Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Article

The Epidemiology of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: Incidence, Risk Factors, Therapies, and Outcome

Peter A. Dargaville, Beverley Copnell and ; for the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network
Pediatrics May 2006, 117 (5) 1712-1721; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2215
Peter A. Dargaville
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beverley Copnell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. We sought to examine, in a large cohort of infants within a definable population of live births, the incidence, risk factors, treatments, complications, and outcomes of meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS).

DESIGN. Data were gathered on all of the infants in Australia and New Zealand who were intubated and mechanically ventilated with a primary diagnosis of MAS (MASINT) between 1995 and 2002, inclusive. Information on all of the live births during the same time period was obtained from perinatal data registries.

RESULTS. MASINT occurred in 1061 of 2490862 live births (0.43 of 1000), with a decrease in incidence from 1995 to 2002. A higher risk of MASINT was noted at advanced gestation, with 34% of cases born beyond 40 weeks, compared with 16% of infants without MAS. Fetal distress requiring obstetric intervention was noted in 51% of cases, and 42% were delivered by cesarean section. There was a striking association between low 5-minute Apgar score and MASINT. In addition, risk of MASINT was higher where maternal ethnicity was Pacific Islander or indigenous Australian and was also increased after planned home birth. Uptake of exogenous surfactant, high-frequency ventilation, and inhaled nitric oxide increased considerably during the study period, with >50% of infants receiving ≥1 of these therapies by 2002. Risk of air leak was 9.6% overall, with an apparent reduction to 5.3% in 2001–2002. The duration of intubation remained constant throughout the study period (median: 3 days), whereas duration of oxygen therapy and length of hospital stay increased. Death related to MAS occurred in 24 infants (2.5% of the MASINT cohort; 0.96 per 100000 live births).

CONCLUSIONS. The incidence of MASINT in the developed world is low and seems to be decreasing. Risk of MASINT is significantly greater in the presence of fetal distress and low Apgar score, as well as Pacific Islander and indigenous Australian ethnicity. The increased use of innovative respiratory supports has not altered the duration of mechanical ventilation.

  • meconium aspiration syndrome
  • risk factors
  • gestational age
  • Apgar score
  • high-frequency ventilation
  • nitric oxide
  • pulmonary surfactants
  • pneumothorax

Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is a disease of the term and near-term infant that is associated with considerable respiratory morbidity. The disease is characterized by early onset of respiratory distress in a meconium-stained infant, with poor lung compliance and hypoxemia clinically and patchy opacification and hyperinflation radiographically.1, 2 At least one third of infants with MAS require intubation and mechanical ventilation,3, 4 and newer neonatal therapies, such as high-frequency ventilation (HFV), inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), and surfactant administration are often brought into play.5, 6

In the past few decades, there seems to have been a reduction in the incidence of MAS in many centers, at least in the developed world.4, 7, 8 This observation has largely been based on declining numbers in individual centers, with only 1 population-based study examining longitudinal trends in MAS incidence.7 The apparent reduction in the risk of MAS has been attributed to better obstetric practices, in particular, avoidance of postmaturity and expeditious delivery where fetal distress has been noted.8

In previous epidemiologic studies, some important risk factors for the development of MAS have been identified, either within the general birth population or among infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF). The presence of fetal compromise, indicated by abnormalities of fetal heart rate tracings and/or poor Apgar scores, is known to increase the risk of MSAF7, 9, 10 and of MAS in the meconium-stained infant.8, 9, 11–15 Cesarean delivery is also associated with a heightened incidence of MAS.16 There is an apparent relationship between maternal ethnicity and risk of MSAF7, 10, 17, 18 and the suggestion in several reports of an increased risk of MAS in black Americans and Africans7, 17, 19 and Pacific Islanders.18, 20 Advanced gestation has also been recognized as a risk factor, both for MSAF10, 17, 21–23 and for MAS.8, 11, 12, 20, 23–25

Therapy for infants with MAS, in particular, those requiring intubation, is evolving rapidly. There is, however, a paucity of longitudinal data examining the proportional uptake of newer therapies in ventilated infants with MAS. Similarly, whereas it is clear that severe MAS is associated with a relatively high risk of pneumothorax and a relatively long duration of respiratory support and oxygen therapy,1, 2 the specific factors that predict severe disease and long ventilator course are incompletely characterized. The mortality has been quoted as lying between 5% and 37%,1 with the marked disparity in published figures being attributable to the difficulties in identifying the cause of death (respiratory versus nonrespiratory) and the skewed populations in which the mortality risk is calculated.

A complete understanding of the epidemiology of MAS has been hampered by the lack of population-based studies and by difficulties in assembling large cohorts of infants with confirmed disease. We have sought to remedy this situation using the database of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network, supplemented by data from perinatal data registries. Our aims with this study were to examine current indicators and longitudinal trends for (1) the incidence of MAS, (2) the risk factors for MAS among all live births, (3) the treatments applied to ventilated infants with the disease, and (4) the complications and outcomes. In view of the difficulty in reliably recognizing cases of mild to moderate MAS, this investigation focused on infants with relatively severe disease in whom intubation and mechanical ventilation were required.

METHODS

Data on infants with MAS were obtained from the database of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN). This is a voluntary collaboration between all 28 level III NICUs that was established in 1994 to monitor the care of high-risk newborns. A minimum data set has been developed, with any infant satisfying any of the following criteria being included in the database: (1) need for assisted ventilation either through an endotracheal tube or via nasal/nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), (2) need for major surgery, (3) gestation <32 weeks, and (4) birth weight <1500 g. Data are supplied to ANZNN in de-identified form by the individual units and are checked for errors. For each infant, a primary respiratory diagnosis is entered.

For this study, the ANZNN database for the years 1995–2002 was searched for infants >35 weeks' gestation with a primary respiratory diagnosis of MAS. The ANZNN defines MAS in a meconium-stained infant as respiratory distress within 12 hours of age, displaying symptoms such as hypoxia, tachypnea, gasping respirations, and signs of underlying asphyxia, with a chest radiograph showing overexpansion of the lungs with widespread coarse infiltrates.26 It is important to note that the diagnosis of MAS is ascribed by the clinicians responsible for supplying data to the ANZNN database. This analysis focused on cases of MAS requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation (MASINT). Infants with MAS treated with nCPAP only were excluded; such infants, although meconium-stained, may have other diagnoses as the predominant cause of respiratory distress, for example, transient tachypnea of the newborn.27, 28 All of the available antenatal and intrapartum data and information pertaining to severity of the disease and medical management, were extracted from the identified records. The presence of intrauterine growth retardation was noted, defined as birth weight less than the 10th percentile derived from Australian normative data.29 For infants who died, the cause of death was classified as being respiratory or nonrespiratory (ie, directly related or not related to the aspiration of meconium) based on the International Classification of Diseases code numbers and additional diagnostic information entered in the ANZNN database.

Information regarding the total birth population in Australia and New Zealand was also obtained for the years 1995–2002. Data were gathered on the total numbers of live births and the incidence of potential risk factors for MAS that could be matched to the ANZNN MASINT cohort. These factors included maternal ethnicity, gender, place of birth, mode of delivery, gestational age, and condition at birth as indicated by 5-minute Apgar score. Australian data were obtained from the annual reports of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.30 Where variables were reported in terms of the number of confinements, the same percentage was used to project the number of live births. Variables treated in this manner were indigenous births, home births, delivery by cesarean section, and instrumental deliveries. Where data were stated to be missing or incomplete from some states or territories (eg, the classification of cesarean section as “emergency” or “elective”), the national average and previous trends were used to calculate the totals.

For New Zealand, the total number of live births for each year and data on maternal ethnicity and infant gender were obtained from electronic documents made available by Statistics New Zealand.31 Data on type of delivery between 1999 and 2002 and numbers of instrumental vaginal deliveries between 1995 and 1998 were obtained from the Ministry of Health reports on maternity (eg, refs 32 and 33). Numbers of emergency and elective cesarean section deliveries were not separately reported in the years 1995-1998, and estimates have been made from subsequent trends. No reliable data on home births in New Zealand were available. Summary statistics on gestational age and 5-minute Apgar score were reported differently from Australian data and could not be included in the overall data set. For both countries, numbers of infants born in tertiary hospitals were obtained from the annual reports of the ANZNN.26

Summary statistics were generated for all variables in the MAS data set. The duration of intubation and nCPAP were summed to give duration of respiratory support. No assumptions were made about the distribution of continuous variables. For binary and continuous variables, simple comparisons were made with χ2 and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively; longitudinal trends in these variables were examined using the χ2 test for trend and linear regression, respectively. For all tests, a P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Within the MASINT cohort, predictors of duration of respiratory support were sought using multiple linear regression analysis, with addition of all of the relevant variables to the model in a stepwise manner. Binary variables were entered as 1 or 0. Multivariate analysis could not be applied to the entire birth population because of lack of access to specific data from each individual without MASINT.

RESULTS

Between 1995 and 2002, 1061 infants were admitted to a level III NICU in Australia or New Zealand with MASINT, with the number ranging between 109 and 150 annually. An additional 107 infants with MAS treated with nCPAP only were excluded along with 2 infants with a primary diagnosis of MAS in whom no respiratory support was required. Median gestation for infants with MASINT was 40 weeks (interquartile range: 39–41 weeks), median birth weight was 3400 g (interquartile range: 3000–3700 g), and 52.4% were male. Overall, 42% of infants with MASINT were born in a tertiary hospital, with the proportion being higher in New Zealand than Australia (64% vs 31%; P < .001).

During the study period, there were 2490862 live births in the 2 countries, giving an overall rate of MASINT of 0.43 per 1000 live births. In Australia, there were 894 infants with MASINT in 2038666 live births and in New Zealand, 167 cases in 452196 live births, yielding rates of MASINT of 0.44 and 0.37 per 1000 live births, respectively. Combined longitudinal data from both countries revealed an overall decrease in the incidence of MASINT to a low of 0.35 per 1000 in 2002 (P = .0087). Analysis by country shows a steady decrease in incidence in Australia between 1995 and 2002, with considerable fluctuation but no clear trend in incidence in New Zealand.

Figure 1 shows the rate of MASINT per 1000 live births at each week of gestation (Australian data only). Between 36 and 40 weeks, the rate varied between 0.24 and 0.46 per 1000, with the lowest rate occurring at 38 weeks, and rose thereafter to a high of 1.42 per 1000 at 42 weeks and beyond. Thirty-four percent of the MASINT cohort were at >40 weeks' gestation and 6.5% at >41 weeks' compared with 16% and 2.0% of the total birth population (P < .001 in both cases). Figure 2 shows the trends in incidence of MASINT by gestational age grouping during the study period. A decrease in incidence was noted over time at gestations >40 weeks but not at gestational ages between 36 and 40 weeks.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Incidence of MASINT according to gestational age. Plot of incidence of MASINT at each week of gestation; Australian data only. See text for comparisons between gestational age groups.

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Incidence of MASINT according to year in different gestational age groups: plot of incidence of MASINT per 1000 live births for gestations 36 to 40 weeks and for gestations beyond 40 weeks; Australian data only. a Decrease in incidence between 1995 and 2002 for infants beyond 40 weeks' gestation (P = .010), with no discernible trend for 36 to 40 weeks. □, ≥41 weeks; ▵, 36 to 40 weeks.

Antecedents of MASINT, with analysis by year and by country, are shown in Table 1. More than half of the infants were noted to have fetal distress prompting obstetric intervention; 70% of these went on to deliver by cesarean section or assisted vaginal delivery. Cesarean section was the mode of delivery for 42% of the MASINT infants overall. Fully 9.7% of the entire MASINT cohort were delivered by cesarean section without labor, preceded by the recognition of fetal distress in 77% of cases and of intrauterine growth restriction in an additional 6%. The proportion of assisted vaginal deliveries decreased during the study period. The number of MASINT infants with 5-minute Apgar score <7 and the number requiring intubation in the delivery room also decreased. Median Apgar scores at 5 minutes were lower among infants born in New Zealand (6 vs 7; P = .0012), and intubation in the delivery room for resuscitation was more commonly required (59% vs 43%; P < .001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Antecedents of MAS Among the ANZNN MASINT Cohort

The impact of selected antecedents on the risk of MASINT, using combined data from all years, is shown in Fig 3. There was a striking association between low 5-minute Apgar score and risk of MASINT, with an odds ratio of 52. Among the demographic variables, infants born to Pacific Islander mothers in New Zealand and Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander mothers in Australia were ∼3 times more likely to develop MASINT, whereas infants born to Maori mothers had no increased risk. Gender of the infant was not a significant factor. All forms of assisted delivery increased the risk of MASINT to some extent, with infants undergoing emergency cesarean section being at the highest risk, almost sixfold higher than other modes of delivery. Planned home birth was associated with a 2.7-fold increase in risk of MASINT.

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Risk factors for MASINT within the total birth population: plot of odds ratios (⋄) and 95% confidence interval (← and →) for selected risk factors for MASINT. Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) also indicated as text. a Australian data only; b New Zealand data only. TSI indicates Torres Strait Islander; “All CS,” all cesarean-section deliveries.

Figure 4 shows longitudinal trends in odds ratios for selected risk factors during the study period. There was considerable fluctuation in the odds ratio for most risk factors, with no clear trend over time. The risk for infants born to Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander mothers did, however, increase markedly from 1998, such that in 2002 the risk of MASINT was >7 times that of the nonindigenous population in Australia. Both emergency cesarean section and birth in a tertiary center showed a downward trend over the study period but continued to be associated with an increased risk of MASINT. The odds ratio for an assisted vaginal delivery decreased rapidly and was <1 after 1997.

FIGURE 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4

Longitudinal trends in odds ratio for selected risk factors. Plot of odds ratio by year for ethnicity (A), place and mode of delivery (B), and 5-minute Apgar score (C) are shown. Odds ratios for Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander (TSI) are specific for Australia, and those for Pacific Islander are specific for New Zealand. “Emerg CS” indicates cesarean section in labor; “Assist vag,” assisted vaginal delivery (defined in Table 1); other abbreviations as per Fig 3. a Increase in odds ratio for MASINT among Aboriginal/TSI during the study period (P = .0091). b Decrease over time in odds ratio for birth in a tertiary center and assisted vaginal delivery (P = .038 and 0.011, respectively). A, □, Aboriginal/TSI; ▵, Pacific Islander; ⋄, Maori. B, ▵, All CS; □, Emerg CS; ○, Assist vag; ⋄, tertiary birth. C, □, 5-min Apgar <7.

With the knowledge of the antecedents of MASINT in the birth population overall, we sought to identify changes in the demography of live births that might explain the decrease in incidence of MASINT in the latter years of the study period. Compared with 1995, in 2002, there were fewer deliveries beyond 41 weeks' gestation (1.6% vs 2.8%; P < .001) and fewer infants with a 5-minute Apgar score <7 (1.4% vs 1.7%; P < .001). These factors combined account for 62% of the reduction in MAS incidence noted in this time period.

Table 2 shows the therapies received by infants with MASINT. More than half of infants overall received either surfactant, HFV or iNO, with upward trends in the use of all of these therapies during the study period. Infants receiving ≥1 of surfactant, HFV, or iNO were intubated for a median of 5 days and required respiratory support for a median of 6 days, compared with 2 and 3 days, respectively, for infants who received none of these therapies. Only 1.1% of the MASINT cohort required treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; all infants treated with this therapy survived.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Therapies Received by the ANZNN MASINT Cohort

Table 3 shows the complications and outcomes for the ANZNN MASINT cohort. Although no clear trend was discernible for the whole study period, the incidence of air leak seemed to decrease in 2001–2002, being significantly lower for these 2 years compared with all of the other years (5.3% vs 10.8%; P = .013). Infants who developed air leak required respiratory support for a median of 5 days compared with 3.2 for those without this complication. In the MASINT cohort overall, the duration of intubation and of respiratory support remained relatively constant during the study period; however, the duration of oxygen therapy and the length of hospital stay increased. The overall mortality was 6.6% (70 of 1061), with the majority of these deaths being because of perinatal asphyxia (n = 33) or congenital anomalies (n = 6). Death directly attributable to aspiration of meconium occurred in 24 infants, equivalent to 2.5% of the total MASINT cohort and 0.96 per 100000 live births. Mortality rates seemed to remain constant during the study period. Of the 24 infants whose death was directly related to MAS, 7 (29%) were in relatively good condition at birth, not requiring immediate intubation, and with a 5-minute Apgar ≥7. Air leak occurred in 42% of MAS-related deaths compared with 13% of infants dying from other causes (P = .037) and 8.6% of survivors (P < .001). Infants dying of MAS were more likely to have received surfactant, HFV, or iNO (P = .037), but 5 infants received none of these therapies.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Respiratory Outcomes and Complications in the ANZNN MASINT Cohort

Forty-nine infants received home oxygen, with requirement for this therapy increasing during the study period. These infants had a longer duration of respiratory support, with a median of 7 days, compared with 3.8 days for infants who did not require home oxygen (P < .001). They were also more likely to receive surfactant, HFV, or iNO (P = .026), although 16 infants received none of these therapies.

In multiple linear regression analysis, duration of respiratory support in MASINT survivors was found to be predicted by the following binary variables: cesarean section in labor (coefficient: 1.33; P = .003), fetal distress (coefficient: 1.05; P = 0.012), indigenous Australian or Pacific Islander ethnicity (coefficient: 1.38; P = 0.019), and male gender (coefficient: 0.82; P = 0.040). Gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction, and 5-minute Apgar score did not independently predict duration of respiratory support when added to the model.

DISCUSSION

In this study we investigated the epidemiology of MAS in a large cohort of ventilated infants, with reference to available data for the entire birth population during the same period. We found that during the period 1995–2002, there was a reduction in the incidence of MASINT to <0.40 cases per 1000 live births, a strong association of MASINT with low 5-minute Apgar score, a clear increase in risk in Pacific Islander and indigenous Australian pregnancies, and a similar association with advanced gestation to that noted previously. A heightened risk of MASINT was also noted after planned home birth. Our data show a median duration of respiratory support of 4 days, with 31%, 19%, and 30% of cases receiving exogenous surfactant, HFV, and iNO, respectively. Mortality directly attributable to MAS was 2.5% in the MASINT cohort.

A strength of this study lies in the large numbers of infants with MASINT in the ANZNN cohort (1061 infants), in whom a relatively large individual data set has been assembled. In addition, ANZNN data entry allows only 1 primary respiratory diagnosis, with MAS being a clearly defined and distinct entity. This allows exclusion of meconium-stained infants with minimal evidence of parenchymal disease in whom the main diagnosis is PPHN. We have also had the advantage of obtaining data from large perinatal data registries in both countries, meaning that the findings in the ANZNN cohort can be placed in the context of the total population of 2490862 live births in which the cases of MASINT occurred.

The low incidence of MASINT and its apparent reduction during the study period confirm that modern obstetric practices can, for the most part, interrupt the chain of events that results in significant aspiration of meconium. The reduction in incidence cannot be ascribed to more zealous delivery room management, in particular, tracheal suctioning. Indeed, in the latter part of the study period, routine intubation of the trachea after MSAF was largely abandoned in Australia and New Zealand, contemporaneous with the publication of a randomized, controlled trial finding no benefit from this intervention in the vigorous infant.15 The decrease in incidence parallels the findings of Yoder et al,8 who, in selected birth cohorts from the same time period, found a reduction in risk of MAS, attributed to avoidance of postmaturity and more aggressive management of suspected fetal distress. The reduced incidence of MASINT over time in the present study would seem to relate to similar factors, with advanced gestation and the proportion of infants having a 5-minute Apgar score <7 being seen to decrease from 1995–2002.

Our data analysis allowed the computation of odds ratios for a number of potential risk factors for MASINT in the total birth population. In Australian live births, we noted a very strong association with a 5-minute Apgar score <7, with an overall odds ratio of 52. This is, to our knowledge, the first population-based study to quantify the risk of MAS in relation to condition of the infant at birth. The implication is that ∼1.3% of all live-born infants with a 5-minute Apgar score <7 will subsequently be ventilated with MAS compared with 0.025% of those with a 5-minute Apgar score ≥7. Other cohort studies have documented the importance of condition at birth in determining the risk of MAS developing in the context of MSAF. For this latter association, Wiswell et al,15 using stepwise linear regression, reported an odds ratio of 21; others have found the risk to be approximately fourfold.8, 12 There remains some dispute about how this effect is mediated; the presence of fetal distress requiring obstetric intervention in >50% of the ANZNN MASINT cohort suggests exaggerated fetal respiration and in utero aspiration of meconium as a possible mechanism.

The ethnology of MAS has been explored in this study, with the finding of a 3 times greater risk of MASINT in Pacific Islanders and indigenous Australians and, in the latter group, an apparent upsurge in risk in 2001 and 2002. These findings complement those of other investigators in identifying ethnic groups of heightened risk of MSAF and MAS. Black Americans and Africans have been found to have a risk of MSAF 1.5 to 2.6 times that of other ethnic groups,7, 10, 17, 19 the explanation for which may lie in earlier attainment of fetal maturity and is not related to longer gestation.19 Pacific Islanders in New Zealand have a 1.8-fold increase in risk of MSAF.18 There are no published data regarding risk of MSAF or MAS in indigenous Australians. Our population-based estimate of the risk of MAS in Pacific Islanders (odds ratio: 2.7) is similar to that noted previously within a single hospital (odds ratio: 3.6)20 and cannot be entirely explained by the increase in the risk for MSAF noted in this group. At least within the MASINT cohort, we could not identify any other possible explanatory factors, with fetal distress, Apgar score, and gestation being equivalent among Pacific Islanders, indigenous Australians, and others (data not shown). The mechanism by which ethnicity imparts additional risk of MAS requires additional study. We found, as have others,18 no increase in the risk of MAS among the New Zealand Maori population.

The risk of MASINT among live-born infants was increased beyond 40 weeks' gestation, with a 3.4-fold increase in risk at >41 weeks. Only 1 other population-based study has examined the relationship between gestation and risk of MAS, reporting an odds ratio of 2.9 for the risk of MAS beyond 41 weeks.24 The propensity to develop MAS at advanced gestation would seem to be related both to a higher risk of MSAF10, 17, 21–23 and an increased likelihood that MAS will occur in the presence of MSAF,8, 11, 23 independent of other risk factors, such as fetal distress and low Apgar scores.8

We found that place of birth was a predictor of MASINT, with a higher risk for infants born in tertiary centers (odds ratio: 1.65) and for planned home births (odds ratio: 2.74). This latter finding is in contrast to the reported outcome for planned home birth in Canada, where no apparent increase in the risk of either MSAF or MAS was noted.34 We also found cesarean delivery to be associated with MASINT, as has been documented previously in a smaller birth cohort.16 The need for cesarean delivery is also known to be associated with a higher risk of subsequent MAS in the setting of MSAF.11, 12, 15 Fetal growth restriction has been linked previously to MAS,24 and we found a doubling of risk for MASINT in growth-restricted infants. Most infants with MASINT were, however, well-grown, with average birth weight being between the 25th and 50th percentile for gender and gestation.29

A weakness of our investigation is that within the total birth population it was not possible to ascertain the incidence of MSAF, a requisite intermediary in the pathogenesis of MAS. This limits, to some degree, our capacity to distinguish whether the risk factors we defined within the population exert their effect by increasing the rate of MSAF, the risk of MAS in the presence of MSAF, or both. Similarly, for this study we did not have access to data from each individual in the total birth population and, thus, can perform only univariate data analysis. In the absence of multivariate regression analysis, it is not possible to define clearly whether the heightened risks of MASINT related to ethnicity and gestation are subsumed in a final common pathway of fetal distress or low Apgar score. These questions clearly need additional investigation in population-based epidemiologic studies.

Despite limited data to support the use of HFV and exogenous surfactant in MAS, both of these treatments were applied with increasing frequency over the study period. Anecdotally, HFV in the form of oscillatory or jet ventilation has been found to be effective in supporting infants with MAS35, 36 and may be a contributing factor to the low requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the ANZNN MASINT cohort. In a national survey of neonatal units in continental France, Nolent et al37 found high-frequency oscillatory ventilation to be used for MAS in 27 of 29 units; a similar situation exists in Australia and New Zealand (P.A.D., unpublished data).

Of the trials of bolus surfactant therapy published during the study period,38, 39 only that of Findlay et al38 show clear benefits beyond an improvement in oxygenation. It is, therefore, somewhat surprising that exogenous surfactant therapy has found such a prominent place in the treatment of MASINT. In the latter years of the study period, exogenous surfactant was administered to ∼40% of all infants with MASINT. No data are available in this study concerning surfactant dose and retreatment.

Among the ANZNN MASINT cohort, 51% of infants received ≥1 HFV, iNO, and exogenous surfactant, with a documented increase in this proportion from 1996 to 2002. The uptake of these newer therapies over the study period seems to have had no effect on the duration of intubation, and the duration of oxygen therapy and length of hospital stay have increased in the MASINT cohort overall. These findings emphasize the supportive rather than curative nature of these therapies in infants with MASINT.

The mortality risk for ventilated infants with MAS in Australia and New Zealand remains significant. Overall mortality was 6.6%, with deaths directly attributable to the respiratory illness occurring in 2.5% of the entire MASINT cohort and 0.96 per 100000 live births. This latter figure compares favorably with other population-based estimates of MAS-related mortality. Sriram et al7 found a mortality of 2.0 per 100000 live-born infants in the United States in 1998–2000; Nolent et al37 report 1.03 deaths per 100000 births in France in 2000–2001, but incomplete ascertainment of MASINT cases in this study may limit the reliability of this estimate. These population-based estimates of mortality from MAS are generally markedly lower than those derived from hospital birth cohorts. The largest of these, studying cases of MAS in 7 hospitals in the United States during the years 1973–1987 (total birth population: 176790), found a mortality rate of 28 per 100000 live births.4 Another study found a mortality rate of 22 per 100000 among 85562 live births in 1 hospital in Saudi Arabia during the period 1989–1994.40 The apparent high mortality in hospital-based studies is a reflection of the high-risk birth populations from which the estimates are made and can be presumed to also be related to the time period in which the studies were done, before the advent of a number of newer therapies that seem to have improved outcome in MAS. Other more recent studies of smaller hospital-based cohorts have shown lower mortality, including, in several instances, no MAS-related deaths.8, 41

Pneumothorax remains an important complication of MAS, occurring in 9.6% of the MASINT cohort overall, with an apparent reduction to ∼5% in 2001–2002. Other recent studies have reported an incidence of pneumothorax in intubated infants of 8%,38 14%,42 and 20%,43 although this last study selected infants with more severe disease. Despite the advances in respiratory support for MAS, pneumothorax remains an important indicator of disease severity, being present in 42% of infants who ultimately died of MAS in the ANZNN cohort.

Durations of intubation and respiratory support did not alter throughout the study period, although more infants received nCPAP either before or after mechanical ventilation. Disconcertingly, the duration of oxygen therapy and length of hospital stay increased during the study period, reaching a median of 8 and 17 days, respectively, in 2002. These figures emphasize the considerable burden that MAS continues to place on afflicted infants, their families, and the health care system.

CONCLUSIONS

We found in this study that the incidence of MAS requiring intubation in 2 countries in the developed world is low and seems to be decreasing. The risk of MASINT is significantly greater in the presence of fetal distress and low Apgar score, as well as Pacific Islander and indigenous Australian ethnicity. MAS is now frequently treated with newer therapeutic modalities, such as HFV, iNO, and exogenous surfactant, but the duration of ventilation and oxygen therapy have not been improved as a result. Mortality for MASINT is low, but there remains a significant risk of pneumothorax.

Acknowledgments

We thank Deborah Donoghue and Samanthi Abeywardana, past and current Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network Project Officers, and the Directors and participating units of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network: Australia: Professor John Whitehall (Women's and Children's Health Institute, the Townsville Hospital); Professor David Tudehope (Mater Mother's Hospital, Brisbane); Dr David Cartwright (Neonatology, Royal Women's Hospital, Brisbane); Dr Chris Wake (NICU, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle); Associate Professor Nick Evans (the John Spence Nurseries, Royal Prince Alfred Women and Infants, Sydney); Dr Robert Guaran (Newborn Care, Liverpool Health Service, Liverpool); Dr Robert Halliday (Neonatology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney); Dr Kei Lui (Newborn Care, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney); Dr Barry Duffy, PICU, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney); Dr Lyn Downe (NICU, Nepean Hospital); Professor William Tarnow-Mordi (Neonatal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney); Associate Professor Graham Reynolds (Pediatrics and Child Health, Canberra Hospital, Canberra); Dr Andrew Watkins (Neonatology [Medical], Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne); Dr Andrew Ramsden (NICU, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne); Dr Peter McDougall (Neonatal Services, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne); Dr Neil Roy (Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne); Dr Chris Bailey (Pediatrics, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston); Associate Professor Peter Marshall (Centre for Perinatal Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide); Dr Ross Haslam (Newborn Services, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide); Professor Karen Simmer (Medical Director, Neonatology Clinical Care Unit, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth); and Dr Charles Kilburn (Special Care Nursery, Royal Darwin Hospital); New Zealand: Dr Lindsay Mildenhall (Newborn Services, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland); Dr Carl Kuschel (Newborn Services, National Women's Hospital, Auckland); Dr David Bourchier (Newborn Care, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton); Dr Vaughan Richardson (Neonatal Unit, Wellington Women's Hospital, Wellington); Dr Nicola Austin (Newborn Intensive Care, Christchurch Women's Hospital, Christchurch); Dr Roland Broadbent (NICU, Dunedin Hospital); Dr Graeme Lear (Neonatal Unit, Gisborne Hospital); Dr Jenny Corban (Pediatrics, Hawkes Bay Hospital); Dr Ken Dawson (Newborn Unit, Wairau Hospital, Nelson Marlborough District Health Board); Dr Jeff Brown (Child Health, Mid Central Health); Dr Stephen Bradley (Pediatrics, Rotorua Hospital, Rotorua); Dr Paul Tomlinson (Neonatal Unit, Southland Hospital, Southland); Dr John Doran (Child and Adolescent Community Centre, Taranaki Base Hospital); Dr Hugh Lees (Special Care Unit, Tauranga Hospital); Dr Philip Morrison (Pediatrics, Timaru Hospital); Dr Chris Moyes (Child Health, Whakatane Hospital); and Dr Peter Jankowitz (Special Care Infant Unit, Whangarei Area Hospital).

Footnotes

    • Accepted November 7, 2005.
  • Address correspondence to Peter Dargaville, MBBS FRACP, MD, Department of Paediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Liverpool Street, Hobart TAS 7000, Australia. E-mail: peter.dargaville{at}dhhs.tas.gov.au
  • The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

MAS—meconium aspiration syndrome • HFV—high-frequency ventilation • iNO—inhaled nitric oxide • MSAF—meconium-stained amniotic fluid • ANZNN—Australian And New Zealand Neonatal Network • nCPAP—nasal or nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure • MASINT—meconium aspiration syndrome requiring intubation

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Cleary GM, Wiswell TE. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and the meconium aspiration syndrome: an update. Pediatr Clin North Am.1998;45 :511– 529
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Wiswell TE, Bent RC. Meconium staining and the meconium aspiration syndrome: unresolved issues. Pediatr Clin North Am.1993;40 :955– 981
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Coltart TM, Byrne DL, Bates SA. Meconium aspiration syndrome: a 6-year retrospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.1989;96 :411– 414
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Wiswell TE, Tuggle JM, Turner BS. Meconium aspiration syndrome: have we made a difference? Pediatrics.1990;85 :715– 721
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Bhutani VK, Chima R, Sivieri EM. Innovative neonatal ventilation and meconium aspiration syndrome. Indian J Pediatr.2003;70 :421– 427
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Wiswell TE. Advances in the treatment of the meconium aspiration syndrome. Acta Paediatr.2001;90(suppl) :28– 30
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Sriram S, Wall SN, Khoshnood B, Singh JK, Hsieh HL, Lee KS. Racial disparity in meconium-stained amniotic fluid and meconium aspiration syndrome in the United States, 1989–2000. Obstet Gynecol.2003;102 :1262– 1268
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Yoder BA, Kirsch EA, Barth WH, Gordon MC. Changing obstetric practices associated with decreasing incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome. Obstet Gynecol.2002;99 :731– 739
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Peng TC, Gutcher GR, Van Dorsten JP. A selective aggressive approach to the neonate exposed to meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1996;175 :296– 301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Alexander GR, Hulsey TC, Robillard PY, De Caunes F, Papiernik E. Determinants of meconium-stained amniotic fluid in term pregnancies. J Perinatol.1994;14 :259– 263
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Karatekin G, Kesim MD, Nuhoglu A. Risk factors for meconium aspiration syndrome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.1999;65 :295– 297
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Meydanli MM, Dilbaz B, Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Haberal A. Risk factors for meconium aspiration syndrome in infants born through thick meconium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.2001;72 :9– 15
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. Paz Y, Solt I, Zimmer EZ. Variables associated with meconium aspiration syndrome in labors with thick meconium. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2001;94 :27– 30
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. Rossi EM, Philipson EH, Williams TG, Kalhan SC. Meconium aspiration syndrome: intrapartum and neonatal attributes. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1989;161 :1106– 1110
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Wiswell TE, Gannon CM, Jacob J, et al. Delivery room management of the apparently vigorous meconium-stained neonate: results of the multicenter, international collaborative trial. Pediatrics.2000;105 :1– 7
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Hernandez C, Little BB, Dax JS, Gilstrap LC, Rosenfeld CR. Prediction of the severity of meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1993;169 :61– 70
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Sedaghatian MR, Othman L, Hossain MM, Vidyasagar D. Risk of meconium-stained amniotic fluid in different ethnic groups. J Perinatol.2000;20 :257– 261
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Urbaniak KJ, McCowan LM, Townend KM. Risk factors for meconium-aspiration syndrome. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol.1996;36 :401– 406
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Patel RR, Steer P, Doyle P, Little MP, Elliott P. Does gestation vary by ethnic group? A London-based study of over 122,000 pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labour. Int J Epidemiol.2004;33 :107– 113
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Benny PS, Malani S, Hoby MA, Hutton JD. Meconium aspiration: role of obstetric factors and suction. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol.1987;27 :36– 39
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    Eden RD, Seifert LS, Winegar A, Spellacy WN. Perinatal characteristics of uncomplicated postdate pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol.1987;69 :296– 299
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. Ostrea EMJ, Naqvi M. The influence of gestational age on the ability of the fetus to pass meconium in utero: clinical implications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.1982;61 :275– 277
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Usher RH, Boyd ME, McLean FH, Kramer MS. Assessment of fetal risk in postdate pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1988;158 :259– 264
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    Clausson B, Cnattingius S, Axelsson O. Outcomes of post-term births: the role of fetal growth restriction and malformations. Obstet Gynecol.1999;94 :758– 762
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Sunoo CS, Kosasa TS, Nakayama RT, Hale RW. The incidence of meconium-aspiration in Hawaii. Hawaii Med J.1993;52 :290– 293
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Donoghue D; for the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network. The Report of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network, 2002. Sydney, Australia: Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network; 2004
  27. ↵
    Liu WF, Harrington T. Delivery room risk factors for meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Perinatol.2002;19 :367– 378
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Agrawal V, David RJ, Harris VJ. Classification of acute respiratory disorders of all newborns in a tertiary care center. J Natl Med Assoc.2003;95 :585– 595
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    Roberts CL, Lancaster PA. Australian national birthweight percentiles by gestational age. Med J Aust.1999;170 :114– 118
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Laws PJ, Sullivan PA. Australia's Mothers and Babies, 2002. Sydney, Australia: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit; 2004
  31. ↵
    Statistics New Zealand. Births and deaths. 2005. Available at: www.stats.govt.nz/datasets/population/births.htm. Accessed: March 24, 2006
  32. ↵
    New Zealand Ministry of Health. Obstetric Procedures, 1988/89–1997/98. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Health; 1999
  33. ↵
    New Zealand Ministry of Health. Report on Maternity: Maternal and Newborn Information, 2002. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Health; 2004
  34. ↵
    Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ.2002;166 :315– 323
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Davis JM, Richter SE, Kendig JW, Notter RH. High-frequency jet ventilation and surfactant treatment of newborns with severe respiratory failure. Pediatr Pulmonol.1992;13 :108– 112
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Paranka MS, Clark RH, Yoder BA, Null DM. Predictors of failure of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in term infants with severe respiratory failure. Pediatrics.1995;95 :400– 404
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Nolent P, Hallalel F, Chevalier JY, Flamant C, Renolleau S. Meconium aspiration syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation: incidence and respiratory management in France (2000–2001) [in French]. Arch Pédiatr.2004;11 :417– 422
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Findlay RD, Taeusch HW, Walther FJ. Surfactant replacement therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatrics.1996;97 :48– 52
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Lotze A, Mitchell BR, Bulas DI, et al. Multicenter study of surfactant (beractant) use in the treatment of term infants with severe respiratory failure. Survanta in Term Infants Study Group. J Pediatr.1998;132 :40– 47
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Al Takroni AM, Parvathi CK, Mendis KB, Hassan S, Reddy I, Kudair HA. Selective tracheal suctioning to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.1998;63 :259– 263
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Blackwell SC, Carreno CA, Hassan SS, et al. Meconium staining and meconium aspiration syndrome: is there seasonal variation? Fetal Diagn Ther.2001;16 :208– 210
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Vain NE, Szyld EG, Prudent LM, Wiswell TE, Aguilar AM, Vivas NI. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning of meconium-stained neonates before delivery of their shoulders: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet.2004;364 :597– 602
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Chinese Collaborative Study Group for Neonatal Respiratory Diseases. Treatment of severe meconium aspiration syndrome with porcine surfactant: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial. Acta Paediatr.2005;94 :896– 902
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics
Vol. 117, Issue 5
May 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Epidemiology of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: Incidence, Risk Factors, Therapies, and Outcome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The Epidemiology of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: Incidence, Risk Factors, Therapies, and Outcome
Peter A. Dargaville, Beverley Copnell
Pediatrics May 2006, 117 (5) 1712-1721; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-2215

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Epidemiology of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: Incidence, Risk Factors, Therapies, and Outcome
Peter A. Dargaville, Beverley Copnell
Pediatrics May 2006, 117 (5) 1712-1721; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-2215
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Outcomes of endotracheal suctioning in non-vigorous neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support
  • Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns in the Delivery Room
  • Non-Delivery Room Management of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS)
  • Management of the Meconium-Stained Newborn
  • Common respiratory conditions of the newborn
  • Morbidity and Mortality of Neonatal Respiratory Failure in China: Surfactant Treatment in Very Immature Infants
  • Meconium-stained amniotic fluid: discharge vigorous newborns
  • Perspective on meconium staining of the amniotic fluid
  • Role of Complement and CD14 in Meconium-Induced Cytokine Formation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Patterns and Predictors of Professional Interpreter Use in the Pediatric Emergency Department
  • Romantic Relationships in Transgender Adolescents: A Qualitative Study
  • Predictive Models of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Pulmonology
    • Pulmonology
  • Fetus/Newborn Infant
    • Fetus/Newborn Infant
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Open Access
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
  • RSS
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics