Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
From the American Academy of PediatricsClinical Report

Pediatrician Guidance in Supporting Families of Children Who Are Adopted, Fostered, or in Kinship Care

Veronnie F. Jones, Elaine E. Schulte, Douglas Waite and COUNCIL ON FOSTER CARE, ADOPTION, AND KINSHIP CARE
Pediatrics December 2020, 146 (6) e2020034629; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-034629
Veronnie F. Jones
aDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elaine E. Schulte
bThe Children’s Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas Waite
cDepartment of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

The child welfare system strives to provide children and adolescents in foster care with a safe, nurturing environment through kinship and nonkinship foster care placement with the goal of either reunification with birth parents or adoption. Pediatricians can support families who care for children and adolescents who are fostered and adopted while attending to children’s medical needs and helping each child attain their developmental potential. Although this report primarily focuses on children in the US child welfare system, private and internationally adopted children often have similar needs.

  • Abbreviations:
    AAP —
    American Academy of Pediatrics
    GED —
    general equivalency diploma
    FASD —
    fetal alcohol spectrum disorder
  • The Faces of Child Welfare in the United States

    The child welfare system strives to protect the safety of children while supporting families whose children are placed in foster care. In this document, the term “child” includes infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. The child welfare system also serves as a bridge to the primary goal of permanency through reunification or adoption. On September 30, 2018, the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System reported that 437 283 children and adolescents were in foster care.1 Of these children, 262 956 entered foster care during the fiscal year of 2018, with 250 103 exiting foster care. The number of children served in the foster care system during 2018 was 687 345. There were 125 422 children waiting to be adopted, with 71 254 having parental rights terminated and 63 123 subsequently being adopted from care. Primary reasons for entering foster care include neglect (62%), parental substance use (36%), poor coping skills of the caregiver (14%), physical abuse (13%), and inadequate housing (10%). Other reasons that account for less than 10% in each category include child behavior problems, parental incarceration, parental alcoholism, abandonment, sexual abuse, child disability, relinquishment, parental death, and child alcohol and other substance use.1 A growing number of children, estimated to be 5% to 10% of the total foster care population, are specifically placed because of complex medical needs.2 In many cases, a combination of these factors leads to foster care placement.

    The 2018 Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System reports the mean age of children in foster care is 8.3 years of age, with 42% of children 5 years or younger. Of note, adolescents 13 to 20 years of age account for 21% of the population in foster care.1 Black or African American children account for 23% of the foster care population, and Hispanic and Latino children make up 21%. Children who identify as ≥2 races account for 8% of the foster care population, and children of American Indian or Alaskan native, Asian American, and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific or unknown ethnicity represent 4% of the population.1 Forty-six percent of children are placed in nonrelative foster care, with another 32% placed in a relative or kinship foster home. Other placement categories include institutional (6%), group home (4%), trial home discharge (5%), preadoptive home placement (4%), supervised independent living (2%), and runaways (1%). Fifty-nine percent of children exiting foster care in 2018 returned to a parent or primary caregiver, and 25% were adopted, 7% were emancipated, 7% were living with other relatives, 11% were placed in guardianship care, and 1% transferred to another agency.1 In 2017, a report by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges revealed Black and African American and American Indian and Alaska Native children constitute 27.5% and 2% of the population in care, respectively, although African American and American Indian and Alaska Native children represent approximately 14% and 1%, respectively, of the general population.3 Although the data during the time period did not reveal overrepresentation for Hispanic and Latino children nationally, they did reveal disproportionate representations in several states.3 These disproportionate rates of children in the child welfare system may result from social factors related to poverty, race, and class bias in initial reporting and subsequent processing of children in the child welfare system.3–6 The effects of structural racism in the child welfare system also should be acknowledged and addressed in the disproportionate rates of minority children in the system.7,8

    Legislation Supporting the Care of Children in Foster Care and Adoption

    In 2018, the Family First Prevention Services Act was signed into law.9–11 This law evolved in response to an increase in child welfare placements as a result of the opioid epidemic. The current increase in placements is similar to increases observed in 1999 at the height of the crack cocaine epidemic, when 567 000 children were in foster care.12 The Family First Act allows reallocation of annual foster care funding to states, territories, and tribes to be redirected toward evidence-based preventive programs for mental health services, substance use treatment, and in-home parenting skill training with the goal of keeping children with their families, focusing especially on families affected by substance use and psychiatric illness.9–11 The Family First Act also seeks to improve the well-being of children in foster care by placing children in the least restrictive environment within the child welfare system while setting standards of care for children with special needs placed in residential treatment programs, including timely assessments and periodic reviews to ensure continued need for a high level of care.9–11,13 Summaries of the Family First Prevention Services Act and other significant federal legislation passed to protect children in foster care are highlighted in Table 1.13–15

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Federal Mandates for Adopted and Foster Children

    Kinship Care

    Approximately 4% of all children in the general population are cared for by extended family members. Although the vast majority of these more than 2.7 million children in the United States live in extended family homes without involvement of the child welfare system, approximately 104 000 of these children have been formally placed in kinship care as part of the state-supervised foster care system.23 One-quarter of all children who have been removed from their homes by the child welfare system are subsequently placed in a kinship home. Over the past decade, the number of children in kinship care has grown 6 times faster than the number of children in the general population (18% vs 3%, respectively). It is estimated that 1 in 11 children live in kinship care for at least 3 consecutive months at some point before the age of 18 years. The likelihood that African American children will experience kinship care is more than double that of the overall population, with 1 in 5 African American children spending time in kinship care at some point during their childhood.23 The passage of the Adoption and Safe Families Act in 1997 promoted placement in kinship care as a means of shortening length of child placement in foster care while continuing a child’s relationship with his or her birth parent.20 Kinship care is relatively cost-effective and may keep children more connected with their families, communities, and cultures compared with nonkinship care.24,25

    Multiple studies suggest specific advantages when children are placed with members of their birth family.26–32 In a systematic review, authors found that children placed in kinship foster care experienced fewer behavioral problems, mental health disorders, and placement disruptions compared with their counterparts in nonkinship care.26 Thirty-two percent of children placed in early kinship care showed behavioral problems 36 months after placement, compared with 46% of children placed in nonkinship homes when controlling for baseline behavior before placement.27 Children also experienced less stigma and trauma from the separation from parents and were more likely to remain connected to siblings and maintain family cultural traditions.28–32 Researchers have consistently shown that relative caregivers are more likely to be single, poorer, and older; to have less formal education than nonkin foster parents; to care for large sibling groups; and to have chronic health conditions or disabilities because of their age.33,34 Children who come to the attention of child protection and are placed with a relative but are not taken into state custody (voluntary kinship care) are more likely to be cared for by a grandparent (87%) than children placed in kinship foster care after being taken into state custody (43%). Conversely, children in kinship foster care are more likely to be in the care of an aunt or uncle (37%) than those in voluntary kinship care (10%).33 Children in kinship care are more likely to be removed from the birth parent’s home because of parental substance use and neglect than children in nonkinship care.34 For kinship families, unexpected placement of children with relatives may exacerbate financial and daily life stress. A report by the Annie E. Casey Foundation revealed 38% of children living in kinship care live below the federal poverty threshold, and 63% live below 200% of the poverty level.23 A recent report by Generations United revealed that of the 2 572 146 grandparents responsible for their grandchildren, 57% were in the workforce, with 20% living below the poverty line.35

    Despite these challenges, voluntary and kinship foster caregivers are less likely to be aware of financial benefits and other support services available to children in nonkinship foster care.23,36,37 The Annie E. Casey Foundation reports that fewer than 12% of kin caregivers receive help from Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, although the majority of families are eligible to receive benefits.23,37 Fifty-eight percent of low-income kinship families do not receive Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program benefits (food stamps) or Medicaid health coverage.23,37 Only 17% of families receive child care assistance, with a mere 15% seeking housing cost support.23 These statistics highlight how little our current child welfare system and communities support kinship families, especially those outside of the child welfare system, and why pediatricians, through referral to benefit resources and simple acknowledgment of the dedication of kinship parents, can be an important part of a support network to kinship families who care for children who would otherwise be placed in a nonkinship home.

    The Families First Act has several provisions to support kinship families by extending Title IV-E eligibility requirements at the end of 12 months while ensuring that programs provided to children are not counted against a kinship caregiver’s eligibility for other programs.9–11,13 The Family First Act funds the development of an electronic interstate database to help facilitate placement of children with relatives who live in states other than the child’s state of origin. Additionally, the Family First Act allows states to receive funding for up to 50% of the state’s expenditures on kinship navigator programs that work to help locate potential kinship placements for children in the child welfare system.9–11,13

    In addition to placement in kinship care, placement of siblings in the same foster home helps maintain ties to a child’s family of origin. Approximately two-thirds of children in the child welfare system have a sibling in care.38,39 The Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 was the first federal law to address the placement and welfare of siblings and promote ongoing relationships with siblings, requiring:

    [S]tates to make reasonable efforts to place siblings in the same foster care, kinship guardianship, or adoptive placement, unless doing so would be contrary to the safety or well-being of any of the siblings. If siblings are not placed together, the state must make reasonable efforts to provide frequent visitation or other ongoing interaction between the siblings, unless this interaction would be contrary to a sibling’s safety or well-being.16–18

    Efforts to maintain sibling placement can be complicated because of inaccurate contact information after sibling separation.40 Furthermore, specialized medical and psychiatric needs of a child may require an exceptional foster home placement, which further complicates attempts to keep siblings together.41 Maintaining contact with siblings and other members of a kinship family in such cases helps ameliorate the strains such separations put on ties to a child’s birth family.

    An often-forgotten venue of kinship care and placement of siblings is the adult sibling caregiver, which is the third largest relative caregiver group behind grandparents and aunts and uncles.42 In their study, Denby and Ayala42 reported adult sibling caregivers have the same unmet service needs as other kinship caregivers, and the emotional toll may be even greater because of their unique sibling relationship to the child’s birth parents. Although sibling caregivers who express a relatively high degree of parenting ability report strong support systems, others with low levels of family involvement and social support report a dissatisfaction with available services.42 Additionally, when younger siblings have special health care needs, the adult sibling caregiver is more likely to commit to adopt their siblings.42 Pediatricians can help adult sibling caregivers connect with peer-aged parents and caregivers to support parenting skills. By educating sibling caregivers on the developmental abilities of their younger siblings, pediatricians can ease unrealistic caregiver expectations while encouraging activities to promote child development.42

    Kinship caregivers report significantly fewer support services than other foster caregivers, such as parent training, peer support, and respite care.43 Grandparents who become adoptive parents may have the additional burden of grieving lost expectations of their own children becoming parents while coping with the stresses of raising another generation of children and managing the ongoing challenges that led to their grandchild’s placement in care.35 In some cases, the stress of taking in a grandchild may cause problems within a marriage, exacerbate preexisting health issues, and increase financial strain within the family. Kinship parents may experience guilt or resentment over the birth parents’ inability to be primary caregivers for their children.35 At the same time, kinship parents may face challenges from birth parents who may express anger over the circumstances that led to their children being placed in foster care and feel the kinship parent conspired against them to obtain custody.35,44 In addition, children may not understand or may resent the kinship parent, blaming them for their inability to live with their birth parents.28 Boundaries must be set regarding the type of contact, timing, and granting of parental responsibility to the birth parents. All family members may need to be reminded that the guardian or adoptive parent is the responsible parent.

    Adoption and Permanency

    Approximately 2.4% of the child population in the United States is adopted, accounting for 2.1 million children.45 In 2014, there were a total of 110 373 adoptions, with 41 023 (37%) adoptions with at least 1 adoptive parent related to the child by blood or marriage, and 69 350 (63%) family-unrelated adoptions.46 The number of children who are adopted in the United States has steadily declined, primarily because of a decrease in international adoptions. In 2004, 22 989 children were adopted internationally. In 2013, 7092 international adoptions occurred, dropping to 4714 in 2017.47 Although this clinical report is focused on children who are served through the child welfare system, awareness of other venues for adoption is important, because many of the same issues exist for both groups.

    Additional demographic data collected by the Children’s Bureau at the Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families provide a broader picture of adoptive families.48 Data reveal that the predominant family structures are married couples (68.8%) and female-headed households (26.5%). Previous families of fostered youth account for almost half of adoptions, with relatives making up 31% of adoptive families. Eighty-one percent of children adopted from the foster care system are classified as having special needs. Ninety-one percent of families receive an adoption subsidy. White children account for most adoptees (49%), whereas African American and Hispanic children represent 19% and 22%, respectively.48 Younger children are more likely to be adopted than teenagers. According to a report from the Children’s Bureau through a partnership with the Ad Council, AdoptUSKids, youth in the foster care system between the ages of 15 and 18 years represent 43% of all children with active photograph listings on AdoptUSKids.org, but only 5% of all children adopted in 2015 were in that age range.49

    Two different forms of adoption influence a child’s subsequent relationship to his or her family of origin. Closed adoption allows no sharing of identifying parental information with the adoptive parent, leaving large amounts of information and details of an adopted child’s family of origin and birth unknown to the adoptive parent. In contrast to closed adoptions, open adoption allows a continuum of communication between birth families, adoptive parents, and the adopted child.50 Open adoption may be restricted to birth parents’ participation in the selection of the adoptive parents or may extend to regular communication between, or face-to-face meetings with, the adoptive parents, adopted child, or both.51,52 Open adoption is a dynamic and fluid process with the goal of child-centered integration of a child’s family of origin with the adoptive family that ensures the child’s awareness of his or her origins and culture. Open adoption may be particularly important to an older child or adolescent with long-standing bonds to members of his or her birth family. Postadoption contact between families is typically unregulated; in rare cases, a judge may order postadoption contact with birth family relatives, even over the adoptive parents’ objection. Although these statutes are present in most states, their implementation is varied.53

    As children age into adolescence and adulthood, they often wish to seek out more information about their biological families.54 In attempting to gain information about their birth parents, adopted individuals who joined their families through intercountry adoption may choose to make a trip to their country of birth. Others seek information about their birth parents through commercially available DNA testing that matches an individual with those who share a similar DNA inheritance.55 Advancements through social media have also made it much easier to locate relatives of their family of origin.56 Other available routes include exploration of reunion registries, reestablishment of ties in a lapsed open adoption, or restoration of other ties that have connections to the child’s family.

    Although some adoptive parents may view their child’s searching for his or her birth family as a sign of rejection, this transition is a normal sign of healthy emotional growth and establishment of identity. The experience of a reunion with the biological family may be rewarding but may also cause the child to re-experience his or her loss. In preparing for contact and reunion, those who have been adopted or experienced foster care may need to anticipate a whole range of realities, including rejection by the birth parent(s) and family members.57,58 Pediatricians need to be aware of the feelings children may have after meeting a sibling, either one who is older or who remained with the birth parent(s) or one who was born after the child was placed. Adoptive parents may fear birth parents will interfere in the adoptive family’s life or affect the child’s bond with the adoptive family. All members of this triad may need the help of mental health professionals to work through these situations. An adoption-competent social worker and/or counselor can discuss the extent of communication between the adoptive family and birth family and provide needed support by identifying benefits and drawbacks to the relationship. Pediatricians are encouraged to become aware of local community resources, support groups, conferences, services, and mental health professionals to which families confronting these difficult issues can be referred. Some available resources are included later in the article.

    Medical Issues

    Children, adolescents, and young adults involved in the child welfare system often have multiple health care needs.59–66 Because children who have been in foster care may move through multiple placements, the resulting fracture of medical care places children at risk for having medical, developmental, and psychiatric needs that remain either unaddressed and/or untreated. In addition to developmental delays and behavioral issues that can occur because of neglect and early environmental deprivation, physical and sexual abuse can lead to marked behavioral challenges at any age. The effects of toxic stress in early childhood on the neuroendocrine–immune system not only leads to psychological and psychiatric morbidity but also can result in higher risks for later medical morbidity. Additional information on the effects of early life adversity on brain development and both physical and mental health can be found in the 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy statement and technical report on early childhood adversity and toxic stress in addition to the AAP Trauma Toolkit (https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/resilience/Pages/Training-Toolkit.aspx).67,68

    Among the multiple factors associated with removal of a child from a parent’s home, parental substance use is one of the most common. Although 36% of children in the child welfare system are referred because of documented parental substance use, children referred for neglect (62% of child welfare referrals) often have parental substance use that has not been documented at the time of intake.1 Although parental substance use is often reported on foster care intake, the co-occurrence of alcohol use by the parents is often overlooked. This is especially important in caring for children born with neonatal abstinence syndrome. The prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs) among children in foster care has been estimated to be 16.9%.63 A recent study of children in foster care referred for developmental evaluation provides further evidence of the prevalence of FASD in foster care and lack of diagnosis of this disorder. Eighty percent of children subsequently diagnosed with an FASD had not been previously diagnosed with this disorder.64 Given this prevalence, all children entering foster care should be screened for prenatal alcohol exposure. The AAP has created an implementation guide for pediatric primary care providers to increase screening for prenatal alcohol exposure (https://www.aap.org/en-us/Documents/FASD_PAE_Implementation_Guide_FINAL.pdf). In addition, a comprehensive medical evaluation, including behavioral health assessment by using validated tools to identify needs, is most effective when completed soon after placement.61,62,66 An early evaluation allows the pediatrician to identify and address existing medical diagnoses, uncover issues unaddressed before placement, discuss developmental and behavioral concerns with parents, and make appropriate referrals when appropriate.61,62,66 Other issues for exploration, particularly in the adolescent and young adult population, include a history of their own substance use, mental health history, and the potential of the adolescent or young adult to be involved in sex trafficking.

    Review of past medical records allows successful coordination of the child’s medical, developmental, and mental health needs. Children in foster care may arrive at the office or hospital with little or no documented medical history. Despite reasonable efforts to obtain past records, information may be incomplete or uncomprehensive in scope. Barriers to obtaining consent from birth parents can make these efforts frustrating. Determining who has legal authority to give consent to care and allow access to past medical records is critical. Access to a child’s medical history is particularly important for children with complex health care needs. At the time of admission to the child welfare system, the person with legal custody of the child signs consent for general and emergency medical care. Consent for further medical intervention beyond routine care must be obtained from the legal guardian. Foster parents may not be authorized to sign consent for medical care. Many states have passed medical consent laws that allow kinship caregivers to make health decisions on the child’s behalf with parental consent and without having to obtain legal custody.69 In cases in which, despite diligent efforts, obtaining consent is not possible or in cases of parent refusal to sign consent, local child welfare authorities or the family court system can override custody rights in acting toward the best interests of the child.70 Such situations may include the need for surgery, medical tests, psychotropic medication, and developmental evaluation and intervention. These legal issues often require pediatricians to act as advocates for the child while working with the foster care agency and family court system. After adoption, adoptive parents gain the right to be legal guardians and make decisions separate from the birth parent. The AAP Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care has provided further guidance related to consent in “Health Care Issues for Children and Adolescents in Foster Care and Kinship Care”61 and at the AAP Fostering Health Web site: https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/healthy-foster-care-america/Pages/Fostering-Health.aspx.

    Particularly relevant parts of the health care record include past medical history; complications of pregnancy; late recognition of pregnancy; lack of prenatal care; prenatal exposures to maternal alcohol, substances, and/or tobacco; poor maternal nutrition; preterm birth; maternal and paternal psychiatric illness; and genetic diseases within the family. Important history also includes the number of previous placements, significant past relationships, developmental delays, abnormalities in growth, behavioral challenges, mental health history, substance abuse, and any traumatic events such as physical and sexual abuse, including sex trafficking.61,62,65,66 Pediatricians can use the time a child is in foster care to integrate the medical, developmental, and psychiatric history within an electronic health record that can be easily forwarded to new placements while working with their state child welfare system to advocate for centralized or portable records that can travel with the child across foster care placements. Examples of categories within such records may include birth and developmental history, prenatal drug and/or alcohol exposure risk factors, immunization records, past psychiatric treatment, and ongoing diseases and medications. When reviewing medical records, informed interpretation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act allows proper sharing of information to improve continuity and coordination of medical care. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act contains several provisions that encourage information sharing regarding children in foster care.71

    In collaboration with members of child welfare services, pediatricians can develop treatment recommendations that support caregivers in planning to best meet their child’s physical and mental health needs while anticipating future challenges. Pediatricians without expertise in this area may seek resources through the AAP Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care to assist in this effort.72 For internationally adopted children, this evaluation includes, but is not limited to, infectious disease and developmental screening tests and assessment of immunization status, as recommended in the AAP Red Book73 and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Yellow Book.74 The following AAP resources are also available to guide pediatricians: Addressing Mental Health Concerns in Primary Care: A Clinician’s Toolkit,75 Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics,76 and Adoption Medicine: Caring for Children and Families.77

    Finally, identification and documentation of a child’s medical diagnoses may be necessary in establishing eligibility for financial subsidies to support the child’s needs. Although the type and amount of assistance vary by state and typically are negotiated before the adoption is finalized, financial subsidy may specifically support medical and/or psychiatric care, counseling or therapy, special equipment, tutoring programs, or other support services that may help children who have special needs.78–80 Community services, such as early child intervention programs, quality early childhood learning centers, parent support groups, financial assistance, respite care, trauma-informed care, and community organizations, including local child welfare agencies, can also help support families. Organizations such as the Child Welfare League of America81 and Generations United82 may be valuable resources for pediatricians and families.

    Communicating With Children and Adolescents About Placement and Permanency

    Even before a child understands the words “adoption,” “adopted,” “foster care,” “kinship care,” “guardianship,” and “biological family” or “birth family,” these words should become a part of a family’s natural conversation, whether the adoption is open or confidential, kinship, or foster-adoptive placement.83,84 Positive language lays a foundation for a child’s later understanding of the abstract concepts of foster care, adoption, and separation from birth parents. It is generally not advisable for families to wait until “just the right minute” to talk to children about their permanency status, because this may leave children feeling betrayed and wondering what else their parents may have hidden from them. Early communication that shares these sensitive histories, starting with placement or early childhood, helps maintain trust between the parent and child. Encouraging an honest, nonjudgmental discussion of a child’s birth family and the placement or permanency process will give a child permission to ask questions and express thoughts and feelings that not only serve to develop trust and a feeling of security but also help ameliorate the shame and the stigma associated with being in the child welfare system.85–87

    Some information in a child’s past may be difficult to discuss, such as previous sexual or physical abuse or having been conceived in the context of rape or incest, and should be discussed on the basis of the child’s questions and developmental ability to understand these difficult thoughts, feelings, and memories. Furthermore, for older youth and adolescents, discussion of parental psychiatric history, substance use disorder, and life challenges that might have hindered a parent from being a greater part of the child’s life can help open future questions and dialogue. Pediatricians, potentially with the collaboration of a mental health specialist, may help the family decide how and when to disclose this information. Open discussion with a child is essential in building bridges of trust and security within a family, but it is also important that the discussion be framed with developmentally appropriate language.87 Effective communication nurtures a child’s self-esteem as he or she grows in the understanding of what it means to join a family and integrate disparate parts of their lives. A child’s understanding of the meaning of permanency changes with his or her cognitive development. The pediatrician can counsel parents about the need to understand the child’s specific questions surrounding placement and permanency in the context of the child’s current development and answer questions in a way that supports a child’s sense of self and self-efficacy (Table 2).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Developmental Tasks and Issues Specific to Adopted and Foster Children

    Children placed in families at a young age may not understand that they have another family besides the family with whom they live. For many children and adolescents, separation anxiety and other internalizing and externalizing disorders may be pronounced, especially with children who remember the loss of birth or foster parents, siblings, or other relatives. Children may fear that their current family will abandon them in the same way once their “hidden flaws” are discovered. Some children may express yearnings to have been “in the belly” of their mother with whom they are presently living.86 By kindergarten, many children realize that most of their peers are not in foster care, kinship care, or adopted, which may lead children to feel responsible for their birth parents’ inability to raise them as well as for the repeated losses through moves in and out of foster care. This feeling of responsibility is especially true when a foster placement does not advance to adoption of the child.89–93

    Pediatricians are encouraged to model positive adoption language for all families. Adoptive, foster care, and kinship care families are “real” families; siblings who joined a family through any of these channels are “real siblings.” Birth parents do not “give up a child for adoption,” which might imply to the child that he or she was of less worth and was given away. Rather, they “make an adoption plan for a child.” Furthermore, in modeling positive language, pediatricians can use vocabulary that reflects respect and permanency about children and their families.84 A “life book,” that compiles both happy and difficult periods of a child’s life experiences can be an effective tool for parents in helping a child process their thoughts and feelings.94 Some families choose to develop rituals with their child to honor the child’s birth parents on birthdays or holidays or as a special prayer to commemorate the birth family. Rituals like these allow children to acknowledge and remember their past but also to honor their present status.84

    Loss, Grief, and Trauma Associated With Foster Care Placement

    Although birth parents may anticipate the loss of their parental rights or loss of their child through adoption, the surrendering of their child often precipitates grief and a sense of loss manifested as denial, sorrow, depression, anger, and guilt. Birth parents may grieve the loss of their role as a parent and of playing a significant part in their child’s life. The later birth of other children may be a reminder of the loss of the child that they did not raise.95 In cases in which change of custody is kept secret, friends and family may not even be aware of this loss or not understand the extent of the birth parent’s loss.

    Foster parents can experience loss and grief with each child for whom they care. In many instances, foster parents interact with birth families to support reunification of the family. Although reunification may be the mutually desired goal, the resulting separation can be traumatic to both the foster parent and child.96 Moreover, other children in the home may experience loss and undergo their own grieving process. Birth children of foster parents report feelings of guilt, sadness, and blame at the departure of a child who had been fostered in their childhood home.97 Anniversary reactions often occur for children with each passing year. Anniversaries may trigger thoughts of the birth family, and children may wonder whether their birth parents still love them or even think about them. The Child Welfare Information Gateway provides useful resources for families on separation and grief.

    Family Differences

    Although all children, especially in adolescence, face the normal developmental task of clarifying their identity, adopted children and children living in foster care with parents of a different race, ethnicity, or cultural background face the additional challenges of assimilating disparate parts of their lives. Children as young as 3 or 4 years are aware of differences between themselves and members of other racial groups.98–102 When children live in communities where they are members of an ethnic minority, the differences in racial identity will be easily apparent to classmates, other parents, and strangers. These differences may provoke a child’s sense of confusion about their racial, ethnic, or cultural origins.102

    Children may encounter racist remarks for the first time, particularly in situations in which they are not physically or emotionally safeguarded by their parents. Role-playing with children with respect to stereotypes and racist statements may help them to feel in control when they encounter comments from strangers, friends, or extended family members.103,104 Parents who have not experienced racism personally may need to pay extra attention to teaching their children effective ways to respond to racism. Families should openly acknowledge racial differences while providing the child with relationships with others of the same race or ethnic group, including adults and children.104 The child should also be given the opportunity to learn more about the heritage of his or her racial and ethnic group and country of origin.

    An estimated 220 000 children are being raised by more than 111 000 same-sex couples, with approximately 12% of children identified as adopted or in the foster care system.105,106 Gates et al107 reported that same-sex couples are 4 times more likely to adopt and are 6 times more likely to foster children than their different-sex counterparts. Additionally, approximately 25% of same-sex couples raising children are involved in kinship care arrangements. In the past, same-sex couples raising adopted children were typically older, more educated, and had more economic resources compared with other adoptive parents.107 More recently, however, this trend may be changing secondary to the evolving societal acceptance and legal climate within the United States.108,109 Between 2014 and 2016, 16.2% of all same-sex couples were raising children.109 The majority (68%) of the couples were raising biological children; however, same-sex couples were more likely to have a child who was adopted (21% vs 3.0%) and/or a child in foster care (2.9% vs 0.4%) compared with male-female couples.109

    In 2002, the AAP published a policy statement and technical report supporting coparent or second-parent adoption and reaffirmed the policy statement in May 2009.110,111 Regardless of the sexual identity of the parent, children thrive best when raised in a home that provides a caring, supportive, and secure home environment. Children who grow up with gay or lesbian parents show the same emotional, cognitive, social, and sexual development as children who grow up with heterosexual parents.112 Authors of a recent study exploring the perspectives of youth who were adopted by gay and lesbian parents reported that although many children experienced more bullying and teasing than their counterparts, children of gay or lesbian parents were more accepting, had greater understanding, and were more compassionate toward people and individual differences than their counterparts raised by heterosexual parents.113 This growing literature supports pediatricians in their advocacy for all capable individuals to have the opportunity to become foster and adoptive parents.

    Educational Challenges

    Information from a 2018 multistate study reveals that 65% of foster youth had had more than 1 foster care placement, 34% had experienced 5 or more school placements; up to 47% had been placed in special education, and 65% completed high school by age 21.114 Additionally, 17- to 18-year-old youth in the child welfare system are 2 times more likely to be suspended and 3 times more likely to be expelled from school.114 Researchers in the 2005 Midwest study of 736 foster care alumni found that although 57.8% of former foster youth earned a high school diploma and 5% completed a general equivalency diploma (GED), 37% had attained neither a high school diploma nor GED.115 Youth who earn a high school diploma are 1.7 times more likely to complete an associate’s degree and 3.9 times more likely to complete a bachelor’s degree and have higher incomes than those with a GED credential.115 A 2018 multistate study found that although 70% to 84% of high school graduates wished to pursue further college education, only 32% to 45% actually enrolled in college, and only 3% to 11% attained a bachelor’s degree.114

    Researchers have shown that a higher incidence of exposure to one or more traumatic adverse childhood experiences affects educational achievement.116–118 Maltreatment experienced before kindergarten was associated with negative academic and behavioral outcomes by second grade.117,118 Kovan et al119 report children involved with the child welfare system had poorer outcomes than their peers with no involvement with the child welfare systems on measures of receptive vocabulary, math reasoning, and teacher ratings of anger or aggression and anxiety or withdrawal. These findings support previous studies with similar conclusions of poor outcomes of children who have experienced neglect in early childhood.117 Similarly, poor science outcomes have also been reported for children who experience neglect before kindergarten compared with their peers.117 Thus, disproportionate representation of children from minority populations in the child welfare system helps maintain disparities in academic outcomes.3–6 Quality early child care and early education programs, such as Head Start and prekindergarten programs, can partially mitigate the effects of maltreatment on school readiness and child development.118–121 For children younger than 3 years, referral to a federally funded early intervention program may be warranted. For children older than 3 years, Individualized Education Program and 504 plans under the Individual with Disabilities Act can be mechanisms to obtain services and resources to help meet the special needs of children in foster care or those who have been adopted.122 In addition, the Uninterrupted Scholars Act (Pub L No. 112-278), passed in 2013, allows information sharing between schools, child welfare agencies, and tribal organizations without parental consent.123

    Transition Care to Adulthood: Barriers and Opportunities

    Most young adults not in foster care continue to receive ongoing financial and social support from their parents beyond age 18.124 In 2018, approximately 19 000 young adults aged out of foster care, potentially losing the financial, educational, and social support services of state foster care overnight when they turned 18 to 21 years old, depending on the state in which they resided.1,125 Adolescents in foster care enter the world of adulthood all too often ill prepared, their prospects compounded by mental health problems, substance use, and underemployment.126,127 The Midwest outcome study revealed that fewer than half of young adults leaving foster care were currently employed at age 26, approximately half of the young adults who had worked during the past year reported annual earnings of $9000 or less, and more than one-quarter had no earnings at all.127 Researchers in a study of aged-out youth found that 20% were chronically homeless, with housing instability associated with emotional and behavioral problems, physical and sexual victimization, criminal conviction, and high school dropout.128

    Title IV-E of the Social Security Act was amended in 1986 to create the Independent Living Program, allowing states to receive funds to provide independent living services.129 State child welfare agencies are required to develop a transition plan in collaboration with the youth aging out of foster care that includes housing, health insurance, education, local opportunities for mentors and continuing support services, workforce supports, and employment services.16–18,129,130 The age limit for foster care varies by state, with some states extending care to 21 years of age. The Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 amended Title IV-E to extend the age of Title IV-E eligibility from 18 to 21 years.16–18,129 In one study, youth living in a state that extended the age of foster care to 21 years were nearly twice as likely to complete at least 1 year of college education.126 Awareness of state-specific age limits on foster care placement allows early transition planning for all adolescents in the medical home.131 Youth who remain in care past age 18 attain higher educational credentials, which translate into better employment outcomes.126,127,132,133 Furthermore, even when the level of educational achievement is controlled for, the number of years in care after the age of 18 positively affects employment and higher wages of the youth.134 This study suggests a window of opportunity within transition planning for obtaining employment before discharge from foster care. It also supports the extension of foster care from age 18 to age 21.134

    Youth transitioning out of foster care report that the most important support for working toward their educational and employment goals are job preparation skills, transportation, child care, educational services, and overall life skills.135 Yet, former fostered youth who currently live independently overwhelmingly describe a lack of resources in the areas of employment, education, finances, housing, access to independent living classes, personal care, and networking.135 Although parents outside the foster care system often contribute to the development of young adult independence by advancing important skill-building activities early in life, empowering youth to make decisions for their own lives, and reinforcing the youth’s ability to learn and cope with the consequences of those decisions in a supportive environment, this support often fails to be included in the transition care of children in foster care.136

    Mental health challenges further complicate transition planning from foster care. More than half of young adults leaving care (54.4%) have current mental health problems, compared with less than one-quarter of the general population (22.1%).137 The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder within the previous 12 months is higher among young adults in foster care (25.2%) than among the general US population (4.0%) and nearly twice the rate of that experienced by American war veterans (Vietnam: 15%; Afghanistan: 6%; and Iraq: 12–13%).137 The prevalence of major depression within the previous 12 months is significantly higher among foster alumni (20.1%) than among the general population (10.2%).137 Although mental health challenges might be thought to be solely linked to foster care placement, researchers of studies among US adoptees suggest otherwise. Among 96% of the adopted children placed before 1 year of age and all children adopted before their second birthday, adoptees were 4 times more likely to attempt suicide than nonadoptees.138 Potential contributing factors for the increased risk of suicide attempt include early trauma before adoption, prenatal substance and alcohol exposure, and genetic predisposition to psychiatric illness.138

    In the face of these adversities lie barriers to medical and psychiatric care. In a study of foster care alumni, only 47% of young adults had health insurance as they prepared to leave foster care.139 Young adults in foster care are more likely to have health conditions that limit their daily activities, report more emergency department visits and hospitalizations during the previous 5 years than their peers, and suffer medical problems that are left untreated because of lack of health insurance.61,140 Pediatricians can help youth prepare to transition their health care needs by identifying medical issues that require regular follow-up and educating youth on how to use health insurance benefits and nonemergent medical care.133 Information on billing for the delivery of health care transition services can be found in the 2017 Transition Coding and Reimbursement Tip Sheet, as well as other resources, on the Got Transition Web site.141

    Finally, children placed in foster care are at risk for “crossing over” to the juvenile justice system, and inversely, many juvenile justice–involved youth later become involved in the child welfare system. These youth are commonly referred to as crossover youth, whereas youth with concurrent involvement in both the child welfare and juvenile justice system are described as dually involved or dually adjudicated youth.142,143 Children who have experienced maltreatment average a 47% greater risk for future delinquency relative to children who have not experienced abuse or neglect.144 An estimated 56% of crossover youth have mental health problems. A growing body of research indicates that running away from foster care increases the probability of subsequent involvement in the juvenile and/or adult justice system, especially for male individuals, with 42% of youth with runaway histories in one study having at least 1 juvenile and/or adult conviction.145 Approximately 16% of children placed into foster care experience at least 1 delinquency court involvement compared with 7% of all maltreatment victims who are not removed from their family.144 Other characteristics related to delinquency include age at first child welfare placement, years in placement, number of placements, total length of time in residential care, and sex, race, and recurrence of maltreatment.144,146 African American youth involved in the child welfare system are up to 13 times more likely than white fostered youth to become involved in the juvenile justice system.147 Reasons for this disparity are complex; however, structural racism should be considered.7,8,147 Structural racism refers to the policies and practices that reinforce racial group inequity by allowing privilege associated with race, in this case white-colored skin, while withholding those same privileges from communities of color. Structural racism is insidious and embedded within historical, cultural, and ideological norms of organizations and systems.8 Norms around language, behavior, and practices, such as policing and court judgments, are typically based on white middle class expectations and contribute to the disproportionate involvement of youth of color in both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems.147 Recognition of structural racism in current systems allows for education and interventions to be put in place to mitigate its effects.

    One of several promising approaches to juvenile court involvement is multisystemic therapy.148 Multisystemic therapy interventions target problems identified by the child, family, and worker within and between the multiple systems of the home, school, and neighborhood to problem-solve challenges and support success.146,148 Pediatricians can affect the outcomes of these youth by participating in a multidisciplinary team that includes members from the juvenile justice system, child welfare organizations, and the family. This coordinated approach provides opportunities to change the trajectory of children with judicial involvement and affect the long-term outcome of their lives.149

    The Last Word: Resilience

    Resilience is the developmental process by which an individual can use internal and external resources to negotiate and adapt to current challenges while developing skills to aid future challenges. Resilience implies the presence of adaptive capacities to negotiate life challenges effectively.150 In a study of 164 young adults emancipated from foster care, nearly half (47%) managed challenges in education, employment, civic engagement, relationships, self-esteem, and mental health, and 16.5% had low educational and low occupational competence, low civic engagement, problematic interpersonal relationships, low self-esteem, and high depressive symptoms. Yet among those youth having difficulties in their external life, 30% exhibited internal resilience, characterized by psychological well-being, despite having difficulties in external circumstances such as education, employment, homelessness, early parenthood, drug use, and criminal activity. In contrast, 6.5% of youth showed significant emotional difficulties despite the appearance of external competence.151 Thus, young adults can demonstrate resilience in one area of their lives even as they struggle in others. The greatest association with improvement in resilience is having more than one strong network (biological family, peers, foster care), with multiple strong social networks ameliorating the psychological stress of life struggles.152 In addition to biological family, foster parents, extended family, and peers, support can come from child welfare case workers, therapists, teachers, mentors, coaches, and pediatricians, many of whom often continue to be a resource after the formal placement has ended.149 For this reason alone, pediatricians can never underestimate the effect of the day-to-day interactions they share with fostered youth. Conversations for even a simple medical concern can affect a child or foster parent in ways we can never foresee.

    Further information on the care of children in foster care and children who have been adopted can be found on the AAP Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care Web site.

    Key Points and Recommendations of Clinical Report

    • Children and adolescents involved in the child welfare system, whether formally or informally, often have multiple health care needs that require an interdisciplinary team to maximize their well-being. See the AAP Fostering Health Web site for further information: https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/healthy-foster-care-america/Pages/Fostering-Health.aspx.

    • Children and adolescents in foster care and those who have been adopted are at far greater risk than the general population for neurodevelopmental disorders, such as fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Pediatricians can provide surveillance and screening of socioemotional well-being using validated tools and being aware of developmental and mental health issues common among children and adolescents in foster care. See the AAP Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Toolkit for further information: https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/fetal-alcohol-spectrum-disorders-toolkit/.

    • Many children and adolescents experience social and emotional issues during periods of transition. It is important for pediatricians to counsel and provide information to parents in the recognition and management of current and future medical, developmental, and behavioral problems.

    • Pediatricians can advocate for the development of a standardized process for consent and transfer of health information with their local Department of Social Services.

    • Pediatricians can address the effects of adverse childhood experiences, early childhood adversity, and trauma on early brain development and life course trajectory for both physical and mental health, as recommended by AAP policy.39 See the AAP Trauma Toolkit for further information: https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/resilience/Pages/Training-Toolkit.aspx.

    • Pediatricians can encourage parents to have developmentally appropriate discussions using developmentally appropriate language with their child or adolescent. Words such as “adoption,” “adopted,” “foster care,” “kinship care,” “guardianship,” and “biological family” or “birth family” should become a part of a family’s natural conversation, whether the adoption is open or confidential, kinship, or foster-adoptive placement.84,85 Positive language lays a foundation for a child’s later understanding of the abstract concepts of foster care, adoption, and separation from birth parents and facilitates the formation of an integrated identity.

    • Pediatricians can help parents acknowledge racial and cultural differences and support children and adolescents in coming to an understanding of these differences. See HealthyChildren.org for further information for pediatricians Talking to children about racial bias https://www.healthychildren.org/English/healthy-living/emotional-wellness/Building-Resilience/Pages/Talking-to-Children-About-Racial-Bias.aspx Teaching children cultural and racial pride https://www.healthychildren.org/English/family-life/family-dynamics/Pages/Teaching-Children-Cultural-and-Racial-Pride.aspx

    • Pediatricians can be aware of the complexity of losses experienced by children and adolescents in foster care or kinship care or adopted, in addition to losses experienced by foster, adoptive, and birth parents, while facilitating mental health referral as needed.

    • Pediatricians can advocate for young adults who are transitioning out of care and/or involved in the juvenile justice system, because they are at risk for poor physical and mental health outcomes, low socioeconomic status, and lower educational attainment.

    Resources

    Available resources include the following:

    • AAP, Council of Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care (https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/Committees-Councils-Sections/Council-on-Foster-Care-Adoption-Kinship/Pages/Foster-Care-Adoption-Kinship.aspx);

    • AAP, Healthy Children (https://www.healthychildren.org/English/Pages/default.aspx);

    • National Council for Adoption (http://www.adoptioncouncil.org/);

    • Child Welfare Information Gateway (https://www.childwelfare.gov/):

      • Legal Issues in Adoption (https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/systemwide/courts/processes/legal-issues-in-adoption/);

      • Working With American Indian Children and Families in Adoption (https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/systemwide/cultural/adoption/american-indian-families/);

      • Helping Children and Families with Separation and Grief (https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/outofhome/casework/helping/); and

      • Helping Youth Transition to Adulthood: Guidance for Foster Parents (https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/youth_transition.pdf);

    • Grandparents Raising Grandchildren (http://www.raisingyourgrandchildren.com/Index.htm);

    • AdoptUsKids: Families for Native American Children: Consideration When Fostering and Adopting (https://www.adoptuskids.org/adoption-and-foster-care/overview/who-can-adopt-foster/families-for-native-children);

    • Jones BJ, Tilden M, Gaines-Stoner K. The Indian Child Welfare Act Handbook: A Legal Guide to the Custody and Adoption of Native American Children. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association; 2008;

    • National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice. Family Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System (https://www.ncmhjj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Family-Involvement-in-the-Juvenile-Justice-System-for-WEBSITE.pdf); and

    • Baker JL, Brown EJ, Schneiderman M, Sharma-Patel K, Berrill LM. Application of evidenced-based therapies to children in foster care: a survey of program developers. APSAC Advisor. 2013;27(3):27–34 (http://www.apsacny.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/APSAC_Advisor_Vol_26_1-pp27-34.pdf).

    Lead Authors

    Veronnie F. Jones, MD, MSPH, FAAP

    Elaine E. Schulte, MD, MPH, FAAP

    Douglas Waite, MD, FAAP

    Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care Executive Committee, 2018–2020

    Sarah Springer, MD, FAAP, Chairperson

    Moira Ann Szilagyi, MD, PhD, FAAP, Immediate Past Chair

    Heather Forkey, MD, FAAP

    Kristine Fortin, MD, FAAP

    Mary V. Greiner, MD, MS, FAAP

    David Harmon, MD, FAAP

    Veronnie Faye Jones, MD, MSPH, FAAP

    Anu N. Partap, MD MPH, FAAP

    Linda Davidson Sagor, MD, MPH, FAAP

    Mary Allen Staat, MD MPH, FAAP

    Jonathan D. Thackery, MD, FAAP

    Douglas Waite, MD, FAAP

    Lisa W. Zetley, MD, FAAP

    Liaisons

    George Alex Fouras, MD – American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    Jeremy Harvey – Foster Care Alumni of America

    Camille Robinson, MD – American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Pediatric Trainees

    Staff

    Mary Crane, PhD, LSW

    Tammy Piazza Hurley, BS

    Footnotes

    • Address correspondence to V. Faye Jones, MD, PhD. E-mail: vfjone01{at}louisville.edu
    • This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have filed conflict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication.

    • Clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefit from expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external reviewers. However, clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics may not reflect the views of the liaisons or the organizations or government agencies that they represent.

    • The guidance in this report does not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.

    • All clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, revised, or retired at or before that time.

    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: No external funding.

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    References

    1. ↵
      US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. The AFCARS Report #26. Preliminary FY 2018 Estimates as of August 22, 2019 - No. 26. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2019. Available at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport26.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2020
    2. ↵
      1. Seltzer RR,
      2. Henderson CM,
      3. Boss RD
      . Medical foster care: what happens when children with medical complexity cannot be cared for by their families? Pediatr Res. 2016;79(1–2):191–196
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. Disproportionality rates for children of color in foster care 2015 Technical Assistance Bulletin. 2017. Available at: https://www.ncjfcj.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/NCJFCJ-Disproportionality-TAB-2015_0.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    4. National Indian Child Welfare Association. National Indian Child Welfare Association (NICWA) disproportionality statistics. 2014. Available at: https://www.nicwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Disproportionality-Table.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    5. Child Welfare and Information Gateway. Racial disproportionality and disparity in the child welfare continuum. 2016. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/racial_disproportionality.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    6. ↵
      1. Hines AM,
      2. Lemon K,
      3. Wyatt P,
      4. Merdinger J
      . Factors related to the disproportionate involvement of children of color in the child welfare system: a review and emerging themes. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2004;26(6):507–527
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    7. ↵
      1. Trent M,
      2. Dooley DG,
      3. Dougé J; Section on Adolescent Health; Council on Community Pediatrics; Committee on Adolescence
      . The impact of racism on child and adolescent health. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2):e20191765
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Pryce J
      . Child welfare is not exempt from structural racism and implicit bias. The Imprint. 2019. Available at: https://chronicleofsocialchange.org/opinion/child-welfare-is-not-exempt-from-structural-racism-and-implicit-bias/33315. Accessed November 10, 2019
    9. ↵
      1. Torres K,
      2. Mathur R
      . Family first prevention services act. Fact sheet. Available at: https://campaignforchildren.org/resources/fact-sheet/fact-sheet-family-first-prevention-services-act/. Assessed May 10, 2019
    10. National Conference of State Legislatures. Family first prevention services act. Updates. Available at: www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/family-first-prevention-services-act-ffpsa.aspx. Accessed May 10, 2019
    11. ↵
      Children’s Defense Fund. The Family First Prevention Services Act: historic reforms to the child welfare system will improve outcomes for vulnerable children. 2018. Available at: https://www.childrensdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/family-first-detailed-summary.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    12. ↵
      Trends Child. Key facts about foster care. 2018. Available at: https://www.childtrends.org/indicators/foster-care. Accessed September 26, 2018
    13. ↵
      Administration for Children and Families. Information memorandum. Subject: New Legislation – Public Law 115-123, the Family First Prevention Services Act within Division E, Title VII of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. 2018. Available at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/im1802.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    14. Child Welfare Information Gateway. Legal and court issues in permanency. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/permanency/legal-court/. Accessed May 10, 2019
    15. ↵
      Child Welfare Information Gateway. Federal laws related to permanency. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/permanency/legal-court/fedlaws/. Accessed May 10, 2019
    16. ↵
      Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008, Pub L No. 110–351, 122 Stat 3949 (2008). Available at: https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ351/PLAW-110publ351.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2018
      1. Court Appointed Special Advocates for Children
      . Fostering connections to success act. Available at: https://www.ncsc.org/services-and-experts/government-relations/child-welfare/fostering-connections-to-success-act. Accessed May 10, 2019
    17. ↵
      Children’s Defense Fund. Fostering connections to success and increasing adoptions act summary. 2010. Available at: https://www.childrensdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/FCSIAA-detailed-summary.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    18. The Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act of 2011–2012, Pub L No. 112-34, 125 Stat 369 (2011). Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/2883. Accessed May 10, 2019
    19. ↵
      Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, Pub L No. 105–89, 111 Stat 2115 (1997). Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-105publ89/pdf/PLAW-105publ89.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    20. Tribal Law and Policy Institute. The Indian child welfare act summary. Available at: http://nc.casaforchildren.org/files/public/community/programs/Tribal/indian-child-welfare-act-summary.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
      1. Jones BJ
      . The Indian child welfare act. The need for a separate law. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/gpsolo12&div=46&id=&page=. Accessed May 28, 2019
    21. ↵
      1. Bissell M,
      2. Miller J
      . Stepping Up for Kids: What Government and Communities Should Do to Support Kinship Families. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation; 2012. Available at: https://www.aecf.org/resources/stepping-up-for-kids/. Accessed May 10, 2019
    22. ↵
      1. Jimenez J
      . The history of child protection in the African American community: implications for current child welfare policies. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2006;28(8):888–905
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    23. ↵
      1. Xu Y,
      2. Bright CL
      . Children’s mental health and its predictors in kinship and non-kinship foster care: a systematic review. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018;89:243–262
      OpenUrl
    24. ↵
      1. Winokur M,
      2. Holtan A,
      3. Batchelder KE
      . Systemic review of kinship care effects on safety, permanency, and well-being outcomes. Res Soc Work Pract. 2018;28(1):19–32
      OpenUrl
    25. ↵
      1. Rubin DM,
      2. Downes KJ,
      3. O’Reilly ALR,
      4. Mekonnen R,
      5. Luan X,
      6. Localio R
      . Impact of kinship care on behavioral well-being for children in out-of-home care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(6):550–556
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Cywnar G
      . Kinship adoption: meeting the unique needs of a growing population. 2010. Available at: https://njarch.org/kinship-adoption-meeting-the-unique-needs-of-a-growing-population/. Accessed May 28, 2019
      1. Cuddeback GS
      . Kinship family foster care: a methodological and substantive synthesis of research. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2004;26(7):623–639
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Winokur M,
      2. Holtan A,
      3. Valentine D
      . Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD006546
      1. Monahan DJ,
      2. Smith CJ,
      3. Greene VL
      . Kinship caregivers: health and burden. J Fam Soc Work. 2013;16(5):392–402
      OpenUrl
    27. ↵
      1. Peterson TL
      . Changes in health perceptions among older grandparents raising adolescent grandchildren. Soc Work Public Health. 2017;32(6):394–406
      OpenUrl
    28. ↵
      1. Ehrle J,
      2. Geen R
      . Kin and non-kin foster care–findings from a national survey. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2002;24(1–2):15–35
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    29. ↵
      1. Rubin D,
      2. Springer SH,
      3. Zlotnik S,
      4. Kang-Yi CD; Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care
      . Needs of kinship care families and pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2017;139(4):e20170099
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      Generations United. In loving arms: the protective role of grandparents and other relatives in raising children exposed to trauma. 2017. Available at: https://www.gu.org/app/uploads/2018/05/Grandfamilies-Report-SOGF-2017.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2019
    31. ↵
      Child Welfare and Information Gateway. Working with kinship caregivers. 2012. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/kinship.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    32. ↵
      Annie E. Casey Foundation. What is kinship care? 2019. Available at: https://www.aecf.org/blog/what-is-kinship-care/. Accessed November 11, 2019
    33. ↵
      1. Webster D,
      2. Shlonsky A,
      3. Shaw T,
      4. Brookhart MA
      . The ties that bind II: reunification of siblings in out-of-home care using a statistical technique for examining non-independent observations. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2005;27(7):765–782
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    34. ↵
      1. Wulczyn F,
      2. Zimmerman E
      . Sibling placements in longitudinal perspective. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2005;27(7):741–763
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    35. ↵
      Child Welfare Information Gateway. Sibling issues in foster care and adoption. 2014. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/siblingissues.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    36. ↵
      1. Kernan E
      . Keeping siblings together: past, present, and future. 2006. Available at: https://youthlaw.org/publication/keeping-siblings-together-past-present-and-future/. Accessed May 10, 2019
    37. ↵
      1. Denby RW,
      2. Ayala J
      . Am I my brother’s keeper: adult siblings raising younger siblings. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2013;23(2):192–210
      OpenUrl
    38. ↵
      1. Sakai C,
      2. Lin H,
      3. Flores G
      . Health outcomes and family services in kinship care: analysis of a national sample of children in the child welfare system. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(2):159–165
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    39. ↵
      1. Lee E,
      2. Clarkson-Hendrix M,
      3. Lee Y
      . Parenting stress of grandparents and other kin as informal kinship caregivers: a mixed methods study. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016;69:29–38
      OpenUrl
    40. ↵
      1. Lofquist D,
      2. Lugaila T,
      3. O’Connell M,
      4. Feli S
      . Households and families: 2010. 2012. Available at: https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-14.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    41. ↵
      1. Jones J,
      2. Placek P
      . Adoption by the Numbers. Alexandria, VA: National Council For Adoption; 2017. Available at: https://www.adoptioncouncil.org/publications/2017/02/adoption-by-the-numbers. Accessed May 10, 2019
    42. ↵
      Bureau of Consular Affairs, US Department of State. Intercountry adoption. 2016. Available at: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption/adopt_ref/adoption-statistics.html. Accessed May 10, 2019
    43. ↵
      Children’s Bureau. Adoption data 2014. Available at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/resource/adoption-data-2014. Accessed May 10, 2019
    44. ↵
      Children’s Bureau, Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. New PSAs focus on the importance of adopting teenagers from foster care. 2017. Available at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/media/press/2017/new-psas-focus-on-the-importance-of-adopting-teenagers-from-foster-care. Accessed May 10, 2019
    45. ↵
      1. Child Welfare Information Gateway
      . Openness in Adoption: Building Relationships Between Adoptive and Birth Families. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau; 2013
    46. ↵
      1. Siegel DH
      . Open adoption of infants: adoptive parents’ feelings seven years later. Soc Work. 2003;48(3):409–419
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    47. ↵
      1. Appell AR
      . The open adoption option. Children’s Rights Litigation. 2010;13(1):8–12
      OpenUrl
    48. ↵
      Child Welfare Information Gateway. Postadoption contact agreements between birth and adoptive families. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/cooperative.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019
    49. ↵
      1. Muller U,
      2. Perry B
      . Adopted persons’ search for and contact with their birth parents. I: who searches and why? Adoption Q. 2001;44(3):5–37
      OpenUrl
    50. ↵
      1. Kirkpatrick BE,
      2. Rashkin MD
      . Ancestry testing and the practice of genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(1):6–20
      OpenUrl
    51. ↵
      1. Samuels J
      . Reframing adoptive family narratives through digital and social media technologies. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture. 2018;9(2):239–250
      OpenUrl
    52. ↵
      1. McWey LM,
      2. Acock A,
      3. Porter B
      . The impact of continued contact with biological parents upon the mental health of children in foster care. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32(10):1338–1345
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    53. ↵
      1. Clapton G
      . Close relations? The long-term outcomes of adoption reunions. Genealogy. 2018;2(4):41
      OpenUrl
    54. ↵
      1. Schulte EE,
      2. Michaelson RL
      . Caring for Your Adopted Child. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018
      1. Child Welfare Information Gateway
      . Access to Adoption Records. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau; 2016
    55. ↵
      1. Szilagyi MA,
      2. Rosen DS,
      3. Rubin D,
      4. Zlotnik S
      ; Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care; Committee on Adolescence; Council on Early Childhood. Health care issues for children and adolescents in foster care and kinship care. Pediatrics. 2015;136(4). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/136/4/e1142
    56. ↵
      1. Jones VF,
      2. Schulte E
      ; Committee On Early Childhood, Adoption, And Dependent Care. Comprehensive health evaluation of the newly adopted child. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/129/1/e214
    57. ↵
      1. Lange S,
      2. Shield K,
      3. Rehm J,
      4. Popova S
      . Prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in child care settings: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;132(4). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/132/4/e980
    58. ↵
      1. Chasnoff IJ,
      2. Wells AM,
      3. King L
      . Misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses in foster and adopted children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):264–270
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    59. ↵
      1. Beal SJ,
      2. Greiner MV
      . Children in nonparental care: health and social risks. Pediatr Res. 2016;79(1–2):184–190
      OpenUrlPubMed
    60. ↵
      1. Pullmann MD,
      2. Jacobson J,
      3. Parker E, et al
      . Tracing the pathway from mental health screening to services for children and youth in foster care. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018;89:340–354
      OpenUrl
    61. ↵
      1. Shonkoff JP,
      2. Garner AS
      ; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care; Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/129/1/e232
    62. ↵
      1. Garner AS,
      2. Shonkoff JP
      ; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care; Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. Early childhood adversity, toxic stress, and the role of the pediatrician: translating developmental science into lifelong health. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/129/1/e224
    63. ↵
      National Conference of State Legislators. Education and medical consent laws. 2017. Available at: www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/educational-and-medical-consent-laws.aspx. Accessed May 10, 2019
    64. ↵
      1. Strassburger Z
      . Medical decision-making for youth in the foster care system. John Marshall Law Rev. 2016;49(4):1103–1154
      OpenUrl
    65. ↵
      US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. HIPAA for professionals. 2017. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/index.html. Accessed May 10, 2019
    66. ↵
      American Academy of Pediatrics. Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care Web site. Available at: https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/Councils/Council-on-Foster-Care-Adoption-and-Kinship-Care/Pages/COFCAKC.aspx. Accessed January 28, 2020
    67. ↵
      1. American Academy of Pediatrics
      . Medical Evaluation of Internationally Adopted Children for Infectious Diseases. In: Kimberlin DW, Brady MT, Jackson MA, Long SS, eds. Red Book: 2018 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 31st ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018:191–203
    68. ↵
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
      . CDC Yellow Book 2020: Health Information for International Travel. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2018
    69. ↵
      1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Task Force for Mental Health
      . Addressing Mental Health Concerns in Primary Care: A Clinician’s Toolkit. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2010
    70. ↵
      1. American Academy of Pediatrics
      . Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. Elk Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2010
    71. ↵
      1. American Academy of Pediatrics
      . Adoption Medicine: Caring for Children and Families. Elk Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2014
    72. ↵
      Child Welfare Information Gateway. Adoption assistance by state. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/adoption/adopt-assistance/?CWIGFunctionsaction=adoptionByState:main.getAnswersByQuestion&questionID=12. Accessed May 10, 2019
    73. Child Welfare Information Gateway. Financial assistance for kinship caregivers: legal and financial information. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/outofhome/kinship/resourcesforcaregivers/legalinfo/. Accessed May 28, 2019
    74. ↵
      Child Welfare Information Gateway. Adoption assistance for children adopted from foster care. 2011. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubpdfs/f_subsid.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    75. ↵
      1. Child Welfare League of America
      . Social supports as (primary) maltreatment prevention. Available at: https://www.cwla.org/our-work/advocacy/family-community-support/social-supports-as-primary-maltreatment-prevention/. Accessed October 10, 2020
    76. ↵
      1. Generations United
      . Adoption and guardianship for children in kinship foster care. Available at: https://www.gu.org/resources/adoption-and-guardianship-for-children-in-kinship-foster-care/. Accessed October 10, 2020
    77. ↵
      American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care. Respectful ways to talk about adoption: a list of do’s & dont’s. 2015. Available at: https://www.healthychildren.org/English/family-life/family-dynamics/adoption-and-foster-care/Pages/Respectful-Ways-to-Talk-about-Adoption-A-List-of-Dos-Donts.aspx. Accessed May 10, 2019
    78. ↵
      AdoptiveFamlies. Positive Adoption Conversations: The Complete Guide to Talking About Adoption. New York, NY: Adoptive Families Magazine; 2015. Available at: https://www.adoptivefamilies.com/store/adoption-ebook/positive-adoption-conversations/. Accessed January 28, 2020
    79. ↵
      1. Keefer B,
      2. Schooler JE
      . Telling the Truth to Your Adopted or Foster Child: Making Sense of the Past. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey; 2000
    80. ↵
      1. Springer S
      ; American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care. Anticipatory guidance for pediatricians on addressing difficult adoption, foster care, & kinship care topics. 2016. Available at: https://www.aap.org/en-us/Documents/cofcakc_anticipatory_guidance.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2020
    81. ↵
      1. Springer S
      ; American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care. Talking with families about adoption, foster care & kinship care in the pediatrician’s office. 2016. Available at: https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/healthy-foster-care-america/Documents/TalkingWithFamilies.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2020
      1. Erikson EH
      . Identity and the Life Cycle. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company; 1994
    82. ↵
      1. Baxter C
      . Understanding adoption: a developmental approach. Paediatr Child Health. 2001;6(5):281–291
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Singer E
      . Children and Adoption The School Age Years (6-11). Burtonsville, MD: Center for Adoption Support and Education; 2016. Available at: https://adoptionsupport.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/02-The-School-Age-Years.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2020
      1. Berrier S
      . The effects of grief and loss on children in foster care. Fostering Perspectives. 2001;6(1). Available at: https://fosteringperspectives.org/fp_vol6no1/effects_griefloss_children.htm. Accessed January 28, 2020
      1. Forkey H,
      2. Garner A,
      3. Nalven L,
      4. Schilling S,
      5. Sterling J
      . Helping Foster and Adoptive Families Cope With Trauma. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics and Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption; 2015. Available at: https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/healthy-foster-care-america/Documents/Guide.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2020
    83. ↵
      1. Arnett JJ
      . Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469–480
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    84. ↵
      Child Welfare Information Gateway. Lifebooks. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/adoption/adopt-parenting/lifebooks/. Accessed November 20, 2019
    85. ↵
      Child Welfare Information Gateway. Impact of adoption on birth parents. 2013. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/f_impact/index.cfm. Accessed May 10, 2019
    86. ↵
      1. Edelstein SB,
      2. Burge D,
      3. Waterman J
      . Helping foster parents cope with separation, loss, and grief. Child Welfare. 2001;80(1):5–25
      OpenUrlPubMed
    87. ↵
      1. Williams D
      . Grief, loss, and separation: experiences of birth children of foster careers. Child Fam Soc Work. 2017;22(4):1448–1455
      OpenUrl
    88. ↵
      1. Clark KB,
      2. Clark MK
      . Segregation as a factor in the racial identification of Negro pre-school children: a preliminary report. J Exp Educ. 1939;8(2):161–163
      OpenUrl
      1. Clark KB,
      2. Clark MK
      . Skin color as a factor in racial identification of Negro preschool children. J Soc Psychol. 1940;11(1):159–169
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Quintana SM
      . Children’s developmental understanding of ethnicity and race. Appl Prev Psychol. 1998;7:27–45
      OpenUrl
      1. Singarajah A,
      2. Chanley J,
      3. Gutierrez Y, et al
      . Infant attention to same- and other-race faces. Cognition. 2017;159:76–84
      OpenUrl
    89. ↵
      1. Brodzinsky DM
      . Adoptive Identity and Children’s Understanding of Adoption: Implications for Pediatric Practice. In: Mason P, Johnson D, Albers Prock L, eds. Adoption Medicine: Caring for Children and Families. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2014
    90. ↵
      1. Ito-Gates J,
      2. Dariotos WM
      . Talking about race and racism. Available at: https://holtinternational.org/adoption/parent-training/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Talking-About-Race-and-Racism-have-permission-to-reprint.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2019
    91. ↵
      1. Anderson A,
      2. Douge J
      . Talking to children about racial bias. Available at: https://www.healthychildren.org/English/healthy-living/emotional-wellness/Building-Resilience/Pages/Talking-to-Children-About-Racial-Bias.aspx. Accessed November 20, 2019
    92. ↵
      1. Gates GJ
      . LGBT parenting in the United States. 2013. Available at: http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/LGBT-Parenting.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    93. ↵
      1. Gates GJ
      . Marriage and family: LGBT individuals and same-sex couples. Future Child. 2015;25(2):67–87
      OpenUrl
    94. ↵
      1. Gates GJ,
      2. Lee Badgett MV,
      3. Macomber JE,
      4. Chambers K
      . Adoption and Foster Care by Gay and Lesbian Parents in the United States. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and the Charles R. Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Policy; 2007. Available at: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/46401/411437-Adoption-and-Foster-Care-by-Lesbian-and-Gay-Parents-in-the-United-States.PDF. Accessed January 28, 2020
    95. ↵
      Family Equity Council. LGBTQ family fact Sheet. 2017. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/cac/nac/meetings/2017-11/LGBTQ-families-factsheet.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2020
    96. ↵
      1. Goldberg SK,
      2. Conron KJ
      . How many same-sex couples in the U.S. are raising children? 2018. Available at: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Parenting-Among-Same-Sex-Couples.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2019
    97. ↵
      1. Perrin EC; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health
      . Technical report: coparent or second-parent adoption by same-sex parents. Pediatrics. 2002;109(2):341–344
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    98. ↵
      1. Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health
      . Coparent or second-parent adoption by same-sex parents. Pediatrics. 2002;109(2):339–340
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    99. ↵
      1. Perrin EC,
      2. Siegel BS
      ; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Promoting the well-being of children whose parents are gay or lesbian. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/131/4/e1374
    100. ↵
      1. Cody PA,
      2. Farr RH,
      3. McRoy RG,
      4. Ayers-Lopez SJ,
      5. Lesdesma KJ
      . Youth perspectives on being adopted from foster care by lesbian and gay parents: implications for families and adoption professionals. Adoption Q. 2017;20(1):98–118
      OpenUrl
    101. ↵
      National Working Group on Foster Care and Education. Fostering success in education: national factsheet on the educational outcomes of children in foster care. 2018. Available at: https://foster-ed.org/fostering-success-in-education-national-factsheet-on-the-educational-outcomes-of-children-in-foster-care/. Accessed January 28, 2020
    102. ↵
      1. Courtney ME,
      2. Dworsky A,
      3. Ruth G,
      4. Keller TE,
      5. Havlicek J,
      6. Bost N
      . Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youths: outcomes at age 19. 2005. Available at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=socwork_fac. Accessed November 21, 2019
    103. ↵
      1. Metzler M,
      2. Merrick MT,
      3. Klevens J,
      4. Ports KA,
      5. Ford DC
      . Adverse childhood experiences and life opportunities: shifting the narrative. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;72:141–149
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    104. ↵
      1. Fantuzzo JW,
      2. Perlman SM,
      3. Dobbins EK
      . Types and timing of child maltreatment and early school success: a population-based investigation. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33:140–144
      OpenUrl
    105. ↵
      1. Klein S
      . Benefits of Early Care and Education for Children in the Child Welfare System. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2016
    106. ↵
      1. Kovan N,
      2. Mishra S,
      3. Susman-Stillman A,
      4. Piescher KN,
      5. LaLiberte T
      . Differences in the early care and education needs of young children involved in child protection. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;46:139–145
      OpenUrl
      1. Lipscomb ST,
      2. Schmitt SA,
      3. Pratt M,
      4. Acock A,
      5. Pears KC
      . Living in non-parental care moderates effects of prekindergarten experiences on externalizing behavior problems in school. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;40:41–50
      OpenUrl
    107. ↵
      1. Merritt DH,
      2. Klein S
      . Do early care and education services improve language development for maltreated children? Evidence from a national child welfare sample. Child Abuse Negl. 2015;39:185–196
      OpenUrl
    108. ↵
      University of Washington. What is the difference between an IEP and a 504 plan? 2018. Available at: https://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/what-difference-between-iep-and-504-plan. Accessed May 10, 2019
    109. ↵
      1. Styles KM,
      2. Yudin MK
      . Guidance on the amendments to the family educational rights and privacy act by the Uninterrupted Scholars Act. Available at: https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/uninterrupted-scholars-act-guidance.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2020
    110. ↵
      1. Barraso A,
      2. Parker K,
      3. Fry R
      . Majority of Americans say parents are doing too much for their young adult children. 2019. Available at: https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2019/10/23/majority-of-americans-say-parents-are-doing-too-much-for-their-young-adult-children/. Accessed November 15, 2019
    111. ↵
      1. Fowler PJ,
      2. Marcal KE,
      3. Zhang J,
      4. Day O,
      5. Landsverk J
      . Homelessness and aging out of foster care: a national comparison of child welfare-involved adolescents. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;77:27–33
      OpenUrl
    112. ↵
      1. Courtney ME,
      2. Dworsky A,
      3. Cusick GR,
      4. Havlicek J,
      5. Perez A,
      6. Keller T
      . Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: outcomes at age 21. 2007. Available at: https://www.chapinhall.org/wp-content/uploads/Midwest-Eval-Outcomes-at-Age-21.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    113. ↵
      1. Courtney M,
      2. Dworsky A,
      3. Brown A,
      4. Cary C,
      5. Love K,
      6. Vorhies V
      . Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Age 26. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago; 2011. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264883847_Midwest_Evaluation_of_the_Adult_Functioning_of_Former_Foster_Youth_Outcomes_at_Age_26. Accessed May 10, 2019
    114. ↵
      1. Fowler PJ,
      2. Toro PA,
      3. Miles BW
      . Pathways to and from homelessness and associated psychosocial outcomes among adolescents leaving the foster care system. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(8):1453–1458
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    115. ↵
      US Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children. Youth and families. Independent living initiatives. Available at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/pi8701.pdf. Accessed November 21, 2019
    116. ↵
      1. Fernandes-Alcantara AL
      . Youth transitioning from foster care: background and federal programs. 2016. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34499.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    117. ↵
      1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families
      . Children's Bureau. Extension of foster care beyond age 18. 2017. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/extensionfc.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2020
    118. ↵
      1. Dworsky A,
      2. Courtney M
      . Does extending foster care beyond age 18 promote postsecondary educational attainment? 2010. Available at: https://www.chapinhall.org/wp-content/uploads/Midwest_IB1_Educational_Attainment.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2020
    119. ↵
      1. Courtney ME,
      2. Hook JL
      . The potential educational benefits of extending foster care to young adults: findings from a natural experiment. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;72:124–132
      OpenUrl
    120. ↵
      1. Hook JL,
      2. Courtney ME
      . Employment outcomes of former foster youth as young adults: the importance of human, personal, and social capital. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;3310:1855–1865
      OpenUrl
    121. ↵
      1. Thompson HM,
      2. Wojciak AS,
      3. Cooley ME
      . The experience with independent living services for youth in care and those formerly in care. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018;84:17–25
      OpenUrl
    122. ↵
      Child Welfare Information Gateway. Helping youth transition to adulthood: guidance for foster parents. 2013. Available at: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/youth_transition.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    123. ↵
      1. Pecora PJ,
      2. Kessler RC,
      3. Williams J, et al
      . Improving Family Foster Care: Findings from the Northwest Foster Care Alumni Study. The Foster Care Alumni Studies. Seattle, WA: Casey Family Programs; 2005. Available at: https://caseyfamilypro-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/media/AlumniStudies_NW_Report_ES.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2019
    124. ↵
      1. Keyes MA,
      2. Malone SM,
      3. Sharma A,
      4. Iacono WG,
      5. McGue M
      . Risk of suicide attempt in adopted and nonadopted offspring. Pediatrics. 2013;132(4):639–646
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    125. ↵
      1. Jaudes P; Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care and Committee on Early Childhood
      . Health care of youth aging out of foster care. Pediatrics. 2012;130(6):1170–1173
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    126. ↵
      1. Stolzfus E,
      2. Baumrucker EP,
      3. Fernandes-Alcantara AL,
      4. Fernandez B
      . Child welfare: Health care needs of children in foster care and related federal issues. Available at: https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R42378.html. Accessed January 28, 2020
    127. ↵
      1. McManus M,
      2. White P,
      3. Harwood C
      ; National Alliance to Advance Adolescent Health. 2017 coding and reimbursement tip sheet for transition from pediatric to adult health care. Available at: www.gottransition.org/resourceGet.cfm?id=352. 2017. Accessed May 10, 2019
    128. ↵
      1. Herz D,
      2. Lee P,
      3. Lutz L,
      4. Stewart M,
      5. Tuell J,
      6. Wig J
      . Addressing the Needs of Multi-System Youth: Strengthening the Connection Between Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform-Georgetown University, Robert F. Kennedy Children’s Action Corp; 2012
    129. ↵
      1. Herz DC,
      2. Ryan JP,
      3. Bilchik S
      . Challenges facing crossover youth: an examination of juvenile-justice decision-making and recidivism. Fam Court Rev. 2010;48(2):305–321
      OpenUrl
    130. ↵
      1. Ryan JP,
      2. Testa MF
      . Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: investigating the role of placement and placement instability. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2005;27(3):227–249
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    131. ↵
      1. Sarri RC,
      2. Stoffregen E,
      3. Ryan JP
      . Running away from child welfare placements: justice system entry risk. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016;67:191–197
      OpenUrl
    132. ↵
      1. Vidal S,
      2. Prince D,
      3. Connell CM,
      4. Caron CM,
      5. Kaufman JS,
      6. Tebes JK
      . Maltreatment, family environment, and social risk factors: Determinants of the child welfare to juvenile justice transition among maltreated children and adolescents. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;63:7–18
      OpenUrl
    133. ↵
      1. Marshall JM,
      2. Haight WL
      . Understanding racial disproportionality affecting African American Youth who cross over from the child welfare to the juvenile justice system: communication, power, race and social class. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;42:82–90
      OpenUrl
    134. ↵
      1. Borduin CM
      . Multisystemic treatment of criminality and violence in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38(3):242–249
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    135. ↵
      1. Jones T,
      2. McMahon J
      . Tips for preventing delinquent behavior. Fostering Perspectives. 2014;18(2). Available at: http://fosteringperspectives.org/fpv18n2/tips.htm. Accessed January 28, 2020
    136. ↵
      1. Shpiegel S
      . Resilience among older adolescents in foster care: the impact of risk and protective factors. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2016;14:6–22
      OpenUrl
    137. ↵
      1. Yates TM,
      2. Grey IK
      . Adapting to aging out: profiles of risk and resilience among emancipated foster youth. Dev Psychopathol. 2012;24(2):475–492
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    138. ↵
      1. Collins ME,
      2. Spencer R,
      3. Ward R
      . Supporting youth in the transition from foster care: formal and informal connections. Child Welfare. 2010;89(1):125–143
      OpenUrlPubMed
    • Copyright © 2020 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 146, Issue 6
    1 Dec 2020
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Pediatrician Guidance in Supporting Families of Children Who Are Adopted, Fostered, or in Kinship Care
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Pediatrician Guidance in Supporting Families of Children Who Are Adopted, Fostered, or in Kinship Care
    Veronnie F. Jones, Elaine E. Schulte, Douglas Waite, COUNCIL ON FOSTER CARE, ADOPTION, AND KINSHIP CARE
    Pediatrics Dec 2020, 146 (6) e2020034629; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-034629

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Pediatrician Guidance in Supporting Families of Children Who Are Adopted, Fostered, or in Kinship Care
    Veronnie F. Jones, Elaine E. Schulte, Douglas Waite, COUNCIL ON FOSTER CARE, ADOPTION, AND KINSHIP CARE
    Pediatrics Dec 2020, 146 (6) e2020034629; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-034629
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • The Faces of Child Welfare in the United States
      • Legislation Supporting the Care of Children in Foster Care and Adoption
      • Kinship Care
      • Adoption and Permanency
      • Medical Issues
      • Communicating With Children and Adolescents About Placement and Permanency
      • Loss, Grief, and Trauma Associated With Foster Care Placement
      • Family Differences
      • Educational Challenges
      • Transition Care to Adulthood: Barriers and Opportunities
      • The Last Word: Resilience
      • Key Points and Recommendations of Clinical Report
      • Resources
      • Lead Authors
      • Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care Executive Committee, 2018–2020
      • Liaisons
      • Staff
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Health Disparities in Tobacco Use and Exposure: A Structural Competency Approach
    • Management Principles for Acute Illness in Patients With Medium-Chain Acyl-Coenzyme A Dehydrogenase Deficiency
    • Child Life Services
    Show more From the American Academy of Pediatrics

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Current Policy
    • AAP Policy Collections by Authoring Entities
      • Council on Foster Care, Adoption and Kinship Care
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics