Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Commentary

Inpatient Asthma Care and Future Morbidity: A Role for Quality Improvement

Elizabeth D. Allen and Richard J. Brilli
Pediatrics May 2018, 141 (5) e20180420; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-0420
Elizabeth D. Allen
aDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J. Brilli
bHospital Administration, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF
  • Abbreviations:
    ED —
    emergency department
    QI —
    quality improvement
  • Children with asthma continue to suffer significant morbidity1 despite improved treatment options and widely distributed best practice guidelines.2 The best predictor of future severe asthma exacerbations is a recent asthma exacerbation.3,4 In “Inpatient Quality Improvement Interventions for Asthma: A Meta-analysis” published this month in Pediatrics, Parikh et al5 examine the impact of quality improvement (QI) initiatives conducted during inpatient asthma hospitalization on future (postdischarge) asthma morbidity. After reviewing an array of inpatient asthma interventions, they used meta-analysis to conclude that inpatient QI efforts have limited impact on postdischarge asthma outcomes. Their findings reveal the paucity of programs directed at improving postdischarge asthma control. Importantly, they identify some positive outcomes after inpatient multimodal targeted asthma QI interventions.

    We applaud Parikh et al5 for conducting this ambitious analysis, especially given the wide range of interventions, methodologies, measured outcomes, and disparate care settings wherein asthma inpatient QI was conducted. We also congratulate them for evaluating whether inpatient QI work alone has short- or long-term effects on future asthma morbidity (ie, asthma-related emergency department [ED] revisits or readmissions). We suspect some think it naïve to believe inpatient QI work alone can impact future asthma morbidity; however, until an analysis was conducted, this could only be conjecture. The analysis by Parikh et al5 seems to codify the conclusion that inpatient QI work, as currently practiced, has limited impact on future asthma morbidity.

    The authors’ methods were thorough. They focused primarily on postdischarge asthma ED revisits and hospital readmissions as outcomes common to the majority of articles reviewed. They eliminated 18 articles from study because prevention of revisits and/or readmissions was not an intervention goal. Among the eliminated articles, revisits and/or readmissions were frequently balancing measures used to monitor whether hospital length of stay or cost reductions increased postdischarge morbidity.

    In the 12 articles used for the meta-analysis, the authors described strategies ranging from primarily asthma education6,7 to multicomponent interventions targeting compliance with the Joint Commission Children’s Asthma Care measures.8 Although the authors state that these studies were used to target the outcome of posthospital use, closer review reveals that 1 study was focused on developing “a cost saving algorithm,”9 whereas another study’s goal was to improve general practitioner “satisfaction with communication provided by the hospital.”10 Implementation strategies varied from randomized controlled trials of standardized interventions to interventions that evolved during plan-do-study-act cycles. The methodology for identifying index hospitalizations along with postintervention study intervals varied.

    The resulting nonhomogeneity of the studies makes Parikh’s et al5 meta-analysis of overall inpatient asthma QI efficacy inconclusive. However, their article does reveal several important issues. Inpatient asthma QI has not been aggressively aimed at improving postdischarge asthma morbidity. Instead, QI efforts are often centered on reducing inpatient length of stay and costs. With this focus, researchers fail to address these vulnerable patients’ increased risk for future asthma exacerbations or take advantage of a severe asthma episode’s wake-up call to trigger change in provider and caregiver management.11

    Parikh et al5 point out that unidimensional inpatient interventions have little impact on subsequent asthma-related health care use. This is particularly true for projects that are focused primarily on education. Unfortunately, education alone is usually insufficient to change caregiver home management.12 This is also true for providers; simply providing instruction regarding asthma guideline care does not guarantee practice change.13

    The multifaceted programs reviewed by the authors had more impact. Programs that combined education with dispensing emergency oral steroid supplies or confirmed medical home follow-up improved outcomes. Inpatient care standardization that included assessment of the patient’s past clinical asthma control followed by adjustment and prescription of controller medication (especially if those medications were “in hand” at discharge) was effective. Programs employing a standard QI and multidimensional care improvement strategy8,14–16 were especially consistent in their ability to reduce ED revisits and/or rehospitalizations. The lack of impact by a multidimensional QI-based program for a group of community hospitals17 was confounded by the small baseline numbers of readmissions. Asthma readmissions may be an insensitive outcome measure for smaller patient populations. In addition, this measure fails to fully assess the more global impact asthma has on quality of life.

    The time has come to focus on asthma hospitalizations as opportunities to address ongoing asthma control for patients at high risk for future asthma morbidity. We must address the continuum of asthma care from inpatient to outpatient and home care. We should abandon unidimensional approaches and instead focus on multifaceted “bundles” of interventions. We must address both provider and caregiver contributions to asthma morbidity.15,18,19 Outcome measures should identify not only severe attacks but also the less calamitous and more common ways asthma is detrimental to our patients and their families.20 Finally, we believe using a standard and rigorous QI approach with multidimensional targets and tactics is more likely to get results. This approach has been effective in driving change,14 allows for fluid adjustment in interventions to speed impact, and does not leave a portion of children behind to receive “usual care.”

    Footnotes

      • Accepted February 9, 2018.
    • Address correspondence to Elizabeth D. Allen, MD, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, 700 Children’s Dr, Columbus, OH 43205. E-mail: beth.allen{at}nationwidechildrens.org
    • Opinions expressed in these commentaries are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the American Academy of Pediatrics or its Committees.

    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: No external funding.

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    • COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2017-3334.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
      . Most recent asthma data. Available at: www.cdc.gov/asthma/most_recent_data.htm. Accessed February 4, 2018
    2. ↵
      1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
      2. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program
      . Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Full report. 2007. Available at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/sites/default/files/media/docs/asthgdln_1.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2017
    3. ↵
      1. Puranik S,
      2. Forno E,
      3. Bush A,
      4. Celedón JC
      . Predicting severe asthma exacerbations in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(7):854–859pmid:27710010
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Tse SM,
      2. Samson C
      . Time to asthma-related readmission in children admitted to the ICU for asthma. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(12):1099–1105pmid:28922266
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Parikh K,
      2. Keller S,
      3. Ralston S
      . Inpatient quality improvement interventions for asthma: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2018;141(5):e20173334
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Davis AM,
      2. Benson M,
      3. Cooney D,
      4. Spruell B,
      5. Orelian J
      . A matched-cohort evaluation of a bedside asthma intervention for patients hospitalized at a large urban children’s hospital. J Urban Health. 2011;88(suppl 1):49–60pmid:21337051
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Stevens CA,
      2. Wesseldine LJ,
      3. Couriel JM,
      4. Dyer AJ,
      5. Osman LM,
      6. Silverman M
      . Parental education and guided self-management of asthma and wheezing in the pre-school child: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2002;57(1):39–44pmid:11809988
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Fassl BA,
      2. Nkoy FL,
      3. Stone BL, et al
      . The Joint Commission children’s asthma care quality measures and asthma readmissions. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):482–491pmid:22908110
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. McDowell KM,
      2. Chatburn RL,
      3. Myers TR,
      4. O’Riordan MA,
      5. Kercsmar CM
      . A cost-saving algorithm for children hospitalized for status asthmaticus. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(10):977–984pmid:9790607
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Marks MK,
      2. Hynson JL,
      3. Karabatsos G
      . Asthma: communication between hospital and general practitioners. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999;35(3):251–254pmid:10404444
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Resnicow K,
      2. Page SE
      . Embracing chaos and complexity: a quantum change for public health. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1382–1389pmid:18556599
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Auger KA,
      2. Kahn RS,
      3. Davis MM,
      4. Simmons JM
      . Pediatric asthma readmission: asthma knowledge is not enough? J Pediatr. 2015;166(1):101–108pmid:25241184
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Cloutier MM,
      2. Tennen H,
      3. Wakefield DB,
      4. Brazil K,
      5. Hall CB
      . Improving clinician self-efficacy does not increase asthma guideline use by primary care clinicians. Acad Pediatr. 2012;12(4):312–318pmid:22634077
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Bergert L,
      2. Patel SJ,
      3. Kimata C,
      4. Zhang G,
      5. Matthews WJ Jr
      . Linking patient-centered medical home and asthma measures reduces hospital readmission rates. Pediatrics. 2014;134(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/134/1/e249pmid:24936001
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Kercsmar CM,
      2. Beck AF,
      3. Sauers-Ford H, et al
      . Association of an asthma improvement collaborative with health care utilization in Medicaid-insured pediatric patients in an urban community. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(11):1072–1080pmid:28975221
      OpenUrlPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Krupp NL,
      2. Fiscus C,
      3. Webb R, et al
      . Multifaceted quality improvement initiative to decrease pediatric asthma readmissions. J Asthma. 2017;54(9):911–918pmid:28118056
      OpenUrlPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Nkoy F,
      2. Fassl B,
      3. Stone B, et al
      . Improving pediatric asthma care and outcomes across multiple hospitals. Pediatrics. 2015;136(6). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/136/6/e1602pmid:26527553
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Allen ED,
      2. Arcoleo K,
      3. Rowe C,
      4. Long WW
      . Implementation of a “real world” School-Based Asthma Therapy program targeting urban children with poorly controlled asthma [published online ahead of print November 30, 2017]. J Asthma. doi:10.1080/02770903.2017.1396472pmid:29190172
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Snyder DA,
      2. Thomas OW,
      3. Gleeson SP, et al
      . Reducing emergency department visits utilizing a primary care asthma specialty clinic in a high-risk patient population [published online ahead of print August 30, 2017]. J Asthma. doi:10.1080/02770903.2017.1369989pmid:28853957
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Bime C,
      2. Nguyen J,
      3. Wise RA
      . Measures of asthma control. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012;18(1):48–56pmid:22081089
      OpenUrlPubMed
    • Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 141, Issue 5
    1 May 2018
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Inpatient Asthma Care and Future Morbidity: A Role for Quality Improvement
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Inpatient Asthma Care and Future Morbidity: A Role for Quality Improvement
    Elizabeth D. Allen, Richard J. Brilli
    Pediatrics May 2018, 141 (5) e20180420; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-0420

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Inpatient Asthma Care and Future Morbidity: A Role for Quality Improvement
    Elizabeth D. Allen, Richard J. Brilli
    Pediatrics May 2018, 141 (5) e20180420; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-0420
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Surgery as a Viable Option in Neutropenic Appendicitis
    • Realizing the Potential of Nurse Home Visiting
    • The Public Health and Clinical Importance of Accurate Neonatal Testing for COVID-19
    Show more Commentary

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Pulmonology
      • Pulmonology
      • Asthma
    • Administration/Practice Management
      • Quality Improvement
      • Administration/Practice Management
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics