Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • NCE Meeting Abstracts
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • NCE Meeting Abstracts
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
American Academy of Pediatrics
Article

Microstream Capnography Improves Patient Monitoring During Moderate Sedation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Jenifer R. Lightdale, Donald A. Goldmann, Henry A. Feldman, Adrienne R. Newburg, James A. DiNardo and Victor L. Fox
Pediatrics June 2006, 117 (6) e1170-e1178; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1709
Jenifer R. Lightdale
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald A. Goldmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry A. Feldman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrienne R. Newburg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James A. DiNardo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor L. Fox
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Investigative efforts to improve monitoring during sedation for patients of all ages are part of a national agenda for patient safety. According to the Institute of Medicine, recent technological advances in patient monitoring have contributed to substantially decreased mortality for people receiving general anesthesia in operating room settings. Patient safety has not been similarly targeted for the several million children annually in the United States who receive moderate sedation without endotracheal intubation. Critical event analyses have documented that hypoxemia secondary to depressed respiratory activity is a principal risk factor for near misses and death in this population. Current guidelines for monitoring patient safety during moderate sedation in children call for continuous pulse oximetry and visual assessment, which may not detect alveolar hypoventilation until arterial oxygen desaturation has occurred. Microstream capnography may provide an “early warning system” by generating real-time waveforms of respiratory activity in nonintubated patients.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to determine whether intervention based on capnography indications of alveolar hypoventilation reduces the incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation in nonintubated children receiving moderate sedation for nonsurgical procedures.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS. We included 163 children undergoing 174 elective gastrointestinal procedures with moderate sedation in a pediatric endoscopy unit in a randomized, controlled trial. All of the patients received routine care, including 2-L supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula. Investigators, patients, and endoscopy staff were blinded to additional capnography monitoring. In the intervention arm, trained independent observers signaled to clinical staff if capnograms indicated alveolar hypoventilation for >15 seconds. In the control arm, observers signaled if capnograms indicated alveolar hypoventilation for >60 seconds. Endoscopy nurses responded to signals in both arms by encouraging patients to breathe deeply, even if routine patient monitoring did not indicate a change in respiratory status.

OUTCOME MEASURES. Our primary outcome measure was patient arterial oxygen desaturation defined as a pulse oximetry reading of <95% for >5 seconds. Secondary outcome measures included documented assessments of abnormal ventilation, termination of the procedure secondary to concerns for patient safety, as well as other more rare adverse events including need for bag-mask ventilation, sedation reversal, or seizures.

RESULTS. Children randomly assigned to the intervention arm were significantly less likely to experience arterial oxygen desaturation than children in the control arm. Two study patients had documented adverse events, with no procedures terminated for patient safety concerns. Intervention and control patients did not differ in baseline characteristics. Endoscopy staff documented poor ventilation in 3% of all procedures and no apnea. Capnography indicated alveolar hypoventilation during 56% of procedures and apnea during 24%. We found no change in magnitude or statistical significance of the intervention effect when we adjusted the analysis for age, sedative dose, or other covariates.

CONCLUSIONS. The results of this controlled effectiveness trial support routine use of microstream capnography to detect alveolar hypoventilation and reduce hypoxemia during procedural sedation in children. In addition, capnography allowed early detection of arterial oxygen desaturation because of alveolar hypoventilation in the presence of supplemental oxygen. The current standard of care for monitoring all patients receiving sedation relies overtly on pulse oximetry, which does not measure ventilation. Most medical societies and regulatory organizations consider moderate sedation to be safe but also acknowledge serious associated risks, including suboptimal ventilation, airway obstruction, apnea, hypoxemia, hypoxia, and cardiopulmonary arrest. The results of this controlled trial suggest that microstream capnography improves the current standard of care for monitoring sedated children by allowing early detection of respiratory compromise, prompting intervention to minimize hypoxemia. Integrating capnography into patient monitoring protocols may ultimately improve the safety of nonintubated patients receiving moderate sedation.

  • monitoring
  • sedation
  • patient safety

There is no acceptable adverse-event rate for elective patient sedation during nonsurgical procedures.1 According to the Institute of Medicine, technological advances in patient monitoring from 1960 to 1990 and carefully constructed guidelines have contributed to substantially decreased mortality from 1 per 5500 to 1 per 20000 people receiving general anesthesia in operating room settings.2–4 Patient safety has not been similarly targeted for the several million children annually in the United States who receive moderate sedation without endotracheal intubation.5,6 Critical event analyses have documented that hypoxemia secondary to depressed respiratory activity is a principal risk factor for near misses and death in this population.7,8 Investigative efforts to improve monitoring during sedation for patients of all ages are part of a national agenda for patient safety.2,5,9

Continuous pulse oximetry in conjunction with visual assessment is the current standard of care for patient monitoring during pediatric moderate sedation.10–12 The American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations have defined moderate sedation as a drug-induced depression of consciousness along the continuum of sedation that maximizes comfort and cooperation without compromising airway integrity.13,14 More than 20000 US children per year undergo gastrointestinal procedures,15 many with moderate or even deep procedural sedation.16,17 Recent prospective observational studies have suggested that real-time graphic assessment of ventilation using capnography in nonintubated patients undergoing sedated gastrointestinal procedures may complement current practice by providing an “early warning system” for impending respiratory compromise and resultant hypoxemia.18,19

We examined the effectiveness of the recently advanced technology of microstream capnography at improving the safety of nonintubated children undergoing sedated procedures. Specifically, we investigated whether electronically monitoring respiratory activity reduces the incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation in pediatric patients undergoing moderate sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. We used a primary outcome of minor oxygen desaturation not as a surrogate for adverse events, but rather with the strong recognition that staff in our endoscopy unit are vigilant for early airway compromise.

METHODS

Study Design and Definitions

This prospective, double-blind, randomized trial contained 2 study arms. In both arms, standard of care ventilatory monitoring was performed by endoscopy staff, while independent observers silently recorded information obtained by microstream capnography (Philips M4 with Microstream CO2, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA; Oridion Medical Inc, Needham, MA). In addition to absolute end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) values, independent observers tracked continuous waveforms (capnograms) of expired carbon dioxide throughout the ventilatory cycle on the study capnometer.

In the intervention arm, independent observers signaled to endoscopy staff by a raised hand if capnograms indicated alveolar hypoventilation, including apnea, for >15 seconds, as measured by a stopwatch (Fig 1). In the control arm, independent observers signaled if capnograms indicated alveolar hypoventilation for >60 seconds. Alveolar hypoventilation and apnea were defined as the persistent cessation of ventilatory waveforms.19–21 Signal criteria were based on ethical considerations, as well as published observational data, suggesting that short spans of capnograms consistent with alveolar hypoventilation are frequent in sedated patients,18 and patients who experience >45 seconds of alveolar hypoventilation are at risk for arterial oxygen desaturation.19 On signals from independent observers, endoscopy nurses (registered nurses [RNs]) repositioned patients' heads and encouraged them to breathe deeply with verbal instructions.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Example of normal capnogram (A), alveolar hypoventilation (B), and apnea (C).

Our primary outcome variable was patient oxygen desaturation defined as a pulse oximetry reading of <95% for >5 seconds, (Nellcor Symphony N-3000 Pulse Oximeter with size-appropriate [adult, pediatric, or infant] OxiMax latex-free adhesive oxygen sensor, Nellcor Puritan Bennett Inc, Pleasanton, CA) with time also measured by stopwatch. This level of mild hypoxemia has been reported to precede adverse events.22,23 Secondary outcome measures included RN-documented assessments of abnormal ventilation, termination of the procedure secondary to concerns for patient safety (near misses), as well as other more rare adverse events, including the need for bag-mask ventilation, sedation reversal (ie, naloxone), or seizures. We hypothesized that acting on early capnographic indications of ventilatory compromise would decrease the incidence of oxygen desaturation, near misses, and other adverse events in children undergoing moderate sedation for gastrointestinal procedures.

The study was approved by the Children's Hospital Boston Committee on Clinical Investigation (institutional review board) and the Children's Hospital Boston General Clinical Research Center. Independent observers for the study (a General Clinical Research Center research nurse and a research assistant) were trained in capnography by a senior staff anesthesiologist. They then performed simultaneous monitoring of 5 “dry-run” patients who were not randomly assigned for analysis and biweekly silently watched each other record study data to ensure interobserver agreement of capnogram interpretation. Data coordination and randomization schemes were provided by the Clinical Research Program at Children's Hospital Boston.

Patients

Participants were recruited from all outpatients (December 2003 to November 2004) referred for elective procedures with moderate sedation in the endoscopy unit at a single, free-standing children's hospital. Primary gastroenterologists confirmed patient eligibility according to age (6 months to 19 years) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class (1: healthy; 2: single, controlled disease state).10 Exclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists classes 3 to 5, general anesthesia, emergency procedures, known seizure disorders, and use of mood-altering or chronic pain medications. Demographic information was collected for eligible participants. Written, informed consent was obtained on the day of procedure.

Randomization

Independent observers randomly assigned patients to study arms by opening pregenerated, sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes. The randomization scheme was permuted blocks of 2, 4, 6, and 8, stratified by procedure type (esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD] or colonoscopy). Participants undergoing combined EGD/colonoscopy were randomly assigned according to the first procedure planned. Investigators, patients, endoscopy unit staff (RNs and technicians), and endoscopists were blinded to study arm assignments.

Clinical Procedure

Sedation for endoscopy followed approved standardized protocols at our institution. Per endoscopist preference, some patients received oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg; maximum dose: 20 mg) in preparation for peripheral intravenous catheter placement. All of the patients were continuously monitored for heart rate, respiratory rate, electrocardiogram, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry. Vital signs, visual assessment of patient chest wall excursion, and depth of sedation using the Ramsay scale (eg, 1 = patient awake, anxious, agitated or restless; 6 = anesthesia)24 were documented every 5 minutes by dedicated RNs. An a priori sedation plan for all of the patients targeted moderate sedation, defined at our institution as the continuum of sedation at a Ramsay score of ≤4 (eg, patient asleep, purposeful response to a light stroke to the cheek).

A size-appropriate (infant, pediatric, or adult) nasal cannula with proboscis extending over the mouth provided 2 L of free-flowing oxygen and was equipped with an aspiration port for continuous sampling of CO2 content of both inspired and expired patient gas samples (50 mL/minute) during either nasal or mouth breathing (Smart MAC-Line O2 ETCO2 sampling lines, Oridion Medical Inc). Inspired samples were expected to contain essentially no CO2 in the presence of supplemental oxygen; expired samples were expected to represent alveolar gas, with a small amount of gas containing no CO2 from patient physiologic dead space. In the presence of alveolar hypoventilation, microstream samples contained increasing proportions of entrained ambient air with little to no CO2.

In both study arms, gastrointestinal procedures proceeded routinely and patient care followed standard practice. Intravenous sedation with fentanyl (maximum dose: 5 μg/kg) and midazolam (maximum dose: 0.3 mg/kg) was administered stepwise via slow intravenous push. Adequacy of sedation was determined by endoscopists. RNs monitored for deep sedation, defined as a Ramsay Score of ≥5 (eg, 5 = no response to a light stroke to the cheek but response to painful stimulus; 6 = anesthesia, no response to nail bed pressure).

On any evidence of inadequate ventilation detected by standard means, RNs intervened by repositioning patients, instructing patients to take a deep breath, providing supplemental blow-by oxygen (1–3 L via funnel), and alerting physicians to pause during the procedure or to withdraw the scope. RNs recorded any adverse events, such as clinical signs of hypoventilation (respiratory rate <10 breaths per minute), bradycardia (heart rate <55 beats per minute), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 in children >1 year of age), vomiting, aspiration, or seizures, on a standardized sedation-monitoring record.

Capnography

In both study arms, the capnometer was muted and was visible only to independent observers. Capnometer waveforms were continuously generated throughout the respiratory cycle by measuring infrared absorption of aspirated gas samples at patient nares. CO2 has peak absorption at 4200 nm with absorption at this wavelength proportional to Pco2. Peaks in the capnogram correspond to expiration, whereas troughs correspond to inspiration. Distinct respiratory patterns are associated with specific waveforms.25 Capnograms depicting alveolar hypoventilation were presumed representative of central depression of respiration, airway obstruction, or both.

Independent observers were trained to detect artifact in all electronic monitoring. Pulse oximetry readings were considered reliable if there was a steady pulse beat that correlated with plethysmography. Capnograms were considered reliable if nasal cannulae were in the nares, and the patient was not moving, verbalizing, or otherwise artifactually causing loss of waveform. Any concerns from clinical staff or independent observers that vital signs were not being adequately detected were addressed by the RNs repositioning the equipment, including nasal cannulae.

Independent observers recorded capnometer readings at least every 5 minutes from the time of intravenous sedation administration to the time of scope withdrawal. Incidence and time of capnograms indicating alveolar hypoventilation lasting >15 seconds were noted. As a subset of alveolar hypoventilation, a flat line (absence of any CO2 detection) lasting >15 seconds on the capnometer was recorded as an episode of apnea.

Data Collection, Monitoring, and Safety

Data were recorded on paper forms and entered into a database via customized entry screens (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). All of the data were entered twice for verification and quality-control purposes. Adverse events were monitored by the principal investigator, graded by an independent consultant, and reported to the institutional review board within 72 hours.

Statistical Analysis

We conducted an intention-to-treat analysis. The primary null hypothesis, that equal proportions of intervention and control subjects would experience arterial oxygen desaturation, was addressed by a 2-sided Fisher's exact test. Other comparisons between arms were made by Fisher's exact test for dichotomous end points and the Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) 2-sample test for continuous measures (many of which showed severely skewed distributions). To confirm the primary result adjusting for incidental variables (which were, in theory, balanced by randomization and, in fact, closely balanced as shown in Table 1) we performed multiple logistic regression analysis with arterial desaturation as the binary end point, study arm as the independent variable, and various patient characteristics and clinical outcomes as covariates. To test for effect modification we added arm × covariate interaction to the regression model. The criterion for statistical significance in all of the tests was P < .05. SAS software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) was used for all of the computations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Baseline Characteristics of Study Participants

Our analysis plan called for 1 interim analysis after 30 patients were randomly assigned. Sample size was chosen on the basis of 9 cases of arterial desaturation observed at that point, or 30% in both arms combined, with 99% confidence interval 11% to 55%. No other interim analyses were planned or performed. Assuming an overall rate of 12% (just within the lower confidence bound), a sample of 174 provided 90% power to detect a fivefold reduction in intervention compared with control (4% vs 20%). The 5% type I error rate for the trial was not affected by use of the initial 30 patients, because the 2 trial arms were not separated, and blinding was maintained.26

RESULTS

Participants

We randomly assigned 163 participants to an intervention or control arm before undergoing a total of 174 procedures (Fig 2). To eliminate issues of correlated response within a given patient's data, we analyzed only the first procedure for each patient, reducing the sample size to 163 but only negligibly reducing power. Indications for gastrointestinal procedures included gastroesophageal reflux (56 patients), abdominal pain (37), vomiting (14), rectal bleeding (13), and diarrhea (12). Procedures performed included EGDs (131 patients), colonoscopy (21), and EGD with colonoscopy (11). Before intravenous insertion, 14 patients received oral midazolam. Baseline characteristics of an additional 16 eligible patients who declined to participate did not differ significantly from participants. Intervention and control patients did not differ significantly in baseline characteristics or procedural times (Table 1).

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Trial flow diagram.

Primary Outcome Measure

Patients in the intervention arm were significantly less likely to have an intraprocedural episode of arterial oxygen desaturation to <95% than those in the control arm (11% vs 24%; P < .03; Table 2). Several clinical characteristics and covariates were significantly associated with desaturation (eg, detection of apnea by capnography or detection of hypoventilation by the RN), but controlling for these variables in multiple regression analysis did not reduce the magnitude or statistical significance of the intervention effect. Adjustment for covariates in fact strengthened the point estimate of the intervention effect, although it widened the confidence interval (Table 2). No interaction between intervention arm and covariates was detected.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Patients in the Intervention Arm Were Significantly Less Likely to Become Hypoxemic Than Those in the Control Arm

Two patients in the control arm had a pulse oximetry reading of <95% for >5 seconds without defined alveolar hypoventilation on capnography. All of the other patients experienced arterial desaturation for a mean of 3.4 minutes (median: 1 minute; range: 0–13 minutes) after capnograms first depicted alveolar hypoventilation with no differences in time to desaturation between control and intervention arms (P > .40).

Secondary Outcome Measures

No procedures were terminated for patient safety concerns. There were no rare adverse events during the study period, including no need for bag-mask ventilation, sedation reversal, cardiovascular instability, or seizures. Two study patients experienced adverse events: 1 vomited on awakening from moderate sedation in the postanesthesia care unit, whereas the other failed to sedate with standard doses of sedation. Neither adverse event was determined to be related to participation in the study or to the use of capnography.

Dedicated Nurse Assessments of Ventilation

Endoscopy RNs documented poor ventilation during 5 (3%) procedures and no episodes of apnea. During all of the procedures, RNs frequently checked and repositioned patients to optimize ventilation, independent of any signals from study observers. Supplemental blow-by oxygen via funnel was provided intermittently throughout many procedures. One patient experienced transient arterial oxygen desaturation to 79% for <1 minute and received active airway intervention (chin lift). No study patient received jaw lift, bag-mask ventilation, or endotracheal intubation.

Pulse Oximetry

Twenty-nine (18%) patients had a pulse oximetry reading of <95% for >5 seconds at least once during sedation with 2-L supplemental O2 via nasal cannula. Baseline arterial oxygen saturations obtained from all of the patients without supplemental O2 ranged from 95% to 100%, with a mean and median of 99%. When 2-L supplemental O2 via nasal cannula was applied before the procedure, only 6 (5%) study patients did not reach a maximum arterial saturation of 99% to 100%.

Capnography

More than 15 seconds of alveolar hypoventilation was noted on capnography in 58% (94) of patients and 56% (98) of procedures. More than 15 seconds of apnea on capnography was noted in 25% (40) of patients and 24% (42) of procedures. Transient loss of waveform because of talking, moving, crying, or other artifact happened during every procedure.

Baseline ETCO2 readings obtained at the time of intravenous sedation administration ranged from 17 to 50 (median: 39) and included 3 patients with baseline ETCO2 readings of <20 who were crying. The highest ETCO2 reading obtained from each participant during procedure time ranged from 27 to 67 (median: 50) and included 2 children with ETCO2 readings of <35. There were no differences between intervention and control arms in median maximum (P = .20) or minimum (P = .77) ETCO2 readings.

Maximum ETCO2 values were similar between patients who had a pulse oximetry reading of <95% for >5 seconds (P = .20) or patients who had capnograms consistent with alveolar hypoventilation for >15 seconds (P = .64). Minimum ETCO2 values were significantly lower in those patients with arterial desaturation (P = .05) and those with capnograms consistent with alveolar hypoventilation (P < .0001). In these patients, alveolar hypoventilation resulted in the largest portion of the aspiration ETCO2 sample being composed of room air and supplemental oxygen devoid of CO2 rather than of CO2-rich alveolar gas.

DISCUSSION

The results of this controlled effectiveness trial indicate that stimulation of moderately sedated patients in response to abnormal capnograms is associated with fewer incidents of arterial oxygen desaturation as measured by continuous pulse oximetry. According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics, the term “moderate sedation” should replace the more commonly used term “conscious sedation” and involves active continual patient assessment for deep sedation with possible ventilatory compromise.12,13 Our results support the routine use of microstream capnography to improve detection of alveolar hypoventilation and reduce arterial oxygen desaturation during moderate sedation for pediatric procedures.

In addition, capnography allowed early detection of arterial oxygen desaturation because of alveolar hypoventilation in the presence of supplemental oxygen. It has been suggested that providing supplemental oxygen during procedural sedation may mask early detection of inadequate ventilation by continuous pulse oximetry.10 At the same time, it has been shown that withholding supplemental oxygen significantly shortens the interval between respiratory compromise and arterial desaturation.11 Integrating capnography into sedation protocols solves this dilemma by allowing for routine administration of supplemental oxygen without compromising patient monitoring.

Catastrophic adverse events during moderate sedation for nonemergent pediatric procedures are rare, but almost all are directly linked to failure to rescue from impending respiratory failure.7 Several studies of pediatric sedation have demonstrated a direct link between arterial oxygen desaturation as detected by pulse oximetry and poor outcomes.7,8,27 The current standard of care for monitoring all patients receiving sedation11,12 relies overtly on pulse oximetry, which does not measure ventilation.5,10 Early detection of alveolar hypoventilation in patients undergoing moderate sedation may be valuable in avoiding significant morbidity and mortality.5

Recent advances in lightweight compact microstream capnography technology allow the easy, accurate, real-time graphic display of ventilatory waveforms in nonintubated patients.28,29 Different from conventional mainstream capnometers, which use blackbody infrared technology that is vulnerable to interference by other infrared absorbing molecules, such as water vapor, microstream capnography uses molecular correlation spectroscopy that is highly selective for carbon dioxide.29 Compared with validated older technologies, including mainstream capnometers,28 pretracheal stethoscopes,19 and direct arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure sampling,30 microstream capnography shows less potential for inaccurate measurements and fewer technical disadvantages.31

Observational studies substantiate our finding that continuous monitoring by capnography is feasible in very young children.31–34 The results of our study may be generalizable to adult populations in a variety of settings.35,36 In moderately sedated adults undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with routine ventilatory monitoring, Vargo et al19 reported that 57% had ≥1 episode of apnea or disordered respiration detected by capnography and not detected by standard monitoring. The results of our study support capnograms, rather than absolute ETCO2 values, as the most sensitive measure of ventilation in nonintubated patients.19,36

Our study relied on detection of arterial oxygen desaturation by conventional pulse oximetry, and our results might have been different if newer oximetry technologies with improved clinical accuracy had been used.37,38 Another limitation to our study is that some occurrences of capnograms consistent with alveolar hypoventilation may have instead been artifact, and independent observers could have, in effect, signaled nuisance alarms to RNs. Generally speaking, we designed this study as an effectiveness trial that took place in the real world of our endoscopy unit. To this end, we used our own conventional pulse oximeters and definitions of capnograms that we felt could be easily and feasibly adopted clinically.

Of course, few adverse events occurred, and use of capnography cannot be directly linked to improved patient safety. We chose minor oxygen desaturation to <95% as the primary outcome measure, in part because it represents a consensus threshold point in our endoscopy unit and others16,17 at which staff act to stimulate a sedated child out of concern that the child is not optimally ventilating. Our primary outcome measure is not intended to be a surrogate for significant adverse events but rather represents a point at which the operating environment in our endoscopy unit is altered by staff concern for patient safety.

As with aviation safety paradigms,39 the target “crash rate” for moderate sedation in relatively healthy patients is 0. Pilots are trained to act early on indications that their plane is in distress. Clinicians will often intervene to stimulate patient respiration if a pulse oximeter detects minor arterial desaturation, a relatively late sign of suboptimal ventilation.27 Acting even earlier by adopting a “new cockpit dial,” such as capnography, may be warranted and valuable in avoiding significant morbidity and mortality.

Most medical societies and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations consider moderate sedation to be safe but also acknowledge serious associated risks, including suboptimal ventilation, airway obstruction, apnea, hypoxemia, hypoxia, and cardiopulmonary arrest.9,11–13,40 The results of this controlled trial suggest that microstream capnography improves the current standard of care for monitoring sedated children by allowing early detection of respiratory compromise, prompting intervention to minimize hypoxemia. Used in conjunction with pulse oximetry and visual assessment, capnography may ultimately improve patient safety during moderate sedation for pediatric procedures.

Acknowledgments

This study received a Harvard University Risk Management Foundation Patient Safety Grant and was supported by the General Clinical Research Center at Children's Hospital Boston (M01-RR02172). Dr Lightdale is the recipient of a career development award from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08 HS1-367502). Oridion Inc provided capnography filter lines for the study, and Philips provided the monitor.

We thank the following individuals at Children's Hospital Boston for invaluable contributions to this study: Lisa A. Heard, RN, Kate M. Donovan, BS, and the staff of the Endoscopy Unit; Victoria L. Turbini, MS, RN, and the staff of the General Clinical Research Center; Lisa B. Mahoney, BS; Navil F. Sethna, MD; and Stavroula K. Osganian, MD, ScD, and the staff of the Clinical Research Program.

Footnotes

    • Accepted December 27, 2005.
  • Address correspondence to Jenifer R. Lightdale, MD, MPH, Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: jenifer.lightdale{at}childrens.harvard.edu
  • The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

ETCO2—end-tidal carbon dioxide • RN—registered nurse • EGD—esophagogastroduodenoscopy

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Pierce EC Jr. The 34th Rovenstine Lecture. 40 years behind the mask: safety revisited. Anesthesiology.1996;84 :965– 975
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Institute of Medicine. Setting performance standards and expectations. In: Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M, eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000:144–145
  3. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA.1961;178 :261– 266
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Warden JC, Holland R. Anaesthesia mortality. Anaesth Intensive Care.1995;23 :255– 256
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Blike GT, Cravero JP. Pride, Prejudice and Pediatric Sedation: A Multispeciality Evaluation of State of the Art. Report from the Dartmouth Summit of Pediatric Sedation. 2000. Available at: www.npsf.org/download/PediatricSedation.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2006
  6. ↵
    Hostetler MA, Auinger P, Szilagyi PG. Parenteral analgesic and sedative use among ED patients in the United States: combined results from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) 1992–1997. Am J Emerg Med.2002;20 :139– 143
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Cote CJ, Notterman DA, Karl HW, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors. Pediatrics.2000;105 :805– 814
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR. Adverse events and risk factors associated with the sedation of children by nonanesthesiologists. Anesth Analg.1997;85 :1207– 1213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Poe SS, Nolan MT, Dang D, et al. Ensuring safety of patients receiving sedation for procedures: evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Jt Comm J Qual Improv.2001;27 :28– 41
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Krauss B, Green SM. Sedation and analgesia for procedures in children. N Engl J Med.2000;342 :938– 945
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology.2002;96 :1004– 1017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Drugs. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: addendum. Pediatrics.2002;110 :836– 838
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    American Society of Anesthesiologists. Distinguishing Monitored Anesthesia Care (“MAC”) From Moderate Sedation/Analgesia, Conscious Sedation. Parkridge, IL: American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2004. Available at www.asahq.org/publicationsandservices/standards/35.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2006
  14. ↵
    Joint Commission Resources, Organizations. New definitions, revised standards address the continuum of sedation and anesthesia. Jt Comm Perspect.2000;20 :10
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Kugathasan S, Judd RH, Hoffmann RG, et al. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of children with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease in Wisconsin: a statewide population-based study. J Pediatr.2003;143 :525– 531
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Squires RH Jr, Morriss F, Schluterman S, Drews B, Galyen L, Brown KO. Efficacy, safety, and cost of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia in children undergoing endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc.1995;41 :99– 104
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Lamireau T, Dubreuil M, Daconceicao M. Oxygen saturation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children: general anesthesia versus intravenous sedation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1998;27 :172– 175
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Soto RG, Fu ES, Vila H Jr, Miguel RV. Capnography accurately detects apnea during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg.2004;99 :379– 382
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Vargo JJ, Zuccaro G Jr, Dumot JA, Conwell DL, Morrow JB, Shay SS. Automated graphic assessment of respiratory activity is superior to pulse oximetry and visual assessment for the detection of early respiratory depression during therapeutic upper endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc.2002;55 :826– 831
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. Woomer JL Jr, Berkheimer DA. Using capnography to monitor ventilation. Nursing.2003;33 :42– 43
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    Carroll P. Procedural sedation: capnography's heightened role. RN.2002;65 :54– 58, 60, 62, 63
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Cote CJ, Rolf N, Liu LM, et al. A single-blind study of combined pulse oximetry and capnography in children. Anesthesiology.1991;74 :980– 987
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Vade A, Sukhani R, Dolenga M, Habisohn-Schuck C. Chloral hydrate sedation of children undergoing CT and MR imaging: safety as judged by American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. AJR Am J Roentgenol.1995;165 :905– 909
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J.1974;2 :656– 659
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Kodali BS. www.capnography.com: an animated website. Anesth Analg.2001;93 :1364
    OpenUrlOpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Gould AL. Interim analyses for monitoring clinical trials that do not materially affect the type I error rate. Stat Med.1992;11 :55– 66
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Cote CJ, Goldstein EA, Cote MA, Hoaglin DC, Ryan JF. A single-blind study of pulse oximetry in children. Anesthesiology.1988;68 :184– 188
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Singh S, Venkataraman ST, Saville A, Bhende MS. NPB-75: a portable quantitative microstream capnometer. Am J Emerg Med.2001;19 :208– 210
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Colman Y, Krauss B. Microstream capnograpy technology: a new approach to an old problem. J Clin Monit Comput.1999;15 :403– 409
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Casati A, Gallioli G, Scandroglio M, Passaretta R, Borghi B, Torri G. Accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring using the NBP-75 microstream capnometer: a study in intubated ventilated and spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol.2000;17 :622– 626
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Thomas PE. What's the latest on carbon dioxide monitoring? Neonatal Netw.2004;23 :70– 72
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. Mason KP, Burrows PE, Dorsey MM, Zurakowski D, Krauss B. Accuracy of capnography with a 30 foot nasal cannula for monitoring respiratory rate and end-tidal CO2 in children. J Clin Monit Comput.2000;16 :259– 262
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. Yldzdas D, Yapcoglu H, Ylmaz HL. The value of capnography during sedation or sedation/analgesia in pediatric minor procedures. Pediatr Emerg Care.2004;20 :162– 165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Krauss B. Capnography in EMS. A powerful way to objectively monitor ventilatory status. JEMS.2003;28 :28– 30, 32–38, 41
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Kober A, Schubert B, Bertalanffy P, et al. Capnography in non-tracheally intubated emergency patients as an additional tool in pulse oximetry for prehospital monitoring of respiration. Anesth Analg.2004;98 :206– 210
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Miner JR, Heegaard W, Plummer D. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during procedural sedation. Acad Emerg Med.2002;9 :275– 280
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Goldman JM, Petterson MT, Kopotic RJ, Barker SJ. Masimo signal extraction pulse oximetry. J Clin Monit Comput.2000;16 :475– 483
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Kocher S, Rohling R, Tschupp A. Performance of a digital Pco2/SPo2 ear sensor. J Clin Monit Comput.2004;18 :75– 79
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Hart CA. Aviation industry provides roadmap to improve patient safety. Biomed Instrum Technol.2004;38 :466– 469
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    Waring JP, Baron TH, Hirota WK, et al. Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc.2003;58 :317– 322
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics
Vol. 117, Issue 6
June 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Microstream Capnography Improves Patient Monitoring During Moderate Sedation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Microstream Capnography Improves Patient Monitoring During Moderate Sedation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Jenifer R. Lightdale, Donald A. Goldmann, Henry A. Feldman, Adrienne R. Newburg, James A. DiNardo, Victor L. Fox
Pediatrics Jun 2006, 117 (6) e1170-e1178; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1709

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Microstream Capnography Improves Patient Monitoring During Moderate Sedation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Jenifer R. Lightdale, Donald A. Goldmann, Henry A. Feldman, Adrienne R. Newburg, James A. DiNardo, Victor L. Fox
Pediatrics Jun 2006, 117 (6) e1170-e1178; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1709
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures
  • Capnography Monitoring During Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
  • Patient safety during procedural sedation using capnography monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Noninvasive Monitoring of Oxygen and Ventilation
  • Redesign of an Open-System Oxygen Face Mask With Mainstream Capnometer for Children
  • A Comparison of Different Techniques for Interfacing Capnography With Adult and Pediatric Supplemental Oxygen Masks
  • Monitoring Exhaled Carbon Dioxide
  • Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures: Update 2016
  • Pharmacists' role in procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department
  • Guideline for Care of the Patient Receiving Moderate Sedation/Analgesia
  • The use of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a comparison with midazolam
  • Monosodium L-glutamate added to a high-energy, high-protein liquid diet promotes gastric emptying
  • Scopus (191)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Trends in Trampoline Fractures: 2008–2017
  • Global Health Experience and Interest: Results From the AAP Periodic Survey
  • Distinct Populations of Sudden Unexpected Infant Death Based on Age
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Administration/Practice Management
    • Safety
  • Anesthesiology/Pain Medicine
    • Anesthesiology/Pain Medicine
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Open Access
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Librarians
  • Licensing Information
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • RSS Feeds
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
  • RSS
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2019 American Academy of Pediatrics