Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Article

Neurologic Outcome After Prematurity: Perspectives of Parents and Clinicians

Monica E. Lemmon, Hanna Huffstetler, Mary Carol Barks, Christine Kirby, Madelaine Katz, Peter A. Ubel, Sharron L. Docherty and Debra Brandon
Pediatrics July 2019, 144 (1) e20183819; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3819
Monica E. Lemmon
aDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine,
bDuke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanna Huffstetler
bDuke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Carol Barks
bDuke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Kirby
bDuke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madelaine Katz
bDuke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter A. Ubel
cFuqua School of Business, Sanford School of Public Policy, School of Medicine,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharron L. Docherty
aDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine,
dSchool of Nursing, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra Brandon
aDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine,
dSchool of Nursing, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Infant and Maternal Characteristics

    Characteristicsn (%) or median (range)
    Infant (N = 10a)
     Gestational age, wk, median (range)23 (23–26)
     Sepsis, n (%)6 (60)
     Intraventricular hemorrhage, n (%)4 (40)
     Necrotizing enterocolitis, n (%)2 (20)
     Death, n (%)3 (30)
    Parent (N = 16)
     Mother, n (%)9 (56)
     Father, n (%)7 (44)
     Age, y, median (range)26 (19–35)
    Race and/or ethnicity, n (%)
     White5 (31)
     African American9 (56)
     American Indian2 (13)
    Level of education, n (%)
     High school or less12 (75)
     Some postgraduate education4 (25)
    Annual income, $, n (%)
     <15 0002 (12.5)
     15 000–25 0006 (37.5)
     26 000–50 0004 (25)
     51 000–75 0004 (25)
    • ↵a One case included a set of twins.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Clinician Characteristics

    Characteristics (N = 53)n (%)
    Attending physician16 (30)
    Fellow5 (9)
    Social worker10 (19)
    Nurse practitioner7 (13)
    Registered nurse15 (28)
    Race and/or ethnicity
     White46 (87)
     African American1 (2)
     Hispanic6 (11)
    Sex
     Male13 (25)
     Female40 (75)
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Theme 1: Parents and Clinicians Discuss and Value Prognostic Information Differently From Each Other When Considering Care Decisions for Infants

    Parent discussion of prognosis
     “That it is a hard road. It is a journey. And she could have a point where she just goes downhill, which, that’s okay. She [the clinician] tells us the outcome, what to expect. From her, you know it’s going to be a hard road, you know that this isn’t going to be easy, and she believes that [the child]’s going to make it.” (Mother, case 7)
     “I can’t get cocky, and be like, 'This is going to be fine,' because whatever is going to happen is going to happen, no matter how I feel. I realize that. I don’t have control over what’s going to happen to her.” (Mother, case 2)
     “I’m just going to keep the faith and keep praying that what’s supposed to happen is going to happen. I know my little girl is going to be here. I’m just hoping my little girl continues her fight and she wins. Regardless of how everything looks to the naked eye, my baby girl is fighting. You hear me?” (Mother, case 3)
     “[I hope] that she can catch up with the babies her age. Some babies catch on; some babies take longer than others. And just, that’s it. Basically, ain’t nothing really.” (Mother, case 6)
     “I know they’re [the medical team] here to do what they can, but deep down, He’s [God] the only one that can save her. I just left everything in His hands from here on out because whatever happens, happens. But I feel really good that she’s going to come home in December. She’s going to come home.” (Mother, case 9)
    Clinician discussion of prognosis
     “She may not hear, she may not see, she would end up with cerebral palsy more than likely, or she would not be able to move at all. He [the neonatologist] gave them the worst possible scenario. He gave them percentages with the kind of brain damage that she had. …I think he said somewhere in the 70%–80% would have severe neurologic deficits.” (Nurse practitioner, case 7)
     “It’s a combination of things, I guess. Twenty-two to 23 [weeks’ gestational age] under the best of circumstances have a difficult time. The mortality is high, and the side effects are also high, a 22- to 23-weeker with a grade IV bleed, hypotension requiring dopamine, epinephrine, vasopressin, hydrocortisone… I think it puts that child at, the chance[s] of that child having a normal or near-normal neurologic outcome are dismally small…30% mortality rate in that group here.” (Neonatologist, case 1)
     “When some of these babies have bilateral grade 4 bleeds, they have no hope of having any kind of real quality of life, and we know this, the literature supports this. One hundred percent of kids with bilateral grade 4 bleeds long-term don’t do well.” (Neonatologist, case 6)
     “I just hope that [the child] continues on as well as she has. I mean she’s really almost…I hate to say, ‘miracle baby,’ but you know, really, I mean, from what the anticipated outcome was, she’s really exceeded a lot of expectations.” (Social worker, case 8)
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Theme 2: Barriers and Facilitators to a Shared Understanding of Infant Outcome

    Clinicians perceived parents did not or could not understand prognostic information
     “My impression of them was that they were in shock. It just seems like nothing was real to them. They seemed in shock. You would tell them something, and you could see that you were telling them something, but definitely the message wasn’t always getting through.” (Nurse, case 1)
     “I think the staff, generally, here gets concerned if they feel that the plan of care, either that the parents aren’t informed or that the parents don’t understand, which is a different thing and that may not be true, the parents may understand and be choosing differently than we wish they would choose.” (Social worker, case 3)
     “Even if I tell parents it’s going to take 4 or 5 months of them being in the hospital, it’s very hard to conceive. [The mother is] focusing a lot on small things, and I was telling her today, the sodium being down, 'Well, the sodium is down today, it’s up tomorrow, it’s down the next day.' …I think they’re not concentrating on the big picture because they don’t understand the degree of this, what’s going on. And they’re concentrating on the sodium.” (Neonatologist, case 7)
    Parents valued consistent therapeutic relationships
     “I think, to her, the primaries [are] important ‘cause they know [the child]; they’ve been working with her long enough, and they know what she needs and what makes her comfortable.” (Father, case 7)
     “For the most part, when you get the same nurses all the time that we’re happy with, it’s good. …And they know her. They know she doesn’t like to lay this way or that way…and all the little things about her.” (Father, case 2)
     “Now he’s on the [other] team, and the advantage of that is that the attending will also be the one that does his follow-ups, so I think it’s good that they get to know him now because that’s who he’ll be seeing with his follow-ups.” (Mother, case 4)
    Clinical uncertainty forced parents and clinicians to wait and see about the future
     “We’ll never feel secure until we’re home with him…and probably then won’t even feel secure until he’s bigger. You know? It’s just, it’s very scary. He’s doing well, he’s stable, but to me, that doesn’t mean anything. So, it’s a scary place to be very uncertain. And [there is] nothing that I can do can change it.” (Mother, case 4)
     “They said it looks pretty good for her, that we have to take 1 day at a time. You never know what can happen. …You get nervous walking back there to see what they’re going to say today.” (Mother, case 1)
     “They just, you know, they said it’s going to be a rocky road over the next bit of time. So, you know, it’s hour by hour, day by day.” (Father, case 2)
     “It’s very hard to predict the future. That’s why I try to stay away [from] that. …And I think the fellows, for instance, I was telling them that you cannot apply that. You cannot guess because…kids are miracles walking, grade 4 that you see in the follow-up clinic that are perfect, go to school and learn. So, you can never predict. There are some cases, though, that are devastating.” (Neonatologist, case 1)
     “There’s always a little bit of uncertainty. You can’t say 100%, ‘I know he’s not going to survive,’ you have to say, ‘I’ve never seen a baby in his condition survive. Even if he did survive, he would have to go through a huge amount, and is it worth putting him through that for, you know, a 1%, or 2%, or 10% chance of survival?’ And that’s hard.” (Neonatologist, case 8)
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics
Vol. 144, Issue 1
1 Jul 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neurologic Outcome After Prematurity: Perspectives of Parents and Clinicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Neurologic Outcome After Prematurity: Perspectives of Parents and Clinicians
Monica E. Lemmon, Hanna Huffstetler, Mary Carol Barks, Christine Kirby, Madelaine Katz, Peter A. Ubel, Sharron L. Docherty, Debra Brandon
Pediatrics Jul 2019, 144 (1) e20183819; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-3819

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Neurologic Outcome After Prematurity: Perspectives of Parents and Clinicians
Monica E. Lemmon, Hanna Huffstetler, Mary Carol Barks, Christine Kirby, Madelaine Katz, Peter A. Ubel, Sharron L. Docherty, Debra Brandon
Pediatrics Jul 2019, 144 (1) e20183819; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-3819
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Breastfeeding Mothers
  • Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Studies Funded Under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act
  • Clinical Impact of a Diagnostic Gastrointestinal Panel in Children
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Fetus/Newborn Infant
    • Fetus/Newborn Infant
    • Neonatology
  • Children With Special Health Care Needs
    • Children With Special Health Care Needs
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Open Access
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
  • RSS
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics