Advertising Disclaimer »

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

Article

Intellectual Disability in Children Conceived Using Assisted Reproductive Technology

Michele Hansen, Kathryn R. Greenop, Jenny Bourke, Gareth Baynam, Roger J. Hart and Helen Leonard
Pediatrics December 2018, 142 (6) e20181269; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1269
Download PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether children conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) have a higher risk of intellectual disability (ID) compared with non–ART-conceived children and describe known causes of ID in these groups.

METHODS: We linked ID and ART data from population-based registers in Western Australia. Our cohort included live births from 1994 to 2002 (n = 210 627) with at least 8 years of follow-up. The prevalence of ID was compared between ART- and non–ART-conceived children, and risk of ID was estimated using Poisson regression with robust SEs. We also stratified by plurality and gestation at delivery.

RESULTS: Children conceived using ART had a small increased risk of ID (risk ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval 1.19–2.11) even when analyses were restricted to singleton births (risk ratio 1.56; 95% confidence interval 1.10–2.21). The risk of ID was more than doubled for those born very preterm, for severe ID, and after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments. Children conceived using ICSI had a greater risk of ID than those conceived using in vitro fertilization and were more likely to have a known genetic cause for ID (27.6% vs 12.9% in vitro fertilization and 11.9% non-ART).

CONCLUSIONS: The risk of ID was increased in children born after ART in Western Australia from 1994 to 2002. More recent cohorts should be examined to assess the impact of important changes in ART clinical practice. Our results are particularly pertinent because multiple embryo transfers are routinely performed in many countries, increasing the risk of preterm birth, and ICSI use rates are high.

  • Abbreviations:
    ART —
    assisted reproductive technology
    BD —
    birth defect
    CI —
    confidence interval
    HOM —
    higher-order multiple
    ICSI —
    intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    ID —
    intellectual disability
    IDEA —
    Intellectual Disability Exploring Answers
    IVF —
    in vitro fertilization
    LB —
    live birth
    PHI —
    private health insurance
    RR —
    risk ratio
    SES —
    socioeconomic status
    SET —
    single embryo transfer
    WARDA —
    Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies

    • What’s Known on This Subject:

    Evidence from high-quality population-based studies examining the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and intellectual disability (ID) is conflicting. The risk to the child may differ according to the treatment undertaken and be mediated by prematurity and multiple births.

    What This Study Adds:

    The risk of ID was increased in children conceived using ART, particularly severe ID, in very preterm births and subsequent to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. We provide the first detailed description of known causes of ID in ART-conceived children.

    Intellectual disability (ID) is a lifelong condition that includes difficulty with cognition, learning, communication, memory, problem solving, and judgment with significant implications for the individual and his or her family.1,2 For many, there is no clear cause for the condition. In Western Australia, the prevalence of ID in children born between 1983 and 2005 was 17.0 per 1000 live births (LBs),2 up from an earlier estimate of 14.3 per 1000 for children born between 1983 and 1992,3 mostly because of an increasing prevalence of mild or moderate ID.

    Assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments have increased in use since their inception ∼40 years ago. Standard in vitro fertilization (IVF) involves controlled ovarian stimulation followed by oocyte collection, fertilization, embryo maturation, and the transfer of 1 or more embryos to the uterus.4 Embryos may be transferred fresh or frozen for later use. A common treatment variation is intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), in which 1 sperm is directly injected into the oocyte. In Australia, ∼4.3% of children are conceived using ART5,6; this may increase with trends toward delayed childbearing, increasing obesity, and falling sperm counts.6–8

    ART may be associated with a higher risk of ID through several pathways. ART procedures may interfere with epigenetic processes in the developing embryo, resulting in abnormalities that lead to ID.9 ART treatment, underlying fertility problems, and the age and/or health of the couples seeking treatment may also increase the risk of ID by promoting increased risks of pregnancy complications, adverse perinatal outcomes, and birth defects (BDs), which in turn have a greater risk of neurologic sequelae.10–15 There are few population-based studies of the association between ART and ID, and their results are conflicting. A recent systematic review16 revealed many methodological issues affecting previous research in this area, including the often deliberate exclusion of children who are at high risk of ID (multiples and those born preterm) and the lack of data on children aged >5 years. This review concluded that high-quality studies do not reveal an increased risk of cognitive impairment after IVF conception, but questions remain about children who are conceived using ICSI.16

    In this study, we use population-based health and disability data to investigate whether ART-conceived children have a higher risk of ID compared with non–ART-conceived children. Subanalyses were used to compare specific ART procedures (IVF, ICSI, and fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer) and ID severity. We describe known causes of ID and the presence of pregnancy and/or birth complications and coexisting conditions in children with ID of unknown cause.

    Methods

    Study Population

    This retrospective population-based cohort study included LBs from 1994 to 2002 in Western Australia. ART was defined as children conceived by using standard IVF or ICSI. Data on all children with ID were obtained from the population-based Intellectual Disability Exploring Answers (IDEA) database.1 Cases in this register are ascertained from the state-governed Disability Services Commission and the public education system (for children with ID who receive education support). Criteria for inclusion are a full IQ score of <70 and deficits in adaptive functioning with evidence of developmental delay before 18 years of age. For Disability Services Commission–ascertained cases, information is available about the main cause of ID assigned by physicians and recorded in the IDEA database using the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (formerly the American Association on Mental Retardation) classification system.17,18 Diagnoses of ID to December 2010 were included, giving at least 8 years of follow-up for all children in the cohort. IDEA database records were linked to 4 other data sources: (1) the Midwives Notification System, a statutory collection of antenatal and perinatal data on all Western Australian births from 20 weeks’ gestation (or ≥400 g); (2) the Reproductive Technology Register, a statutory collection of treatment data from Western Australian fertility clinics; (3) the Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies (WARDA), in which data on BDs diagnosed up to 6 years of age (major or minor classification and the exclusion list are available on the King Edward Memorial Hospital Web site19) and diagnoses of cerebral palsy20 are collected; and (4) the Registry of Deaths (linkage with this data set was updated in March 2016). Data were linked by the Western Australian Health Department Data Linkage Branch using probabilistic matching and deidentified for provision to researchers. Ethical approval was obtained from the Western Australian Department of Health Human Research Ethics Committee (2011/80).

    Figure 1 describes the children excluded from our cohort. These comprised (1) Aboriginal births because they represented <0.5% of our ART cohort (versus 6% of non-ART births) and are at increased risk of ID2; (2) births conceived by using gamete intrafallopian transfer (n = 178; 1 with ID), partial zona dissection, and subzonal insemination (n = 15; no ID), which are too few in number to allow for meaningful comparisons; (3) children who died before the age of 7 years without a diagnosis of ID (N = 1056) because some diagnoses may not be made until a child attends school (the characteristics of children who were excluded for this reason are presented in Supplemental Table 6); and (4) children with a known postneonatal cause for ID (eg, postnatal injury [N = 31]).

    FIGURE 1
    FIGURE 1

    Flowchart of exclusions from the Western Australian Midwives Notification of Births system (LBs; 1994–2002). a Eight cases (all non-ART) were retained with either cerebral neoplasm or intracranial hemorrhage in which the process that resulted in ID may have begun prenatally. GIFT, gamete intrafallopian transfer; PZD, partial zona dissection; SUZI, subzonal insemination.

    ID was categorized into mild or moderate (IQ 40–69) or severe (IQ <40).1 Known causes of ID recorded in the IDEA database or in linked WARDA records were reviewed by 3 authors (M.L., H.L., and G.B.), who were blinded to conception status, and presented in a hierarchical fashion similar to that of Yeargin-Allsopp et al,21 with each child classified according to 1 main cause of ID. In children with no identified sufficient cause, we describe the presence of pregnancy and/or birth complications and coexisting conditions. ART was categorized as “any or none,” with subcategories of IVF, ICSI, and fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Analyses were stratified by plurality and prematurity when numbers permitted. The following variables were considered potential confounders: child’s sex, parity (3 groups), maternal and paternal age at birth (7 groups each), maternal socioeconomic status (SES) (area-based social disadvantage index in centiles22), maternal smoking during pregnancy, private health insurance (PHI) at birth, year of birth (1994–1996, 1997–1999, and 2000–2002), delivery method (vaginal, elective cesarean delivery, and emergency cesarean delivery), and marital status (married and/or cohabiting versus other).

    Statistical Analysis

    Univariate statistics (cross-tabulations with χ2 tests and means and/or t tests) were used to identify variables associated with both ID and ART. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by using Poisson regression with robust SEs. Regression models were adjusted for covariates with no missing data (child’s sex, maternal age, parity, year of birth, delivery mode) and then marital status and PHI. In final models, we used generalized estimating equations (specifying an exchangeable correlation structure) to account for the potential correlation in results between births from the same mother. Marital status was missing for 0.1% of births, and PHI was missing for ∼6%, but this did not differ by ID status. The following variables met the criteria for confounding but were not included: paternal age (highly correlated with maternal age), maternal smoking (only available from 1997 and made only a 3% change to the model), and maternal SES (more missing data than for PHI and less representative of the socioeconomic gradient between ART and non-ART births, being an area-based rather than individual measure). Supplementary analyses were used to investigate the impact of missing data and of additionally adjusting for maternal SES.

    RRs for any ID, mild or moderate ID, and severe ID were estimated for all children. Analyses of any ID were also conducted for singletons and twins separately and by preterm or term status. Data were too sparse to allow for an analysis of higher-order multiples (HOMs) separately. ART subtypes were compared by using both non-ART and standard IVF as comparison groups.

    A 2-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 24 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY).

    Results

    There were 225 728 LBs in Western Australia between 1994 and 2002; of which 3118 (1.4%) were conceived with ART. After exclusions (Fig 1), 2876 ART-conceived and 207 751 non–ART-conceived children were available for analysis. Although all children had at least 8 years of follow-up, those in the ART group were younger on average than those in the non-ART group (median age 10.6 years versus 12.8 years), reflecting the increasing use of ART over time. All ART procedures involved cleavage stage transfers; 182 (6.3%) were single embryo transfers (SETs).

    Mothers of ART-conceived children were older, less likely to have smoked, more often primiparous, and more likely to have PHI and be of higher SES (Table 1). ART-conceived children were more likely to be twins or HOMs (33.6% ART versus 2.5% non-ART), be born preterm, have lower birth weight, have been delivered by cesarean, and to have a major BD (Table 1).

    View this table:
    TABLE 1

    Birth and Demographic Characteristics of Live-Born Children and Mothers by Conception Type

    There were 3551 children diagnosed with ID (16.9 per 1000 LBs), 60 of whom were ART conceived (20.9 in 1000), comprising 37 singletons and 23 multiples. The proportion of severe ID was higher in ART-conceived (12.9%) than in non–ART-conceived children (5.9%).

    ART-conceived children were at an increased risk of any ID, mild or moderate ID, and severe ID in adjusted analyses (Table 2). Risks remained when analyses were restricted to singletons and were highest (although not statistically significant) for those born very preterm. A similar pattern of higher risk was observed for ART-conceived twins of <32 weeks’ gestation. Median tests revealed no significant difference in gestational age of preterm (<32 and 32–36 weeks) ART-conceived and non–ART-conceived singletons or twins (data not shown), suggesting that the increased risk of ID among ART births in these strata was not attributable to lower gestational age. Missing data had minimal impact on the RRs, as did additional adjustment for maternal SES (Supplemental Tables 7 and 8).

    View this table:
    TABLE 2

    Risk of ID in Children Who Were Conceived Using ART Compared With Non–ART-Conceived Children

    When comparing ART subtypes to non-ART, ICSI-conceived children had the highest risk of ID (RR 2.54; 95% CI 1.69–3.83); both fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer were associated with a 60% elevation in risk (Table 2). Surgically retrieved sperm was used in 190 (20%) ICSI cycles resulting in an LB. A greater proportion of children were diagnosed with ID after ICSI with ejaculated (3.48%) versus surgically retrieved sperm (1.58%). The risk of ID was also elevated for ICSI-conceived children versus those who were conceived using IVF (RR 1.98; 95% CI 1.12–3.48; Table 3). When stratified by sex (Supplemental Table 9), the highest RRs were seen for ICSI-conceived girls (regardless of whether the comparison group was non–ART-conceived or IVF-conceived girls).

    View this table:
    TABLE 3

    Risk of ID After ICSI Compared With Standard IVF

    Known causes of ID among ART-conceived and non–ART-conceived children are shown in Table 4. Although the numbers in some categories are small, children born after ICSI were more likely to have a known genetic condition than IVF-conceived or non–ART-conceived children (28% vs 13% and 12%, respectively). Down syndrome was the most frequent genetic cause of ID for both ART-conceived and non–ART-conceived children, accounting for 10% of ART and 5% of non-ART cases. Conditions that are sometimes caused by imprinting errors (Angelman, Prader-Willi, and Russell-Silver syndromes) were diagnosed in 5% of ART versus 0.3% of non-ART cases (data not shown). No cause of ID was identified for 72% of ART-conceived and 82% of non–ART-conceived children. Among the children with no identified cause for ID, several pregnancy complications, low birth weight, being a twin or HOM, and having cerebral palsy were more likely in ART-conceived than in non-ART-conceived children (Table 5).

    View this table:
    TABLE 4

    Known Causes of ID by Conception Type

    View this table:
    TABLE 5

    Characteristics of Children With ID With No Identified Cause by Conception Type (N = 2910)

    Discussion

    With our findings, we suggest that children conceived using ART have a small increased risk of ID even when analyses are restricted to singleton births. The risk of ID is doubled among very preterm births, after ICSI, and for severe ID. ID was also more common in children born after ICSI versus standard IVF.

    The cumulative prevalence of ID in all children in Western Australia remained stable over our study period.2 Comparisons with other studies are complicated by differences in study methods, case definitions, and follow-up periods. However, our findings are consistent with Knoester et al,23 who found that 5- to 8-year-old children born after ICSI (compared with non-ART) had a lower IQ, and Zhu et al,24 who found that singletons born after infertility treatment had twice the risk of severe developmental delay at age 18 months compared with singletons born to fertile couples. The birth cohorts in 2 population-based studies covered time periods similar to ours: Bay et al25 reported no increase in “mental retardation” in IVF-conceived and ICSI-conceived children in Denmark, whereas Sandin et al26 reported an 18% increase in risk for ART-conceived versus non–ART-conceived children in Sweden and a 51% increase for ICSI versus IVF. The underlying population prevalence of ID in these studies was ∼6 per 1000 births (versus 17 per 1000 in our study), which was similar to Western Australian estimates before the inclusion of education data (7.6 in 1000).1 The Western Australian register may therefore be capturing milder cases of ID than the Danish psychiatric and Swedish patient registers, including those diagnosed only when a child attends school. A 2011 meta-analysis of ID prevalence in population-based studies of children and adolescents reported a pooled prevalence of 18.3 in 1000,27 which was similar to our study.

    ID is a heterogeneous condition with many possible causes. We therefore stratified by known mediating factors (prematurity and plurality) that are more likely to occur after ART. The observed increased risk of ID after ART in very preterm births warrants further investigation in larger cohorts. We recently observed a higher risk of cerebral palsy in preterm (<32 weeks) ART versus non-ART singletons28 and postulated that the loss of a comultiple (estimated to occur in 10% of ART singleton births resulting from multiple embryo transfer) might play a role in the greater risk of adverse outcomes in this group.29–31

    ICSI use was restricted to couples with severe male-factor subfertility in our cohort, but we cannot determine whether increased risks of ID relate to the procedure itself or to the underlying subfertility. Contrary to Sandin et al,26 we found no evidence that ICSI with surgical sperm extraction was associated with a greater risk of ID than ICSI with ejaculated sperm. ICSI-conceived children were more likely to have a known genetic cause of ID. We showed previously that ICSI singletons had a twofold increased risk of chromosomal anomalies compared with non-ART births.32 Genetic abnormalities occur more frequently in men who are infertile, so ICSI (which bypasses natural selection barriers) may allow for the transmission of chromosomal anomalies to the offspring.12 Advanced paternal age is also associated with higher risk of genetic mutations in sperm, several (autosomal-dominant) monogenic disorders, autism, and subtle deficits in neurocognitive outcomes.33–36 Thus, it is noteworthy that ICSI fathers had the highest median age (37 years) and that ICSI fathers of children with ID of a known genetic cause had a median age of 40 years (data not shown). Syndromes related to aberrant imprinting have been associated with ART.12 Although 5% of ART-conceived children with ID were diagnosed with conditions that are sometimes caused by imprinting disturbance, we had no information to determine whether imprinting defects occurred in these children.

    ICSI is now used to treat a broader group of patients,37 which will allow for comparisons of ID risk in the offspring of couples with a range of causes for their subfertility. Comparisons of ID risk when ICSI is used for specific indications (eg, reduced semen parameters, preimplantation genetic screening, and failed IVF) would be particularly informative; however, these data are not usually collected in ART registers.

    The prevalence of ID is known to be higher in male patients,38 but in our study, it was similarly elevated in both girls and boys who were conceived using ICSI (31 per 1000 births). This finding needs confirmation in larger studies.

    Strengths of this study include population-based ID data ascertained from both disability service and education sources.39 The minimum 8-year follow-up makes it likely that we captured most ID cases in our cohort. Because ID may be diagnosed only at school commencement and ART-conceived children who died before age 7 years had higher rates of prematurity, low birth weight, and were more often multiples (all of which may be associated with a greater risk of ID13–15; Supplemental Table 6), we excluded children who died before 7 years of age without a diagnosis of ID. Although ART-conceived children have greater contact with the health system40 (which may increase the likelihood of ID being diagnosed), such ascertainment bias is unlikely to affect diagnoses of severe ID (which were increased in our study) or differentially affect IVF and ICSI births. We were able to describe the known causes of ID using information from both the IDEA database and WARDA. This included 20% of ART-conceived and 12% of non–ART-conceived children with known genetic disorders. In contrast, Sandin et al26 report that only 1.7% of ART-conceived and 2.3% of non–ART-conceived children with ID in their study had a known genetic disorder.

    Study limitations included the relatively few ID cases in ART-conceived children, leading to imprecise estimates in some subgroup analyses. We made no adjustment for multiple comparisons and note that many RRs had lower confidence limits close to unity. Information about maternal obesity (potentially associated with both ID41 and ART42) or parental psychiatric history was not available (although adjustment for psychiatric history did not alter risk estimates in the large Scandanavian studies25,26). We were unable to identify children who were conceived using ovulation induction alone or intrauterine insemination, and they are therefore included in the non-ART comparison group. If these treatments are also associated with increased risks of ID, our risk estimates may be biased toward the null; however, there is limited and conflicting information in the literature in this regard.16 Missing data for 2 covariates did not appear to materially affect our RR estimates.

    Our study included children born from 1994 to 2002, when multiple embryo transfer was common practice in Western Australia. Therefore, our observations that ART-conceived children with no identified cause for ID were much more likely than non–ART-conceived children to be twins or HOMs and have very low birth weight are not surprising. There have been major shifts in clinical practice in Australia since that time; SET is now used in 86% of cycles, resulting in important reductions in the prevalence of multiple births and pregnancies affected by vanishing twins and improvements in perinatal health.5 Preimplantation genetic testing has also increased and was used in 8.6% of cycles in 2015.5 However, in many other countries, the shift toward SET has occurred far more slowly. Risk of ID after ART may be particularly high in regions such as North America, Latin America, and the Middle East, where multiple embryo transfer is widely used and ICSI use rates are high.37,43,44

    To prevent ID and reduce the burden it places on families and communities, it is important to identify even small modifiable risk factors so that they can be ameliorated. For ID associated with ART, such actions may include reducing preterm births via treatment strategies that favor SET and restricting ICSI treatment to couples with severe male-factor subfertility. These couples may opt to use preimplantation genetic testing to maximize the transfer of chromosomally normal embryos.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Prof Elizabeth Milne for her helpful comments on our article draft. We also thank the Western Australian Data Linkage Branch and Department of Health data custodians for the linkage of and access to core health data sets, the Western Australian Reproductive Technology Council for permission to use data from the Reproductive Technology Register, and the Register and Fertility Centre staff for their assistance with data queries.

    Footnotes

      • Accepted August 21, 2018.
    • Address correspondence to Michele Hansen, PhD, MPH, Telethon Kids Institute, PO Box 855, West Perth, WA 6872, Australia. E-mail: michele.hansen{at}telethonkids.org.au

    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr Hart is the medical director of Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, has equity interests in Western IVF, and in the last 2 years, has received grant support from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals; the other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Early Career Fellowship 1090648 to M.H., Senior Research Fellowship 1117105 to H.L., and project grant 211930 to M.H.) and an educational grant for statistical support from Ferring Pharmaceuticals (R.H.). The funders did not take part in developing this article beyond funding the study.

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Hart is a part owner and shareholder of an in vitro fertilization company, has received travel grants and honoraria from pharmaceutical manufacturers of gonadotrophins, and is on the medical advisory board of pharmaceutical companies that manufacture gonadotrophins; the other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    • COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10/1542/peds.2018-3072.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Petterson B,
      2. Leonard H,
      3. Bourke J, et al
      . IDEA (Intellectual Disability Exploring Answers): a population-based database for intellectual disability in Western Australia. Ann Hum Biol. 2005;32(2):237–243pmid:16096222
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Bourke J,
      2. de Klerk N,
      3. Smith T,
      4. Leonard H
      . Population-based prevalence of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders in Western Australia: a comparison with previous estimates. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(21):e3737pmid:27227936
      OpenUrlPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Leonard H,
      2. Petterson B,
      3. Bower C,
      4. Sanders R
      . Prevalence of intellectual disability in Western Australia. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003;17(1):58–67pmid:12562473
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Harris K,
      2. Fitzgerald O,
      3. Paul RC, et al
      . Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2014. Sydney, Australia: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, University of New South Wales; 2016
    5. ↵
      1. Fitzgerald O,
      2. Harris K,
      3. Paul RC, et al
      . Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2015. Sydney, Australia: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, University of New South Wales; 2017
    6. ↵
      1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
      . Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2015 - In Brief. Perinatal Statistis Series No. 33 Cat No PER 91. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; 2017
      1. Luke B
      . Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):270–281pmid:28322775
      OpenUrlPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Levine H,
      2. Jørgensen N,
      3. Martino-Andrade A, et al
      . Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6):646–659pmid:28981654
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. El Hajj N,
      2. Haaf T
      . Epigenetic disturbances in in vitro cultured gametes and embryos: implications for human assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(3):632–641pmid:23357453
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Doherty DA,
      2. Newnham JP,
      3. Bower C,
      4. Hart R
      . Implications of polycystic ovary syndrome for pregnancy and for the health of offspring. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1397–1406pmid:26000511
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Hart R,
      2. Norman RJ
      . The longer-term health outcomes for children born as a result of IVF treatment. Part II–mental health and development outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(3):244–250pmid:23449643
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Kurinczuk JJ,
      2. Bhattacharya S
      . Rare chromosomal, genetic, and epigenetic-related risks associated with infertility treatment. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(4):250–253pmid:24893827
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Langridge AT,
      2. Glasson EJ,
      3. Nassar N, et al
      . Maternal conditions and perinatal characteristics associated with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e50963pmid:23308096
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Leonard H,
      2. Nassar N,
      3. Bourke J, et al
      . Relation between intrauterine growth and subsequent intellectual disability in a ten-year population cohort of children in Western Australia. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(1):103–111pmid:17898000
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Petterson B,
      2. Bourke J,
      3. Leonard H,
      4. Jacoby P,
      5. Bower C
      . Co-occurrence of birth defects and intellectual disability. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(1):65–75pmid:17239182
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Rumbold AR,
      2. Moore VM,
      3. Whitrow MJ, et al
      . The impact of specific fertility treatments on cognitive development in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(7):1489–1507pmid:28472417
      OpenUrlPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Heber R
      . A manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Am J Ment Defic. 1959;Suppl 64(2):1–111pmid:14400459
      OpenUrlPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Heber R
      . Modifications in the manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Am J Ment Defic. 1961;65:499–500pmid:13712632
      OpenUrlPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Government of Western Australia, North Metropolitan Health Service
      . For the researcher. Available at: https://www.kemh.health.wa.gov.au/Our-services/Statewide-Services/WARDA/For-the-researcher. Accessed July 25, 2018
    20. ↵
      1. Bower C,
      2. Baynam G,
      3. Rudy E, et al
      . Report of the Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies, 1980-2014. Perth, Australia: King Edward Memorial Hospital Women and Newborn Health Service; 2015
    21. ↵
      1. Yeargin-Allsopp M,
      2. Murphy CC,
      3. Cordero JF,
      4. Decouflé P,
      5. Hollowell JG
      . Reported biomedical causes and associated medical conditions for mental retardation among 10-year-old children, metropolitan Atlanta, 1985 to 1987. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(3):142–149pmid:9112961
      OpenUrlPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Pink B
      . Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) - Technical Paper. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Commonwealth of Australia; 2006
    23. ↵
      1. Knoester M,
      2. Helmerhorst FM,
      3. Vandenbroucke JP,
      4. van der Westerlaken LA,
      5. Walther FJ,
      6. Veen S; Leiden Artificial Reproductive Techniques Follow-up Project
      . Cognitive development of singletons born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(2):289–296pmid:17980875
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Zhu JL,
      2. Basso O,
      3. Obel C,
      4. Hvidtjørn D,
      5. Olsen J
      . Infertility, infertility treatment and psychomotor development: the Danish National Birth Cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23(2):98–106pmid:19159396
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Bay B,
      2. Mortensen EL,
      3. Hvidtjørn D,
      4. Kesmodel US
      . Fertility treatment and risk of childhood and adolescent mental disorders: register based cohort study. BMJ. 2013;347:f3978pmid:23833075
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Sandin S,
      2. Nygren KG,
      3. Iliadou A,
      4. Hultman CM,
      5. Reichenberg A
      . Autism and mental retardation among offspring born after in vitro fertilization. JAMA. 2013;310(1):75–84pmid:23821091
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Maulik PK,
      2. Mascarenhas MN,
      3. Mathers CD,
      4. Dua T,
      5. Saxena S
      . Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(2):419–436pmid:21236634
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Goldsmith S,
      2. Mcintyre S,
      3. Badawi N,
      4. Hansen M
      . Cerebral palsy after assisted reproductive technology: a cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(1):73–80pmid:28980316
      OpenUrlPubMed
    29. ↵
      1. Almog B,
      2. Levin I,
      3. Wagman I, et al
      . Adverse obstetric outcome for the vanishing twin syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(2):256–260pmid:20113963
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Davies MJ,
      2. Rumbold AR,
      3. Whitrow MJ, et al
      . Spontaneous loss of a co-twin and the risk of birth defects after assisted conception. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2016;7(6):678–684pmid:27374401
      OpenUrlPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Pinborg A
      . The vanishing twin: prevalence and consequences for outcome after assisted reproduction. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;3(3):369–377
      OpenUrl
    32. ↵
      1. Hansen M,
      2. Kurinczuk JJ,
      3. de Klerk N,
      4. Burton P,
      5. Bower C
      . Assisted reproductive technology and major birth defects in Western Australia. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):852–863pmid:22996103
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Dubov T,
      2. Toledano-Alhadef H,
      3. Bokstein F,
      4. Constantini S,
      5. Ben-Shachar S
      . The effect of parental age on the presence of de novo mutations - lessons from neurofibromatosis type I. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2016;4(4):480–486pmid:27468422
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Saha S,
      2. Barnett AG,
      3. Foldi C, et al
      . Advanced paternal age is associated with impaired neurocognitive outcomes during infancy and childhood. PLoS Med. 2009;6(3):e40pmid:19278291
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Wiener-Megnazi Z,
      2. Auslender R,
      3. Dirnfeld M
      . Advanced paternal age and reproductive outcome. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(1):69–76pmid:22157982
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Sandin S,
      2. Schendel D,
      3. Magnusson P, et al
      . Autism risk associated with parental age and with increasing difference in age between the parents. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(5):693–700pmid:26055426
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    37. ↵
      1. Boulet SL,
      2. Mehta A,
      3. Kissin DM,
      4. Warner L,
      5. Kawwass JF,
      6. Jamieson DJ
      . Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015;313(3):255–263pmid:25602996
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    38. ↵
      1. Leonard H,
      2. Wen X
      . The epidemiology of mental retardation: challenges and opportunities in the new millennium. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8(3):117–134pmid:12216056
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    39. ↵
      1. Bourke J,
      2. Wong K,
      3. Leonard H
      . Validation of intellectual disability coding through hospital morbidity records using an intellectual disability population-based database in Western Australia. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e019113pmid:29362262
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    40. ↵
      1. Källén B
      . The risk of neurodisability and other long-term outcomes for infants born following ART. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(4):239–244pmid:24793634
      OpenUrlPubMed
    41. ↵
      1. Mann JR,
      2. McDermott SW,
      3. Hardin J,
      4. Pan C,
      5. Zhang Z
      . Pre-pregnancy body mass index, weight change during pregnancy, and risk of intellectual disability in children. BJOG. 2013;120(3):309–319pmid:23190394
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    42. ↵
      1. Bellver J,
      2. Busso C,
      3. Pellicer A,
      4. Remohí J,
      5. Simón C
      . Obesity and assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12(5):562–568pmid:16790099
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    43. ↵
      1. Dyer S,
      2. Chambers GM,
      3. de Mouzon J, et al
      . International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1588–1609pmid:27207175
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    44. ↵
      1. Zagadailov P,
      2. Hsu A,
      3. Seifer DB,
      4. Stern JE
      . Differences in utilization of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):45pmid:28606175
      OpenUrlPubMed
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 142, Issue 6
    1 Dec 2018
    View this article with LENS
    Email Article
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Citation Tools
    Intellectual Disability in Children Conceived Using Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Michele Hansen, Kathryn R. Greenop, Jenny Bourke, Gareth Baynam, Roger J. Hart, Helen Leonard
    Pediatrics Dec 2018, 142 (6) e20181269; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1269
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts

    Jump to section

    Subjects