This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bacteremia in young infants has remained an important ongoing concern for decades. Despite changes in prenatal screening and infant immunizations, the current epidemiology of this problem has received little attention.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all blood cultures collected at Kaiser Permanente Northern California on full-term, previously healthy infants presenting for care between 1 week to 3 months of age for whom a blood culture was drawn from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2009.
RESULTS: During the study period, 4255 blood cultures were collected from 160 818 full-term infants. Only 2% of all blood cultures were positive for pathogens (93/4255), whereas 247 positive cultures were due to contaminants. The incidence rate of true bacteremia was 0.57 in 1000 full-term births. The most common pathogen was Escherichia coli (56%). Ninety-eight percent of infants with E coli bacteremia had a urinary tract infection. Group B Streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus were the second and third most common pathogens, respectively. There were no cases of Listeria monocytogenes bacteremia or meningococcemia and only 1 case of enterococcal bacteremia. Ampicillin resistant pathogens accounted for 36% of organisms.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates bacteremia in young infants occurs infrequently and in only 2.2% of those who had a blood culture drawn. On the basis of the epidemiology of pathogens found in this large cohort, these data suggest a change in currently recommended presumptive antibiotic coverage in 1-week to 3-month-old infants with suspected bacteremia.
- CSF —
- cerebral spinal fluid
- GBS —
- group B Streptococcus
- KPNC —
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California
- UTI —
- urinary tract infection
- WBC —
- white blood cell
- Accepted November 18, 2011.
- Copyright © 2012 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
Individual Login
Institutional Login
You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your librarian or administrator if you do not have a username and password.
Log in through your institution
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 days for US$25.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- A 29-day-old Infant with Poor Feeding and a Rash
- Accuracy of PECARN rule for predicting serious bacterial infection in infants with fever without a source
- Reducing Invasive Care for Low-risk Febrile Infants Through Implementation of a Clinical Pathway
- Management and Outcomes of Previously Healthy, Full-Term, Febrile Infants Ages 7 to 90 Days
- Management of Fever in Young Infants: Evidence Versus Common Practice
- Should We Evaluate Febrile Young Infants Step-by-Step in the Emergency Department?
- Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections in Children
- Bacteraemic urinary tract infection: management and outcomes in young infants
- Sepsis in children
- Variation in Care of the Febrile Young Infant <90 Days in US Pediatric Emergency Departments
- Epidemiology of Bacteremia in Febrile Infants in the United States
- It's Just a Virus! Viral Etiologies of Fever Without a Source
- Etiology of Fever in Young Infants: A Reassessment
- Incidence of Bacteremia in Infants Aged 1 Week to 3 Months