Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
ELECTRONIC ARTICLES

Reference Values for Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalographic Activity in Preterm Infants Younger Than 30 Weeks’ Gestational Age

Monika Olischar, Katrin Klebermass, Stefan Kuhle, Margot Hulek, Christina Kohlhauser, Ernst Rücklinger, Arnold Pollak and Manfred Weninger
Pediatrics January 2004, 113 (1) e61-e66; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.1.e61
Monika Olischar
*Division of Neonatology and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katrin Klebermass
*Division of Neonatology and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Kuhle
*Division of Neonatology and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margot Hulek
*Division of Neonatology and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Kohlhauser
*Division of Neonatology and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ernst Rücklinger
‡Rücklinger Statistical Consulting, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnold Pollak
*Division of Neonatology and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manfred Weninger
*Division of Neonatology and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

Objective. To prospectively investigate the development of amplitude-integrated electroencephalographic (aEEG) activity during the first 2 weeks of life in neurologically normal and clinically stable preterm infants <30 weeks’ gestational age (GA).

Patients and Methods. Infants with a GA of <30 weeks admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of the Vienna University Children’s Hospital (Vienna, Austria) were studied prospectively by using aEEG and cranial ultrasound. Clinically stable infants without clinical or sonographic evidence of neurologic abnormalities were eligible for inclusion in the reference group. The distribution of 3 background aEEG activity patterns (discontinuous low-voltage, discontinuous high-voltage, and continuous), presence of sleep-wake cycles, and number of bursts per hour in the reference group were determined by visual analysis.

Results. Seventy-five infants (median GA: 27 weeks; range: 23–29 weeks) were eligible for inclusion in the reference group and had aEEG recordings during the first 2 weeks of life available. Analysis of aEEG background activity showed that with higher GA the relative amount of continuous activity increased while discontinuous patterns decreased. The number of bursts per hour decreased with increasing GA. Cyclical changes in aEEG background activity resembling early sleep-wake cycles were observed in all infants.

Conclusions. Normal values for aEEG background activity were determined in preterm infants <30 weeks’ GA. Clinically stable and neurologically normal preterm infants exhibit at least 2 different patterns of aEEG activity. There is a correlation between the GA and the relative duration of continuous aEEG activity.

  • amplitude-integrated EEG
  • aEEG
  • cerebral function monitor
  • preterm infant
  • reference values
  • sleep-wake cycles

Advances in neonatal intensive care during the last decades have led to an increased survival rate of extremely low birth weight infants. However, neurologic and developmental disability is still common among survivors.1 Prevention of brain injury in these patients has become one of the main goals of modern neonatology. Continuous monitoring of neonatal brain function may aid in the identification of risk factors and patients at increased risk for neurologic morbidity. Early recognition and modification of potentially harmful environmental factors may prevent secondary brain injury.

Conventional electroencephalography (EEG) is one of the most useful tools for intermittent and continuous assessment of brain function and prediction of neurologic outcome in term infants and children.2–4 However, conventional EEG has limitations in its application for extremely low birth weight infants. Registration and interpretation of conventional EEG in this age group are difficult because of the electrical interferences on the neonatal intensive care unit, the large volume of data generated during a longer recording, and the need for 24-hour availability of a skilled examiner experienced in EEG of preterm infants. Further, data on normal EEG patterns in extremely premature infants are still limited.5,6

Recently, amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) provided by the cerebral function monitor (CFM),7 a single-channel, time-compressed aEEG monitor, has gained widespread popularity as an alternative to conventional EEG monitoring in neonates. aEEG circumvents most of the problems of conventional EEG in this age group by generation of a compressed curve allowing continuous point-of-care monitoring for hours and a relative ease of application and interpretation.

Two studies have shown a good agreement of aEEG findings with those of conventional EEG in term infants.8,9 aEEG has further been shown to be of value in the assessment of infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy,10–12 seizures,13–15 and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH).16

However, before embarking on larger trials using aEEG in extremely low birth weight infants, normal patterns for this age group need to be established. To date, normal values for aEEG activity in preterm and term infants have only been described for patients >30 weeks of gestation.17,18 Information on aEEG activity in extremely premature infants is still limited.19

Therefore, the objective of this study was to prospectively investigate the development of aEEG activity in preterm infants <30 weeks of gestation. We have already published preliminary results on the occurrence of sleep-wake cycles in 38 preterm infants from this cohort.20 The present study expands the previous report, because large numbers of patients increased the power of the study, allowing for a more in-depth analysis of the development of aEEG activity in preterm infants. This article details the characteristics, occurrence, and frequency of aEEG patterns in neurologically normal and clinically stable preterm infants <30 weeks of gestation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Newborn infants with a gestational age (GA) of <30 weeks admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at the Vienna University Children’s Hospital (Vienna, Austria) were eligible for inclusion in the study. All infants were studied prospectively by using aEEG and cranial ultrasound.

aEEG

aEEG recordings were performed in each infant on a weekly basis until tracings showed a normal pattern according to the data published by Thornberg and Thiringer18 or until the infant was discharged, transferred, or died. The aEEG was recorded as a single-channel EEG from biparietal surface disk electrodes by using a CFM (CFM 5330, Lectromed Devices Ltd, United Kingdom). The technique of the CFM has been described in detail elsewhere.7 In brief, the obtained signal is filtered, rectified, smoothed, and amplitude-integrated before it is written out at slow speed (6 cm/hour) at the bedside. The quality of the recording is monitored by continuous impedance tracing. Duration of the recordings was at least 90 minutes. The CFM was calibrated before each recording. Handling or routine nursing care periods were marked on the tracing. The quality of recording was checked at close intervals by the nurse caring for the patient or by one of the investigators.

Cranial Ultrasound

Cranial ultrasound scans were performed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 of life and then once a week until discharge by using an Acuson (Mountainview, CA) 128XP with a 7.5-MHz transducer. IVH and periventricular leukomalacia were classified according to Volpe21 and de Vries et al,22 respectively.

Patients

Recording time and impedance of the aEEG tracing, birth weight, GA at birth, and postnatal age at the time of the recordings, medication, cranial ultrasound findings, and clinical condition were recorded in all patients. Based on clinical history and ultrasound findings, infants were classified as being clinically stable and eligible for inclusion in the reference group if they fulfilled the following conditions: no evidence of IVH or periventricular leukomalacia of any grade on cranial ultrasound; no evidence of asphyxia12; no sedation or analgesia <48 hours before aEEG recording; no clinical evidence of seizures; and no cerebral malformations, central nervous system infection, or metabolic disorders.

GA was determined from the date of the mother’s last menstrual period and according to antenatal ultrasound scans.

Evaluation of aEEG Tracings

In the reference group, the first aEEG recording obtained during the first 2 weeks of life was evaluated. Tracings were evaluated visually and classified according to a modified version of the method adapted from Hellström-Westas et al19 and Thornberg and Thiringer.18 Descriptive analysis of aEEG tracings was done by dividing each trace in 10-minute epochs. These 10-minute epochs were classified into 3 pattern categories as follows (Fig 1):

  • Discontinuous low-voltage pattern: tracing with irregular bandwidth and marked variations of amplitude and voltage, minimal amplitude <3 μV, and maximal amplitude between 15 and 30 μV.

  • Discontinuous high-voltage pattern: tracing with irregular bandwidth and marked variations of amplitude and voltage, minimal amplitude between 3 and 5 μV, and maximal amplitude between 20 and 40 μV.

  • Continuous pattern: tracing with regular bandwidth, without marked variations of amplitude and voltage, minimal amplitude >5 μV, and maximal amplitude between 20 and 40 μV.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

The 3 observed types of aEEG patterns in a patient of 28 + 2 weeks’ GA (the period between 2 vertical bars corresponds to 10 minutes).

This classification is based on visual perception, which can be confirmed by quantitative analysis of minimal and maximal amplitudes. Although there is an overlap concerning maximal amplitudes between the discontinuous low-voltage (15–30 μV) and the discontinuous high-voltage (20–40 μV) patterns, there is a clear distinction concerning minimal amplitudes (<3 μV for the discontinuous low-voltage pattern versus 3 to 5 μV for the discontinuous high-voltage pattern).

Sleep-wake cycles were defined as cyclical sinusoidal variations of both amplitude and continuity of aEEG activity with a minimum epoch duration of 20 minutes.19,20 Bursts were defined as amplitudes >100 μV.

Statistical Analysis

Infants were divided into 3 groups based on their GA (24–25 weeks [corresponding to 24,0–25,84 weeks], 26–27 weeks [corresponding to 26,0–27,84 weeks), and 28–29 weeks (corresponding to 28,0–29,84 weeks]) for further analysis. The frequency of the occurrence of each of the 3 aEEG patterns in percent was determined as the ratio between the duration of the pattern and the duration of the entire recording. Frequencies of the patterns are given as median, range, and 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles.

Correlations between the GA and duration of aEEG patterns and number of bursts per hour, respectively, were examined by using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. P values were calculated 2-sided. P < .05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS 10.0.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).

The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Informed parental consent was obtained in all cases.

RESULTS

During the study period from January 1, 2000 to March 31, 2002, a total of 230 preterm infants <30 weeks of gestation were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Vienna University Children’s Hospital. Of the 230 infants, 86 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In 11 of 86 infants no aEEG tracings during the first week of life were available. The remaining 75 (33%) infants were in the following groups: 24 to 25 weeks’ GA (including [weeks + days] 24 + 0 to 25 + 6; n = 11); 26 to 27 weeks’ GA (including 26 + 0 to 27 + 6; n = 38); and 28 to 29 weeks’ GA (including 28 + 0 to 29 + 6; n = 26). One patient born in the 23rd week of gestation was included in the 24- to 25-week group.

Median GA was 27 weeks (range: 23–29 weeks), and median birth weight was 940 g (range: 491-1646 g). aEEG recordings were performed at a median postnatal age of 5 days (range: 1–14 days). Median duration of the recordings was 3.8 hours (range: 1.5–19.7 hours), and median impedance of the tracing was 3 kO (range: 2–20 kO).

The median duration of the discontinuous low-voltage pattern showed an inverse correlation to GA (r = −.408; P < .001), decreasing from 55.6% at 24 to 25 weeks to 34.0% at 26 to 27 weeks and 7.1% at 28 to 29 weeks.

The median duration of the continuous pattern increased with increasing GA (r = .373; P < .001), ranging from 0% at 24 to 25 weeks to 5.9% at 26 to 27 weeks and 16.9% at 28 to 29 weeks.

The duration of the discontinuous high-voltage pattern showed a nonsignificant trend to increase with higher GA.

The median number of bursts per hour showed an inverse correlation to GA (r = −.364; P = .001) decreasing from 20.4 per hour at 24 to 25 weeks to 14.9 per hour at 26 to 27 weeks and 4.4 per hour at 28 to 29 weeks.

The results are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Median (Range) and 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th Percentiles for the Relative Duration of the 3 aEEG Patterns Observed

Cyclical variations of aEEG patterns were observed in all infants of the reference group. At lower GA, the patterns mostly varied between the discontinuous low-voltage and discontinuous high-voltage patterns (Fig 2), whereas at higher GA patterns mostly varied between the discontinuous high-voltage and continuous patterns (Fig 3).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Cyclical rhythmical variations as a change between the discontinuous low-voltage and discontinuous high-voltage patterns in a patient of 26 + 0 weeks’ GA (the period between 2 vertical bars corresponds to 10 minutes).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Cyclical rhythmic variations as a change between the discontinuous high-voltage and continuous patterns in a patient of 29 + 5 weeks’ GA (the period between 2 vertical bars corresponds to 10 minutes).

DISCUSSION

The present study describes for the first time the characteristics and developmental changes in aEEG background activity during the first 2 weeks of life in neurologically normal and clinically stable preterm infants <30 weeks’ GA. Analysis of aEEG background activity showed that with higher GA the relative amount of continuous activity increased while discontinuous activity decreased. The number of aEEG amplitudes >100 μV decreased with increasing GA. Cyclical changes in aEEG background activity resembling early sleep-wake cycles could be observed in all preterm infants during the first 2 weeks of life.

To date, only 3 studies have investigated aEEG activity in preterm infants. Thornberg and Thiringer18 studied healthy preterm infants between 30 and 36 weeks’ GA. They described a broader, discontinuous pattern and a more narrow, continuous pattern of aEGG activity in 30- to 31-week-old infants. These patterns correspond well to the continuous and discontinuous high-voltage patterns found in the more mature infants in the present study (Fig 3). Hellstrom-Westas et al19 studied aEEG activity in extremely low birth weight infants between 26 and 33 weeks’ GA during the first week of life. A more recent study by the same group described the use of aEEG for prediction of outcome in preterm infants with large IVHs.16 In contrast to findings in the current study, “burst suppression” was the prevailing pattern in the vast majority of infants. Only a small number of infants had brief episodes of intermixed continuous activity. However, most infants in these studies were severely ill, required ventilation at the time of the recording, and had received phenobarbitone, which may have caused increased aEEG discontinuity.23 By contrast, the infants in the current study were neurologically normal and clinically stable at the time of the recording and had not received any sedative medication. Therefore, the results of the current study are most reliable.

aEEG background activity in preterm infants commonly is classified into continuous and discontinuous patterns.16,19 However, based on our experience with aEEG in very preterm infants,20 we determined that there are 2 discernible discontinuous aEEG patterns in most preterm infants: one pattern that resembles a more immature form of discontinuity (frequently labeled burst suppression) with lower minimum amplitudes (<3 μV) and higher maximum amplitudes; and one pattern that resembles a more mature form of discontinuity with higher minimum amplitudes (between 3 and 5 μV) and higher maximum amplitudes. In the current study, we therefore decided to divide the discontinuous pattern further into 2 called the “discontinuous low-voltage” (which shows a peak at 24–25 weeks’ GA) and “discontinuous high-voltage” (which shows a peak at 26–27 weeks’ GA) patterns (Figs 1 and 2).

In keeping with the results from the present study, other investigators using conventional EEG in preterm infants found that with increasing GA continuous background activity increased while discontinuous activity decreased.6,24,25 Similarly, the interburst interval, a surrogate measure of EEG discontinuity, was reported to decrease as GA increases.5,6,24,25 Interestingly, in the present study, periods of continuous aEEG activity were found in preterm infants as early as 23 weeks of gestation. Hayakawa et al,6 using 8-channel conventional EEG, also found brief episodes of continuous activity as early as 23 weeks’ GA. Connell et al25 found brief periods of continuous activity at 26 weeks’ GA. Other authors did not find continuous activity at these early GAs.5,26 However, this discrepancy may be explained by differences in the study population. Further, most of the infants in our study received caffeine citrate for treatment of apnea. Possibly, the central arousing effects of caffeine led to an increase of continuous activity in the infants.

Cyclical variations of aEEG background activity could be detected in even the most premature infants in our study. These variations may be interpreted as early sleep states.19,20 Similar variations of aEEG activity were found in 2 other studies using aEEG and clinical observation. The authors referred to these patterns as “sleep-wake cycles.”19,27 The concept of sleep states in the very premature infant is controversial. Earlier studies suggested that organized sleep states do not appear before 32 weeks of gestation.28,29 However, possibly because of improvements in neonatal intensive care in the last decades, more recent studies have described rudimentary sleep states in extremely premature infants.5,30 Intact sleep organization is a prognostic factor in preterm infants.31,32 Thus, the presence of cyclical variations of aEEG activity may be useful for prediction of outcome in preterm infants.19 In that context, it is of interest that only a few of the infants with large IVH in the study by Hellstrom-Westas et al had sleep-wake cycles.16

The possibility exists that the cyclical variations of aEEG activity found in the present study were caused by changes in environmental factors during the recording and do not represent changes in state. However, because impedance remained unchanged during the recording, technical artifacts can largely be excluded. The fact that the aEEG changes were also observed between routine nursing care rounds when the infants were not disturbed makes reactivity to handling also unlikely.19 We therefore hypothesize that the cyclical variations of aEEG activity found in our cohort of preterm infants are early, rudimentary sleep states that may represent switches between different, possibly thalamocortical and neocortical pattern generators.33

The number of burst (amplitudes >100 μV) per hour on aEEG background activity found in the preterm infants in the present study was relatively high compared with term infants. Although in term infants the presence of repeated bursts may indicate seizure activity,8 our results show that in neurologically normal and clinically stable preterm infants <30 weeks’ GA, the presence of bursts seems to be a physiologic phenomenon. This finding is in agreement with conventional EEG studies, in which amplitudes up to 500 μV may still be physiologic.26

The present study aimed to establish normal values and patterns for aEEG activity in healthy preterm infants <30 weeks of gestation. However, the criteria of what constitutes a healthy, normal preterm infant are not easy to define, because prematurity itself is a pathology. We defined “healthy” in our study population as the absence of neurologic abnormalities (including sedation and analgesia) at the time of the aEEG recording and a normal cranial ultrasound scan throughout the study period. Therefore, the data of the preterm infants in this study may be considered normal values.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics and development of aEEG activity during the first 2 weeks of life were described in this cohort of 75 neurologically normal and clinically stable preterm infants <30 weeks’ GA. Percentiles for frequencies of discontinuous and continuous patterns have been established and may be used as reference values for patients at these very early GAs. Cyclical variations of aEEG background activity corresponding to early sleep-wake cycles can be found in preterm infants as early as 23 weeks’ GA.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from Jubilaeumsfonds der Oesterreichischen Nationalbank (project OENB 8505) and the Verein “Unser Kind.”

Footnotes

    • Received May 21, 2003.
    • Accepted September 15, 2003.
  • Address correspondence to Monika Olischar, MD, Division of Neonatology and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: monika.olischar{at}akh-wien.at.ac
EEG, electroencephalography, aEEG, amplitude-integrated EEG, CFM, cerebral function monitor, IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage, GA, gestational age

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group. N Engl J Med.2000;343 :378– 384
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Dusser A, Navelet Y, Devictor D, Landrieu P. Short- and long-term prognostic value of the electroencephalogram in children with severe head injury. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.1989;73 :85– 93
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. Sinclair DB, Campbell M, Byrne P, Prasertsom W, Robertson CM. EEG and long-term outcome of term infants with neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Clin Neurophysiol.1999;110 :655– 659
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    McBride MC, Laroia N, Guillet R. Electrographic seizures in neonates correlate with poor neurodevelopmental outcome. Neurology.2000;55 :506– 513
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Selton D, Andre M, Hascoet JM. Normal EEG in very premature infants: reference criteria. Clin Neurophysiol.2000;111 :2116– 2124
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Hayakawa M, Okumura A, Hayakawa F, et al. Background electroencephalographic (EEG) activities of very preterm infants born at less than 27 weeks’ gestation: a study on the degree of continuity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.2001;84 :F163– F167
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Maynard D, Prior PF, Scott DF. Device for continuous monitoring of cerebral activity in resuscitated patients. Br Med J.1969;4 :545– 546
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Hellstrom-Westas L. Comparison between tape-recorded and amplitude-integrated EEG monitoring in sick newborn infants. Acta Paediatr.1992;81 :812– 819
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Toet MC, van der Meij W, de Vries LS, Uiterwaal CS, van Huffelen KC. Comparison between simultaneously recorded amplitude integrated electroencephalogram (cerebral function monitor) and standard electroencephalogram in neonates. Pediatrics.2002;109 :772– 779
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Thornberg E, Ekstrom-Jodal B. Cerebral function monitoring: a method of predicting outcome in term neonates after severe perinatal asphyxia. Acta Paediatr.1994;83 :596– 601
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. al Naqeeb N, Edwards AD, Cowan FM, Azzopardi D. Assessment of neonatal encephalopathy by amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. Pediatrics.1999;103 :1263– 1271
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Toet MC, Hellstrom-Westas L, Groenendaal F, Eken P, de Vries LS. Amplitude integrated EEG 3 and 6 hours after birth in full term neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.1999;81 :F19– F23
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Hellstrom-Westas L, Westgren U, Rosen I, Svenningsen NW. Lidocaine for treatment of severe seizures in newborn infants. I. Clinical effects and cerebral electrical activity monitoring. Acta Paediatr Scand.1988;77 :79– 84
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. Klebermass K, Kuhle S, Kohlhauser-Vollmuth C, Pollak A, Weninger M. Evaluation of the cerebral function monitor as a tool for neurophysiological surveillance in neonatal intensive care patients. Childs Nerv Syst.2001;17 :544– 550
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Hellstrom-Westas L, Blennow G, Rosen I. Amplitude-integrated encephalography in pyridoxine-dependent seizures and pyridoxine-responsive seizures. Acta Paediatr.2002;91 :977– 980
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Hellstrom-Westas L, Klette H, Thorngren-Jerneck K, Rosen I. Early prediction of outcome with aEEG in preterm infants with large intraventricular hemorrhages. Neuropediatrics.2001;32 :319– 324
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Viniker DA, Maynard DE, Scott DF. Cerebral function monitor studies in neonates. Clin Electroencephalogr.1984;15 :185– 192
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Thornberg E, Thiringer K. Normal pattern of the cerebral function monitor trace in term and preterm neonates. Acta Paediatr Scand.1990;79 :20– 25
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Hellstrom-Westas L, Rosen I, Svenningsen NW. Cerebral function monitoring during the first week of life in extremely small low birthweight (ESLBW) infants. Neuropediatrics.1991;22 :27– 32
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Kuhle S, Klebermass K, Olischar M, et al. Sleep-wake cycles in preterm infants below 30 weeks of gestational age. Preliminary results of a prospective amplitude-integrated EEG study. Wien Klin Wochenschr.2001;113 :219– 223
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    Volpe JJ. Neurology of the newborn. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2001
  22. ↵
    de Vries LS, Eken P, Dubowitz LM. The spectrum of leukomalacia using cranial ultrasound. Behav Brain Res.1992;49 :1– 6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Bell AH, Greisen G, Pryds O. Comparison of the effects of phenobarbitone and morphine administration on EEG activity in preterm babies. Acta Paediatr.1993;82 :35– 39
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Anderson CM, Torres F, Faoro A. The EEG of the early premature. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.1985;60 :95– 105
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Connell J, Oozeer R, de Vries L, Dubowitz LM, Dubowitz V. Continuous EEG monitoring of neonatal seizures: diagnostic and prognostic considerations. Arch Dis Child.1989;64 :452– 458
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Biagioni E, Bartalena L, Boldrini A, Cioni G, Giancola S, Ipata AE. Background EEG activity in preterm infants: correlation of outcome with selected maturational features. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.1994;91 :154– 162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Greisen G, Hellstrom-Westas L, Lou H, Rosen I, Svenningsen N. Sleep-walking shifts and cerebral blood flow in stable preterm infants. Pediatr Res.1985;19 :1156– 1159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Dreyfus-Brisac C. Ontogenesis of sleep in human prematures after 32 weeks of conceptional age. Dev Psychobiol.1970;3 :91– 121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Monod N, Garma L. Auditory responsivity in the human premature. Biol Neonate.1971;17 :292– 316
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Curzi-Dascalova L, Figueroa JM, Eiselt M, et al. Sleep state organization in premature infants of less than 35 weeks’ gestational age. Pediatr Res.1993;34 :624– 628
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Thoman EB, Denenberg VH, Sievel J, Zeidner LP, Becker P. State organization in neonates: developmental inconsistency indicates risk for developmental dysfunction. Neuropediatrics.1981;12 :45– 54
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Scher MS, Steppe DA, Banks DL. Prediction of lower developmental performances of healthy neonates by neonatal EEG-sleep measures. Pediatr Neurol.1996;14 :137– 144
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Steriade M, Gloor P, Llinas RR, Lopes de Silva FH, Mesulam MM. Report of IFCN Committee on Basic Mechanisms. Basic mechanisms of cerebral rhythmic activities. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.1990;76 :481– 508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics
Vol. 113, Issue 1
1 Jan 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reference Values for Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalographic Activity in Preterm Infants Younger Than 30 Weeks’ Gestational Age
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Reference Values for Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalographic Activity in Preterm Infants Younger Than 30 Weeks’ Gestational Age
Monika Olischar, Katrin Klebermass, Stefan Kuhle, Margot Hulek, Christina Kohlhauser, Ernst Rücklinger, Arnold Pollak, Manfred Weninger
Pediatrics Jan 2004, 113 (1) e61-e66; DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.1.e61

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reference Values for Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalographic Activity in Preterm Infants Younger Than 30 Weeks’ Gestational Age
Monika Olischar, Katrin Klebermass, Stefan Kuhle, Margot Hulek, Christina Kohlhauser, Ernst Rücklinger, Arnold Pollak, Manfred Weninger
Pediatrics Jan 2004, 113 (1) e61-e66; DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.1.e61
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • PATIENTS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Automated cot-side tracking of functional brain age in preterm infants with routine EEG monitoring
  • Can neurophysiological assessment improve timing of intervention in posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation?
  • Reference Values for Amplitude-Integrated EEGs in Infants From Preterm to 3.5 Months of Age
  • Amplitude-integrated EEG Classification and Interpretation in Preterm and Term Infants
  • Role of cerebral function monitoring in the newborn
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cerebral Lymphoma in an Adenosine Deaminase–Deficient Patient With Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Receiving Polyethylene Glycol–Conjugated Adenosine Deaminase
  • Disparate Clinical Presentation of Neonatal Hemochromatosis in Twins
  • Tolerance of Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy in Neonates
Show more ELECTRONIC ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Neurology
    • Neurology
  • Fetus/Newborn Infant
    • Fetus/Newborn Infant

Keywords

  • amplitude-integrated EEG
  • aEEG
  • cerebral function monitor
  • preterm infant
  • reference values
  • sleep-wake cycles
  • EEG, electroencephalography
  • aEEG, amplitude-integrated EEG
  • CFM, cerebral function monitor
  • IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage
  • GA, gestational age
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Open Access
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
  • RSS
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics