive myocardial infarction. Another 2-year-old boy presented with <24 hours of fever, respiratory distress, and shock. Echocardiography revealed severe left ventricular dysfunction with normal coronary arteries, moderate mitral regurgitation, and pericardial effusion. He experienced hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia. He was put on ECMO and subsequently died after cerebral injury while on ECMO. The last patient who died was a 14-month-old girl with a history of tetralogy of Fallot status post–complete repair and invasive ventilation through tracheostomy. She developed fever, rash, gastrointestinal symptoms, shock, and severe left ventricular dysfunction without CAAs. She died after multiple cardiac arrests after 7 days of admission.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients With KD-Like Illness Versus Incomplete KD-Like Illness and Shock

    Patients with KD-like illness had shorter lengths of stay than those with other presentations (7.3 ± 6.4 vs 8.1 ± 6.3 days in incomplete KD-like illness and 9.5 ± 4.3 days; P < .001) and required overall less intensive care support when compared with the remaining patients with MIS-C. Data are summarized in Table 3.

    After admission, 26 of 183 patients experienced worse outcomes with escalation of care from ward to PICU and/or need for major treatment (inotropic support, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and/or ECMO) and/or death. Univariate analysis revealed that a shorter duration of symptoms before admission was found to be associated with poor patient outcome as measured by requiring inotropes, mechanical ventilation, or ECMO and/or death (bad outcome). There was an increase of 72.3% risk of worse outcome per everyday reduction (95% confidence interval: 0.56–0.90; P = .006). Similarly, this shorter duration of symptoms before admission was a risk factor for ECMO and/or death in the total patient population, with a 63.3% increased risk per day reduction (95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.82; P < .0001).

    Discussion

    We report the largest international series of children with MIS-C after their full hospital course has been completed. More than 40% of patients with MIS-C presented with shock. They had higher levels of NT-proBNP, D-dimer, CRP, and ferritin and developed more cardiac complications other than CAAs, especially pericardial effusion, valvulitis, and left ventricular dysfunction. Not surprisingly, their hospital stay was longer and required more inotropic support and mechanical ventilation. A minority (nearly 15%) of the patients with MIS-C fulfilled criteria for KD. These patients were usually stable at admission, with fewer symptoms and less inflammation than other patients with MIS-C. They did not experience shock and only had a few cardiac complications other than CAAs. Their hospital stays were shorter, with less PICU management, inotropic support, and mechanical ventilation, although one of them experienced sudden death in the setting of multiple giant aneurysms. The remaining patients with MIS-C who did not experience shock predominantly had fever and inflammation. These patients had a higher rate of CAAs but less valvulitis, pericardial effusion, and ventricular dysfunction. They generally had a better outcome.

    In other studies, researchers have reported clinical characteristics of PIMS-TS and MIS-C cases. Belhadjer et al6 described the hospital course and early outcomes of 35 critically sick children with acute heart failure in cases in which ECMO was needed in 28% with a favorable outcome in all cases. Davies et al10 reported a larger cohort of 78 patients with PIMS-TS managed in a UK PICU, revealing that the indication for ECMO was much less than in the French study. In that cohort, male patients and those from ethnic minority backgrounds were overrepresented. CAAs were present in 36% of the patients.

    Dufort et al8 described the results of active surveillance for MIS-C in New York State, with 191 cases reported to the state health department, of which only 99 met the case definition. Up to 80% of them required treatment in the ICU. This percentage differs from our study cohort, in which 11% of patients with KD-like illness and 55% of patients with non–KD-like illness required intensive care admission. It is likely that inclusion criteria in the study conducted by Dufort et al8 favored the inclusion of the sickest patients, whereas our study included a wider spectrum of presentations. Feldstein et al9 reported 186 MIS-C cases identified by targeted surveillance in 26 US states over a 2-month period. In this group, multiorgan-involvement was similar to our cohort. Coronary artery aneurysms were documented in 8% of children and KD-like features in 40%. Not all patients had been discharged at the time of publication, and therefore, it is difficult to comment on the outcome. All these findings are confirmed in our international survey. Additionally, our study is the first to reveal that a shorter period of symptoms before admission is a risk factor for worse outcome and for ECMO and/or death.

    Previous multicenter reviews from US centers provided a comprehensive description of MIS-C and clarified its differences from KD, KD shock syndrome, and toxic shock syndrome.10,11 In our study, patients classified as KD-like also had additional uncommon clinical features for KD, such as a higher rate of gastrointestinal symptoms and frequent association with Black race.4,6–11 Moreover, this group of patients showed more heterogeneous cardiac involvement at presentation than in KD, such as ischemic changes on electrocardiogram, left ventricular dysfunction, pericardial effusion, and valvulitis on echocardiography. Finally, this cardiac phenotype was often present within the first days of the disease, as opposed to KD, in which cardiac features usually occur after 2 or 3 weeks.23–29 Hence, despite clinical similarities with KD, our results support the concept that these patients with MIS-C belong to a different entity.

    Almost one-half of the patients fulfilling MIS-C criteria in our series presented with shock. These patients presented as having a fulminant disease with rapidly progressing symptoms requiring immediate intensive care management, and they were associated with ECMO and/or death, especially when the time interval between the onset of symptoms and admission was short. This type of presentation is rare in KD. Kawasaki shock syndrome has been typically described in younger patients, after a long period of symptoms before admission, and with a higher rate of CAAs.30–32

    Finally, there were numerous patients who presented with incomplete KD features who did not experience shock and had little cardiac involvement. The main characteristics of these patients were fever and inflammation. Their outcome was generally favorable.

    By means of a survey, we were able to collect the largest available MIS-C data set rapidly and worldwide. The symptoms categorized under gastrointestinal, respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurologic were not detailed in the data collection. Data collection was kept to a minimum to maximize responses, and this was a drawback to gather management variables such as doses of drugs. This limited our ability to develop a detailed risk stratification for this cohort of patients.

    Our study is based on the broader UK definition of PIMS-TS and therefore includes patients who are critically ill, patients meeting diagnostic criteria for KD, and some patients with unexplained fever and inflammation. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or exposure is not mandatory on the basis of such a definition, whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization definitions require evidence of such. This requirement might be problematic because asymptomatic infections are common and antibody testing is neither universally available nor reliable.

    Conclusions

    MIS-C has emerged with a wide clinical spectrum at presentation, including KD-like, life-threatening shock and milder forms with mainly fever and inflammation. The risk for worse outcome (ECMO and/or death) is associated with a short time interval between the onset of symptoms and admission. More studies encompassing larger numbers of patients are needed to better describe this new disease, its optimal treatment, and long-term monitoring.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank the following investigators for their support and their contributions to the study with inclusion of patients: Prof Giovanni di Salvo (Universita degli Studi di Padova), Prof Inna I Trunina (Pirogov Medical University), Dr Adina Olariu (Southampton University Hospital), Dr Clara Sorribes (Hospital Joan XXIII Tarragona), Dr Belen Toral (Hospital 12 de Octubre), Dr Elena Montanes (Hospital 12 de Octubre), Dr Antonio Martinez (Hospital Regional Universitario), Dr Andre Rudolph (Pediatric Heart Centre), Dr Fatima Pinto (Santa Marta CHULC), Dr Anshoo Dhelaria (Lister Hospital), Dr Emma Hulbert-Powell (University Hospitals Plymouth), Dr Jens Dubenhorst (St Joseph-Krankenhaus, Berlin-Tempelhof Hospital), Dr Roxana Rodriguez (Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia), Dr Elmer Zapata Yarleque (Clinica San Felipe), Dr Kimberly Elisabeth McHugh (Medical University of South Carolina), Dr Shazia Mohsi (Aga Khan University Hospital), Dr Ravi Kumar (Royal Berskhire Hospital), Dr Vikranth Anna Venugopalan (Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals), Dr Julio Roberto Erdmenger (Orellana, Multimedica Norte Hospital), Dr Mark Daniel Hicar (University at Buffalo), Dr Nicola Storring, (St George’s Hospital), Dr Jean Papadopoulos (Hopital de Jolimont), Heechan Kang (Royal Brompton Hospital), and Enrico Piccinelli (Royal Brompton Hospital).

    Footnotes

      • Accepted November 19, 2020.
    • Address correspondence to Alain Fraisse, PhD, Paediatric Cardiology Services, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, United Kingdom. E-mail: a.fraisse{at}rbht.nhs.uk
    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: No external funding.

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Fraisse is a consultant and proctor for Abbott, Occlutech, and Medtronic. Dr Bonnet has served as an advisor and steering committee member for Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Healthcare, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer; the other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    References

    1. 1.↵
      1. Riphagen S,
      2. Gomez X,
      3. Gonzalez-Martinez C,
      4. Wilkinson N,
      5. Theocharis P
      . Hyperinflammatory shock in children during COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395(10237):1607–1608
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. 2.
      1. DeBiasi RL,
      2. Song X,
      3. Delaney M, et al
      . Severe coronavirus disease-2019 in children and young adults in the Washington, DC, metropolitan region. J Pediatr. 2020;223:199–203.e1
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. 3.
      1. Jones VG,
      2. Mills M,
      3. Suarez D, et al
      . COVID-19 and Kawasaki disease: novel virus and novel case. Hosp Pediatr. 2020;10(6):537–540
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. 4.↵
      1. Verdoni L,
      2. Mazza A,
      3. Gervasoni A, et al
      . An outbreak of severe Kawasaki-like disease at the Italian epicentre of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1771–1778
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. 5.
      1. Paediatric Critical Care Society
      . PICS Statement regarding novel presentation of multi-system inflammatory disease. Available at: https://pccsociety.uk/news/pics-statement-regarding-novel-presentation-of-multi-system-inflammatory-disease/. Accessed May 18, 2020
    6. 6.↵
      1. Belhadjer Z,
      2. Méot M,
      3. Bajolle F, et al
      . Acute heart failure in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children in the context of global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Circulation. 2020;142(5):429–436
      OpenUrl
    7. 7.↵
      1. Whittaker E,
      2. Bamford A,
      3. Kenny J, et al.; PIMS-TS Study Group and EUCLIDS and PERFORM Consortia
      . Clinical characteristics of 58 children with a pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020;324(3):259–269
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. 8.↵
      1. Dufort EM,
      2. Koumans EH,
      3. Chow EJ, et al.; New York State and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Investigation Team
      . Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children in New York state. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(4):347–358
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. 9.↵
      1. Feldstein LR,
      2. Rose EB,
      3. Horwitz SM, et al.; Overcoming COVID-19 Investigators; CDC COVID-19 Response Team
      . Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in U.S. children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(4):334–346
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. 10.↵
      1. Abrams JY,
      2. Godfred-Cato SE,
      3. Oster ME, et al
      . Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2: a systematic review. J Pediatr. 2020;226:45–54.e1
      OpenUrl
    11. 11.↵
      1. Godfred-Cato S,
      2. Bryant B,
      3. Leung J, et al.; California MIS-C Response Team
      . COVID-19-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children - United States, March–July 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(32):1074–1080
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. 12.
      1. Davies P,
      2. Evans C,
      3. Kanthimathinathan HK, et al
      . Intensive care admissions of children with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS) in the UK: a multicentre observational study. [published correction appears in Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(9):e35]. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(9):669–677
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. 13.↵
      1. Levin M
      . Childhood multisystem inflammatory syndrome - a new challenge in the pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(4):393–395
      OpenUrlPubMed
    14. 14.↵
      1. Clark BC,
      2. Sanchez-de-Toledo J,
      3. Bautista-Rodriguez C, et al
      . Cardiac abnormalities seen in pediatric patients during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic: an international experience. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(21):e018007
      OpenUrl
    15. 15.↵
      1. Wei M,
      2. Yuan J,
      3. Liu Y,
      4. Fu T,
      5. Yu X,
      6. Zhang ZJ
      . Novel coronavirus infection in hospitalized infants under 1 year of age in China. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1313–1314
      OpenUrlPubMed
    16. 16.↵
      1. Lu X,
      2. Zhang L,
      3. Du H, et al.; Chinese Pediatric Novel Coronavirus Study Team
      . SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(17):1663–1665
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. 17.↵
      1. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
      , Health Policy team. Paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome temporally associated with COVID-19 (PIMS) – guidance for clinicians. Available at: https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/guidance-paediatric-multisystem-inflammatory-syndrome-temporally-associated-covid-19. Accessed April 9, 2020
    18. 18.↵
      European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Rapid risk assessment: paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome and SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. 2020. Available at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/paediatric-inflammatory-multisystem-syndrome-and-sars-cov-2-rapid-risk-assessment. Accessed May 18, 2020
    19. 19.
      CDC Health Alert Network. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Available at: https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2020/han00432.asp. Accessed May 18, 2020
    20. 20.↵
      1. World Health Organization
      . Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and adolescents with COVID-19. Available at: https://www.who.int/teams/health-care-readiness-clinical-unit/covid-19/data-platform/. Accessed May 18, 2020
    21. 21.↵
      1. Henderson LA,
      2. Canna SW,
      3. Schulert GS, et al
      . On the alert for cytokine storm: immunopathology in COVID-19. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(7):1059–1063
      OpenUrl
    22. 22.↵
      1. Mehta P,
      2. McAuley DF,
      3. Brown M,
      4. Sanchez E,
      5. Tattersall RS,
      6. Manson JJ; HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK
      . COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033–1034
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. 23.↵
      1. Newburger JW,
      2. Takahashi M,
      3. Gerber MA, et al.; Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; American Heart Association; American Academy of Pediatrics
      . Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: a statement for health professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2004;110(17):2747–2771
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. 24.↵
      1. McCrindle BW,
      2. Rowley AH,
      3. Newburger JW, et al.; American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention
      . Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: a scientific statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(17):e927–e999
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    25. 25.↵
      1. Manlhiot C,
      2. Millar K,
      3. Golding F,
      4. McCrindle BW
      . Improved classification of coronary artery abnormalities based only on coronary artery z-scores after Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;31(2):242–249
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. 26.↵
      1. McCrindle BW,
      2. Li JS,
      3. Minich LL, et al.; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators
      . Coronary artery involvement in children with Kawasaki disease: risk factors from analysis of serial normalized measurements. Circulation. 2007;116(2):174–179
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. 27.
      1. Burgner D,
      2. Harnden A
      . Kawasaki disease: what is the epidemiology telling us about the etiology? Int J Infect Dis. 2005;9(4):185–194
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. 28.
      1. Salo E,
      2. Griffiths EP,
      3. Farstad T, et al
      . Incidence of Kawasaki disease in northern European countries. Pediatr Int. 2012;54(6):770–772
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. 29.↵
      1. Uehara R,
      2. Belay ED
      . Epidemiology of Kawasaki disease in Asia, Europe, and the United States. J Epidemiol. 2012;22(2):79–85
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    30. 30.↵
      1. Gamez-Gonzalez LB,
      2. Moribe-Quintero I,
      3. Cisneros-Castolo M, et al
      . Kawasaki disease shock syndrome: unique and severe subtype of Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Int. 2018;60(9):781–790
      OpenUrl
    31. 31.
      1. Ma L,
      2. Zhang YY,
      3. Yu HG
      . Clinical manifestations of Kawasaki Disease shock syndrome. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018;57(4):428–435
      OpenUrl
    32. 32.↵
      1. Li Y,
      2. Zheng Q,
      3. Zou L, et al
      . Kawasaki disease shock syndrome: clinical characteristics and possible use of IL-6, IL-10 and IFN-γ as biomarkers for early recognition. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2019;17(1):1–9
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    • Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 147, Issue 2
    1 Feb 2021
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: An International Survey
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: An International Survey
    Carles Bautista-Rodriguez, Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo, Bradley C. Clark, Jethro Herberg, Fanny Bajolle, Paula C. Randanne, Diana Salas-Mera, Sandrine Foldvari, Devyani Chowdhury, Ricardo Munoz, Francesco Bianco, Yogen Singh, Michael Levin, Damien Bonnet, Alain Fraisse
    Pediatrics Feb 2021, 147 (2) e2020024554; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-024554

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: An International Survey
    Carles Bautista-Rodriguez, Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo, Bradley C. Clark, Jethro Herberg, Fanny Bajolle, Paula C. Randanne, Diana Salas-Mera, Sandrine Foldvari, Devyani Chowdhury, Ricardo Munoz, Francesco Bianco, Yogen Singh, Michael Levin, Damien Bonnet, Alain Fraisse
    Pediatrics Feb 2021, 147 (2) e2020024554; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-024554
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Conclusions
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Clinical Impact of a Diagnostic Gastrointestinal Panel in Children
    • Intrapartum Group B Streptococcal Prophylaxis and Childhood Allergic Disorders
    • Changes in Neurodevelopmental Outcomes From Age 2 to 10 Years for Children Born Extremely Preterm
    Show more Articles

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Critical Care
      • Critical Care
    • Infectious Disease
      • Infectious Disease
    • Cardiology
      • Cardiology
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics