Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Commentary

Still More to Understand in the Intersection Between Gender Diversity and Sexual Development

Jason Rafferty
Pediatrics December 2020, 146 (6) e2020028514; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-028514
Jason Rafferty
Thundermist Health Center, Woonsocket, Rhode Island; Hasbro Children’s Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; and Emma Pendleton Bradley Hospital, East Providence, Rhode Island
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF
  • Abbreviations:
    GAS —
    gender affirming surgery
    GAT —
    gender affirmative treatment
    TGD —
    transgender and gender diverse
  • The intersection between gender identity and sexuality is complicated. In gender affirmative treatment (GAT), care is approached by listening to the youth, with the input of their parents and caregivers, to best understand how to affirm and validate their gender identity and expression in the context of their health and development.1 It may include any of the following: social interventions (eg, by using asserted name and pronouns), pubertal suppression, hormone treatment, or gender affirming surgery (GAS), with psychosocial support provided throughout.2 Although empirical support of GAT is growing, the literature often minimizes the fundamental, dynamic connection between intimate relationships and one’s sense of self. For example, intimate activities may be adapted to overcome or avoid gender dysphoria associated with certain sexual parts. Traditional labels (gay, straight, bisexual, etc) may be seen as inadequate and too restrictive given evolving identities. One’s gender label may influence power dynamics and roles in the relationship. Developmentally, young people are navigating these challenges with gender identity and sexuality simultaneously in a process that is not well understood or supported by medical providers.

    In this month’s issue of Pediatrics, Bungener et al2 examined sexual behaviors among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth during and after GAT. They reviewed previous research suggesting that at the time of referral, before any intervention, TGD youth had fallen in love, formed relationships, and engaged in sexual contact at lower rates than their cisgender peers. By adulthood, trends in sexual activity and satisfaction are less clear.2 Bungener et al2 specifically assessed sexual experiences among young adults, from 18 to 26 years old, who had all undergone puberty suppression, affirming hormones (estrogen or testosterone), and GAS.

    Bungener et al2 found an increase in nearly all sexual experiences from those recalled during GAT (presurgery) to those reported postsurgery. Transwomen demonstrated the largest increases in experiences that involved their own genitals (intercourse, receptive oral intercourse, receptive manual intercourse, and masturbation), whereas transmen had the strongest increases in sexual behaviors that involved them touching their own genitals (receptive oral intercourse and receptive manual intercourse). This is in contrast to the finding that, before GAS, the majority of TGD youth only touched their partner’s genitals. Despite these increases in experiences, TGD youth were generally underexperienced sexually when compared with a representative sample of Dutch youth.2 Overall, this supports the necessity of GAT not only in validating one’s sense of self but also in fostering interpersonal and intimate relationships.

    TGD youth and their parents commonly fear a future of loneliness, victimization, and difficulty in romantic relationships.3 However, ad hoc analysis revealed all TGD youth in the study value sex, love, and relationships and, with GAT, can be moderately to very satisfied with their sexual behaviors. Most reported having had a partner and high levels of sexual competency and assertiveness.2

    There are a number of important considerations from their work that could help expand future research on the sexual lives of TGD youth. Attribution bias is possible from the sizeable drop-out rate, reducing the sample size from 113 (38 transwomen and 75 transmen) to 91 (unclear differentiation) youth, largely because of unreturned questionnaires or refusal to participate. It is unclear why some were reluctant to respond or participate.

    Bungener et al2 grouped TGD youth into transmale and transfemale categories, presumably on the basis of rejection of gender assigned at birth and/or their specific GAT. Therefore, these are researcher prescribed labels that carry important assumptions. These labels fail to recognize the complexity of gender diversity beyond a male and female binary, particularly the unique contributions of less represented and understood groups, such as nonbinary, agender, and genderqueer populations. Such groups are likely to struggle considerably against stereotypical assumptions about relationships and sex. It is also important to recognize that gender identity also cannot be determined by using specific GAT interventions.4–6 For example, a person assigned as male at birth may choose to go on estradiol and have a mastectomy but may still assert as a feminine male or something other than transfemale. A self-asserted label would be more accurate and inclusive and is likely to be a better indicator of patterns in relationships and sexual behaviors.

    There is no prescribed path or sequence of interventions that constitutes appropriate GAT. Bungener et al2 included participants who, like many TGD youth, start with pubertal suppression and hormones and progress to a “final step” of GAS. Although that path may be true of many TGD youth, there are important exceptions, including many individuals who are nonbinary,4,5 who need to be identified and included to truly understand gender diversity and relationships.

    Bungener et al2 referred to the participants as having received “early” GAT, but puberty suppression and hormones can be started much earlier at the onset of puberty, when indicated.7,8 The mean age at referral was nearly 15 years old, ranging from 10 to nearly 18 years old. In general, pubertal onset in children is 8 to 10 years old, with completion usually within 3 to 5 years.9 This means that a majority of youth referred to start GAT in this study had full or nearly complete development of secondary sex characteristics before the onset of GAT, which may have influenced the need for GAS and increased sexual experiences postoperatively. TGD youth who start pubertal suppression at pubertal onset and later pursue affirming hormones develop a physical appearance more in line with their asserted gender, often without the need for certain GAS.10 They also have improved mental health outcomes.8 Expanding on this study, it will be important to assess whether the increase in sexual experiences is truly related to GAS or if the experience is any different for youth who start earlier and may not need certain GAS.

    Bungener et al2 provide an important contribution to TGD health care, emphasizing the importance of GAT on the sexual health and development of TGD youth, while also dispelling myths. It is a necessity to expand on these findings by including TGD youth who present earlier and increasingly with nonbinary identities to not only further understand gender diversity but also challenge conventional conceptions of sexual attraction and relationships.

    Footnotes

      • Accepted September 22, 2020.
    • Address correspondence to Jason Rafferty, MD, MPH, EdM, Department of Pediatrics, Thundermist Health Center, 450 Clinton St, Woonsocket, RI 02895. E-mail: jason_rafferty{at}mail.harvard.edu
    • Opinions expressed in these commentaries are those of the author and not necessarily those of the American Academy of Pediatrics or its Committees.

    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The author has indicated he has no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: No external funding.

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The author has indicated he has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    • COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2019-1411.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Hidalgo MA,
      2. Ehrensaft D,
      3. Tishelman AC, et al
      . The gender affirmative model: what we know and what we aim to learn. Hum Development. 2013;56(5):285–290
      OpenUrl
    2. ↵
      1. Bungener SL,
      2. de Vries ALC,
      3. Popma A,
      4. Steensma TD
      . Sexual experiences of young transgender persons during and after gender affirmative treatment. Pediatrics. 2020;146(6):e20191411
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Chen D,
      2. Hidalgo MA,
      3. Garofalo R
      . Parental perceptions of emotional and behavioral difficulties among prepubertal gender-nonconforming children. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2017;5(4):342–352
      OpenUrl
    4. ↵
      1. Scandurra C,
      2. Mezza F,
      3. Maldonato NM, et al
      . Health of non-binary and genderqueer people: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1453
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Frohard-Dourlent H,
      2. Dobson S,
      3. Clark BA,
      4. Doull M,
      5. Saewyc EM
      . “I would have preferred more options”: accounting for non-binary youth in health research. Nurs Inq. 2017;24(1):e12150
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Vlot MC,
      2. Klink DT,
      3. den Heijer M,
      4. Blankenstein MA,
      5. Rotteveel J,
      6. Heijboer AC
      . Effect of pubertal suppression and cross-sex hormone therapy on bone turnover markers and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) in transgender adolescents. Bone. 2017;95:11–19
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Hembree WC,
      2. Cohen-Kettenis PT,
      3. Gooren L, et al
      . Endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(11):3869–3903
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Turban JL,
      2. King D,
      3. Carswell JM,
      4. Keuroghlian AS
      . Pubertal suppression for transgender youth and risk of suicidal ideation. Pediatrics. 2020;145(2):e20191725
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Alotaibi MF
      . Physiology of puberty in boys and girls and pathological disorders affecting its onset. J Adolesc. 2019;71:63–71
      OpenUrl
    10. ↵
      1. Mahfouda S,
      2. Moore JK,
      3. Siafarikas A,
      4. Zepf FD,
      5. Lin A
      . Puberty suppression in transgender children and adolescents. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(10):816–826
      OpenUrl
    • Copyright © 2020 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 146, Issue 6
    1 Dec 2020
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Still More to Understand in the Intersection Between Gender Diversity and Sexual Development
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Still More to Understand in the Intersection Between Gender Diversity and Sexual Development
    Jason Rafferty
    Pediatrics Dec 2020, 146 (6) e2020028514; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-028514

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Still More to Understand in the Intersection Between Gender Diversity and Sexual Development
    Jason Rafferty
    Pediatrics Dec 2020, 146 (6) e2020028514; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-028514
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Addressing Health Inequities for Limited English Proficiency Patients: Interpreter Use and Beyond
    • Progress in Helping Children Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Achieve Their Potential
    • Is Developmental Screening Enough in High-Risk Populations?
    Show more Commentaries

    Similar Articles

    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics