Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
From the American Academy of PediatricsPolicy Statement

Hospital Stay for Healthy Term Newborn Infants

William E. Benitz and COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN
Pediatrics May 2015, 135 (5) 948-953; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0699
William E. Benitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

The hospital stay of the mother and her healthy term newborn infant should be long enough to allow identification of problems and to ensure that the mother is sufficiently recovered and prepared to care for herself and her newborn at home. The length of stay should be based on the unique characteristics of each mother-infant dyad, including the health of the mother, the health and stability of the newborn, the ability and confidence of the mother to care for herself and her newborn, the adequacy of support systems at home, and access to appropriate follow-up care in a medical home. Input from the mother and her obstetrical care provider should be considered before a decision to discharge a newborn is made, and all efforts should be made to keep a mother and her newborn together to ensure simultaneous discharge.

  • newborn
  • hospital discharge

Purpose

The purpose of this policy statement is to review issues related to length of stay and readmission of healthy term newborns and to identify specific criteria that should be met to ensure that discharge and subsequent follow-up are appropriate.

Background

The hospital stay of the mother and her healthy term newborn infant (mother-infant dyad) should be long enough to allow identification of problems and to ensure that the mother is sufficiently recovered and prepared to care for herself and her newborn at home. Many neonatal cardiopulmonary problems related to the transition from the intrauterine to the extrauterine environment usually become apparent during the first 12 hours after birth.1 Other neonatal problems, such as jaundice,2,3 ductal-dependent cardiac lesions,4,5 and gastrointestinal obstruction,6 may require a longer period of observation by skilled health care professionals.7 Likewise, significant maternal complications, such as endometritis, may not become apparent during the first day after delivery.

The average length of stay of the mother-infant dyad after delivery declined steadily from 1970 until the mid-1990s.8 Early newborn discharge was implemented in the 1990s, but in response to the ensuing debate on the care and safety of mothers and their infants, most states and the US Congress enacted legislation that ensured hospital stay for up to 48 hours for a vaginal delivery and up to 96 hours after birth by cesarean delivery. Several subsequent studies have reported that the postpartum length-of-stay legislation has led to an increase in postpartum length of stay, but the impact of this increase in length of stay on the rate of neonatal readmissions has been inconsistent.8–11

Risk of Readmission

Criteria for newborn discharge include physiologic stability, family preparedness and competence to provide newborn care at home, availability of social support, and access to the health care system and resources. An inadequate assessment by health care providers in any of these areas before discharge can place an infant at risk and may result in readmission. In several large epidemiologic studies, readmission rates were used to assess the adequacy of the newborn hospital length of stay. In these reports, readmissions after an early discharge varied from no increase to a significant increase.8,12–15 However, the differences in the definition of early discharge, postdischarge follow-up and support, and the timing of readmissions make it difficult to compare the results. In some of these studies, the risk factors for readmission to identify infants who may benefit from either a longer hospital stay or close postdischarge follow-up also were evaluated. These studies identified jaundice, dehydration, and feeding difficulties as the most common reasons for readmission.16,17 Other frequently reported risk factors for readmission were Asian race, primiparity, associated maternal morbidities, shorter gestation or lower birth weight, instrumented vaginal delivery, and small size for gestational age.13,15–18 Close follow-up and better coordination of postdischarge care were important factors in decreasing the readmission rates.13,17

Readiness for Discharge

Readiness for discharge of a healthy term infant is traditionally determined by pediatric care providers after a review of the mother's and family members' ability to provide care to a newborn infant at home. However, perceptions about the degree of readiness at the time of discharge often differ among pediatric care providers, obstetrical care providers, and mothers.18 Factors associated with perceived unreadiness for maternal or neonatal discharge, primarily as reported by mothers themselves, include first live birth, maternal history of chronic disease or illness after birth, in-hospital neonatal illness, intent to breastfeed, mothers with inadequate prenatal care and poor social support, and black non-Hispanic maternal race.13,18 Although no specific clinical tool is currently available to evaluate mothers' or families' perception of readiness for discharge after delivery, the American Academy of Pediatrics Safe and Healthy Beginnings toolkit contains a discharge-readiness checklist that can aid clinicians with preparation of a newborn for discharge. This tool was tested by 22 clinical practice teams during the Safe and Healthy Beginnings improvement project and focuses on risk for severe hyperbilirubinemia, availability of breastfeeding support, and coordination of newborn care.19 All efforts should be made to keep mothers and infants together to promote simultaneous discharge. To accomplish this, a pediatric care provider's decision to discharge a newborn should be made jointly with input from the mother, her obstetrical care provider, and other health care providers, such as nursing staff and social workers, who are involved in the care of the mother and her infant.

Recommendations

The length of stay of a healthy term newborn should be based on the unique characteristics of each mother-infant dyad, including the health of the mother, the health and stability of the infant, the ability and confidence of the mother to care for her infant, the adequacy of support systems at home, and access to appropriate follow-up care. Input from the mother and her obstetrical care provider and nursing staff should be considered before a decision to discharge a newborn is made, and all efforts should be made to keep a mother and her newborn together to encourage on-demand breastfeeding and to ensure simultaneous discharge. It is recommended that the following minimum criteria be met before discharge of a term newborn, defined as an infant born between 37-0/7 and 41-6/7 weeks of gestation20 after an uncomplicated pregnancy, labor, and delivery.

  1. Clinical course and physical examination reveal no abnormalities that require continued hospitalization.

  2. The infant's vital signs are documented as being within normal ranges, with appropriate variations based on physiologic state, and stable for the 12 hours preceding discharge. These ranges include an axillary temperature of 36.5°C to 37.4°C (97.7–99.3°F, measured properly in an open crib with appropriate clothing),21 a respiratory rate below 60 per minute22 and no other signs of respiratory distress, and an awake heart rate of 100 to 190 beats per minute.23 Heart rates as low as 70 beats per minute while sleeping quietly, without signs of circulatory compromise and responding appropriately to activity, also are acceptable. Sustained heart rates near or above the upper end of this range may require further evaluation.

  3. The infant has urinated regularly and passed at least 1 stool spontaneously.

  4. The infant has completed at least 2 successful feedings. If the infant is breastfeeding, a caregiver knowledgeable in breastfeeding, latch, swallowing, and infant satiety should observe an actual feeding and document successful performance of these tasks in the medical record.24 If the infant is bottle-feeding, it is documented that the newborn is able to coordinate sucking, swallowing, and breathing while feeding.

  5. There is no evidence of excessive bleeding at the circumcision site for at least 2 hours.

  6. The clinical significance of jaundice, if present before discharge, has been determined, and appropriate management and/or follow-up plans have been instituted as recommended in American Academy of Pediatrics clinical practice guidelines for management of hyperbilirubinemia.2

  7. The infant has been adequately evaluated and monitored for sepsis on the basis of maternal risk factors and in accordance with current guidelines for management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset sepsis.25

  8. Maternal and infant laboratory tests are available and have been reviewed, including the following:

    • maternal syphilis, hepatitis B surface antigen, and HIV status; and

    • umbilical cord or newborn blood type and direct Coombs test result, if clinically indicated.2

  9. Initial hepatitis B vaccine has been administered as indicated by the infant’s risk status and according to the current immunization schedule.26

  10. If the mother has not previously been vaccinated, she should receive tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis, adsorbed (Tdap) vaccine immediately after the infant is born. Other adolescents and adults who will have or anticipate having close contact with the infant should be encouraged to receive a single dose of Tdap if they have not previously received Tdap.27 If a mother who delivers during the flu season has not been previously immunized, she also should receive an influenza vaccination.28

  11. Newborn metabolic,29 hearing,30,31 and pulse oximetry32–34 screenings have been completed per hospital protocol and state regulations. If screening metabolic tests were performed before 24 hours of milk feeding, a system for repeating the test during the follow-up visit must be in place in accordance with local or state policy.

  12. The mother's knowledge, ability, and confidence to provide adequate care for her infant are documented by the fact that training and information has been received in the following areas:

    • the importance and benefits of breastfeeding for both mother and infant;

    • appropriate urination and stooling frequency for the infant;

    • umbilical cord, skin, and newborn genital care, as well as temperature assessment and measurement with a thermometer;

    • signs of illness and common infant problems, particularly jaundice;

    • infant safety, such as use of an appropriate car safety seat, supine positioning for sleeping, maintaining a smoke-free environment, and sleeping in proximity but not bed-sharing35,36; and

    • hand hygiene, especially as a way to reduce infection.

  13. A car safety seat appropriate for the infant’s maturity and medical condition that meets Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 213 has been obtained and is available before hospital discharge, and the mother has demonstrated to trained hospital personnel appropriate infant positioning and use.

  14. Family members or other support persons, including health care providers who are familiar with newborn care and are knowledgeable about lactation and the recognition of jaundice and dehydration, are available to the mother and infant after discharge.

  15. A physician-directed source of continuing health care (medical home) for the mother and infant has been identified. Instructions to follow in the event of a complication or emergency have been provided. The mother should know how to reach the medical home and should have scheduled the infant’s first visit, if possible, or know how to do so.

  16. Family, environmental, and social risk factors have been assessed, and the mother and her other family members have been educated about safe home environment. When the following or other risk factors are present, discharge should be delayed until they are resolved or a plan to safeguard the newborn is in place. This plan may involve discussions with social services and/or state agencies, such as child protective services. These risk factors may include, but are not limited to the following:

    • untreated parental use of illicit substances or positive urine toxicology results in the mother or newborn consistent with maternal abuse or misuse of drugs;

    • history of child abuse or neglect by any anticipated care provider;

    • mental illness in a parent or another person in the home;

    • lack of social support, particularly for single, first-time mothers;

    • no fixed home;

    • history of domestic violence, particularly during this pregnancy;

    • adolescent mother, particularly if other previously listed conditions apply; or

    • barriers to adequate follow-up care for the newborn, such as lack of transportation to medical care services, lack of easy access to telephone communication, and non–English-speaking parents.

  17. For newborns discharged before 48 hours after delivery, an appointment should be made for the infant to be examined by a health care practitioner within 48 hours of discharge.10,12,16,37,38 If this cannot be ensured, discharge should be deferred until a mechanism for follow-up is identified. The follow-up visit can take place in a home, clinic, or hospital outpatient setting as long as the health care professional who examines the infant is competent in newborn assessment and the results of the follow-up visit are reported to the infant's primary care provider or his or her designee on the day of the visit. The purpose of the follow-up visit is to

    • promote establishment of a relationship with the medical home by verifying the plan for health care maintenance, including a method for obtaining emergency services, preventive care and immunizations, periodic evaluations and physical examinations, and necessary screenings;

    • weigh the infant and assess the infant's general health, hydration, and degree of jaundice, and identify any new problems;

    • review feeding patterns and technique, and encourage and support breastfeeding by observation of the adequacy of position, latch, and swallowing;

    • obtain historical evidence of adequate stool and urine patterns;

    • provide or make a referral for lactation support if the foregoing evaluations are not reassuring;

    • assess quality of mother-infant attachment and details of infant behavior;

    • reinforce maternal or family education in infant care, particularly regarding feeding and sleep position, avoidance of co-sleeping, and appropriate use of car safety seats, which should be used only for travel and not for positioning in the home;

    • review results of outstanding laboratory tests, such as newborn metabolic screens, performed before discharge;

    • perform screenings in accordance with state regulations and other tests that are clinically indicated, such as serum bilirubin; and

    • assess for parental well-being with focus on screening for maternal postpartum depression.

Conclusions

The timing of discharge from the hospital should be the decision of the health care provider caring for the mother and her newborn. This decision should be made in consultation with the family and should not be based on arbitrary policies established by third-party payers. A shortened hospital stay (less than 48 hours after delivery) for healthy, term newborns can be accommodated but is not appropriate for every mother and newborn. If possible, institutions are encouraged to develop processes to prevent the necessity for early discharge of uninsured or underinsured newborn infants for purely financial reasons, however. Institutions should develop guidelines through their professional staff in collaboration with appropriate community agencies, including third-party payers, to establish hospital-stay programs for mothers and their healthy newborns. State and local public health agencies also should be involved in the oversight of existing hospital-stay programs for quality assurance and monitoring. Obstetrical care, newborn nursery care, and follow-up care should be considered independent services to be paid as separate packages and not as part of a global fee for maternity-newborn labor and delivery services. Adoption of standardized processes, such as predischarge checklists, may facilitate more uniform implementation of these recommendations across the full spectrum of health care settings where care for newborn infants is provided.

Lead Author

William E. Benitz, MD, FAAP

Committee on Fetus and Newborn, 2014–2015

Kristi L. Watterberg, MD, FAAP, Chairperson

Susan Aucott, MD FAAP

William E. Benitz, MD, FAAP

James J. Cummings, MD, FAAP

Eric C. Eichenwald, MD, FAAP

Jay Goldsmith, MD, FAAP

Brenda B. Poindexter, MD, FAAP

Karen Puopolo, MD, FAAP

Dan L. Stewart, MD, FAAP

Kasper S. Wang, MD, FAAP

Liaisons

CAPT Wanda D. Barfield, MD, MPH, FAAP – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

James Goldberg, MD – American College of Obstetricians and

Gynecologists

Thierry Lacaze, MD – Canadian Pediatric Society

Erin L. Keels, APRN, MS, NNP-BC – National Association of Neonatal Nurses

Tonse N. K. Raju, MD, DCH, FAAP – National Institutes of Health

Staff

Jim Couto, MA

Footnotes

  • This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have filed conflict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication.

  • Policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefit from expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external reviewers. However, policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics may not reflect the views of the liaisons or the organizations or government agencies that they represent.

  • The guidance in this statement does not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.

  • All policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, revised, or retired at or before that time.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Desmond MM,
    2. Rudolph AJ,
    3. Phitaksphraiwan P
    . The transitional care nursery. A mechanism for preventive medicine in the newborn. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1966;13(3):651–668pmid:5949898
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia
    . Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):297–316pmid:15231951
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Maisels MJ,
    2. Bhutani VK,
    3. Bogen D,
    4. Newman TB,
    5. Stark AR,
    6. Watchko JF
    . Hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant > or =35 weeks’ gestation: an update with clarifications. Pediatrics. 2009;124(4):1193–1198pmid:19786452
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Gentile R,
    2. Stevenson G,
    3. Dooley T,
    4. Franklin D,
    5. Kawabori I,
    6. Pearlman A
    . Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of time of ductal closure in normal newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1981;98(3):443–448pmid:7205459
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Lambert EC,
    2. Canent RV,
    3. Hohn AR
    . Congenital cardiac anomalies in the newborn. A review of conditions causing death or severe distress in the first month of life. Pediatrics. 1966;37(2):343–351pmid:5902095
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Juang D,
    2. Snyder CL
    . Neonatal bowel obstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(3):685–711, ix–xpmid:22595716
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Jackson GL,
    2. Kennedy KA,
    3. Sendelbach DM,
    4. et al
    . Problem identification in apparently well neonates: implications for early discharge. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2000;39(10):581–590pmid:11063039
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Datar A,
    2. Sood N
    . Impact of postpartum hospital-stay legislation on newborn length of stay, readmission, and mortality in California. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):63–72pmid:16818550
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Madden JM,
    2. Soumerai SB,
    3. Lieu TA,
    4. Mandl KD,
    5. Zhang F,
    6. Ross-Degnan D,
    7. Health maintenance organization
    . Effects of a law against early postpartum discharge on newborn follow-up, adverse events, and HMO expenditures. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(25):2031–2038pmid:12490685
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Meara E,
    2. Kotagal UR,
    3. Atherton HD,
    4. Lieu TA
    . Impact of early newborn discharge legislation and early follow-up visits on infant outcomes in a state Medicaid population. Pediatrics. 2004;113(6):1619–1627pmid:15173482
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Madden JM,
    2. Soumerai SB,
    3. Lieu TA,
    4. Mandl KD,
    5. Zhang F,
    6. Ross-Degnan D
    . Length-of-stay policies and ascertainment of postdischarge problems in newborns. Pediatrics. 2004;113(1 pt 1):42–49pmid:14702445
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kotagal UR,
    2. Atherton HD,
    3. Eshett R,
    4. Schoettker PJ,
    5. Perlstein PH
    . Safety of early discharge for Medicaid newborns. JAMA. 1999;282(12):1150–1156pmid:10501118
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Watt S,
    2. Sword W,
    3. Krueger P
    . Longer postpartum hospitalization options—who stays, who leaves, what changes? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2005;5:13pmid:16225678
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Grupp-Phelan J,
    2. Taylor JA,
    3. Liu LL,
    4. Davis RL
    . Early newborn hospital discharge and readmission for mild and severe jaundice. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(12):1283–1288pmid:10591307
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Paul IM,
    2. Lehman EB,
    3. Hollenbeak CS,
    4. Maisels MJ
    . Preventable newborn readmissions since passage of the Newborns’ and Mothers’ Health Protection Act. Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):2349–2358pmid:17142518
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Escobar GJ,
    2. Greene JD,
    3. Hulac P,
    4. et al
    . Rehospitalisation after birth hospitalisation: patterns among infants of all gestations. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(2):125–131pmid:15665162
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Danielsen B,
    2. Castles AG,
    3. Damberg CL,
    4. Gould JB
    . Newborn discharge timing and readmissions: California, 1992-1995. Pediatrics. 2000;106(1 pt 1):31–39pmid:10878146
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Bernstein HH,
    2. Spino C,
    3. Finch S,
    4. et al
    . Decision-making for postpartum discharge of 4300 mothers and their healthy infants: the Life Around Newborn Discharge study. Pediatrics. 2007;120(2). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/120/2/e391pmid:17636111
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Safe and Healthy Beginnings. A resource toolkit for hospitals and physicians' offices. 2009. Available at: https://www.aap.org/en-us/professional-resources/practice-support/quality-improvement/Quality-Improvement-Innovation-Networks/Pages/Safe-and-Healthy-Beginnings-A-Resource-Toolkit-for-Hospitals-and-Physicians-Offices.aspx?aid=2577. Accessed March 3, 2014
  18. ↵
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    . ACOG Committee Opinion No 579: definition of term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1139–1140pmid:24150030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Mayfield SR,
    2. Bhatia J,
    3. Nakamura KT,
    4. Rios GR,
    5. Bell EF
    . Temperature measurement in term and preterm neonates. J Pediatr. 1984;104(2):271–275pmid:6694025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Taylor WC,
    2. Watkins GM
    . Respiratory rate patterns in the newborn infant. Can Med Assoc J. 1960;83:1292–1295pmid:13775652
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Semizel E,
    2. Oztürk B,
    3. Bostan OM,
    4. Cil E,
    5. Ediz B
    . The effect of age and gender on the electrocardiogram in children. Cardiol Young. 2008;18(1):26–40pmid:18093359
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Hagan JF, Shaw JS, Duncan PM, eds. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 3rd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2008
  23. ↵
    1. Polin RA,
    2. Papile LA,
    3. Baley JE,
    4. et al.,
    5. Committee on Fetus and Newborn
    . Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):1006–1015pmid:22547779
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended immunization schedule for persons aged 0 through 18 years: United States—2014. Available at: www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-schedule.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014
  25. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    . Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in pregnant women—Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(7):131–135pmid:23425962
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    . Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices–United States, 2013-2014. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013;62(RR-07):1–43
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Newborn Screening Authoring Committee
    . Newborn screening expands: recommendations for pediatricians and medical homes—implications for the system. Pediatrics. 2008;121(1):192–217pmid:18166575
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing
    . Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):898–921pmid:17908777
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Harlor AD Jr,
    2. Bower C,
    3. Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine,
    4. Section on Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
    . Hearing assessment in infants and children: recommendations beyond neonatal screening. Pediatrics. 2009;124(4):1252–1263pmid:19786460
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Kemper AR,
    2. Mahle WT,
    3. Martin GR,
    4. et al
    . Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/128/5/e1259pmid:21987707
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Mahle WT,
    2. Martin GR,
    3. Beekman RH III,
    4. Morrow WR,
    5. Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Executive Committee
    . Endorsement of Health and Human Services recommendation for pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1):190–192pmid:22201143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    US Department of Health and Human Services. HHS Secretary adopts recommendation to add critical congenital heart disease to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel. 2012. Available at: www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/mchbadvisory/heritabledisorders/recommendations/correspondence/cyanoticheartsecre09212011.pdf. Accessed November 3, 2013
  32. ↵
    1. Durbin DR,
    2. Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention
    . Child passenger safety. Pediatrics. 2011;127(4):788–793pmid:21422088
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Moon RY,
    2. Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
    . SIDS and other sleep-related infant deaths: expansion of recommendations for a safe infant sleeping environment. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):1030–1039pmid:22007004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Escobar GJ,
    2. Braveman PA,
    3. Ackerson L,
    4. et al
    . A randomized comparison of home visits and hospital-based group follow-up visits after early postpartum discharge. Pediatrics. 2001;108(3):719–727pmid:11533342
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Nelson VR
    . The effect of newborn early discharge follow-up program on pediatric urgent care utilization. J Pediatr Health Care. 1999;13(2):58–61pmid:10382465
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics
Vol. 135, Issue 5
1 May 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hospital Stay for Healthy Term Newborn Infants
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Hospital Stay for Healthy Term Newborn Infants
William E. Benitz, COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN
Pediatrics May 2015, 135 (5) 948-953; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-0699

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Hospital Stay for Healthy Term Newborn Infants
William E. Benitz, COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN
Pediatrics May 2015, 135 (5) 948-953; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-0699
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Purpose
    • Background
    • Recommendations
    • Conclusions
    • Lead Author
    • Committee on Fetus and Newborn, 2014–2015
    • Liaisons
    • Staff
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Early Postnatal Discharge for Infants: A Meta-analysis
  • Providing Care for Infants Born at Home
  • Updates on an At-Risk Population: Late-Preterm and Early-Term Infants
  • Adherence to AAP Healthy Newborn Discharge Criteria in a Tertiary Care Childrens Hospital
  • Current Scope of Practice for Newborn Care in Non-Intensive Hospital Settings
  • Evaluating Educational Needs of Parents at Newborn Discharge: A Pilot Study
  • Respiratory Rate During the First 24 Hours of Life in Healthy Term Infants
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Health Disparities in Tobacco Use and Exposure: A Structural Competency Approach
  • Management Principles for Acute Illness in Patients With Medium-Chain Acyl-Coenzyme A Dehydrogenase Deficiency
  • Child Life Services
Show more From the American Academy of Pediatrics

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Current Policy
  • Fetus/Newborn Infant
    • Fetus/Newborn Infant
  • AAP Policy Collections by Authoring Entities
    • Committee on Fetus & Newborn

Keywords

  • newborn
  • hospital discharge
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Open Access
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
  • RSS
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics