Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Pediatrics Perspective

Ending the Culture of Culture-Negative Sepsis in the Neonatal ICU

Joseph B. Cantey and Stephen D. Baird
Pediatrics October 2017, 140 (4) e20170044; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0044
Joseph B. Cantey
aDepartment of Pediatrics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Texas
bDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen D. Baird
aDepartment of Pediatrics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Texas
cDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF
  • Abbreviations:
    CFU —
    colony-forming unit
    IAP —
    intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among infants in the NICU. Because septic infants present with nonspecific clinical findings, providers are justifiably concerned about missing sepsis. Blood cultures are the gold standard for diagnosis of sepsis, and when adequate volumes are obtained, cultures have excellent sensitivity even when the infant has very low levels of bacteremia.1 However, many providers view sterile culture results with skepticism, especially when the infant appears ill or received antibiotics before cultures were obtained. Therefore, we have developed a culture (no pun intended) of acceptance in treating “culture-negative” sepsis. Recent reports suggest that up to 10 times as much antibiotic is used for culture-negative sepsis as for culture-proven sepsis.2,3 This practice must stop. The evidence for unintended harm caused by prolonged or unnecessary antibiotic exposure continues to mount and includes increased risk for obesity, atopy, and, for preterm infants, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and death.4 Why then do providers view sterile cultures with such skepticism?

    The first reason is that providers have all-too-frequent experiences with cultures that are obtained incorrectly. Blood cultures collected inappropriately cannot be trusted, but such cultures, unfortunately, are a common problem. The recommendation is that a minimum of 1 mL of blood, either in 1 culture or divided into 2 0.5 mL cultures, be obtained from infants with suspected sepsis before initiation of antimicrobial therapy.5 However, sampling is limited by blood volume, particularly among extremely low birth weight infants, who are at the highest risk for sepsis but have the lowest total blood volume. Providers may prioritize blood gas analysis or other laboratory studies, using whatever volume remains to inoculate blood cultures. However, blood culture sensitivity decreases by 10% to 40% when 0.5 mL is inoculated compared with 1 mL.1 Therefore, blood cultures need to be prioritized to ensure that an adequate volume is cultured. Additionally, cultures obtained after antibiotics are initiated are difficult to interpret and frequently lead to prolonged therapy. Finally, contaminated blood cultures require additional blood draws and continued treatment while the repeat cultures are processing. These inappropriate cultures can be minimized through education and quality improvement initiatives with a focus on ensuring that adequate volume is collected.6 Drawing cultures appropriately the first time will lead to decreased blood sampling and reduced antibiotic exposure. To quote hall-of-fame basketball coach John Wooden, “If you don’t have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?”

    More difficult to address is the properly obtained blood culture that providers refuse to believe. Some argue that the sensitivity of blood culture is suboptimal at low bacterial concentrations. However, Schelonka et al1 demonstrated that the sensitivity of blood cultures approaches 100% when 1 mL is inoculated and the infant has a bacteremia concentration of at least 4 colony-forming units (CFU) per milliliter. The detection threshold is even lower with current blood culture techniques, which have excellent sensitivity even at low levels of organism (1–4 CFU/mL); considerably less than the median concentration of bacteria in neonatal sepsis (>100 CFU/mL).7 Admittedly, the sensitivity of blood cultures decreases at ultralow (<1 CFU/mL) bacteremia. The question then becomes whether 36 to 48 hours of empirical therapy is sufficient for the treatment of ultralow bacteremia. If the purpose of antimicrobial therapy is to reduce the bacterial burden to a level that the infant’s innate immune system can overcome, then 36 hours may be adequate when pathogen concentration is already several logs lower than usual sepsis. This theory is reinforced by clinical experience, which shows that infants with sterile blood cultures who receive 36 to 48 hours of empirical therapy virtually never require retreatment.2 It is our opinion that ultralow bacteremia is not clinically significant, particularly when infants are empirically treated for 36 to 48 hours.

    Another argument is that blood cultures obtained from infants whose mothers received adequate intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) should be discounted. After all, because the purpose of IAP is to achieve bactericidal levels of antibiotic in the fetus, shouldn’t we consider those infants pretreated? However, to those who say blood cultures may be sterile after adequate IAP, we answer, “Yes, that is the whole point!” Infants whose mothers received IAP, either because of group B streptococcal colonization or chorioamnionitis, are at a lower risk for early onset sepsis than infants whose mothers did not receive adequate IAP. Yet providers consistently view these infants as being at greater risk instead of lower. Indeed, an infant treated for culture-negative sepsis receives more total therapy (ampicillin and gentamicin) than an infant with a blood culture positive for group B Streptococcus (ampicillin monotherapy).2,3 Paradoxically, the result of an adequate maternal IAP and sterile blood cultures is often more treatment. Our view is that when cultures are sterile after adequate IAP, bacterial concentrations in the infant either have been reduced to ultralow concentrations or sterilized, neither of which require additional antibiotic therapy.

    Finally, some providers are hesitant to discontinue therapy because they are convinced that the infant has sepsis despite a sterile culture. However, the idea that providers can differentiate sepsis from other conditions in the ill neonate has been disproven.8 Clinical signs such as respiratory distress, hypotension, and temperature instability are nonspecific for sepsis and occur at much higher rates among preterm infants than sepsis does. Unsurprisingly, the majority of ill-appearing infants who are evaluated for sepsis are uninfected.2 Even among infected infants, a meaningful number have viral rather than bacterial infection.9 The pretest probability of sepsis, even among critical infants, is low. Models that attempt to better define the likelihood of sepsis have been effective in reducing the number of blood cultures and empirical antibiotic courses among term and late preterm infants.10 However, such models have not been validated in more premature infants. It is perfectly appropriate to obtain proper cultures and treat these infants empirically when sepsis is part of the differential, but we must train ourselves to trust our cultures and discontinue empirical therapy if they remain sterile at 36 to 48 hours of incubation. Additionally, ancillary laboratory tests such as complete blood counts or C-reactive protein have poor positive predictive value, lack specificity, and cannot be used to screen for or diagnose neonatal sepsis. In short, there are no substitutes for properly obtained blood cultures.

    Conclusions

    Blood cultures are an excellent resource for providers caring for neonates. When drawn properly, they have excellent sensitivity. However, providers justify treating sterile blood cultures on the basis of 3 incorrect assumptions: that they are insensitive, unreliable after maternal IAP, or inferior to the clinician’s own judgement. In reality, blood cultures are the gold standard for diagnosing neonatal sepsis. Put simply, if the bacteria cannot grow in the blood culture bottle (an ideal medium at an ideal temperature, free of antibiotics, complement, or phagocytes), then why would they grow effectively in the infant’s bloodstream? As we learn more about the adverse effects of antibiotic exposure on short- and long-term neonatal outcomes, it becomes increasingly clear that prolonged antibiotic therapy for suspected sepsis is a luxury our infants cannot afford. To end the culture of culture-negative sepsis, providers must systematically obtain appropriate blood cultures . . . and then trust them.

    Footnotes

      • Accepted April 17, 2017.
    • Address correspondence to Joseph B. Cantey, MD, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229. E-mail: cantey{at}uthscsa.edu
    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: No external funding.

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Schelonka RL,
      2. Chai MK,
      3. Yoder BA,
      4. Hensley D,
      5. Brockett RM,
      6. Ascher DP
      . Volume of blood required to detect common neonatal pathogens. J Pediatr. 1996;129(2):275–278pmid:8765627
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Cantey JB,
      2. Wozniak PS,
      3. Pruszynski JE,
      4. Sánchez PJ
      . Reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in the neonatal intensive care unit (SCOUT): a prospective interrupted time-series study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(10):1178–1184pmid:27452782
      OpenUrlPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Fjalstad JW,
      2. Stensvold HJ,
      3. Bergseng H, et al
      . Early-onset sepsis and antibiotic exposure in term infants: a nationwide population-based study in Norway. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016;35(1):1–6pmid:26368059
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Ting JY,
      2. Synnes A,
      3. Roberts A, et al; Canadian Neonatal Network Investigators
      . Association between antibiotic use and neonatal mortality and morbidities in very low-birth-weight infants without culture-proven sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(12):1181–1187pmid:27775765
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Polin RA; Committee on Fetus and Newborn
      . Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):1006–1015pmid:22547779
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Connell TG,
      2. Rele M,
      3. Cowley D,
      4. Buttery JP,
      5. Curtis N
      . How reliable is a negative blood culture result? Volume of blood submitted for culture in routine practice in a children’s hospital. Pediatrics. 2007;119(5):891–896pmid:17473088
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Sabui T,
      2. Tudehope DI,
      3. Tilse M
      . Clinical significance of quantitative blood cultures in newborn infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999;35(6):578–581pmid:10634987
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Fischer JE
      . Physicians’ ability to diagnose sepsis in newborns and critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6(suppl 3):S120–S125pmid:15857544
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Ronchi A,
      2. Michelow IC,
      3. Chapin KC, et al
      . Viral respiratory tract infections in the neonatal intensive care unit: the VIRIoN-I study. J Pediatr. 2014;165(4):690–696pmid:25027362
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Kuzniewicz MW,
      2. Puopolo KM,
      3. Fischer A, et al
      . A quantitative, risk-based approach to the management of neonatal early-onset sepsis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(4):365–371pmid:28241253
      OpenUrlPubMed
    • Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 140, Issue 4
    1 Oct 2017
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Ending the Culture of Culture-Negative Sepsis in the Neonatal ICU
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Ending the Culture of Culture-Negative Sepsis in the Neonatal ICU
    Joseph B. Cantey, Stephen D. Baird
    Pediatrics Oct 2017, 140 (4) e20170044; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-0044

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Ending the Culture of Culture-Negative Sepsis in the Neonatal ICU
    Joseph B. Cantey, Stephen D. Baird
    Pediatrics Oct 2017, 140 (4) e20170044; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-0044
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Conclusions
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • Newborn Antibiotic Exposures and Association With Proven Bloodstream Infection
    • Challenges and opportunities for antibiotic stewardship among preterm infants
    • Neonatal Antibiotic Use: How Much Is Too Much?
    • Variations in Neonatal Antibiotic Use
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Child Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bad Situation Made Worse
    • Use of Cognitive Shortcuts in Decision-making for Children With Severe Neurologic Impairment
    • Implications of the 21st Century Cures Act in Pediatrics
    Show more Pediatrics Perspectives

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Fetus/Newborn Infant
      • Fetus/Newborn Infant
      • Neonatology
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics