Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Case Report

Early Screening for Tetrahydrobiopterin Responsiveness in Phenylketonuria

Francesco Porta, Marco Spada and Alberto Ponzone
Pediatrics August 2017, 140 (2) e20161591; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1591
Francesco Porta
Department of Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Spada
Department of Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Ponzone
Department of Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

Since 2007, synthetic tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) has been approved as a therapeutic option in BH4-responsive phenylketonuria (PKU) and since 2015 extended to infants younger than 4 years in Europe. The current definition of BH4 responsiveness relies on the observation of a 20% to 30% blood phenylalanine (Phe) decrease after BH4 administration, under nonstandardized conditions. By this definition, however, patients with the same genotype or even the same patients were alternatively reported as responsive or nonresponsive to the cofactor. These inconsistencies are troubling, as frustrating patient expectations and impairing cost-effectiveness of BH4-therapy. Here we tried a quantitative procedure through the comparison of the outcome of a simple Phe and a combined Phe plus BH4 loading in a series of infants with PKU, most of them harboring genotypes already reported as BH4 responsive. Under these ideal conditions, blood Phe clearance did not significantly differ after the 2 types of loading, and a 20% to 30% decrease of blood Phe occurred irrespective of BH4 administration in milder forms of PKU. Such early screening for BH4 responsiveness, based on a quantitative assay, is essential for warranting an evidence-based and cost-effective therapy in those patients with PKU eventually but definitely diagnosed as responsive to the cofactor.

  • Abbreviations:
    BH4 —
    tetrahydrobiopterin
    HPA —
    hyperphenylalaninemia
    PAH —
    phenylalanine hydroxylase
    Phe —
    phenylalanine
    PKU —
    phenylketonuria
  • Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an autosomal recessive disorder of phenylalanine (Phe) metabolism due to more than 800 mutations in the gene encoding Phe-hydroxylase (PAH). Their different severity results in variable PAH impairment from mild hyperphenylalaninemia (HPA) to classic PKU, with residual or absent enzyme activity and high or reduced Phe dietary tolerance, respectively. As Phe itself is a toxic substrate for brain development and function, a calibrated dietary restriction of Phe ensured remarkable results since the second half of the past century.

    In past years, many authors reported that a consistent rate of patients with PKU may be responsive to tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), the natural cofactor of PAH.1,2 In 2007, a pharmaceutical formulation of BH4 (sapropterin dihydrochloride) was approved for treatment of PKU in addition to a Phe-restricted diet in the United States, and in 2008 in Europe. In 2015, its approval was extended to infants younger than 4 years in Europe. The cost of BH4 therapy ranges from $10 000 to more than $80 000 per patient per year, depending on dose and bodyweight. Such an expensive treatment should be offered only to patients with PKU assessed as BH4 responsive. The current definition of BH4 responsiveness is based on the decrease of blood Phe >20% to 30% after BH4 loading or prolonged administration. With these criteria, however, patients with an identical genotype have been alternatively classified as BH4 responders or nonresponders, and ∼60% of “responders” to BH4 loading showed nonsignificant Phe reduction after 6 weeks of cofactor treatment.2 These erratic results are likely consequent to variable blood Phe concentration at the time of BH4 loading, variable Phe intake before and during the challenge with cofactor, inconsistent assignation of a patient’s phenotype, and diurnal fluctuations of blood Phe concentration, also occurring on steady dietary treatment.3–5 Furthermore, the largely accepted simple BH4 loading is not comparative.

    We already argued that the assessment of BH4 responsiveness should rely on a reproducible, quantitative, and controlled procedure, taking into account all the determinants of blood Phe level.6,7 According to other experts in the field, “under ideal conditions, one would need to perform both the combined Phe+BH4 as well as a single Phe loading test” to definitely prove the effectiveness of BH4 in enhancing Phe hydroxylation in patients with PKU.8 This procedure was previously applied by us in a small series of patients with PKU of different age, phenotype, and genotype, all resulting definitely unresponsive to the administration of synthetic cofactor.3 With the recent approval of BH4 therapy in children and infants, this procedure has been adopted and tested in a larger cohort infants with PKU, homogeneous for weight and age, to early screen their definite responsiveness to BH4 to anticipate treatment optimization.

    Methods

    The procedure was applied to 18 infants with PKU consecutively detected at newborn mass screening. Sixteen of 18 patients harbored mutations in the PAH gene already reported as BH4 responsive and 2 harbored severe nonresponsive mutations (Fig 1).

    FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Comparative outcome of a simple Phe (150 mg/kg) oral loading test (white boxes) and a combined Phe plus BH4 (20 mg/kg 3 hours after Phe administration) (gray boxes) oral loading test in 18 infants with PAH deficiency due to mutations previously associated with BH4-responsiveness* (A) or not (B). P values are indicated for each comparison at each time. Boxes represent 10th to 90th percentile ranges with median value (point), I bars indicate 1st and 99th percentiles. Differences between groups were established by using the Student’s t test, with statistical significance achieved with P < .05.

    Their age ranged between 3 and 6 months and weight between 5 and 7 kg. Patients were classified according to the Phe tolerance into 3 classes: mild HPA, mild PKU, and classic PKU (Fig 1). The outcome of a simple Phe oral loading (150 mg/kg, an amount corresponding to 3 g/kg natural protein) was compared with that of a combined oral Phe (150 mg/kg) followed by oral BH4 loading (sapropterin dihydrochloride 20 mg/kg, 3 hours after Phe administration). Blood Phe concentration was measured at 0, 1.5, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 24 hours. Prerequisite before the procedure was the normalization of blood Phe by diet (≤120 µmol/L at time 0) as different basal Phe concentration does alter the outcome of the loading. To avoid any additional Phe intake, during the test (24 hours), a Phe-free, normocaloric diet was administered. Written informed consent for inclusion in the study was obtained from the parents.

    Results

    Blood Phe clearance was not significantly different after the 2 types of loading, only with Phe or with Phe plus BH4. Moreover, a >20% to 30% decrease with respect to peak levels (3–5 hours after Phe loading) of blood Phe was usual in patients with mild PKU and mild HPA, not in classic PKU, within 24 hours after Phe loading, irrespective of BH4 administration (Fig 1).

    Discussion

    None of the 18 consecutive infants with PKU, loaded with equimolar Phe amounts, showed significant variation of the spontaneous Phe hydroxylation rates if challenged with equimolar amounts of synthetic BH4, independently from their genotypes and phenotypes.

    Three main conclusions can be drawn from this study. In the first instance, previous and present observations clearly show that a 20% to 30% decrease of blood Phe after BH4 administration to patients with PKU with spontaneous or induced HPA is a deceptive criterion of responsiveness to cofactor. Actually, such blood Phe fluctuations do occur in patients on a steady Phe-restricted diet,5 and blood Phe decrease can attain even 100% within 24 hours after patients with milder PKU are loaded with 150 mg/kg Phe, a dose exceeding the daily Phe requirement. This behavior is in line with the high Phe tolerance of these patients.4

    Second, no evident effect of BH4 on Phe hydroxylation was observed even in those patients with mutations already reported as BH4 responsive, with Phe hydroxylation rates not significantly differing either after a simple Phe or a combined Phe+BH4 loading. Based on these results, on our experience in handling the use of BH4 in HPAs,9,10 and on the nonreproducible clinical results in front of its high cost, we encourage early screening for BH4 responsiveness with suitable procedures in all patients with PKU. Actually, as Phe is the physiologic enhancer of PAH activity, any eventual effect of BH4 administration on Phe hydroxylation must be validated by a quantitative comparison with the outcome of spontaneous or induced HPA. This crucial assay, however, has been omitted from the first11 to the last12 study concerning this topic, and these same authors using nonquantitative procedures do suggest the investigation of other alternatives. The same conclusion came from the article by Langenbeck.13 For clinical purposes, the procedure we here described and tested can be applied soon in PKU neonates. As based on an internal control, patients’ genotype and phenotype are unnecessary. Reaching a stronger definition of BH4-responsive PKU is essential for warranting an evidence-based and cost-effective therapy in selected patients definitely responsive to the cofactor.

    Footnotes

      • Accepted December 19, 2016.
    • Address correspondence to Francesco Porta, MD, Department of Pediatrics, University of Torino, Piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy. E-mail: porta.franc{at}gmail.com
    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: No external funding.

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Muntau AC,
      2. Röschinger W,
      3. Habich M, et al
      . Tetrahydrobiopterin as an alternative treatment for mild phenylketonuria. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(26):2122–2132pmid:12501224
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Levy HL,
      2. Milanowski A,
      3. Chakrapani A, et al; Sapropterin Research Group
      . Efficacy of sapropterin dihydrochloride (tetrahydrobiopterin, 6R-BH4) for reduction of phenylalanine concentration in patients with phenylketonuria: a phase III randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):504–510pmid:17693179
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Ponzone A,
      2. Porta F,
      3. Mussa A,
      4. Alluto A,
      5. Ferraris S,
      6. Spada M
      . Unresponsiveness to tetrahydrobiopterin of phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. Metabolism. 2010;59(5):645–652pmid:19913839
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Ponzone A,
      2. Spada M,
      3. Roasio L,
      4. Porta F,
      5. Mussa A,
      6. Ferraris S
      . Impact of neonatal protein metabolism and nutrition on screening for phenylketonuria. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;46(5):561–569pmid:18493213
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. MacDonald A,
      2. Rylance GW,
      3. Asplin D,
      4. Hall SK,
      5. Booth IW
      . Does a single plasma phenylalanine predict quality of control in phenylketonuria? Arch Dis Child. 1998;78(2):122–126pmid:9579152
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Ponzone A,
      2. Peduto A,
      3. Spada M
      . Tetrahydrobiopterin and mild phenylketonuria. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(17):1722–1724pmid:12711753
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Porta F,
      2. Mussa A,
      3. Garelli D,
      4. Spada M
      . Phenotyping and treatment of phenylketonuria. Lancet. 2011;377(9764):465, author reply 466pmid:21296231
      OpenUrlPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Blau N,
      2. Erlandsen H
      . The metabolic and molecular bases of tetrahydrobiopterin-responsive phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2004;82(2):101–111pmid:15171997
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Ponzone A,
      2. Guardamagna O,
      3. Ferraris S,
      4. Bracco G,
      5. Cotton RG
      . Screening for malignant phenylketonuria. Lancet. 1987;1(8531):512–513pmid:2881074
      OpenUrlPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Ponzone A,
      2. Guardamagna O,
      3. Ferraris S,
      4. Ferrero GB,
      5. Dianzani I,
      6. Cotton RG
      . Tetrahydrobiopterin loading test in hyperphenylalaninemia. Pediatr Res. 1991;30(5):435–438pmid:1754298
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Kure S,
      2. Hou DC,
      3. Ohura T, et al
      . Tetrahydrobiopterin-responsive phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. J Pediatr. 1999;135(3):375–378pmid:10484807
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Anjema K,
      2. Hofstede FC,
      3. Bosch AM, et al
      . The neonatal tetrahydrobiopterin loading test in phenylketonuria: what is the predictive value? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11:10pmid:26822130
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Langenbeck U
      . Classifying tetrahydrobiopterin responsiveness in the hyperphenylalaninaemias. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008;31(1):67–72pmid:18210214
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    • Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 140, Issue 2
    1 Aug 2017
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Early Screening for Tetrahydrobiopterin Responsiveness in Phenylketonuria
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Early Screening for Tetrahydrobiopterin Responsiveness in Phenylketonuria
    Francesco Porta, Marco Spada, Alberto Ponzone
    Pediatrics Aug 2017, 140 (2) e20161591; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1591

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Early Screening for Tetrahydrobiopterin Responsiveness in Phenylketonuria
    Francesco Porta, Marco Spada, Alberto Ponzone
    Pediatrics Aug 2017, 140 (2) e20161591; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1591
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Demodex Folliculitis and Recent Dupilumab Administration
    • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis Complicated by Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Case Series
    • Cutting Ties With an Old Friend: Omphalitis and Bacteremia With Umbilical Cord Nonseverance
    Show more Case Report

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Endocrinology
      • Metabolic Disorders
      • Endocrinology
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics