This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
To the Editor—
I read with interest the review article on leukotriene (LT) modifiers in pediatric asthma.1 There are several inconsistencies that deserve attention. On page 387, 2 discordant statements appear: “There are no pediatric studies addressing asthma control in children with mild persistent asthma,” yet the author concludes (p. 387), “LT modifiers can be used as first-line treatment of young wheezy preschool children with mild recurrent symptoms.” In the author’s review of the Knorr study2 of moderate to severe asthmatics, Bisgaard states that the “β-agonist was significantly reduced by 0.6 dose per day compared with a 0.2 dose per day in the placebo group.” In Table 2 of the Knorr study, the P value is .08. Further, Bisgaard fails to discuss lack of clinical significance of Knorr’s primary endpoint, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Knorr established the FEV1 as the primary endpoint with a planned sample size of 240 children to detect a 7.1% difference in FEV1 between treatment groups. FEV1 in the montelukast group was significantly different from placebo, but the difference from placebo achieved was only 4%, not the planned 7.1%. The clinical relevance of a 4% change in FEV1 in children with a mean baseline FEV1 of …
Individual Login
Institutional Login
You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your librarian or administrator if you do not have a username and password.
Log in through your institution
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 days for US$25.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.