Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
Commentary

Childhood Obesity: A New Pandemic of the New Millennium

Sue Y.S. Kimm and Eva Obarzanek
Pediatrics November 2002, 110 (5) 1003-1007; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.5.1003
Sue Y.S. Kimm
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva Obarzanek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

WHY A PANDEMIC?

The major epidemiologic transition in the 20th century was the shift in mortality and morbidity from infectious diseases to chronic diseases, with cardiovascular diseases leading the list. This transition was primarily attributable to the social, economic, and public health changes that took place in the United States during the first half of the century. The availability of abundant food led not only to better overall nutriture and improved child health, but also to the current population’s state of excess positive energy balance, accelerated by an increasingly sedentary lifestyle in recent decades. At the beginning of this new millennium, a new challenge has emerged—a marked increase in obesity prevalence with a parallel increase in obesity-associated chronic diseases and their clinical onset at ever younger ages. Type 2 diabetes, a condition traditionally associated with middle-aged adults, is beginning to occur several decades earlier as obesity afflicts an ever greater number of children and adolescents in the United States.1–5

A recent publication in Pediatrics presented longitudinal findings from a large multicenter cohort study—the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study (NGHS)—of 1213 black and 1166 white girls followed for 9 years from ages 9 to 10.6 As can be seen in the accompanying study in this issue by Kimm et al,7 even at age 9, the prevalence of overweight (≥85th percentile of body mass index [BMI] based on the National Health Examination Survey reference population) was about one third higher in black girls than in white girls—31% versus 22%. The prevalence of obesity (≥95th percentile) in black girls was twice as high than in white girls—18% versus 8%. A most alarming finding in this study was the approximate doubling of the rate of overweight and obesity in both groups during the 10 years between ages 9–10 years and 18–19 years. Therefore, by 19 years of age, overweight was present in more than half of black and a third of white girls, and more than a third of black girls were obese as compared with almost one fifth of white girls. Thus, these data suggest that the trend in obesity in children is continuing upward and may have even accelerated more than previously reported.8–10

A “pandemic” is defined by Merriam-Webster’s dictionary as “occurring over a wide geographic area and affecting an exceptionally high proportion of the population.”11 Given the current prevalence of childhood obesity and its geographic distribution throughout the United States, the term “pandemic” is appropriate for describing the current status of childhood obesity.

ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATES OF CHILDHOOD OBESITY: RECENT FINDINGS FROM THE NGHS

Although much speculation abounds, the root cause of this increase in childhood obesity remains unknown. What is evident from available national data are that this trend in childhood obesity has not been accompanied by a parallel population increase in daily energy intake.12,13 Although the information on trends in physical activity is exceedingly limited, in recent years much concern has been expressed regarding the role of television watching.14–17 The NGHS examined a biracial cohort for biological, behavioral (diet and physical activity), psychosocial, and sociologic correlates of obesity development during adolescence. Because of the study’s large sample size, disparate geographic sites, and the long duration during a critical life period, the information available from NGHS might provide some insight into this complex topic.6,18

BIOLOGICAL FACTORS

The longitudinal data from NGHS showed that pubertal maturation was associated with a significant gain in adiposity for both racial groups with the largest increases occurring at the initiation of pubertal maturation and at menarche. Starting at age 10, adiposity in black girls was significantly greater than in whites because of the more advanced pubertal maturation of black girls.6 When pubertal maturation was adjusted for in longitudinal regression analyses, the racial divergence in adiposity was manifested by age 12, around the time of menarche for the majority of black girls. Therefore, one can surmise that the nascence of the high rate of obesity in black women may be around the time of menarche.

Another biological factor associated with the increased susceptibility to obesity in black women may be in part attributable to racial differences in energy balance. Several recent studies have shown that African American women display lower resting energy expenditure (REE) than do white women.19 A random sample of 150 older adolescent females from the NGHS cohort also revealed that black adolescent girls manifested REE levels lower on average by 77.5 kcal/d (adjusted for body composition) than did white girls.20 Data from 150 NGHS subjects suggest that an uncoupling protein gene may be associated with the racial difference in REE.21 Those black girls with UCP 3 (exon 5) C/C genotype showed the lowest levels of REE, and there was a significant trend toward lower REE from T/T, C/T, and C/C in black but not in white girls.

Dietary Factors

In the NGHS, the role of energy intake is unclear. For instance, although caloric intake was not related to obesity when the cohort was ages 9 to 10 years, percent energy from fat (total fat in white girls, saturated fat in black girls) was associated with obesity.22 For ages 9 to 19 years, there was a significant inverse relationship between caloric intake and adiposity.6 This somewhat counterintuitive finding is most likely attributable to difficulties of accurately quantifying one’s intake, underreporting of food intake, or tendency for overweight girls to diet. The recently available doubly labeled water method—which accurately measures energy requirement and, therefore, energy intake—has shown that underreporting of energy intake can be substantial.23 Using doubly labeled water in a random sample of 150 NGHS girls aged 18 to 21, underreporting of energy intake was 11% for black girls and 23% for white girls.24 With this degree of misreporting, the quantitative relationship between caloric intake and obesity development in free-living subjects remains unresolved.

Physical Activity

As with the assessment of energy intake, the assessment of physical activity in free-living subjects poses challenges, because the most commonly used methods are based on self-reported measures whose validation studies have yielded correlation coefficients ranging from 0.17 to 0.51.25 Habitual activity had a weak inverse association with adiposity in 9- to 10-year-old NGHS black girls but not in white girls in a cross-sectional analysis.22 Preliminary data analysis revealed an inverse longitudinal association between habitual activity and obesity during adolescence in the NGHS girls.26 However, the longitudinal association between daily activity level and adiposity was not significant.6

What has emerged from NGHS data are evidence of a dramatic decline in physical activity between ages 9 and 19 years. The levels of habitual activity declined by 83%, and daily activity levels also declined during this period by 35%.27 These longitudinal NGHS data on trends in physical activity corroborate what is known from national cross-sectional surveys.28

Psychosocial Factors

Analyses of psychosocial factors in NGHS show intriguing racial differences in measures of self-perception, particularly in the domains of physical appearance and social acceptance.29 Although satisfaction with physical appearance was lower with increasing adiposity for both groups, white girls manifested greater dose-response to adiposity than did black girls. The racial difference was particularly striking for perceived social acceptance, in which black girls exhibited no variation across the entire spectrum of adiposity, whereas an inverse association between perceived social acceptance and adiposity was seen in white girls. This finding on perceived social acceptance suggests greater tolerance for obesity among African Americans.

There were other interesting racial differences found in NGHS. For instance, although almost half of NGHS girls, even at ages 9 and 10, were trying to lose weight, more of the thin black girls than white girls reported trying to gain weight, suggesting a lower tolerance by black girls for being too thin.30 White girls, on the other hand, were generally more dissatisfied with their weight and body shape than black girls. In addition, for white girls, perceived physical attractiveness began to decrease even at extreme thinness and declined linearly across the entire spectrum of adiposity, suggesting the presence of an underlying drive for thinness.29 Nine- and 10-year-old black girls were more than twice as likely as white girls to engage in less favorable eating practices, such as eating big helpings and eating in the bedroom, generally believed to be associated with overeating.31

Taken together, a pattern emerges that white girls are generally more concerned than black girls about physical appearance even at the lower range of adiposity. In contrast to white girls, who are sensitive about social acceptance in relationship to adiposity, black girls displayed no concern in this domain across adiposity. On the other hand, black girls tend to be more susceptible to eating behaviors that may lead to overweight and do not feel socially ostracized when obese. These findings may provide additional insight into cultural issues involving obesity.

Socioeconomic Factors

Poverty has often been considered a major contributor to the high prevalence of obesity seen in African American women. However, for 9- and 10- year-old NGHS black girls, there was no variation in the risk for obesity across household income or parental education, whereas there was an inverse association with both in white girls.32 When income, education, and the number of parents in the household were included in multivariate analyses, greater television viewing was associated with higher likelihood of being obese in black girls but not in white girls. For 9- and 10-year-old white girls, only higher parental education and having 2 parents in the household decreased the likelihood of obesity. In both races, higher levels of parental education tended to be consistently related to more favorable nutrient intakes, including lower fat intake and higher intakes of essential vitamins and minerals, and to lower likelihood of engaging in eating practices associated with overeating.31,33 The decline in physical activity during adolescence in the NGHS cohort was also inversely associated with parental education.34 In summary, based on the findings from the NGHS, parental education, not household income, tended to exert a greater effect on the salutary behavioral factors, and the effect of parental education was greater in white girls than in black girls.

UNRESOLVED ISSUES

Because the large rise in obesity in the pediatric population has occurred primarily within the last 2 decades, several issues and questions regarding childhood obesity remain and need to be addressed.

Definition

The fundamental definition of obesity in children needs to be reexamined. The traditional concept of ideal body weight in adults was based on actuarial data collected over time on a large number of insured adults, which provided the quantitative information on standard mortality ratios in relationship to relative weight (weight for height).35 Based on mortality and morbidity data compiled from other large cohort studies, the current standard definition of overweight and obesity uses specific BMI cut points of 25 and 30, respectively.36 For children, however, mortality or even disease as an adverse outcome of obesity cannot be readily assessed. The currently used cut points to categorize overweight or obesity in children, such as age- and gender-specific ≥85th and/or ≥95th percentile BMI or weight-for-height, are arbitrary statistical measures serving as reference values. They are not based on biological data linked to some estimate of adverse outcome.37–39 Perhaps, a biologically relevant outcome could be based on risk factors for disease such as elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated fasting blood glucose, and elevated blood pressure.40 This approach to a definition of childhood obesity would require a systematic review of available information from population studies to examine the relationship between BMI and disease risk factors in children. Some believe that children may be more vulnerable to adverse psychological, rather than biological, effects of obesity, so psychological risk factors might also be included.

Clinical Management

Unresolved issues for clinical management of obesity include the extent of diagnostic evaluation that needs to be conducted at the physician’s office when an obese child is seen. In the past, thyroid function was frequently assessed to look for underlying endocrine causes of obesity, although the yield was exceedingly low. Another unresolved issue is the extent of screening for potential morbid conditions associated with obesity such as hyperlipidemia, elevated blood pressure, and type 2 diabetes.

The use of pharmacologic and surgical treatment of childhood obesity is beginning to emerge.41,42 At what degree of obesity and at what age should one entertain the use of a pharmacologic agent such as metformin hydrochloride or even gastric bypass surgery? The age range of the recent report on gastric bypass surgery was 15 to 17 years, a time when peak bone mass is being achieved.42 What would be the long-term consequence on bone health from gastric bypass surgery, which might impact calcium nutriture? What would be the criteria for undertaking such an invasive procedure in the young? Pediatric surgical services are beginning to ready themselves for providing bariatric surgery. Are pediatricians and/or family medicine physicians themselves prepared to deal with this clinical problem? Two NHLBI national surveys of primary care physicians, conducted 10 years apart, indicated that clinical management of childhood obesity was the most wanted topic for continuing medical education.43,44 Is it timely to establish bariatric pediatrics as a legitimate subspecialty? Many of these questions are unanswered because there has not yet been a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial to test the efficacy and safety of weight reduction regimens, both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic, in a broadly representative sample of children. The randomized controlled trial of weight reduction in 6- to 12-year-old children conducted by Epstein et al45 was a single-center study of a highly selected middle-class white population. Information is urgently needed in the area of nonpharmacologic and nonsurgical approaches to the clinical management of childhood obesity. The oft-encountered reaction to childhood obesity among primary care physicians is that “nothing works.” Before pharmacologic and surgical procedures become “standard” treatments for childhood obesity, more research is urgently needed to test the efficacy of various dietary interventions for weight reduction.

A question still besetting primary care physicians caring for children is the age at which one should undertake active weight reduction and the amount of caloric reduction that can be safely instituted in young growing children. For instance, for an obese 1- year-old child, should one institute a hypocaloric dietary regimen or wait until that child is older but also likely to be fatter, or should one focus more on physical activity than diet? What are appropriate parameters for safety monitoring of children on a reduced-calorie diet? Is height growth an appropriate measure of safety surveillance? Obesity is often accompanied by accelerated linear growth in prepubertal children, but height growth tends to decelerate with weight reduction in an obese child.46 If height-for-age changes from the 95th percentile to the 75th percentile after significant weight loss, should this change be regarded as undesirable and a reason to discontinue the weight reduction regimen? Or is this a biological “normalization” process for a child with an abnormally accelerated growth rate associated with obesity?

Another unresolved issue is the type of health care providers who need to be involved in the clinical management of childhood obesity. For instance, dietary and physical activity counseling and behavioral therapy are considered necessary components of obesity treatment. Both treatment modalities are time-consuming. In this cost-conscious era, do we have the luxury or even an opportunity to involve a dietitian and/or behavioral therapist for every obese child seen in the primary care physician’s office, particularly given the high prevalence of this condition? What would be the necessary competency levels of these health care professionals? There is wide variation in the skills, experience, and knowledge of these professionals. A behavioral therapist well versed in smoking cessation techniques may not be as effective for weight reduction. Or a dietitian experienced with cancer patients may be less equipped to deal with childhood obesity. As we require competency testing for pediatricians, should there be competency requirements for these allied health professionals dealing with childhood obesity?

The continuing increase in childhood obesity dictates that these unresolved issues be addressed. Standardized guidelines for meaningful diagnosis, clinical evaluation, and treatment of childhood obesity need to be established. To be effective, these guidelines need to be recognized and supported by third-party payers and the leaders of health maintenance organizations.

Future Directions

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a periodic national survey that includes measurements of height and weight in children and adolescents. Despite the highly complex sampling strategy used to achieve a representative sample of the US population, the actual sample sizes become quite small when NHANES data are stratified by race, gender, and single-year age groups.47 Consideration should be given to the sampling strategy of these national surveys to better accommodate age- and gender-specific high-risk population groups. Although NHANES surveys serve many purposes, in light of the looming public health crisis of obesity, the scope of these surveys may need to be expanded to encompass public health issues related to obesity. For instance, as type 2 diabetes is seen in increasing numbers in children and adolescents, diabetes might be tracked as part of the surveillance of the rising tide of morbid childhood obesity. Perhaps, in the not-too-distant future, urinary glucose testing in primary schools may become widespread.

Because of its widespread nature, population approaches should be considered for primary prevention of childhood obesity. The initial basis for the school lunch program was out of concern for hunger in America in the early 1960s. Given the current problem of childhood obesity, the goals and rules of the school breakfast and lunch program need to be reexamined and readdressed. For example, should chocolate milk and whole milk be removed from school menus as a national policy? As contemporary US children become more physically inactive, the goal of physical education in schools also needs to be reassessed. The architectural design of school buildings and their environment could be reexamined to provide more opportunities for physical activities. A multistory building with a carefully constructed class schedule could lead to stairclimbing during the course of a school day.

The widespread nature and the continuing rise of childhood obesity border on a national crisis, because it will surely exact an enormous societal toll on health in the coming decades. Complacency needs to be overcome to begin to systematically identify and address many fundamental questions pertaining to childhood obesity. A bold vision is needed to develop novel approaches at both the population and the individual level.

NGHS, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study • BMI, Body Mass Index • REE, resting energy expenditure • NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Pinhas-Hamiel O, Dolan LM, Daniels SR, Standiford D, Khoury PR, Zeitler P. Increased incidence of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus among adolescents. J Pediatr.1996;128 :608– 615
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. Glaser NS. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in childhood and adolescence. Pediatr Clin North Am.1997;44 :307– 337
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. Rosenbloom AL, House DV, Winter WE. Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in minority youth: research priorities and needs. Clin Pediatr.1998;37 :143– 152
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Sinha R, Fisch G, Teague B, et al. Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance among children and adolescents with marked obesity. N Engl J Med.2002;346 :802– 810
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Rocchini AP. Childhood obesity and a diabetes epidemic. N Engl J Med.2002;346 :854– 855
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Barton BA, Obarzanek E, et al. Racial divergence in adiposity during adolescence: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study. Pediatrics.2001;107(3) . Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/107/3/e34
  7. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Barton BA, Obarzanek E, et al. Obesity development during adolescence in a biracial cohort: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study. Pediatrics.2002;110(5) . Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/110/5/e54
  8. ↵
    Troiano RP, Flegal KM, Kuczmarski RJ, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Overweight prevalence and trends for children and adolescents. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1963 to 1991. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.1995;149 :1085– 1091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Prevalence of overweight among children and adolescents: United States, 1999. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/overwght99.htm
  10. ↵
    Strauss RS, Pollack HA. Epidemic increase in childhood overweight, 1986–1998. JAMA.2001;286 :2845– 2848
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. 2001 On-line edition. Available at: www.m-w.com
  12. ↵
    Kimm SYS. Obesity prevention and macronutrient intake of children in the United States. Ann N Y Acad Sci.1993;699 :70– 80
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    McDowell MA, Briefel RR, Alaimo K, et al. Energy and macronutrient intakes of persons ages 2 months and over in the United States: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Phase 1, 1988–91. Advance Data, Vital and Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; October 24, 1994, Publication 255
  14. ↵
    Dietz WH Jr, Gortmaker SL. Do we fatten our children at the television set? Obesity and television viewing in children and adolescents. Pediatrics.1985;75 :807– 812
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. Gortmaker SL, Must A, Sobol AM, Peterson K, Colditz GA, Dietz WH. Television viewing as a cause of increasing obesity among children in the United States, 1986–1990. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.1996;50 :356– 362
    OpenUrl
  16. Robinson TN. Reducing children’s television viewing to prevent obesity: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA.1999;282 :1561– 1567
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Crespo CJ, Smit E, Troiano RP, Bartlett SJ, Macera A, Andersen RE. Television watching, energy intake, and obesity in US children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.2001;155 :360– 365
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Obesity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in black and white girls: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study. Am J Public Health.1992;82 :1613– 1620
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Gannon B, DiPietro L, Poehlman ET. Do African Americans have lower energy expenditure than Caucasians? Int J Obes.2000;24 :4– 13
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Glynn NW, Daniels S, Poehlman ET. The effects of race, cigarette smoking and the use of contraceptive medications on resting energy expenditure in young women. Am J Epidemiol.2001;154 :718– 724
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Glynn NW, Aston CE, et al. Racial differences in the relationship between uncoupling protein genes and resting energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr.2002;75 :714– 719
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Obarzanek E, Schreiber GB, Crawford PB, et al. Energy intake and physical activity in relation to indices of body fat: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr.1994;160 :15– 22
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Black AE, Prentice AM, Goldberg GR, et al. Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc.1993;93 :572– 579
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Kimm S, Glynn N, Daniels S, Poehlman E. Is misreporting (M-R) of energy intake (EI) affected by certain macronutrient intake? Int J Obes.2000;24(suppl 1) :S14
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    Pate RR. Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.1993;33 :321– 325
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Kimm S, Glynn NW, Barton BA, et al. The association of physical activity with obesity development during adolescence: NHLBI Growth and Health Study. Circulation.2001;103 :1345 . Abstract
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Glynn NW, Kriska A, et al. Longitudinal assessment of physical activity from childhood through adolescence. Med Sci Sports Exerc.1999;32 :1445– 54
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Controls and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996:175–207
  29. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Barton BA, Berhane K, Ross JW, Payne GH, Schreiber G. Self-esteem and obesity in black and white girls: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study. Ann Epidemiol.1997;7 :550– 560
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Schreiber GB, Robins M, Striegel-Moore R, Obarzanek E, Morrison JA, Wright DJ. Weight modification efforts reported by black and white preadolescent girls: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. Pediatrics.1996;98 :63– 70
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    McNutt SW, Hu Y, Schreiber GB, Crawford PB, Obarzanek E, Mellin L. A longitudinal study of the dietary practices of black and white girls 9 and 10 years old at enrollment: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study. J Adolesc Health.1997;20 :27– 37
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Obarzanek E, Barton BA, et al. Race, socioeconomic status, and obesity in young adolescent girls: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study. Ann Epidemiol.1996;6 :266– 275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Crawford PB, Obarzanek E, Schreiber GB, et al. The effects of race, household income, and parental education on nutrient intake of 9- and 10-year-old girls: NHLBI Growth and Health Study. Ann Epidemiol.1995;5 :360– 368
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Glynn NW, Kriska AM, et al. Decline in physical activity in black and white girls during adolescence. N Engl J Med.2002;347 :709– 715
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1983 Metropolitan Height and Weight Tables. Stat Bull Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.1984;64 :2– 9
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the Evidence Report. Obesity Res.1998;6(suppl 2) :51S– 209S
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. CDC Growth Charts: United States. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts
  38. Himes J, Dietz WH. Guidelines for overweight in adolescent preventive services: recommendation from an expert committee. Am J Clin Nutr.1994;59 :307– 316
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Rosner B, Prineas R, Loggie J, Daniels SR. Percentiles for body mass index in US children 5 to 17 years of age. J Pediatr.1998;132 :211– 222
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Williams DP, Going SB, Lohman TG, et al. Body fatness and risk for elevated blood pressure, total cholesterol, and serum lipoprotein ratios in children and adolescents. Am J Public Health.1992;82 :358– 363
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    Kay JP, Alemadeh R, Langley G, D’Angelo L, Smith P, Holshouser S. Beneficial effects of metformin in normoglycemic morbidly obese adolescents. Metabolism.2001;50 :1457– 1461
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Strauss RS, Bradley LJ, Brolin RE. Gastric bypass surgery in adolescents with morbid obesity. J Pediatr.2001;138 :499– 504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Payne GH, Lakatos E, Webber LS, Greenblatt J. Primary care physicians and children’s blood cholesterol. Prev Med.1992;21 :191– 202
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Kimm SYS, Payne GH, Stylianou MP, Waclawiw MA, Lichtenstein C. National trends in the management of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children: second NHLBI survey of primary care physicians. Pediatrics.1998;102(5) . Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/102/5/e50
  45. ↵
    Epstein LH, Valoski A, Wing RR, McCurley J. Ten-year follow-up on behavioral, family-based treatment for obese children. JAMA.1990;264 :2519– 2523
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Dietz WH, Hartung R. Changes in height velocity of obese preadolescents during weight reduction. Am J Dis Child.1985;139 :705– 707
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    Ezzati TM, Massey JT, Waksberg J, Chu A, Maurer KR. Sample design: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat.1992;2(113) :1– 35
    OpenUrl
  • Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics
Vol. 110, Issue 5
1 Nov 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Childhood Obesity: A New Pandemic of the New Millennium
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Childhood Obesity: A New Pandemic of the New Millennium
Sue Y.S. Kimm, Eva Obarzanek
Pediatrics Nov 2002, 110 (5) 1003-1007; DOI: 10.1542/peds.110.5.1003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Childhood Obesity: A New Pandemic of the New Millennium
Sue Y.S. Kimm, Eva Obarzanek
Pediatrics Nov 2002, 110 (5) 1003-1007; DOI: 10.1542/peds.110.5.1003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • WHY A PANDEMIC?
    • ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATES OF CHILDHOOD OBESITY: RECENT FINDINGS FROM THE NGHS
    • BIOLOGICAL FACTORS
    • UNRESOLVED ISSUES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • An Evaluation of Mother-Centered Anticipatory Guidance to Reduce Obesogenic Infant Feeding Behaviors
  • Associations between deprivation and rates of childhood overweight and obesity in England, 2007-2010: an ecological study
  • Alternative Methods of Insulin Sensitivity Assessment in Obese Children and Adolescents
  • Chronic Kidney Disease: Common, Harmful, and Treatable--World Kidney Day 2007
  • Chronic Kidney Disease: Common, Harmful, and Treatable--World Kidney Day 2007
  • The Association of Child and Household Food Insecurity With Childhood Overweight Status
  • Evidence for secular trends in children's physical activity behaviour * Commentary
  • The Role of Health Care Providers in the Prevention of Overweight and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents
  • Children's Residential Weight-Loss Programs Can Work: A Prospective Cohort Study of Short-Term Outcomes for Overweight and Obese Children
  • Obesity and the Neuroendocrine Control of Energy Homeostasis: The Role of Spontaneous Locomotor Activity
  • Adolescent Bariatric Surgery: Treatment Delayed May Be Treatment Denied
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Safety of Breastfeeding by Mothers With COVID-19: New Evidence From Israel
  • Advocating for Minority Inclusion in Clinical Trials: A Call for Representation and Justice
  • Pediatric Enteric Diagnostic Stewardship: The Right Test in the Right Context
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Obesity
    • Obesity
  • Endocrinology
    • Endocrinology
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Open Access
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
  • RSS
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics