Advertising Disclaimer »

PEDIATRICS COVID-19 COLLECTION
We are fast-tracking and publishing the latest research and articles related to COVID-19 for free. View the collection.
Review Article

Kangaroo Mother Care and Neonatal Outcomes: A Meta-analysis

Ellen O. Boundy, Roya Dastjerdi, Donna Spiegelman, Wafaie W. Fawzi, Stacey A. Missmer, Ellice Lieberman, Sandhya Kajeepeta, Stephen Wall and Grace J. Chan
Pediatrics January 2016, 137 (1) e20152238; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2238
Download PDF

Abstract

CONTEXT: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is an intervention aimed at improving outcomes among preterm and low birth weight newborns.

OBJECTIVE: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the association between KMC and neonatal outcomes.

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, African Index Medicus (AIM), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information System (LILACS), Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region (IMEMR), Index Medicus for the South-East Asian Region (IMSEAR), and Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPRIM).

STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized trials and observational studies through April 2014 examining the relationship between KMC and neonatal outcomes among infants of any birth weight or gestational age. Studies with <10 participants, lack of a comparison group without KMC, and those not reporting a quantitative association were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers extracted data on study design, risk of bias, KMC intervention, neonatal outcomes, relative risk (RR) or mean difference measures.

RESULTS: 1035 studies were screened; 124 met inclusion criteria. Among LBW newborns, KMC compared to conventional care was associated with 36% lower mortality(RR 0.64; 95% [CI] 0.46, 0.89). KMC decreased risk of neonatal sepsis (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34, 0.83), hypothermia (RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.12, 0.41), hypoglycemia (RR 0.12; 95% CI 0.05, 0.32), and hospital readmission (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.23, 0.76) and increased exclusive breastfeeding (RR 1.50; 95% CI 1.26, 1.78). Newborns receiving KMC had lower mean respiratory rate and pain measures, and higher oxygen saturation, temperature, and head circumference growth.

LIMITATIONS: Lack of data on KMC limited the ability to assess dose-response.

CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to scale up KMC implementation are warranted.

  • Abbreviations:
    AIM —
    African Index Medicus
    CI —
    confidence interval
    IMEMR —
    Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region
    IMSEAR —
    Index Medicus for the South-East Asian Region
    KMC —
    kangaroo mother care
    LBW —
    low birth weight
    LILACS —
    Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information System
    MD —
    mean difference
    RCT —
    randomized controlled trial
    RR —
    relative risk
    SMD —
    standardized mean difference
    SSC —
    skin-to-skin contact
    WPRIM —
    Western Pacific Region Index Medicus

    • An estimated 4 million infants die each year during their first 4 weeks of life.1 Although important progress has been made toward Millennium Development Goal 4 to reduce mortality in children <5 years old, less improvement has been achieved in the neonatal period.2 Infants born before term or at low birth weight (LBW) are at elevated risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity, inhibited growth and development, and chronic disease.1,3,4 Health technologies such as incubators can help improve outcomes in high-risk infants; however, such equipment is not widely available in low- and middle-income countries, where 99% of all neonatal deaths occur.1 Effective and low-cost alternative methods of neonatal care are needed.

    In 1978, Dr Edgar Rey Sanabria introduced kangaroo mother care (KMC) in Bogotá, Colombia as an alternative to incubators for LBW infants.5 The World Health Organization defines KMC with 4 components: early, continuous, and prolonged skin-to-skin contact (SSC) between the newborn and mother, exclusive breastfeeding, early discharge from the health facility, and close follow-up at home.6 KMC is postulated to improve neonatal outcomes by maintaining the infant’s temperature and other vital sign parameters through SSC and by providing the benefits of breastfeeding.5 These effects are thought to be beneficial for all newborns but may be especially advantageous for preterm infants.

    In previous meta-analyses, KMC was found to reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among LBW infants.7,8 In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), SSC alone has also been associated with improved breastfeeding, cardiorespiratory stability, and improved responses to procedural pain.9,10 Although these reviews have provided important evidence on the effectiveness of KMC, they are limited to specific outcome measures and newborn populations, and they have included only RCTs, with the exception of Lawn et al 2010.7 To give a more complete understanding of the potential benefits and drawbacks of KMC, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a comprehensive summary of observational studies and RCTs on KMC and neonatal outcomes.

    Methods

    Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

    The literature search for this review included original reports, direct queries of authors of published articles, and program reports. We identified studies through electronic database searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, African Index Medicus (AIM), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information System (LILACS), Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region (IMEMR), Index Medicus for the South-East Asian Region (IMSEAR), and Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPRIM) by using the terms “kangaroo mother care,” “kangaroo care,” and “skin to skin care” through April 24, 2014. We also conducted hand searches of reference lists of published systematic reviews. To search the gray literature for unpublished studies, we explored programmatic reports and requested data from programs implementing KMC.

    We included studies using any definition of KMC with at least the SSC component and any neonatal outcome. We excluded studies with nonhuman subjects, <10 participants, nonprimary data collection or analysis, lack of a comparison group without KMC, and those that did not report a quantitative effect measure. We did not limit our analysis to studies of newborns with a specific gestational age or birth weight.

    Data Abstraction

    All article abstracts were screened by 2 independent reviewers. When eligibility for inclusion was unclear from the abstract, the full text was screened. Two reviewers then abstracted data from all articles meeting the inclusion criteria. At each stage, reviewers compared results to ensure agreement, and in cases of disagreement, a third party acted as tiebreaker. Data from articles in English, Spanish, and Portuguese were abstracted by 2 fluent speakers. For articles in less common languages, a single native speaker abstracted data. If an article was missing key information, we contacted authors by e-mail to request data.

    We collected information on study design, setting, participant characteristics, description of KMC and comparison groups, follow-up time, outcomes, assessment of bias, and measures of association. Relative risks (RRs) or mean difference (MD) effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. We collected exposure data on KMC components, clinical stabilization criteria for starting KMC, and duration of SSC promoted and practiced.

    Study Quality

    Two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of studies in 5 domains: selection bias, information bias, detection bias, attrition bias, and other bias.11 For observational studies, an additional domain for confounding was assessed. Each domain was categorized as high, low, or unclear risk of bias. We then created an overall assessment of bias for each study. For RCTs, if both selection and information bias were low risk, the overall risk of bias was considered low. If either domain was high risk, the overall risk of bias was designated as high. For observational studies, if selection bias, information bias, and confounding were all low risk, the overall risk of bias was considered low. If any of those 3 domains was high risk, the overall risk was considered high. Otherwise, the overall risk of bias was considered unclear.

    Statistical Analysis

    We used the random effects estimator to assess the effect of KMC compared with conventional care on each neonatal outcome.12 For dichotomous outcomes, we report summary estimates as RR and 95% CI. For studies that did not report an RR, we calculated the RR and SE from the data if available. For continuous outcomes, we report summary estimates as MD and 95% CI. When different units or scales were used across studies, we calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD).11 When available, estimates adjusted for confounding were used rather than crude. Estimates that were presented only as medians rather than means, only as odds ratios without raw data to calculate the RR, or those with 0 cells were excluded from summary measures.13–28

    We performed sensitivity analyses by restricting the analyses to RCTs and adjusted RR estimates for dichotomous outcomes and by restricting the analyses to RCTs and randomized crossover studies for continuous outcomes. To assess between-study heterogeneity, we report the I2 statistic and the P value for the Q statistic.12,29,30 The I2 statistic quantifies the amount of variation in the effect estimate attributable to between-study heterogeneity, reported as a percentage, with a higher I2 indicating more heterogeneity. We conducted subgroup analyses and metaregression for outcomes with data from ≥10 studies. We explored these predetermined subgroups: year, study type, sample size, location, country-level economy,31 country-level neonatal mortality rate in 2013,32 infant gestational age and birth weight, KMC components, KMC initiation criteria, SSC duration, and study quality classification. In metaregression analyses, we report the residual I2, indicating the amount of remaining heterogeneity in the effect estimate after adjustment for a given characteristic. The indicator method was used for missing covariate information in metaregressions.33

    We assessed publication bias by visual inspection of funnel plots of effect size and SE for asymmetry and by Begg’s rank correlation and Egger’s linear regression tests.34,35 We conducted meta-analyses by using Stata statistical software (version 13.1), and risk of bias figures were created in RevMan software (version 5.3).

    Results

    Our search identified 2515 records (Fig 1). We then identified 29 additional records related to KMC through crosscheck of reference lists, communication with an author,36 and programmatic reports. After 1006 duplicates were removed, 1035 records underwent abstract screening. Of those, 527 did not meet inclusion criteria. Full-text articles for the remaining 508 records were then assessed and of those, 384 did not meet inclusion criteria. This review and meta-analysis includes 124 studies that reported an association between KMC and ≥1 neonatal outcome. One hundred eleven (90%) were in English, 7 (6%) in Portuguese, 4 (3%) in Spanish, and 2 (2%) in Farsi. We e-mailed 8 authors to obtain additional information37–44 and received a response with data from 2.38,39

    FIGURE 1
    FIGURE 1

    Flow diagram for identification of included studies.

    Study Characteristics

    Of the 124 included studies, 110 (89%) were published between 2000 and 2014 (Table 1). Seventy-six studies (61%) had <100 participants. Fifty-five (44%) were RCTs, 8 (6%) were randomized crossover trials, and 61 (49%) were observational or nonrandomized intervention studies. Most studies (n = 113, 94%) were in middle- or high-income countries and were conducted in health facilities (n = 118, 98%).

    View this table:
    TABLE 1

    Characteristics of Included Studies (n = 124)

    Among studies reporting gestational age, the majority (n = 61, 68%) were among preterm infants <37 weeks’ gestation; 17 (19%) were among full-term infants, defined as ≥37 weeks, and 12 (13%) were among infants of all gestational ages. Similarly, 47 studies (58%) were among LBW infants (≤2500 g), an additional 15 (19%) were among very LBW infants (≤1500 g), 9 (11%) were among non-LBW infants, and 10 (12%) were among infants of all birth weights. Forty-three studies (35%) did not specify infants’ birth weight, and 34 (27%) did not specify gestational age, but all studies reported either birth weight or gestational age, except for 1.45

    Most studies (n = 71, 68%) defined KMC as SSC only, 14 (13%) defined KMC as SSC plus promotion of exclusive breastfeeding, 20 (19%) included an early discharge or follow-up component, and 19 (15%) did not describe the components of their KMC intervention. SSC was initiated immediately after birth in 7 studies (8%), whereas 41 (48%) had stability criteria to be met before SSC initiation, and 27 (31%) had other non–stability-related initiation criteria. Eleven studies (14%) looking at pain-related outcomes started SSC around the time of an infant procedure. Fifty-two studies (66%) promoted <4 hours of SSC per day, 20 (25%) promoted ≥22 hours per day, and few studies (n = 7, 9%) had a duration between 4 and 21 hours per day. Thirty-eight studies (31%) did not specify when SSC was initiated, and 45 studies (36%) did not report the daily duration of SSC mothers were instructed to practice. Information on duration of SSC actually practiced rather than promoted was only available in 16 studies (13%). Details of each included study are presented in Supplemental Table 16.

    Meta-analysis

    Summary RR estimates for dichotomous outcomes are reported in Table 2, and MD estimates for continuous outcomes are reported in Table 3.

    View this table:
    TABLE 2

    RR and 95% CI for the Effect of KMC Compared With Conventional Care on Dichotomous Neonatal Outcomes

    View this table:
    TABLE 3

    MD and 95% CI for the Effect of KMC Compared With Conventional Care on Continuous Neonatal Outcomes

    Mortality

    Compared with conventional care, KMC was associated with a 23% lower risk of mortality at each study’s latest follow-up time (n = 16; 95% CI, 0.60, 0.99; I2 = 67%) (Fig 2). Among 11 studies reporting mortality during the first 45 days of life, there was nonsignificant 21% decrease in mortality with KMC (95% CI, 0.57 to 1.10; I2 = 77%), whereas the 7 studies reporting mortality at 3, 6, or 12 months of age showed 41% lower mortality in the KMC groups compared with controls (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.82; I2 = 0%) (Table 2).

    FIGURE 2
    FIGURE 2

    Forest plot for effect of KMC compared with conventional care on mortality at latest follow-up time, grouped by follow-up time. BW, birth weight.

    Among LBW newborns <2000 g, KMC decreased mortality at latest follow-up time by 36% (n = 15; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.89; I2 = 72%). In the 2 studies of infants of all birth weights, KMC did not significantly affect mortality (RR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.33; I2 = 0%). Additional subgroup analyses of study characteristics and KMC components for mortality at latest follow-up are presented in Supplemental Table 4. We did not find important differences in the effect of KMC on mortality by location, country-level economy, or neonatal mortality rate. Two studies whose KMC intervention included SSC, exclusive breastfeeding, early discharge, and close follow-up showed a stronger protective effect of KMC against mortality (RR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.98) than studies using other KMC definitions. Similarly, when mothers were encouraged to provide SSC plus ≥1 other component, KMC was protective against mortality (n = 9; RR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89), whereas studies where KMC was defined as SSC alone did not (n = 5; RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.52). There was no difference in mortality between studies including promotion of exclusive breastfeeding in their KMC definition compared with those that did not.

    Studies instructing mothers to start SSC after stability criteria was met showed a similarly protective effect against mortality (n = 9, RR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.97) as those that started SSC immediately (n = 3, RR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.78) (Supplemental Fig 3). Eleven studies promoting ≥22 hours of SSC per day showed a protective effect of KMC (RR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.92) on mortality, whereas there was no association in the 1 study promoting 4 to 8 hours per day or the 4 studies that did not define SSC duration (Supplemental Fig 4).

    Breastfeeding

    KMC increased the likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge or 40 to 41 weeks postmenstrual age by 50% (n = 13; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.78; I2 = 93%) (Supplemental Fig 5). KMC increased the likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding across nearly all subgroups of study, infant, and KMC characteristics (Supplemental Table 5). At 1- to 4-month follow-up, KMC increased the likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding by 39% (n = 8; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.74; I2 = 60%) (Table 2). KMC did not have a significant impact on the MD in time to breastfeeding initiation (n = 4; SMD −1.07; 95% CI, −2.30 to 0.17; I2 = 97%) (Table 3). Several studies looked at other feeding outcomes that were too heterogeneous to combine into a summary estimate.62–64,72,77,96,118,119

    Infection

    Risk of infection during study follow-up was not statistically different between KMC and control groups (n = 12; RR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.05; I2 = 60%) (Table 2). When data were stratified by infection type, however, KMC was associated with 47% lower risk of sepsis (n = 8; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.83; I2 = 25%) but did not have an effect on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or other severe infections (n = 4; RR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.40 to 2.46; I2 = 77%) (Supplemental Fig 6). KMC did not have a significant effect on risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 3; RR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.04) (Table 2). All studies that examined sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis were among infants <2250 g at birth.

    Among RCTs, KMC decreased risk of infection by 49% (n = 9; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.81) (Supplemental Table 6). Nine studies that had stability criteria before initiating SSC showed a protective effect of KMC against infection (RR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.77), whereas the 2 studies that had other non–stability-related criteria before initiation did not (RR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.45).

    Heart Rate

    KMC did not have a significant effect on mean heart rate (n = 15; MD 0.41 beats per minute; 95% CI, −2.25 to 1.42; I2 = 46%) (Supplemental Fig 7). No statistical or clinically significant differences were noted in subgroup analysis of study, infant, or KMC characteristics (Supplemental Table 7).

    Respiration and Oxygenation

    Compared with conventional care, KMC was associated with a non–statistically significant reduction in risk of apnea among 6 studies of LBW infants <2000 g (RR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.14; I2 = 42%) (Table 2). On average, newborns receiving KMC had a respiratory rate 3 breaths per minute slower (n = 12; 95% CI, −5.15 to −1.19; I2 = 75%) and oxygen saturation 0.9% higher than controls (n = 14; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.45; I2 = 92%) (Supplemental Figs 8 and 9). Across subgroup analyses, KMC was associated with lower respiratory rate and higher oxygen saturation (Supplemental Tables 8 and 9).

    Temperature

    Compared with conventional care, KMC was associated with 78% lower risk of hypothermia (n = 9; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.41; I2 = 71%) and 23% lower risk of hyperthermia (n = 3; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.01; I2 = 0%) (Table 2). Mean body temperature of infants receiving KMC was 0.24°C higher than in controls (n = 14; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.33; I2 = 82%) (Supplemental Fig 10). This effect was similar across subgroups of study, infant, and KMC characteristics (Supplemental Table 10).

    Hypoglycemia and Cortisol

    KMC was strongly protective against hypoglycemia in 2 studies of LBW infants (RR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.32; I2 = 0%) (Table 2). Standardized mean cortisol levels were not significantly different between KMC and control groups (n = 3; SMD −0.44; 95% CI, −0.94 to 0.06; I2 = 54%) (Table 3).

    Hospital Stay

    KMC decreased the likelihood of hospital readmission by 58% in 2 studies (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.76; I2 = 0%) (Table 2). Length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between KMC and control groups (n = 12; MD −0.68 days; 95% CI, −2.11 to 0.75; I2 = 95%) (Supplemental Fig 11, Supplemental Table 11). One study reported length of hospital and NICU stays stratified by birth weight and found shorter hospital stays in the KMC group compared with controls among infants <1500 g and in length of NICU stay among infants 1201 to 1500 g.120

    Growth

    Various infant growth outcomes were examined across studies. We looked at the effect of KMC on measures of weight gain individually and by combining them using the SMD (Table 3, Supplemental Fig 12). We did not find a significant association between KMC and the SMD in weight gain or body length growth. Infants receiving KMC had head circumference growth 0.19 cm per week higher than controls in 3 studies of infants <2000 g at birth (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.37; I2 = 89%). Among studies reporting weight gain outcomes, there were no important differences in the effect of KMC by subgroups of study, infant, or KMC characteristics (Supplemental Table 12). One additional study examined the risk of being malnourished, overweight, or obese at 5 to 6 years old and found no difference between the KMC and control groups.121

    Pain

    Several studies examined pain-related outcomes, including crying, heart rate, and pain scores during and after painful procedures (Table 3). According the Premature Infant Pain Profile scale, with a range from 0 to 21, infants receiving SSC during a painful procedure had a mean pain score 0.83 points lower than controls (n = 7; 95% CI, −1.53 to −0.13; I2 = 88%).122 Studies using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale123 (n = 3) and the Neonatal Facial Coding System121,124 (n = 2) showed nonsignificant decreases in pain among infants receiving SSC during painful procedures compared with controls. When combined across scales using the SMD, a decrease in pain score was again noted in infants receiving SSC compared with conventional care (SMD −0.63; 95% CI, −1.09 to −0.16; I2 = 89%) (Supplemental Fig 13). This effect was similar across subgroups (Supplemental Table 13).

    After a painful stimulus, infants receiving SSC cried on average 11 seconds less than control group infants (n = 3; 95% CI, −19.79 to −2.80; I2 = 0%) (Table 3). Among studies using infant heart rate during painful stimulus as a proxy pain measure, mean heart rate was 7 beats per minute slower in the SSC groups than controls (n = 3; 95% CI, −12.98 to −1.93; I2 = 29%).

    Other Outcomes

    A variety of other neonatal outcomes were reported in a single study or in different ways across studies that could not be combined into a summary measure. Those outcomes related to illness included retinopathy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, regurgitation, respiratory tract disease, diarrhea, and intraventricular hemorrhage.48,49,58,60,125 Other outcomes included hyperbilirubinemia, blood pressure, stratum corneum hydration, oxygen requirement, carbon dioxide production, low-frequency/high-frequency ratio, thyroid measures, water loss, home observation of the environment, stabilization of cardiopulmonary system, and cost of care.13,44,71,79,80,89,125–139 Several studies also examined the effect of KMC on neurocognitive outcomes. These data were reported across different scales with endpoints at different ages and thus could not be combined into summary measures. They included assessments of behavior, mental and psychomotor development, reflexes, temperament, brain maturation, and sleep.16,61,77,90,91,95,110,113,115,140–151

    Risk of Bias

    After evaluating 5 domains of bias among the 55 RCTs, we classified 25 (45%) as overall low risk of bias, 14 (25%) as high, and 16 (29%) unclear (Supplemental Table 14; Supplemental Fig 14). When the same 5 bias domains were used plus a domain for confounding for the 69 observational studies, overall risk of bias was considered low in 29 (42%), high in 24 (35%), and unclear in 16 (23%) (Supplemental Table 15; Supplemental Fig 15). When restricted to studies with low overall risk of bias, the protective effects of KMC on mortality, exclusive breastfeeding, and infection were stronger than results obtained with all studies (Supplemental Tables 4–6). Effect estimates for continuous outcomes did not materially change when restricted to studies with low risk of bias (Supplemental Tables 7–13).

    Publication Bias

    We assessed publication bias for mortality at latest follow-up time, exclusive breastfeeding at discharge, and infection outcomes. No evidence of publication bias was noted for mortality by Begg’s (P = .89) or Egger’s (P = .36) tests or by visual inspection of the funnel plot (Supplemental Fig 16). Similarly, no evidence of publication bias was found for exclusive breastfeeding (Begg’s P = .25; Egger’s P = .12) or infection (Begg’s P = .45; Egger’s P = .75).

    Discussion

    When compared with conventional care, KMC is associated with decreased mortality among newborns who survive to receive it, particularly among LBW infants. KMC also increases likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding up to 4 months of age and decreases risk of newborn sepsis, hypothermia, hypoglycemia, and hospital readmission. Additionally, infants receiving KMC have improved vital signs, greater head circumference growth, and lower pain scores. We did not find evidence of harm related to KMC.

    We found a similar magnitude in reduction of mortality risk among LBW infants exposed to KMC as in previous reviews.7,8 We did not find a significant difference in mortality in the 2 studies including all birth weights, which had not been examined in previous reviews. We noted a similar protective effect of KMC against sepsis and hypothermia, increased likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding, and lower Premature Infant Pain Profile score as described in previous work.8–10 We did not find a significant difference in length of hospital stay, which could reflect differences in study inclusion criteria and infant characteristics compared with a previous review.8 We found greater head circumference growth, but no difference in length or weight gain, with most measurements taken across the hospital stay period. Conde-Agudelo and Díaz-Rossello8 reported an increase in growth parameters for KMC-exposed infants compared with controls at latest follow-up, but as in our results, no important differences in growth measured at discharge or 40 to 41 weeks’ postmenstrual age.8

    Although the improvements in respiratory rate, oxygenation, and temperature that we found associated with KMC exposure may each be of modest clinical significance, when taken together they support the hypothesis that KMC improves overall physiologic regulation in the neonate, which could have important effects on other longer-term outcomes. Lower pain measures among infants receiving KMC may also provide additional benefits for LBW infants who experience numerous injections during hospitalization.

    This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive picture of the effects of KMC on neonatal health by its inclusion of all study types, outcomes, and infant populations. Therefore, we were able to look at as many studies as available for each outcome and perform sensitivity analyses. We were able to assess the effect of KMC on normal weight and term infants, albeit with limited data, and to examine several outcomes related to vital signs and procedural pain parameters that were not included in the most recent review of KMC among LBW infants.8 We also collected detailed information on study design, newborn characteristics, and KMC components to look for differences in the effect of KMC in subgroup and metaregression analyses.

    How much of KMC’s effect is through SSC alone compared with KMC that includes additional components remains unclear because of the sparsity of details available on the KMC intervention practiced in many studies. When they were described, we noted heterogeneity in the definition and components of KMC and conventional care across studies. We attempted to address this limitation by performing subgroup analyses by KMC components, duration, and initiation time. The effects of KMC may be confounded with breastfeeding as a component of KMC. We explored this possibility by comparing subgroups of studies that encouraged exclusive breastfeeding as part of their intervention compared with those that did not; we did not see a consistent difference in effect.

    We were limited in our ability to adequately examine the dose–response relationship between duration of SSC and neonatal outcomes because there were few studies with duration of 4 to 21 hours per day, and for any given outcome there was little variation in the SSC duration promoted across studies. We still attempted to look at the data available on SSC duration as a covariate in metaregression analyses, and we found that variation in duration did not appear to have an important impact on the effect of KMC in these data. We could not adequately assess the impact of number of days of SSC because the majority of studies promoted a similar duration of 1 to 5 days.

    Conclusions

    KMC is protective against a wide variety of adverse neonatal outcomes and has not shown evidence of harm. This safe, low-cost intervention has the potential to prevent many complications associated with preterm birth and may also provide benefits to full-term newborns. The consistency of these findings across study settings and infant populations provides support for widespread implementation of KMC as standard of care for newborns. Additional research is needed to determine the ideal duration and components of KMC. Successful strategies for KMC implementation in various contexts should be disseminated among clinicians and policymakers.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions to data abstraction and referencing by Stacie Constantian, Tobi Skotnes, Ilana Bergelson, Rodrigo Kuromoto and Eduardo Toledo. We acknowledge Kate Lobner for developing the search strategy.

    Footnotes

      • Accepted October 20, 2015.
    • Address correspondence to Grace J. Chan, MD, MPH, PhD, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: grace.chan{at}childrens.harvard.edu

    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: This study was supported by the Saving Newborn Lives initiative (SNL) of Save the Children. Dr Boundy received support from training grant T32HD060454 in reproductive, perinatal, and pediatric epidemiology from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, and training grant T76MC00001 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Lawn JE,
      2. Cousens S,
      3. Zupan J; Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team
      . 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365(9462):891–900pmid:15752534
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Bryce J,
      2. Black RE,
      3. Victora CG
      . Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5: progress and challenges. BMC Med. 2013;11:225pmid:24228742
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. World Health Organization
      . Preterm birth fact sheet no. 363. 2014 Available at: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs363/en/. Accessed December 17, 2014
    4. ↵
      1. United Nations Children’s Fund and World Health Organization
      . Low Birthweight: Country, Regional and Global Estimates. New York, NY: UNICEF; 2004
    5. ↵
      1. Charpak N,
      2. Ruiz JG,
      3. Zupan J, et al
      . Kangaroo Mother Care: 25 years after. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(5):514–522pmid:16188735
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research
      . Kangaroo Mother Care: A Practical Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003
    7. ↵
      1. Lawn JE,
      2. Mwansa-Kambafwile J,
      3. Horta BL,
      4. Barros FC,
      5. Cousens S
      . ‘Kangaroo mother care’ to prevent neonatal deaths due to preterm birth complications. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(Suppl 1):i144–i154pmid:20348117
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Conde-Agudelo A,
      2. Díaz-Rossello JL
      . Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;3:CD002771
      OpenUrlPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Moore ER,
      2. Anderson GC,
      3. Bergman N
      . Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD003519
      OpenUrlPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Johnston CC-Y,
      2. Fernandes A,
      3. Inglis D,
      4. Streiner D,
      5. Zee R
      . Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD008435
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Higgins JPT,
      2. Green S
      , eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. London, England: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011
    12. ↵
      1. DerSimonian R,
      2. Laird N
      . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188pmid:3802833
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Karlsson V,
      2. Heinemann AB,
      3. Sjörs G,
      4. Nykvist KH,
      5. Agren J
      . Early skin-to-skin care in extremely preterm infants: thermal balance and care environment. J Pediatr. 2012;161(3):422–426pmid:22497906
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Broughton EI,
      2. Gomez I,
      3. Sanchez N,
      4. Vindell C
      . The cost-savings of implementing kangaroo mother care in Nicaragua. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;34(3):176–182pmid:24233110
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Eka Pratiwi IGAP
      . Soetjiningsih, Made Kardana I. Effect of kangaroo method on the risk of hypothermia and duration of birth weight regain in low birth weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Indones. 2009;49:253–258
      OpenUrl
    16. ↵
      1. Azevedo VMGO,
      2. David RB,
      3. Xavier CC
      . Kangaroo mother care in preterm newborns on artificial ventilation: an evaluation of behavior patterns. Cuidado mãe canguru em recém-nascidospré-termo sob suporte ventilatório: avaliação dos estados comportamentais. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2011;11(2):133–138
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Kambarami RA,
      2. Chidede O,
      3. Kowo DT
      . Kangaroo care versus incubator care in the management of well preterm infants--a pilot study. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1998;18(2):81–86pmid:9924567
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Acharya N,
      2. Singh RR,
      3. Bhatta NK,
      4. Poudel P
      . Randomized control trial of kangaroo mother care in low birth weight babies at a tertiary level hospital. J Nepal Paediatr Soci. 2014;34(1):18–23
      OpenUrl
      1. Almeida CM,
      2. Almeida AFN,
      3. Forti EMP
      . Effects of kangaroo mother care on the vital signs of low-weight preterm newborns. Braz J Phys Ther. 2007;11(1):1–5
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Almeida H,
      2. Venancio SI,
      3. Sanches MT,
      4. Onuki D
      . The impact of kangaroo care on exclusive breastfeeding in low birth weight newborns. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010;86(3):250–253pmid:20424798
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Bohnhorst B,
      2. Heyne T,
      3. Peter CS,
      4. Poets CF
      . Skin-to-skin (kangaroo) care, respiratory control, and thermoregulation. J Pediatr. 2001;138(2):193–197pmid:11174616
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Lyngstad LT,
      2. Tandberg BS,
      3. Storm H,
      4. Ekeberg BL,
      5. Moen A
      . Does skin-to-skin contact reduce stress during diaper change in preterm infants? Early Hum Dev. 2014;90(4):169–172pmid:24548816
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Priya JJ
      . Kangaroo care for low birth weight babies. Nurs J India. 2004;95(9):209–212pmid:15839474
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Saeidi R,
      2. Asnaashari Z,
      3. Amirnejad M,
      4. Esmaeili H,
      5. Robatsangi MG
      . Use of “kangaroo care” to alleviate the intensity of vaccination pain in newborns. Iran J Pediatr. 2011;21(1):99–102pmid:23056772
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Singh A,
      2. Yadav A,
      3. Singh A
      . Utilization of postnatal care for newborns and its association with neonatal mortality in India: an analytical appraisal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:33pmid:22571689
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Toma TS,
      2. Venâncio SI,
      3. Andretto DDA
      . Maternal perception of low birth weight babies before and following the implementation of the kangaroo mother care in a public hospital, in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Percepção das mães sobre o cuidado do bebê de baixo peso antes e após implantação do método mãe-canguru em hospital público da cidade de São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2007;7(3):297–307
      OpenUrl
      1. Ghavane S,
      2. Murki S,
      3. Subramanian S,
      4. Gaddam P,
      5. Kandraju H,
      6. Thumalla S
      . Kangaroo Mother Care in Kangaroo ward for improving the growth and breastfeeding outcomes when reaching term gestational age in very low birth weight infants. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(12):e545–e549pmid:23016710
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Boo NY,
      2. Jamli FM
      . Short duration of skin-to-skin contact: effects on growth and breastfeeding. J Paediatr Child Health. 2007;43(12):831–836pmid:17803670
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. ↵
      1. Higgins JP,
      2. Thompson SG
      . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558pmid:12111919
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Higgins JP,
      2. Thompson SG,
      3. Deeks JJ,
      4. Altman DG
      . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560pmid:12958120
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    31. ↵
      1. World Bank
      . Data: country and lending groups. 2014. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups
    32. ↵
      1. UN Inter-agency Group for Childhood Mortality Estimation
      . (UNICEF, WHO, World Bank, UN DESA Population Division). Data: mortality rate, neonatal (per 1000 live births). 2014. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.DYN.NMRT
    33. ↵
      1. Miettinen O
      . Theoretical Epidemiology: Principles of Occurrence Research in Medicine. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1985
    34. ↵
      1. Egger M,
      2. Davey Smith G,
      3. Schneider M,
      4. Minder C
      . Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–634pmid:9310563
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. ↵
      1. Begg CB,
      2. Mazumdar M
      . Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–1101pmid:7786990
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Nimbalkar SM,
      2. Patel VK,
      3. Patel DV,
      4. Nimbalkar AS,
      5. Sethi A,
      6. Phatak A
      . Effect of early skin-to-skin contact following normal delivery on incidence of hypothermia in neonates more than 1800 g: randomized control trial. J Perinatol. 2014;34(5):364–368pmid:24556982
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    37. ↵
      1. Gray L,
      2. Watt L,
      3. Blass EM
      . Skin-to-skin contact is analgesic in healthy newborns. Pediatrics. 2000;105(1 II):110–111
    38. ↵
      1. Mörelius E,
      2. Theodorsson E,
      3. Nelson N
      . Salivary cortisol and mood and pain profiles during skin-to-skin care for an unselected group of mothers and infants in neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics. 2005;116(5):1105–1113pmid:16263996
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Bigelow A,
      2. Power M,
      3. MacLellan-Peters J,
      4. Alex M,
      5. McDonald C
      . Effect of mother/infant skin-to-skin contact on postpartum depressive symptoms and maternal physiological stress. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(3):369–382pmid:22537390
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Ludington-Hoe SM,
      2. Hosseini R,
      3. Torowicz DL
      . Skin-to-skin contact (Kangaroo Care) analgesia for preterm infant heel stick. AACN Clin Issues. 2005;16(3):373–387pmid:16082239
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Ferber SG,
      2. Makhoul IR
      . Neurobehavioural assessment of skin-to-skin effects on reaction to pain in preterm infants: a randomized, controlled within-subject trial. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(2):171–176pmid:18177441
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Campbell-Yeo M,
      2. Johnston C,
      3. Benoit B, et al
      . Trial of repeated analgesia with Kangaroo Mother Care (TRAKC Trial). BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:182pmid:24284002
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. van Zanten HA,
      2. Havenaar AJ,
      3. Stigt HJH,
      4. Ligthart PAH,
      5. Walther FJ
      . The kangaroo method is safe for premature infants under 30 weeks of gestation during ventilatory support. J Neonatal Nurs. 2007;13(5):186–190
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    44. ↵
      1. Ludington-Hoe SM,
      2. Swinth JY
      . Kangaroo mother care during phototherapy: effect on bilirubin profile. Neonatal Netw. 2001;20(5):41–48pmid:12144221
      OpenUrlPubMed
    45. ↵
      1. Suzuki S
      . Effect of early skin-to-skin contact on breast-feeding. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(7):695–696pmid:24127957
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Charpak N,
      2. Ruiz-Pelaez JG,
      3. Figueroa de C Z,
      4. Charpak Y
      . A randomized, controlled trial of kangaroo mother care: results of follow-up at 1 year of corrected age. Pediatrics. 2001;108(5):1072–1079pmid:11694683
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Lincetto O,
      2. Nazir AI,
      3. Cattaneo A
      . Kangaroo mother care with limited resources. J Trop Pediatr. 2000;46(5):293–295pmid:11077939
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    48. ↵
      1. Suman RP,
      2. Udani R,
      3. Nanavati R
      . Kangaroo mother care for low birth weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2008;45(1):17–23pmid:18250500
      OpenUrlPubMed
    49. ↵
      1. Lamy Filho F,
      2. Silva AA,
      3. Lamy ZC,
      4. Gomes MA,
      5. Moreira ME; Grupo de Avaliação do Método Canguru; Rede Brasileira de Pesquisas Neonatais
      . Evaluation of the neonatal outcomes of the kangaroo mother method in Brazil. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008;84(5):428–435pmid:18923784
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Ahmed S,
      2. Mitra SN,
      3. Chowdhury AM,
      4. Camacho LL,
      5. Winikoff B,
      6. Sloan NL
      . Community Kangaroo Mother Care: implementation and potential for neonatal survival and health in very low-income settings. J Perinatol. 2011;31(5):361–367pmid:21311502
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Blay S.
      Ghana KMC study results [program report]. 2009
      1. Kadam S,
      2. Binoy S,
      3. Kanbur W,
      4. Mondkar JA,
      5. Fernandez A
      . Feasibility of kangaroo mother care in Mumbai. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72(1):35–38pmid:15684446
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. McMaster P,
      2. Haina T,
      3. Vince JD
      . Kangaroo care in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. Trop Doct. 2000;30(3):136–138pmid:10902467
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Pattinson RC,
      2. Bergh AM,
      3. Malan AF,
      4. Prinsloo R
      . Does kangaroo mother care save lives? J Trop Pediatr. 2006;52(6):438–441pmid:16822797
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Sloan NL,
      2. Ahmed S,
      3. Mitra SN, et al
      . Community-based kangaroo mother care to prevent neonatal and infant mortality: a randomized, controlled cluster trial. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):e1047–e1059 www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/121/5/e1047pmid:18450847
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Charpak N,
      2. Ruiz-Peláez JG,
      3. Charpak Y
      . Rey-Martinez Kangaroo Mother Program: an alternative way of caring for low birth weight infants? One year mortality in a two cohort study. Pediatrics. 1994;94(6 Pt 1):804–810pmid:7970993
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Worku B,
      2. Kassie A
      . Kangaroo mother care: a randomized controlled trial on effectiveness of early kangaroo mother care for the low birthweight infants in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Trop Pediatr. 2005;51(2):93–97pmid:15840760
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    58. ↵
      1. Rojas MA,
      2. Kaplan M,
      3. Quevedo M, et al
      . Somatic growth of preterm infants during skin-to-skin care versus traditional holding: a randomized, controlled trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24(3):163–168pmid:12806228
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Cattaneo A,
      2. Davanzo R,
      3. Worku B, et al
      . Kangaroo mother care for low birthweight infants: a randomized controlled trial in different settings. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(9):976–985pmid:9764894
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    60. ↵
      1. Sloan NL,
      2. Camacho LW,
      3. Rojas EP,
      4. Stern C; Maternidad Isidro Ayora Study Team
      . Kangaroo mother method: randomised controlled trial of an alternative method of care for stabilised low-birthweight infants. Lancet. 1994;344(8925):782–785pmid:7916073
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    61. ↵
      1. Whitelaw A,
      2. Heisterkamp G,
      3. Sleath K,
      4. Acolet D,
      5. Richards M
      . Skin to skin contact for very low birthweight infants and their mothers. Arch Dis Child. 1988;63(11):1377–1381pmid:3060024
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    62. ↵
      1. Thukral A,
      2. Sankar MJ,
      3. Agarwal R,
      4. Gupta N,
      5. Deorari AK,
      6. Paul VK
      . Early skin-to-skin contact and breast-feeding behavior in term neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology. 2012;102(2):114–119pmid:22699241
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Marín Gabriel MA,
      2. Llana Martín I,
      3. López Escobar A,
      4. Fernández Villalba E,
      5. Romero Blanco I,
      6. Touza Pol P
      . Randomized controlled trial of early skin-to-skin contact: effects on the mother and the newborn. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(11):1630–1634pmid:19912138
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    64. ↵
      1. Heidarzadeh M,
      2. Hosseini MB,
      3. Ershadmanesh M,
      4. Gholamitabar Tabari M,
      5. Khazaee S
      . The effect of kangaroo mother care (KMC) on breast feeding at the time of NICU discharge. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15(4):302–306pmid:24083002
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Ali SMSJ,
      2. Sharma R,
      3. Alam S
      . Kangaroo mother care as compared to conventional care for low birth weight babies. Dicle Med J. 2009;36(3):155–160
      OpenUrl
      1. Bramson L,
      2. Lee JW,
      3. Moore E, et al
      . Effect of early skin-to-skin mother--infant contact during the first 3 hours following birth on exclusive breastfeeding during the maternity hospital stay. J Hum Lact. 2010;26(2):130–137pmid:20110561
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Charpak N,
      2. Ruiz-Peláez JG
      , Figueroa de C Z, Charpak Y. Kangaroo mother versus traditional care for newborn infants
      1. Gregson S,
      2. Blacker J
      . Kangaroo care in pre-term or low birth weight babies in a postnatal ward. Br J Midwifery. 2011;19(9):568–577
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Hake-Brooks SJ,
      2. Anderson GC
      . Kangaroo care and breastfeeding of mother-preterm infant dyads 0-18 months: a randomized, controlled trial. Neonatal Netw. 2008;27(3):151–159pmid:18557262
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Niela-Vilén H,
      2. Axelin A,
      3. Salanterä S, et al
      . Early physical contact between a mother and her NICU-infant in two university hospitals in Finland. Midwifery. 2013;29(12):1321–1330pmid:23434024
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    71. ↵
      1. Wahlberg V,
      2. Affonso DD,
      3. Persson B
      . A retrospective, comparative study using the kangaroo method as a complement to the standard incubator care. Eur J Public Health. 1992;2(1):34–37
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    72. ↵
      1. Carfoot S,
      2. Williamson PR,
      3. Dickson R
      . The value of a pilot study in breast-feeding research. Midwifery. 2004;20(2):188–193pmid:15177863
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Ramanathan K,
      2. Paul VK,
      3. Deorari AK,
      4. Taneja U,
      5. George G
      . Kangaroo Mother Care in very low birth weight infants. Indian J Pediatr. 2001;68(11):1019–1023pmid:11770234
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Acosta Díaz R,
      2. Piña Borrego CE,
      3. Acosta González LR,
      4. López Fernández L
      . Método piel a piel. Evaluación del neurocomportamiento hasta el año de edad corregida kangaroo mother care method. Evaluation of the neurodevelopment at first year of corrected age. Rev Cubana Pediatr. 2003;75(3)
      1. Park HK,
      2. Choi BS,
      3. Lee SJ,
      4. Son IA,
      5. Seol IJ,
      6. Lee HJ
      . Practical application of kangaroo mother care in preterm infants: clinical characteristics and safety of kangaroo mother care. J Perinat Med. 2014;42(2):239–245pmid:24096437
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Sakaki H,
      2. Nishioka M,
      3. Kanda K,
      4. Takahashi Y
      . An investigation of the risk factors for infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among patients in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(7):580–586pmid:19535174
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    77. ↵
      1. Mohammed El-Nagger NS,
      2. Abed El-Azim H,
      3. Mahmoud Zaki Hassan S
      . Effect of kangaroo mother care on premature infants’ physiological, behavioral and psychosocial outcomes in Ain Shams Maternity and Gynecological Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Life Sci J. 2013;10(1):703–716
      OpenUrl
      1. Ibe OE,
      2. Austin T,
      3. Sullivan K,
      4. Fabanwo O,
      5. Disu E,
      6. Costello AM
      . A comparison of kangaroo mother care and conventional incubator care for thermal regulation of infants <2000 g in Nigeria using continuous ambulatory temperature monitoring. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2004;24(3):245–251pmid:15479575
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    79. ↵
      1. Maastrup R,
      2. Greisen G
      . Extremely preterm infants tolerate skin-to-skin contact during the first weeks of life. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(8):1145–1149pmid:20346075
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    80. ↵
      1. Bauer J,
      2. Sontheimer D,
      3. Fischer C,
      4. Linderkamp O
      . Metabolic rate and energy balance in very low birth weight infants during kangaroo holding by their mothers and fathers. J Pediatr. 1996;129(4):608–611pmid:8859271
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Begum EA,
      2. Bonno M,
      3. Ohtani N, et al
      . Cerebral oxygenation responses during kangaroo care in low birth weight infants. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:51pmid:18990243
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Bergström A,
      2. Okong P,
      3. Ransjö-Arvidson AB
      . Immediate maternal thermal response to skin-to-skin care of newborn. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(5):655–658pmid:17462058
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Boju SL,
      2. Gopi Krishna M,
      3. Uppala R,
      4. Chodavarapu P,
      5. Chodavarapu R
      . Short spell kangaroo mother care and its differential physiological influence in subgroups of preterm babies. J Trop Pediatr. 2012;58(3):189–193pmid:21908546
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Collados-Gómez L,
      2. Aragonés-Corral B,
      3. Contreras-Olivares I,
      4. García-Feced E,
      5. Vila-Piqueras ME
      . [Assessing the impact of kangaroo care on preterm infant stress]. Enferm Clin. 2011;21(2):69–74pmid:21458343
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Legault M,
      2. Goulet C
      . Comparison of kangaroo and traditional methods of removing preterm infants from incubators. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1995;24(6):501–506pmid:7562132
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Ludington-Hoe SM,
      2. Anderson GC,
      3. Swinth JY,
      4. Thompson C,
      5. Hadeed AJ
      . Randomized controlled trial of kangaroo care: cardiorespiratory and thermal effects on healthy preterm infants. Neonatal Netw. 2004;23(3):39–48pmid:15182119
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Miltersteiner AR,
      2. Miltersteiner DR,
      3. Rech VV,
      4. Molle LD
      . Respostas fisiológicas da posição mãe-canguru em bebês pré-termos, de baixo peso e ventilando espontaneamente. Physiological responses of the kangaroo mother position in low birth weight, spontaneous ventilating premature babies. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2003;3(4):447–455
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Tenório EAM,
      2. Mota GC,
      3. Gutierres SB, et al
      . Avaliação dos parâmetros fisiológicos em recém-nascidos pré-termos de baixo peso antes e após a aplicação do método mãe-canguru. Evaluation of physiological parameters in preterm newborns with low weight before and after application of the kangaroo mother care. Fisioter Bras. 2010;11(1):44–48
      OpenUrl
    89. ↵
      1. Lee J,
      2. Bang KS
      . The effects of kangaroo care on maternal self-esteem and premature infants’ physiological stability. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2011;17(5):454–462
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    90. ↵
      1. Messmer PR,
      2. Rodriguez S,
      3. Adams J, et al
      . Effect of kangaroo care on sleep time for neonates. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23(4):408–414pmid:9282055
      OpenUrlPubMed
    91. ↵
      1. Feldman R,
      2. Eidelman AI
      . Skin-to-skin contact (Kangaroo Care) accelerates autonomic and neurobehavioural maturation in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45(4):274–281pmid:12647930
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Sajedi F,
      2. Kashaninia Z,
      3. Rahgozar M,
      4. Noghabi FA
      . The effect of kangaroo care on physiologic responses to pain of an intramuscular injection in neonates. Iran J Pediatr. 2007;17(4):339–344
      OpenUrl
      1. Heimann K,
      2. Jergus K,
      3. Abbas AK,
      4. Heussen N,
      5. Leonhardt S,
      6. Orlikowsky T
      . Infrared thermography for detailed registration of thermoregulation in premature infants. J Perinat Med. 2013;41(5):613–620pmid:23443261
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Ludington-Hoe SM,
      2. Nguyen N,
      3. Swinth JY,
      4. Satyshur RD
      . Kangaroo care compared to incubators in maintaining body warmth in preterm infants. Biol Res Nurs. 2000;2(1):60–73pmid:11232513
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    95. ↵
      1. Keshavarz M,
      2. Haghighi NB
      . Effects of kangaroo contact on some physiological parameters in term neonates and pain score in mothers with cesarean section. Koomesh. 2010;11(2):91–99
      OpenUrl
    96. ↵
      1. Mahmood I,
      2. Jamal M,
      3. Khan N
      . Effect of mother-infant early skin-to-skin contact on breastfeeding status: a randomized controlled trial. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011;21(10):601–605pmid:22015120
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Aghdas K,
      2. Talat K,
      3. Sepideh B
      . Effect of immediate and continuous mother-infant skin-to-skin contact on breastfeeding self-efficacy of primiparous women: a randomised control trial. Women Birth. 2014;27(1):37–40pmid:24216342
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Ahn HY,
      2. Lee J,
      3. Shin HJ
      . Kangaroo care on premature infant growth and maternal attachment and post-partum depression in South Korea. J Trop Pediatr. 2010;56(5):342–344pmid:20601691
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Rodrigues MAG,
      2. Cano MAT
      . Estudo do ganho de peso e duração da internação do recém-nascido pré-termo de baixo peso com a utilização do método canguru. Trial gain of weight and hospital length stay of the low birth weight preterm infant in assistance for kangaroo mother care. Rev Eletrônica Enferm. 2009;8(2):185–191
      OpenUrl
      1. Roberts KL,
      2. Paynter C,
      3. McEwan B
      . A comparison of kangaroo mother care and conventional cuddling care. Neonatal Netw. 2000;19(4):31–35pmid:11949100
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Castral TC,
      2. Warnock F,
      3. Leite AM,
      4. Haas VJ,
      5. Scochi CGS
      . The effects of skin-to-skin contact during acute pain in preterm newborns. Eur J Pain. 2008;12(4):464–471pmid:17869557
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Chermont AG,
      2. Falcão LFM,
      3. de Souza Silva EH,
      4. de Cássia Xavier Balda R,
      5. Guinsburg R
      . Skin-to-skin contact and/or oral 25% dextrose for procedural pain relief for term newborn infants. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):e1101–e1107 www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/124/6/e1101pmid:19948613
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Chidambaram AG,
      2. Manjula S,
      3. Adhisivam B,
      4. Vishnu Bhat B
      . Effect of kangaroo mother care in reducing pain due to heel prick among preterm neonates: a crossover trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(5):488–490
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Freire NB,
      2. Garcia JB,
      3. Lamy ZC
      . Evaluation of analgesic effect of skin-to-skin contact compared to oral glucose in preterm neonates. Pain. 2008;139(1):28–33pmid:18434021
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Johnston CC,
      2. Filion F,
      3. Campbell-Yeo M, et al
      . Kangaroo mother care diminishes pain from heel lance in very preterm neonates: a crossover trial. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:13pmid:18435837
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Marín Gabriel MA,
      2. López Escobar A,
      3. Galán Redondo M, et al
      . [Evaluation of pain in a neonatal intensive care unit during endocrine-metabolic tests]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2008;69(4):316–321pmid:18928698
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Mitchell AJ,
      2. Yates CC,
      3. Williams DK,
      4. Chang JY,
      5. Hall RW
      . Does daily kangaroo care provide sustained pain and stress relief in preterm infants? J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2013;6(1):45–52pmid:24246458
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Nanavati RN,
      2. Balan R,
      3. Kabra NS
      . Effect of kangaroo mother care vs expressed breast milk administration on pain associated with removal of adhesive tape in very low birth weight neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50(11):1011–1015pmid:23798626
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Nimbalkar SM,
      2. Chaudhary NS,
      3. Gadhavi KV,
      4. Phatak A
      . Kangaroo Mother Care in reducing pain in preterm neonates on heel prick. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(1):6–10pmid:22544676
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    110. ↵
      1. Schneider C,
      2. Charpak N,
      3. Ruiz-Peláez JG,
      4. Tessier R
      . Cerebral motor function in very premature-at-birth adolescents: a brain stimulation exploration of kangaroo mother care effects. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(10):1045–1053pmid:22734793
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Kostandy RR,
      2. Ludington-Hoe SM,
      3. Cong X, et al
      . Kangaroo Care (skin contact) reduces crying response to pain in preterm neonates: pilot results. Pain Manag Nurs. 2008;9(2):55–65pmid:18513662
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Saeedi R,
      2. Asnaashri Z,
      3. Amirinejad M,
      4. Esmaili H
      . Effect of kangaroo care method on the pain intensity of vaccination in newborns. Journal of Sabzevar School of Medical Sciences. 2011;13(4):172–177
      OpenUrl
    113. ↵
      1. Kashaninia Z,
      2. Sajedi F,
      3. Rahgozar M,
      4. Noghabi FA
      . The effect of Kangaroo Care on behavioral responses to pain of an intramuscular injection in neonates. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2008;13(4):275–280pmid:19238715
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Cong X,
      2. Ludington-Hoe SM,
      3. McCain G,
      4. Fu P
      . Kangaroo Care modifies preterm infant heart rate variability in response to heel stick pain: pilot study. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(9):561–567pmid:19505775
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    115. ↵
      1. Neu M,
      2. Robinson J
      . Maternal holding of preterm infants during the early weeks after birth and dyad interaction at six months. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010;39(4):401–414pmid:20629927
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Gathwala G,
      2. Singh B,
      3. Balhara B
      . KMC facilitates mother baby attachment in low birth weight infants. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75(1):43–47pmid:18245934
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Tuoni C,
      2. Scaramuzzo RT,
      3. Ghirri P,
      4. Boldrini A,
      5. Bartalena L
      . Kangaroo Mother Care: four years of experience in very low birth weight and preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr. 2012;64(4):377–383pmid:22728609
      OpenUrlPubMed
    118. ↵
      1. Bier JAB,
      2. Ferguson AE,
      3. Morales Y, et al
      . Comparison of skin-to-skin contact with standard contact in low-birth-weight infants who are breast-fed. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(12):1265–1269pmid:8953998
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    119. ↵
      1. Furman L,
      2. Minich N,
      3. Hack M
      . Correlates of lactation in mothers of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2002;109(4):e57 www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/109/4/e57pmid:11927730
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    120. ↵
      1. Tessier R,
      2. Cristo M,
      3. Velez S, et al
      . Kangaroo mother care and the bonding hypothesis. Pediatrics. 1998;102(2):e17 www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/102/2/e17pmid:9685462
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    121. ↵
      1. Acosta Díaz R,
      2. Brito Miliáns L,
      3. Miliáns Uriarte RD,
      4. Morera Betancourt O
      . Método piel a piel. Repercusión sobre el desarrollo físico-intelectual a la edad preescolar. Kangaroo mother care method. Impact on the physical and intellectual development at preschool age. Rev Cubana Pediatr. 2003;75(3)
    122. ↵
      1. Stevens B,
      2. Johnston C,
      3. Petryshen P,
      4. Taddio A
      . Premature Infant Pain Profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain. 1996;12(1):13–22pmid:8722730
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    123. ↵
      1. Lawrence J,
      2. Alcock D,
      3. McGrath P,
      4. Kay J,
      5. MacMurray SB,
      6. Dulberg C
      . The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Netw. 1993;12(6):59–66pmid:8413140
      OpenUrlPubMed
    124. ↵
      1. Grunau RV,
      2. Craig KD
      . Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry. Pain. 1987;28(3):395–410pmid:3574966
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    125. ↵
      1. Christensson K,
      2. Bhat GJ,
      3. Amadi BC,
      4. Eriksson B,
      5. Höjer B
      . Randomised study of skin-to-skin versus incubator care for rewarming low-risk hypothermic neonates. Lancet. 1998;352(9134):1115pmid:9798589
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Cong X,
      2. Cusson RM,
      3. Walsh S,
      4. Hussain N,
      5. Ludington-Hoe SM,
      6. Zhang D
      . Effects of skin-to-skin contact on autonomic pain responses in preterm infants. J Pain. 2012;13(7):636–645pmid:22595172
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Dageville C,
      2. Pignol J,
      3. De Smet S
      . Very early neonatal apparent life-threatening events and sudden unexpected deaths: incidence and risk factors. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(7):866–869pmid:18482167
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Mitchell AJYC,
      2. Yates C,
      3. Williams K,
      4. Hall RW
      . Effects of daily kangaroo care on cardiorespiratory parameters in preterm infants. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2013;6(3):243–249pmid:24246597
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Abouelfettoh A,
      2. Ludington-Hoe SM,
      3. Burant CJ,
      4. Visscher MO
      . Effect of skin-to-skin contact on preterm infant skin barrier function and hospital-acquired infection. J Clin Med Res. 2011;3(1):36–46pmid:22043270
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Tessier R,
      2. Charpak N,
      3. Giron M,
      4. Cristo M,
      5. de Calume ZF,
      6. Ruiz-Peláez JG
      . Kangaroo Mother Care, home environment and father involvement in the first year of life: a randomized controlled study. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(9):1444–1450pmid:19500083
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Vesel L,
      2. ten Asbroek AH,
      3. Manu A, et al
      . Promoting skin-to-skin care for low birthweight babies: findings from the Ghana Newhints cluster-randomised trial. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(8):952–961pmid:23731228
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Bergman NJ,
      2. Linley LL,
      3. Fawcus SR
      . Randomized controlled trial of skin-to-skin contact from birth versus conventional incubator for physiological stabilization in 1200- to 2199-gram newborns. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93(6):779–785pmid:15244227
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Azevedo VM,
      2. Xavier CC,
      3. Gontijo FO
      . Safety of Kangaroo Mother Care in intubated neonates under 1500 g. J Trop Pediatr. 2012;58(1):38–42pmid:21508081
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Carbasse A,
      2. Kracher S,
      3. Hausser M, et al
      . Safety and effectiveness of skin-to-skin contact in the NICU to support neurodevelopment in vulnerable preterm infants. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2013;27(3):255–262pmid:23899805
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Entringer AP,
      2. Gomes MA,
      3. Pinto M,
      4. Caetano R,
      5. Magluta C,
      6. Lamy ZC
      . [Cost analysis of hospital care for newborns at risk: comparison of an Intermediate Neonatal Care Unit and a Kangaroo Unit]. Cad Saude Publica. 2013;29(6):1205–1216pmid:23778552
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Nimbalkar SM,
      2. Tandon R,
      3. Chaudhary NS
      . Reduced duration of CPAP in preterm babies receiving kangaroo care within an hour of birth: randomized trial. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:A512
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Samra NM,
      2. El Taweel A,
      3. Cadwell K
      . The effect of kangaroo mother care on the duration of phototherapy of infants re-admitted for neonatal jaundice. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(8):1354–1357pmid:22122062
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Weller A,
      2. Rozin A,
      3. Goldstein A, et al
      . Longitudinal assessment of pituitary-thyroid axis and adrenal function in preterm infants raised by ‘kangaroo mother care’. Horm Res. 2002;57(1-2):22–26pmid:12006715
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    139. ↵
      1. Anderson GC,
      2. Chiu SH,
      3. Dombrowski MA,
      4. Swinth JY,
      5. Albert JM,
      6. Wada N
      . Mother-newborn contact in a randomized trial of kangaroo (skin-to-skin) care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32(5):604–611pmid:14565739
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    140. ↵
      1. Constantinou JC,
      2. Adamson-Macedo EN,
      3. Stevenson DK,
      4. Mirmiran M,
      5. Fleisher BE
      . Effects of skin-to-skin holding on general movements of preterm infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1999;38(8):467–471pmid:10456242
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Acosta Díaz R,
      2. Vara Cuesta OL,
      3. Fuentes Guerra JM,
      4. Iglesias Castro D,
      5. Piloña Ruiz S
      . Método piel a piel. Evaluación clínica-humoral durante el primer año de edad corregida Kangaroo mother care method. Clinical and humoral assessment during the first year of corrected age. Rev Cubana Pediatr. 2003;75(3)
      1. Ohgi S,
      2. Fukuda M,
      3. Moriuchi H, et al
      . Comparison of kangaroo care and standard care: behavioral organization, development, and temperament in healthy, low-birth-weight infants through 1 year. J Perinatol. 2002;22(5):374–379pmid:12082472
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Kaffashi F,
      2. Scher MS,
      3. Ludington-Hoe SM,
      4. Loparo KA
      . An analysis of the kangaroo care intervention using neonatal EEG complexity: a preliminary study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(2):238–246pmid:22959415
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Saeidi R,
      2. Tafazoli M,
      3. Robatsangi MG
      . Kangaroo mother care for infantile colic: a randomized clinical trial. Tehran Univ Med J. 2010;67(12):870–875
      OpenUrl
      1. Tessier R,
      2. Cristo MB,
      3. Velez S, et al
      . Kangaroo mother care: a method for protecting high-risk low-birth weight and premature infants against developmental delay. Infant Behav Dev. 2003;26(3):384–397
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Scher MS,
      2. Ludington-Hoe S,
      3. Kaffashi F,
      4. Johnson MW,
      5. Holditch-Davis D,
      6. Loparo KA
      . Neurophysiologic assessment of brain maturation after an 8-week trial of skin-to-skin contact on preterm infants. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(10):1812–1818pmid:19766056
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Morgan BE,
      2. Horn AR,
      3. Bergman NJ
      . Should neonates sleep alone? Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70(9):817–825pmid:21802659
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Neu M,
      2. Robinson J,
      3. Schmiege SJ
      . Influence of holding practice on preterm infant development. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2013;38(3):136–143pmid:23625100
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Bera A,
      2. Ghosh J,
      3. Singh AK,
      4. Hazra A,
      5. Mukherjee S,
      6. Mukherjee R
      . Effect of kangaroo mother care on growth and development of low birthweight babies up to 12 months of age: a controlled clinical trial. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(6):643–650pmid:24588543
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Miles R,
      2. Cowan F,
      3. Glover V,
      4. Stevenson J,
      5. Modi N
      . A controlled trial of skin-to-skin contact in extremely preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82(7):447–455pmid:16458458
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    151. ↵
      1. Andrade ISND,
      2. Guedes ZCF
      . Sucção do recém-nascido prematuro: comparação do método mãe-canguru com os cuidados tradicionais. Suckling of the premature newborn child: comparison between the kangaroo mother method with traditional care. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2005;5(1):61–69
      OpenUrl
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 137, Issue 1
    1 Jan 2016
    View this article with LENS
    Email Article
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Citation Tools
    Kangaroo Mother Care and Neonatal Outcomes: A Meta-analysis
    Ellen O. Boundy, Roya Dastjerdi, Donna Spiegelman, Wafaie W. Fawzi, Stacey A. Missmer, Ellice Lieberman, Sandhya Kajeepeta, Stephen Wall, Grace J. Chan
    Pediatrics Jan 2016, 137 (1) e20152238; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-2238
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts

    Jump to section

    Subjects