Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Article

Introduction of Complementary Foods and the Relationship to Food Allergy

Kate E.C. Grimshaw, Joe Maskell, Erin M. Oliver, Ruth C.G. Morris, Keith D. Foote, E.N. Clare Mills, Graham Roberts and Barrie M. Margetts
Pediatrics December 2013, 132 (6) e1529-e1538; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3692
Kate E.C. Grimshaw
aClinical and Experimental Sciences Academic Unit and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joe Maskell
bPublic Health Sciences and Medical Statistics, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin M. Oliver
aClinical and Experimental Sciences Academic Unit and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth C.G. Morris
cWellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith D. Foote
dHampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Winchester, United Kingdom; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.N. Clare Mills
eInstitute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graham Roberts
aClinical and Experimental Sciences Academic Unit and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barrie M. Margetts
fPrimary Care and Population Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To address questions regarding breastfeeding, complementary feeding, allergy development, and current infant-feeding recommendations.

METHODS: This was a nested, case-control within a cohort study in which mothers of 41 infants diagnosed with food allergy by the age of 2 years (according to double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge) and their 82 age-matched controls kept prospective food diaries of how their infants were fed in the first year of life.

RESULTS: Infants who were diagnosed with food allergy by the time they were 2 years of age were introduced to solids earlier (≤16 weeks of age) and were less likely to be receiving breast milk when cow’s milk protein was first introduced into their diet.

CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the current American Academy of Pediatrics’ allergy prevention recommendations and the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition recommendations on complementary feeding to not introduce solids before 4 to 6 months of age. It also supports the American Academy of Pediatrics’ breastfeeding recommendations that breastfeeding should continue while solids are introduced into the diet and that breastfeeding should continue for 1 year, or longer, as mutually desired by mother and infant.

  • breastfeeding
  • food allergy
  • infant feeding
  • prevention
  • Abbreviations:
    DBPCFC —
    double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge
    PIFA —
    Prevalence of Infant Food Allergy Study
    WHO —
    World Health Organization
  • What’s Known on This Subject:

    Breast milk is protective against many conditions, but its role in allergy has not been established. Infant-feeding recommendations support exclusive breastfeeding for 26 weeks, whereas allergy prevention recommendations advise exclusive breastfeeding for 4 to 6 months with continued breastfeeding thereafter.

    What This Study Adds:

    Evidence that continued breastfeeding while solids are introduced into the diet and delaying the introduction of solids until at least 17 weeks of age are associated with fewer food allergies.

    Since announcement of the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation that all infants be exclusively breastfed for 26 weeks, there has been an ongoing debate as to whether the recommendation is wholly appropriate for all infants from developed countries. The debate is well illustrated by a review by Fewtrell et al1 and the letters of response published in 2011.2–4

    Although there is no doubt as to the nutritional and emotional benefits of breastfeeding, the crux of the argument is the benefit of exclusive breastfeeding to 26 weeks. One side (pro– exclusive breastfeeding to 26 weeks) believe breast milk to be nutritionally adequate to the age of 6 months, that exclusive breastfeeding is protective against a plethora of infant conditions,5–8 and that these benefits are demonstrated in developed as well as underdeveloped countries.9 This view is currently advocated by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, and the UK Department of Health.10–12 The other side of the argument is that although exclusive breastfeeding for 26 weeks is undoubtedly the best recommendation for infants in underdeveloped countries, in developed countries, where the risk of gastrointestinal infections are reduced and allergic conditions are increased, the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for this long are not as strong. Calls for further work in this area have been made, with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommending that solids be introduced between 4 and 6 months of age for allergy prevention.10,13 Failure to resolve the debate undermines the authority of current infant-feeding recommendations, which can cause confusion in health care workers and parents alike.

    To inform the debate, we examined the relationship between breastfeeding, complementary feeding, and allergy development in a nested, case-control study within a cohort study in which mothers kept prospective food diaries of how their infants were fed in the first year of life. The study design facilitated the collection of accurate data on the initiation, duration, and exclusivity of breastfeeding, as well as the nature of introduction of solids.

    Methods

    The PIFA (Prevalence of Infant Food Allergy) study is a prospective birth cohort of 1140 infants recruited between 2006 and 2008, and it was the UK cohort of the EuroPrevall project14 with study size and eligibility criteria determined by that study’s protocol.15 It received approval from the research and development departments at the Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester and Southampton General Hospital, and ethical approval was granted by the North and Mid Hampshire Local Research Ethics Committee and the Southampton and South West Hampshire Local Research Ethics Committee (05/Q1703/34).

    Infants from the PIFA study who had been diagnosed as having a food allergy (according to a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge [DBPCFC]15) and their 2 age-matched controls were included in a “nested within a cohort, case-control study.” Controls comprised infants with birthdays closest to the index cases and whose parents consented. They were assessed by using the same symptomatic questionnaire and physical examination to ensure that they exhibited no signs of food allergy.

    Study Design

    The PIFA study has a longitudinal prospective cohort design starting from birth. Interested women met 1 of the study research fellows; informed consent was recorded, and baseline information on socioeconomic, environmental, and family allergy history was collected. Women were also invited to keep food diaries for their infants from birth until 1 year of age. Mothers/caregivers returned the food diaries to the study office monthly. Mothers were also sent a new symptom sheet every 2 months to facilitate identification of symptomatic infants, with parents being asked to contact the study team if they thought their child developed signs of allergic disease. One of the parents was asked to complete the EuroPrevall telephone questionnaire when their infant reached the age of 12 months and again at 24 months. The symptomatic sheets and the 12- and 24-month questionnaires also served to identify infants who may have a food allergy. Prospective completion of food diaries and symptom sheets reduced the potential for experimental bias.

    Food Allergy Diagnosis

    Possible cases of food allergy were triaged via telephone, and those patients fulfilling the EuroPrevall-wide criteria for assessment were invited for a symptomatic visit, at which the EuroPrevall symptomatic questionnaire was completed, a physical examination was performed, skin prick testing was completed, and a blood sample was taken.15 Any infant with a convincing clinical history of food allergy, presence of serum-specific immunoglobulin E to a common food allergen (≥0.35 kU/L), and/or a positive skin prick test result (≥3-mm wheal) was placed on an exclusion diet for the suspected food(s). If symptoms improved, the child attended the Southampton Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility for a DBPCFC. The diagnostic criterion for food allergy in this study for all infants was a positive DBPCFC (which included delayed reactions up to 48 hours after the challenge).

    Dietary Intake Data

    At recruitment, parents were asked to record daily anything their child ate or drank for the first year of life on food diary sheets designed for the purpose, and they were instructed on their completion. Diary sets (which consisted of 4 weekly sheets) were sent out every 2 months, with parents being asked to return each diary to the study office once it was completed. Freepost envelopes were provided for their return.

    To reduce the burden of food diary completion, parents were asked to record what the child consumed but not the amounts of food taken. Upon receipt, diaries were reviewed, and where they lacked adequate detail (eg, type of infant formula given), parents were contacted by telephone so these data could be recorded. The data from all diaries were analyzed in the same manner to determine the timing of specific events such as when infant formula or any solid/semi-solid food was first introduced into the diet and the age at which breastfeeding stopped. In the current article, “exclusive breastfeeding” is defined as when an infant receives only breast milk, water, or vitamin/mineral drops. “Introduction of solid foods” refers to when the infants first received solid/semi-solid foods.

    Statistical Analysis

    A descriptive analysis of baseline characteristics (obtained via standard questionnaire administered at recruitment15), any health and clinical symptoms (obtained by using a symptomatic questionnaire and physical examination), and dietary intake data (obtained via food diary analysis) for infants involved in the study was conducted by using SPSS version 17 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). Continuous variables were described in terms of means ± standard deviations or medians and ranges depending on their distribution. Categorical variables were described in terms of numbers and percentages. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used on all available dietary intake data. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to establish additional details about breastfeeding duration. The study sample size had sufficient power to detect an odds ratio of ≥0.48 at 80% power and a significance level of .05. This equates to infants who went on to develop a food allergy receiving solids 2 weeks earlier than for the infants who did not develop a food allergy.

    Finally, analysis by using a multivariable logistic model was conducted. This analysis included variables that the previous analyses had identified as being significantly different between the study groups and also factors which are considered to be associated with allergy development.

    Results

    Participants

    Infants were from the PIFA study (N = 1140) who had either been diagnosed as having a food allergy according to DBPCFC (n = 41) or were their age-matched controls (n = 82). Figure 1 shows infant numbers at each stage of the main PIFA study and also the stages of diagnosis of the food-allergic infants. The study infants (N = 123) were born between January 2006 and October 2007. Median maternal age was 33 years (range: 19–43 years), and median infant weight was 3420 g (range: 2160–5060 g). Baseline characteristics for the infants who became food allergic and their controls are detailed in Table 1. The demographic characteristics of the main PIFA study population (N = 1140) differed from those of the community from which it was recruited because it had a large proportion of older, well-educated mothers. However, the infants in the 2 experimental groups of the current study (N = 123) did not differ significantly from each other for any demographic or environmental measurement. Median age at start of symptoms of food allergy was 24 weeks (range: 0–64 weeks). Median age at DBPCFC was 56 weeks. The most common causative food was hen’s egg (22 infants), closely followed by cow’s milk (20 infants). Twelve infants were allergic to >1 food. Infants displayed differing symptoms, with some infants displaying >1 symptom. The most common symptom was physician-diagnosed eczema (12 infants), with vomiting being the second most common (11 infants). Details of the infant diet when symptoms started are given in Table 2. No infant who was allergic to egg experienced symptoms before consuming egg; however, 1 peanut-allergic infant experienced cutaneous symptoms after contact with the allergen before any peanut consumption.

    FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Flowchart of participants in the PIFA study.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Characteristics of the Mother and Infant Pairs Included in This Prospective Case-Control Study

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Details of Infant Diet at Time When Symptoms Started

    Breastfeeding

    Ninety-five percent of all mothers included in the study initiated breastfeeding, with a median duration of 20 weeks (range: 0–64 weeks). Median duration for exclusive breastfeeding was 8 weeks (range: 1–26 weeks), with 50% of mothers still exclusively breastfeeding at 9 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference between breastfeeding initiation, duration, or exclusive breastfeeding duration between the symptomatic and control infants (Table 3). Exclusivity was lost to whey-predominant infant formula in 78% of infants, with only 2 infants losing exclusivity due to a different type of formula (casein-predominant and extensively hydrolyzed formula). The second most common way for infants to lose their exclusive breastfeeding status was to have rice introduced into the diet (in the form of “baby rice”).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Breastfeeding Characteristics for Infants With Food Allergy and Control Infants in the Study

    Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated how the nature of breastfeeding differed between the 2 study groups (Fig 2). This difference was not significant (generalized Wilcoxon [Breslow] test, P = .335).

    FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Kaplan-Meier survival analysis plot showing duration of breastfeeding for symptomatic and control infants.

    Concurrent Feeding With Cow’s Milk Protein and Breast Milk

    There was no statistically significant difference between groups for the age cow’s milk (in any form) was introduced into the diet (Table 4). However, among infants who received both cow’s milk in any form and breast milk (n = 27, allergy group; n = 72, control group), the duration of concurrent feeding was 5.5 weeks in the allergy group versus 9 weeks in the control group (P = .047). To investigate whether the duration of overlap was important, the variables were recoded to provide a categorical “concurrent breastfeeding” variable. Again, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups for concurrent feeding with cow’s milk in any form and breast milk (P = .015), suggesting that any concurrent feeding is beneficial. Because the timing of the overlap may be important, a post hoc analysis was conducted to compare whether the ages when concurrent breastfeeding occurred differed between the 2 groups, and no significant difference was found (Mann-Whitney U test, P = .300).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Age at Introduction of Complementary Foods Given for All Infants (N = 123) and for Each Study Group

    There were insufficient numbers of infants commencing foods other than cow’s milk while being breastfed to explore whether this factor affected the development of food allergy.

    Introduction of Solid Foods

    The mean age of any solid introduction was 20.3 weeks. The food with the earliest median age of introduction was rice at 20 weeks (given predominantly as “baby rice”), with carrots introduced at a median age of 21 weeks and apples and bananas at a median age of 22 weeks. The food that was most commonly introduced before 17 weeks of age was rice (20 infants). The other common foods introduced before 17 weeks of age were apples, bananas, and pears (11, 8, and 8 infants, respectively). The first cow’s milk protein taken as an ingredient was most likely to be from yogurt/fromage frais. Solids were introduced significantly earlier in food-allergic infants compared with control infants (P = .044), as was cow’s milk as an ingredient (P = .049) and peanut (P = .037) (Table 4). Control infants were introduced to solids first, but between 12 and 16 weeks, 15% of food-allergic infants were introduced to solids compared with only 9% of control infants (Fig 3). A post hoc analysis was undertaken that stratified the timing of complementary food introduction into 2 groups: introduction before and including 16 weeks of age and introduction at ≥17 weeks of age. Significantly more food-allergic infants were introduced to complementary foods at ≤16 weeks than control infants (35% vs 14%; P = .011).

    FIGURE 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3

    Timing of introduction of solids to food-allergic and control infants.

    Multivariable Logistic Model

    The model included age at solid introduction, concurrent breastfeeding, and cow’s milk in any form, which were variables that the previous analyses had identified as being significantly different between the study groups. Age at solid introduction was changed to a categorical variable because the result of the post hoc analysis found that solid introduction before 17 weeks of age was strongly associated with food allergy development. The concurrent breastfeeding and cow’s milk variable was also recoded into a categorical variable because earlier analysis showed any concurrent breastfeeding seemed to be beneficial. Cow’s milk as an ingredient was not included in the model due to multicollinearity, and age at first peanut consumption was not included due to reverse causation. Factors considered to be associated with allergy development (maternal asthma, allergy, education, age, pet ownership, infant gender, and single birth) were also included in this model. Maternal smoking was not included in the model because the proportion of smoking mothers was rare for all infants (3.3%) and was not significantly different between the groups.

    This analysis found that the association between solid introduction beyond 17 weeks of age and the concurrent breastfeeding and cow’s milk introduction and allergy development remained once the effects of other potentially confounding variables were controlled for (odds ratio: 0.292 [95% confidence interval: 0.099–0.859]; odds ratio: 0.279 [95% confidence interval: 0.080–0.971], respectively [data not shown]). However, because a model with 10 variables may be too many for a sample size of 123, the model was reduced by removing the variables that had a small effect (odds ratio between 0.80 and 1.25), and the results are shown in Table 5. Results were similar if the analysis was stratified according to maternal asthma and maternal allergy (data not shown).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Adjusted Multivariable Logistic Model for Assessment of Variables Associated With Food Allergy Development

    Discussion

    Within this nested case-control study, we found that early introduction of solids was associated with the development of food allergy. Infants with food allergy were much more likely to have had solids introduced between 12 and 16 weeks than control infants.

    The delayed introduction of solids into the infant diet (particularly of allergenic foods) has in the past been advocated for preventing allergy,16 but it has led to disappointing results in clinical trials.17,18 A number of birth cohort studies have failed to show any benefit on allergic outcome by delaying the introduction of solids, and 2 found an association between the delayed introduction of milk19 and egg20,21 and increased incidence of eczema and atopic sensitization.19–22 However, these studies did not indicate an age before which solids should not be introduced into the diet to avoid allergies. Our findings, conversely, suggest 17 weeks is a crucial time point, with solid food introduction before this time appearing to promote allergic disease whereas solid food introduction after that time point seems to promote tolerance. This finding implies that the mechanism, which acts post–17 weeks of age, is a nonallergen-specific tolerogenic immunologic mechanism because the food diary data showed that the foods introduced at this time were mainly fruit and vegetables, which are not considered allergenic. Epigenetic or immunologic mechanisms may be implicated because the foods that are introduced during this time deliver the substrates required for the induction of such processes.23–26 Fruits and vegetables have been shown to modify immune responses in older children,19,20 with the proposed mechanism being due to their antioxidant action on inflammatory processes27 and Treg cells28 or their action on the gut microflora.29,30

    In addition, we demonstrated a protective effect on food allergy development when cow’s milk protein, in whatever form, was given in the infant’s diet concurrently with breast milk. One of the perceived benefits of breastfeeding is the reduced risk of allergy due to the presence of a number of immunomodulatory factors in breast milk.31–33 However, the evidence that breastfeeding prevents allergies is contradictory, with some reviews showing a benefit while others did not.34–38 These findings may be due to variations in breast milk composition, differences in maternal diet,39–42 differences in specific infant-feeding practices, or a lack of precision in the way infant feeding has been measured. However, another explanation is that the immunomodulatory role of breast milk is only apparent when the immune system is exposed to an antigen at the same time as breast milk (the “overlap” effect).43,44 Breast milk is thought to play an important role in the development of oral tolerance because there are a number of immunologic factors in breast milk, particularly transforming growth factor–β, which has an positive association with infant wheeze31; interleukin-12, which promotes Th-1 cytokine mileau32; and soluble CD14, whose levels in breast milk have been shown to be negatively associated with eczema at 6 months of age.33 In the current study, it may be allergen-specific immunoglobulins in the mother’s milk that are promoting tolerogenic mechanisms, and this theory is supported by the fact that there was no benefit of overlap seen with “any foods.” It was not possible to determine if there was a similar association for other allergenic food because there were insufficient numbers of infants consuming these foods while still being breastfed. This outcome occurred because wheat, egg, fish, and the other allergenic foods are generally introduced after 26 weeks of age, and 66% of the study mothers had stopped breastfeeding by that time.

    Breastfeeding initiation and duration have increased over the last decades,45,46 as has the mean age at which solids, particularly allergenic ones, are introduced into the infant diet.46,47 Both these changes are due to amended infant-feeding recommendations.48,49 The net result of these changes may be that the duration that infants receive solids while still being breastfed (ie, the period of overlap) has been reduced. Consequently, population-wide and allergy-specific infant-feeding recommendations may have had a role in the increase in food allergy rates. A number of countries and specialist bodies now recognize this possibility and have amended their infant-feeding recommendations to incorporate the potential role of concurrent breastfeeding on food allergy development50,51; other professional bodies have called for further research into the topic.10,52 The findings from the current study add support to the possible protective effect of concurrent breastfeeding on allergy development and add additional data to the current discussion focusing on the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding (at least until 17 weeks of age).

    The main strength of this study is in its design. Infant-feeding data were collected prospectively from birth before any symptoms of food allergy had developed in all but 3 of the food-allergic infants; thus, the likelihood of bias resulting from an allergy diagnosis or by recall error was minimized. In addition, infants were diagnosed as food allergic by using a DBPCFC, considered the gold standard of food allergy diagnosis. However, due to the prospective nature of the diaries, “reverse causality” in the data cannot be ruled out, but early symptoms of food allergy would likely lead to prolonged breastfeeding and delayed solid/allergenic food introduction, which was not seen except for peanut and tree nuts. This action occurred because parents of allergic children were happier to introduce these foods due to skin prick test results, which control children did not have. Consequently, it is appropriate to consider that this study’s findings reflect a possible causal link with food allergy development. A weakness of the study is that the demographic characteristics of the study population differed from the demographic characteristics of the community from which it was recruited. However, the infants in the 2 experimental groups of this study (N = 123) did not differ significantly from each other for any demographic or environmental measurement, although due to underpowering (51% for asthma and 43% for maternal allergy), the analysis may not have been able to identify weak associations.

    Conclusions

    This study supports current allergy prevention recommendations that solids should not be introduced before 17 weeks of age10,11 and the general feeding recommendations that breastfeeding should continue while solids are introduced into the diet and beyond.13 These guidelines are in line with the WHO recommendation for breastfeeding to continue alongside solid foods until 2 years of age.53 However, it does not provide evidence on the relationship between exclusive breastfeeding to 26 weeks of age (compared with 17 weeks) and allergy development because insufficient numbers of women in the study were able to exclusively breastfeed for that long. This situation is reflected in general population data which show that in 2010, only 12% of UK women managed to exclusively breastfeed to 17 weeks.46 Exclusive breastfeeding rates in the United States seem to be higher, with 46% of US women exclusively breastfeeding for 3 months,45 but this value still falls short of the WHO recommendation. One reason for the low levels of exclusive breastfeeding may be that the recommendations seem to offer conflicting advice.

    Although we are waiting for more research to be conducted to determine the optimum duration of exclusive breastfeeding for the best overall health outcome of all infants, health professionals can provide advice that is consistent by encouraging exclusive breastfeeding for as long as possible, followed by continued breastfeeding alongside the introduction of complementary foods to maximize the duration of concurrent breastfeeding and solid food introduction.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank all families who took part in the PIFA study and the midwives of Winchester and Eastleigh Health Care Trust for their support of the study and help in recruitment, particularly T. Kemp. We also thank all staff involved in the daily running of the study and the staff in the Child Health and Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility at Southampton General Hospital for following up the participants and performing the clinical work needed to establish the diagnosis of food allergy, particularly L. Gudgeon, R. King, J. Garland, E. Francis, S. Pestridge, K. Scally, E. Gatrell, L. Bellis, A. Acqua, and R. Kemp. Our thanks also go to Professor Jonathan Hourihane for his crucial role in initially setting up the PIFA study.

    Footnotes

      • Accepted September 13, 2013.
    • Address correspondence to Kate E.C. Grimshaw, PhD, RD, Clinical and Experimental Sciences Academic Unit, Mailpoint 803, Level F, South Academic Block, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Rd, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. E-mail: kecg{at}soton.ac.uk
    • Dr Grimshaw was involved in writing the original study protocol, data collection, diagnosis of food allergy, statistical analysis and data management, and initial drafting and revision of the manuscript; Mr Maskell was involved in statistical analysis and data management, and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; Ms Oliver and Ms Morris were involved in data collection, diagnosis of food allergy, and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; Dr Foote was involved in the initiation and set up of the study, data collection, diagnosis of food allergy, and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; Prof Mills was involved in the conception and design of the original study protocol and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; Prof Roberts was involved in the initiation and set-up of the study, data collection, diagnosis of food allergy, statistical analysis and interpretation of the data, and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; and Prof Margetts was involved in the initiation and set-up of the study, statistical analysis and interpretation of the data, and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.

    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr Roberts declares an association with Danone Baby Nutrition (sat on scientific advisory board 2011–2012), Dr Grimshaw declares an association with Nutricia Ltd (November 2011 for input into meeting regarding the “state of the art” of infant feeding and allergy development and June 2012 for a lecture given to pediatric gastroenterologists entitled “Nutritional Management of Food Allergy”), and Dr Mills declares an association with Novartis (for attending 1 board meeting in 2010 regarding the use of a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge as an outcome measure in a food allergy immunotherapy study), Pepsico International (for advice on plant food allergen management in a factory environment), and DBV Technologies (for food challenge meal preparations). The other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: Supported by the UK Food Standards Agency (project TO7046) as part of the European Union’s EuroPrevall Project (contract FOOD-CT-2005-514000).

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Fewtrell M,
      2. Wilson DC,
      3. Booth I,
      4. Lucas A
      . Six months of exclusive breast feeding: how good is the evidence? BMJ. 2011;342:c5955pmid:21233152
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Renfrew MJ,
      2. McGuire W,
      3. McCormick FM
      . When to wean. Analysis article on breast feeding was misleading. BMJ. 2011;342:d987pmid:21324998
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
      1. Wright CM
      . When to wean. Infection more important than anaemia or allergy. BMJ. 2011;342:d1000pmid:21324986
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Williams AF,
      2. Prentice A
      . Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition replies to Mary Fewtrell and colleagues. BMJ. 2011;342:d980
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      1. Howie PW,
      2. Forsyth JS,
      3. Ogston SA,
      4. Clark A,
      5. Florey CD
      . Protective effect of breast feeding against infection. BMJ. 1990;300(6716):11–16pmid:2105113
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Wilson AC,
      2. Forsyth JS,
      3. Greene SA,
      4. Irvine L,
      5. Hau C,
      6. Howie PW
      . Relation of infant diet to childhood health: seven year follow up of cohort of children in Dundee infant feeding study. BMJ. 1998;316(7124):21–25pmid:9451261
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Lucas A,
      2. Cole TJ
      . Breast milk and neonatal necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet. 1990;336(8730):1519–1523pmid:1979363
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Raisler J,
      2. Alexander C,
      3. O’Campo P
      . Breast-feeding and infant illness: a dose-response relationship? Am J Public Health. 1999;89(1):25–30pmid:9987460
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(8):CD003517
    7. ↵
      1. Greer FR,
      2. Sicherer SH,
      3. Burks AW,
      4. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition,
      5. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Allergy and Immunology
      . Effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic disease in infants and children: the role of maternal dietary restriction, breastfeeding, timing of introduction of complementary foods, and hydrolyzed formulas. Pediatrics. 2008;121(1):183–191pmid:18166574
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Agostoni C,
      2. Decsi T,
      3. Fewtrell M,
      4. et al.,
      5. ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition
      . Complementary feeding: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;46(1):99–110pmid:18162844
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      Department of Health. Feeding your baby from birth to five. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/publicationspolicyandguidance/DH_107303. Accessed September 10, 2013
    10. ↵
      1. Section on Breastfeeding
      . Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/129/3/e827pmid:22371471
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. McBride D,
      2. Keil T,
      3. Grabenhenrich L,
      4. et al
      . The EuroPrevall birth cohort study on food allergy: baseline characteristics of 12,000 newborns and their families from nine European countries. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23(3):230–239pmid:22192443
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Keil T,
      2. McBride D,
      3. Grimshaw K,
      4. et al
      . The multinational birth cohort of EuroPrevall: background, aims and methods. Allergy. 2010;65(4):482–490pmid:19793062
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Kleinman RE
      . American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for complementary feeding. Pediatrics. 2000;106(5):1274pmid:11061819
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Zeiger RS,
      2. Heller S
      . The development and prediction of atopy in high-risk children: follow-up at age seven years in a prospective randomized study of combined maternal and infant food allergen avoidance. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;95(6):1179–1190pmid:7797786
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      Koplin J, Osborne N, Martin P, et al. Can early introduction of egg prevent egg allergy in infants? A population based study of an infant cohort. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:807–813
    16. ↵
      1. Snijders BE,
      2. Thijs C,
      3. van Ree R,
      4. van den Brandt PA
      . Age at first introduction of cow milk products and other food products in relation to infant atopic manifestations in the first 2 years of life: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study. Pediatrics. 2008;122(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/122/1/e115pmid:18595956
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Zutavern A,
      2. Brockow I,
      3. Schaaf B,
      4. et al.,
      5. LISA Study Group
      . Timing of solid food introduction in relation to eczema, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food and inhalant sensitization at the age of 6 years: results from the prospective birth cohort study LISA. Pediatrics. 2008;121(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/121/1/e44pmid:18166543
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Filipiak B,
      2. Zutavern A,
      3. Koletzko S,
      4. et al.,
      5. GINI-Group
      . Solid food introduction in relation to eczema: results from a four-year prospective birth cohort study. J Pediatr. 2007;151(4):352–358pmid:17889067
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Zutavern A,
      2. von Mutius E,
      3. Harris J,
      4. et al
      . The introduction of solids in relation to asthma and eczema. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(4):303–308pmid:15033835
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. ↵
      1. Prescott SL,
      2. Smith P,
      3. Tang M,
      4. et al
      . The importance of early complementary feeding in the development of oral tolerance: concerns and controversies. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008;19(5):375–380pmid:18266825
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Pali-Schöll I,
      2. Renz H,
      3. Jensen-Jarolim E
      . Update on allergies in pregnancy, lactation, and early childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(5):1012–1021pmid:19249083
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Calder PC,
      2. Albers R,
      3. Antoine JM,
      4. et al
      . Inflammatory disease processes and interactions with nutrition. Br J Nutr. 2009;101(suppl 1):S1–S45pmid:19586558
      OpenUrlPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Lack G
      . Epidemiologic risks for food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121(6):1331–1336pmid:18539191
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Chatzi L,
      2. Kogevinas M
      . Prenatal and childhood Mediterranean diet and the development of asthma and allergies in children. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(9A):1629–1634pmid:19689832
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Tan PH,
      2. Sagoo P,
      3. Chan C,
      4. et al
      . Inhibition of NF-kappa B and oxidative pathways in human dendritic cells by antioxidative vitamins generates regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2005;174(12):7633–7644pmid:15944264
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. ↵
      1. Blaut M
      . Relationship of prebiotics and food to intestinal microflora. Eur J Nutr. 2002;41(suppl 1):I11–I16pmid:12420111
      OpenUrlPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Claesson MJ,
      2. Jeffery IB,
      3. Conde S,
      4. et al
      . Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature. 2012;488(7410):178–184pmid:22797518
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Oddy WH,
      2. Halonen M,
      3. Martinez FD,
      4. et al
      . TGF-beta in human milk is associated with wheeze in infancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(4):723–728pmid:14564350
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Camporota L
      . Interleukin-12 and the development of atopy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31(10):1481–1484pmid:11678845
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Jones CA,
      2. Holloway JA,
      3. Popplewell EJ,
      4. et al
      . Reduced soluble CD14 levels in amniotic fluid and breast milk are associated with the subsequent development of atopy, eczema, or both. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109(5):858–866pmid:11994712
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. ↵
      1. Muraro A,
      2. Dreborg S,
      3. Halken S,
      4. et al
      . Dietary prevention of allergic diseases in infants and small children. Part III: critical review of published peer-reviewed observational and interventional studies and final recommendations. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004;15(4):291–307pmid:15305938
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Friedman NJ,
      2. Zeiger RS
      . Prevention and natural history of food allergy. In: Leung DYM, Sampson HA, Geha RS, Szefler SJ, eds. Pediatric Allergy. Principles and Practice. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2003:495–509
      1. Gdalevich M,
      2. Mimouni D,
      3. David M,
      4. Mimouni M
      . Breast-feeding and the onset of atopic dermatitis in childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(4):520–527pmid:11568741
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Gdalevich M,
      2. Mimouni D,
      3. Mimouni M
      . Breast-feeding and the risk of bronchial asthma in childhood: a systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Pediatr. 2001;139(2):261–266pmid:11487754
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Kramer MS,
      2. Matush L,
      3. Vanilovich I,
      4. et al.,
      5. Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) Study Group
      . Effect of prolonged and exclusive breast feeding on risk of allergy and asthma: cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):815pmid:17855282
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    31. ↵
      1. Patin RV,
      2. Vítolo MR,
      3. Valverde MA,
      4. Carvalho PO,
      5. Pastore GM,
      6. Lopez FA
      . The influence of sardine consumption on the omega-3 fatty acid content of mature human milk. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2006;82(1):63–69pmid:16532150
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Furuhjelm C,
      2. Warstedt K,
      3. Larsson J,
      4. et al
      . Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy and lactation may decrease the risk of infant allergy. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(9):1461–1467pmid:19489765
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Hoppu U,
      2. Kalliomäki M,
      3. Isolauri E
      . Maternal diet rich in saturated fat during breastfeeding is associated with atopic sensitization of the infant. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54(9):702–705pmid:11002382
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Hoppu U,
      2. Rinne M,
      3. Salo-Väänänen P,
      4. Lampi AM,
      5. Piironen V,
      6. Isolauri E
      . Vitamin C in breast milk may reduce the risk of atopy in the infant. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59(1):123–128pmid:15340369
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Poole JA,
      2. Barriga K,
      3. Leung DY,
      4. et al
      . Timing of initial exposure to cereal grains and the risk of wheat allergy. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):2175–2182pmid:16740862
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    34. ↵
      1. Norris JM,
      2. Barriga K,
      3. Klingensmith G,
      4. et al
      . Timing of initial cereal exposure in infancy and risk of islet autoimmunity. JAMA. 2003;290(13):1713–1720pmid:14519705
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    35. ↵
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding report card, United States, 2012. Available at: http:// www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/reportcard.htm. Accessed August 1, 2012
    36. ↵
      Health and Social Care Information Centre. Infant Feeding Study 2010. Available at: www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB08694. Accessed October 9, 2013
    37. ↵
      1. Grummer-Strawn LM,
      2. Scanlon KS,
      3. Fein SB
      . Infant feeding and feeding transitions during the first year of life. Pediatrics. 2008;122(suppl 2):S36–S42pmid:18829829
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    38. ↵
      1. American Academy of Pediatrics
      Committee on Nutrition. Pediatric Nutrition Handbook. 6th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL American Academy of Pediatrics; 2008
    39. ↵
      1. Department of Health
      . Infant Feeding Recommendation. London, UK: The Stationery Office; 2004
    40. ↵
      Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. Infant Feeding Advice 2010. Available at: www.allergy.org.au/images/stories/aer/infobulletins/2010pdf/ASCIA_Infant_Feeding_Advice_2010.pdf. Accessed October 9, 2013
    41. ↵
      1. Muche-Borowski C,
      2. Kopp M,
      3. Reese I,
      4. Sitter H,
      5. Werfel T,
      6. Schäfer T,
      7. German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI),
      8. Society of German Allergologists (ADA),
      9. German Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ),
      10. German Society of Dermatology (DDG),
      11. German Society of Pediatric Allergology (GPA)
      . Allergy prevention. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010;8(9):718–724pmid:19878402
      OpenUrlPubMed
    42. ↵
      1. Høst A,
      2. Halken S,
      3. Muraro A,
      4. et al
      . Dietary prevention of allergic diseases in infants and small children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008;19(1):1–4pmid:18199086
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    43. ↵
      World Health Organisation (WHO). 55th World Health Assembly. Infant and young child nutrition. Available at: www.who.int/nutrition/topics/WHA55.25_iycn_en.pdf. Accessed October 9, 2013
    • Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 132, Issue 6
    1 Dec 2013
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Introduction of Complementary Foods and the Relationship to Food Allergy
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Introduction of Complementary Foods and the Relationship to Food Allergy
    Kate E.C. Grimshaw, Joe Maskell, Erin M. Oliver, Ruth C.G. Morris, Keith D. Foote, E.N. Clare Mills, Graham Roberts, Barrie M. Margetts
    Pediatrics Dec 2013, 132 (6) e1529-e1538; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-3692

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Introduction of Complementary Foods and the Relationship to Food Allergy
    Kate E.C. Grimshaw, Joe Maskell, Erin M. Oliver, Ruth C.G. Morris, Keith D. Foote, E.N. Clare Mills, Graham Roberts, Barrie M. Margetts
    Pediatrics Dec 2013, 132 (6) e1529-e1538; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-3692
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Conclusions
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • Prevalence estimates and risk factors for early childhood wheeze across Europe: the EuroPrevall birth cohort
    • Modifying the infant's diet to prevent food allergy
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Health Outcomes in Young Children Following Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy
    • Rural-Urban Differences in Changes and Effects of Tobacco 21 in Youth E-cigarette Use
    • Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Breastfeeding Mothers
    Show more Article

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Hematology/Oncology
      • Blood Disorders
    • Nutrition
      • Nutrition
    • Allergy/Immunology
      • Allergy/Immunology

    Keywords

    • breastfeeding
    • food allergy
    • infant feeding
    • prevention
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics