Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Open Access
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Blogs
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • AAP Meeting Abstracts
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • AAP Policy
  • Supplements
    • Supplements
    • Publish Supplement
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers

Discover Pediatric Collections on COVID-19 and Racism and Its Effects on Pediatric Health

American Academy of Pediatrics
ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

An Advisory Statement From the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation

John Kattwinkel, Susan Niermeyer, Vinay Nadkarni, James Tibballs, Barbara Phillips, David Zideman, Patrick Van Reempts and Martin Osmond
Pediatrics April 1999, 103 (4) e56; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.103.4.e56
John Kattwinkel
From the *American Academy of Pediatrics;
‡Neonatal Resuscitation Program;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Niermeyer
From the *American Academy of Pediatrics;
§American Heart Association;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vinay Nadkarni
From the *American Academy of Pediatrics;
§American Heart Association;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Tibballs
‖Australian Resuscitation Council;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Phillips
¶European Resuscitation Council; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Zideman
¶European Resuscitation Council; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Van Reempts
¶European Resuscitation Council; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Osmond
#Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), with representation from North America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, and South America, was formed in 1992 to provide a forum for liaison between resuscitation organizations in the developed world. This consensus document on resuscitation extends previously published ILCOR advisory statements on resuscitation to address the unique and changing physiology of the newly born infant within the first few hours after birth and the techniques for providing advanced life support.

After careful review of the international resuscitation literature and after discussion of key and controversial issues, consensus was reached on almost all aspects of neonatal resuscitation, and areas of controversy and high priority for additional research were delineated. Consensus on resuscitation for the newly born infant included the following principles:

  • Personnel trained in the basic skills of resuscitation should be in attendance at every delivery. A minority (fewer than 10%) of newly born infants require active resuscitative interventions to establish a vigorous cry and regular respirations, maintain a heart rate >100 beats per minute (bpm), and maintain good color and tone.

  • When meconium is present in the amniotic fluid, it should be suctioned from the hypopharynx on delivery of the head. If the meconium-stained newly born infant has absent or depressed respirations, heart rate, or muscle tone, residual meconium should be suctioned from the trachea.

  • Attention to ventilation should be of primary concern. Assisted ventilation with attention to oxygen delivery, inspiratory time, and effectiveness judged by chest rise should be provided if stimulation does not achieve prompt onset of spontaneous respirations and/or the heart rate is <100 bpm.

  • Chest compressions should be provided if the heart rate is absent or remains <60 bpm despite adequate assisted ventilation for 30 seconds. Chest compressions should be coordinated with ventilations at a ratio of 3:1 and a rate of 120 “events” per minute to achieve approximately 90 compressions and 30 rescue breaths per minute.

  • Epinephrine should be administered intravenously or intratracheally if the heart rate remains <60 bpm despite 30 seconds of effective assisted ventilation and chest compression circulation.

Common or controversial medications (epinephrine, volume expansion, naloxone, bicarbonate), special resuscitation circumstances affecting care of the newly born, continuing care of the newly born after resuscitation, and ethical considerations for initiation and discontinuation of resuscitation are discussed. There was agreement that insufficient data exist to recommend changes to current guidelines regarding the use of 21% versus 100% oxygen, neuroprotective interventions such as cerebral hypothermia, use of a laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tube, and use of high-dose epinephrine. Areas of controversy are identified, as is the need for additional research to improve the scientific justification of each component of current and future resuscitation guidelines.

  • resuscitation
  • newborn
  • birth
  • resuscitation
  • neonatal resuscitation
  • Abbreviations:
    ILCOR =
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation •
    AHA =
    American Heart Association •
    ERC =
    European Resuscitation Council •
    HSFC =
    Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada •
    ARC =
    Australian Resuscitation Council •
    RCSA =
    Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa •
    CLAR =
    Council of Latin America for Resuscitation •
    BLS =
    basic life support •
    ALS =
    advanced life support •
    NRP =
    Neonatal Resuscitation Program •
    AAP =
    American Academy of Pediatrics •
    NZRC =
    New Zealand Resuscitation Council •
    WHO =
    World Health Organization •
    THAM =
    Tris buffer, tris-hydroxymethyl aminomethane •
    CO2 =
    carbon dioxide •
    bpm =
    beats per minute •
    IV =
    intravenous •
    CDH =
    congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • PURPOSE

    The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) was formed in 1992 to provide a forum for liaison between the following principal resuscitation organizations in the developed world: the American Heart Association (AHA), European Resuscitation Council (ERC), Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC), Australian Resuscitation Council (ARC), Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa (RCSA), and Council of Latin America for Resuscitation (CLAR). Since 1992, international consensus conferences and publications have addressed many important resuscitation issues, including uniform Utstein-style reporting for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, in-hospital cardiac arrest, pediatric arrest, and laboratory animal studies of cardiopulmonary arrest.1–4 Ten meetings of the ILCOR group and ILCOR working groups in advanced life support, basic life support, and pediatric life support culminated in concurrent multinational publication of consensus international advisory statements on resuscitation in 1997.5 The advisory statement on pediatric resuscitation6 highlighted areas of consensus, conflict, or controversy and provided recommendations in the areas of pediatric basic life support (BLS), pediatric advanced life support (ALS), and BLS for the newly born. The great potential for worldwide improvement in BLS resuscitation for the newly born was acknowledged, but discussion of ALS for the newly born was beyond the scope of the previous document.

    The ILCOR Pediatric Working Group, with the constituent councils named above, was joined by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) Steering Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), New Zealand Resuscitation Council (NZRC), and the World Health Organization (WHO) to extend advisory recommendations beyond BLS to ALS for the newly born. Careful review of current constituent organization guidelines7–13 and current international literature forms the basis for the present document. This advisory statement summarizes the current international consensus on ALS of the newly born, ie, within the first few hours after birth.

    BACKGROUND

    Need for BLS and ALS Guidelines for the Newly Born

    Resuscitation of the newly born infant presents a different set of challenges than resuscitation of the adult or even the older infant or child. The transition from dependence on placental gas exchange in a liquid-filled intrauterine environment to spontaneous breathing of air presents dramatic physiologic challenges to the infant within the first minutes to hours after birth. Approximately 5% to 10% of the newly born population require some degree of active resuscitation at birth (eg, stimulation to breathe),14 and approximately 1% to 10% born in the hospital are reported to require assisted ventilation.15 More than 5 million neonatal deaths occur worldwide each year. It has been estimated that birth asphyxia accounts for 19% of these deaths, suggesting that the outcome might be improved for more than 1 million infants per year through implementation of simple resuscitative techniques.16 Finally, the need for resuscitation of the newly born infant often can be predicted, thus allowing opportunities to select an optimal setting, prepare appropriate equipment, and mobilize trained personnel.

    Definition of Newly Born, Neonate, and Infant

    The term newly born refers specifically to the infant in the first minutes to hours after birth. In contrast, the neonatal period is generally defined as the first 28 days of life. Infancy includes the neonatal period and extends through the age of 12 months. To avoid confusion and promote uniform definitions, the lay terms newborn and baby will be avoided here. This document is intended to apply specifically to newly born infants, although many of the principles are applicable throughout the neonatal period.

    Unique Physiology of the Newly Born

    The transition from fetal to extrauterine life is characterized by a series of unique physiologic events: the lungs change from fluid-filled to air-filled, pulmonary blood flow increases dramatically, and intracardiac and extracardiac shunts (foramen ovale and ductus arteriosus) initially reverse direction and subsequently close. Such physiologic considerations affect resuscitative interventions in the newly born. For initial lung expansion, fluid-filled alveoli may require higher ventilation pressures than commonly used in rescue breathing during infancy.17 ,18Physical expansion of the lungs, with establishment of functional residual capacity, and increase in alveolar oxygen tension both mediate the critical decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance and result in an increase in pulmonary blood flow after birth. Failure to normalize pulmonary vascular resistance may result in persistence of right-to-left intracardiac and extracardiac shunts (persistent pulmonary hypertension). Likewise, failure to adequately expand alveolar spaces may result in intrapulmonary shunting of blood with resultant hypoxemia. Disruption of the fetoplacental circulation also may render the newly born at risk for acute blood loss.

    Developmental considerations at various gestational ages also influence pulmonary pathology and resuscitation physiology in the newly born. Surfactant deficiency in the premature infant alters lung compliance and resistance.19 If meconium is passed into the amniotic fluid, this irritating substance may be aspirated, leading to airway obstruction. Complications of meconium aspiration are particularly likely in infants small for their gestational age or those born after term or with significant perinatal compromise.20

    Although certain physiologic features are unique to the newly born, others pertain to infants throughout the neonatal period and into the first months of life. Severe illness resulting from a wide variety of conditions continues to manifest as disturbances in thermoregulation and respiratory function (cyanosis, apnea, gasping, respiratory failure). Persistent patency of the ductus arteriosus and intracardiac shunts may produce symptoms during the neonatal period or infancy. Thus, many of the considerations and interventions that apply to the newly born may remain important for days, weeks, or months after birth.

    Choice of Action Depends on Evolving Status

    In the newly born the significance of a vital-sign abnormality depends greatly on the time since birth and the time during which effective resuscitative measures have been administered. For example, a bradycardia encountered immediately after birth likely results from a failure of uteroplacental function, whereas the same degree of bradycardia encountered after the establishment of effective ventilation requires additional diagnostic considerations and potentially different interventions.

    ANTICIPATION OF RESUSCITATION NEED

    Personnel

    Personnel trained in the basic skills of resuscitation at birth should be in attendance at every delivery. Ideally, at least one person should be responsible solely for the care of the infant. A person trained in ALS techniques for the newly born should be available for normal low-risk deliveries and in attendance for all deliveries considered at high risk for neonatal resuscitation. Appendix 1 lists the maternal, fetal, and intrapartum circumstances that place the newly born infant at risk. The list is designed to serve as a guideline for issues that local and regional resuscitation organizations are often called on to address. The personnel who attend the mother and infant at delivery (birth attendant, midwife, family physician, obstetrician, perinatologist, obstetrical nurse, neonatal nurse practitioner, pediatrician, neonatologist) will vary according to local circumstances. If it is anticipated that the infant is at high risk to require ALS resuscitative intervention, more than one experienced person should be mobilized.

    Equipment

    Although the need for resuscitation at birth can sometimes be predicted by consideration of risk factors, resuscitation cannot be anticipated for a significant number of infants.21Therefore, emergency preparedness requires that a complete inventory of resuscitation equipment and drugs be maintained at hand and in fully operational condition. Appendix 2 presents a consensus list of suggested equipment and drugs. Minor unresolved controversy was acknowledged over the advisability of inclusion of a 2.0-mm endotracheal tube for extremely premature infants. Proponents argued that the small tube might be lifesaving in the case of extreme prematurity. However, concerns for increased airway resistance (inversely proportional to the fourth power of the internal radius) were raised.22–24 Additionally, the choice of buffer medications (bicarbonate versus THAM [Tris buffer, tris-hydroxymethyl aminomethane], 4.2% versus 8.4% bicarbonate as a stock solution) differed between councils. There was consensus that issues of adequacy of ventilation, potential for worsening respiratory acidosis with carbon dioxide (CO2)-producing buffer administration, and concerns for hyperosmolarity of solution should enter the discussion of which buffer to select.

    Communication

    Appropriate preparation for an anticipated high-risk delivery requires communication between the person(s) caring for the mother and those responsible for the newly born. Communication among caregivers should include details of maternal medical condition and treatment that will affect the resuscitation and management of the newly born. For example, maternal sedatives and analgesics, tocolytics, and corticosteroids all can influence respiratory function at birth. Fetal heart rate monitoring may give information about fetal well-being. Findings of detailed antenatal ultrasonography can guide interventions such as thoracentesis for pleural effusions or immediate intubation for congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

    When time permits, the team responsible for care of the newly born should introduce themselves to the mother and family before delivery. They should outline the proposed plan of care and solicit the family's questions. Especially in cases of potentially lethal fetal malformations or extreme prematurity, the family should be asked to articulate their beliefs and desires regarding the extent of resuscitation.

    Environment

    Temperature

    Prevention of heat loss is important for the newly born. Cold stress can increase oxygen consumption and impede effective resuscitation; however, hyperthermia should be avoided.25 ,26 Whenever possible, the infant should be delivered in a warm, draft-free area. Rapid drying of the skin, removing wet linen after delivery, placing the infant under a radiant warmer, and wrapping the infant in prewarmed blankets will reduce heat loss. Another strategy for reducing heat loss is placing the newly born skin-to-skin on the mother's chest or abdomen to use her body as a heat source. Several recent animal studies have suggested that selective (cerebral) hypothermia of the asphyxiated infant may protect against subsequent brain injury.27–29 Although this was felt to be a promising area of research, there was consensus that no recommendation for routine implementation could be made until appropriate controlled studies in humans have been performed.

    Standard Precautions

    All fluids from patients should be treated as potentially infectious. Personnel should wear gloves and protective shields during procedures that are likely to expose them to droplets of blood or other body fluids. Local standards should be developed, with acknowledgment of individual circumstances and available resources.

    Assessment

    Concept of Integrated Assessment

    Evaluation of the need to initiate and continue resuscitative efforts should begin immediately after birth and proceed throughout the resuscitation process until vital signs have normalized. The complex of signs (initial cry, respirations, heart rate, color, response to stimulation) should be evaluated simultaneously, with action dictated by the integrated findings (compound and ongoing action) rather than by evaluation of a single vital sign, action on the result, and then evaluation of the next sign (sequential action). The appropriate response to abnormal findings also depends on the time elapsed since birth and how the infant has responded to previous resuscitative interventions. It is recognized that evaluation and intervention for the newly born are often simultaneous processes, especially when more than one trained provider is present. To enhance educational retention, this process is often taught as a sequence of distinct steps.

    Response to Stimulation

    Most newly born infants will respond to the stimulation of an extrauterine environment with movement of all extremities, strong inspiratory efforts, and a vigorous cry. If these responses are absent or weak, the infant should be stimulated. Appropriate stimulation includes drying the infant with a towel, flicking the bottoms of the feet, or gently rubbing the back. Such tactile stimulation may initiate spontaneous respirations in newly born infants who are experiencing “primary apnea.” If these efforts do not result in prompt onset of effective ventilation, they should be discontinued because the infant is in “secondary” or “terminal apnea” and should be given assisted ventilation.30 By consensus, slapping, shaking, spanking, or holding the newly born upside down is contraindicated and potentially dangerous.6

    Respiration

    After initial respiratory efforts, the newly born infant should be able to establish regular respirations sufficient to improve color and maintain a heart rate >100 beats per minute (bpm). Gasping is an ominous sign and requires intervention. The marked variability of respiratory rate that is characteristic of perinatal transition prevents designation of a specific respiratory rate requiring intervention.

    Heart Rate

    Heart rate is determined by listening to the precordium with a stethoscope, feeling for pulsations at the base of the umbilical cord, or feeling the brachial or femoral pulse. Palpation of the carotid artery is not recommended in the newly born because of the difficulty of reliably palpating the artery and the potential for causing iatrogenic airway obstruction and/or vagal stimulation of the newly born. Central and peripheral pulses are often difficult to feel in infants and should not be relied on independently if they are absent.31 ,32 Heart rate should be consistently >100 bpm in an uncompromised newly born infant. An increasing or decreasing heart rate also can provide evidence of improvement or deterioration.

    Color

    An uncompromised newly born infant will be able to maintain a pink color without supplemental oxygen. Cyanosis is determined by examining central structures and mucous membranes. Acrocyanosis is usually a normal finding at birth but may indicate other conditions such as cold stress. Acrocyanosis is considered an unreliable indicator of oxygenation.

    TECHNIQUES OF RESUSCITATION

    The techniques of ALS resuscitation are discussed below and are outlined in Fig 1, which shows the universal template for ALS of the newly born.

    Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Universal template for advanced life support of the newly born infant. Rectangles indicate evaluation; ovals, action.

    Opening the Airway

    The infant's airway is opened by positioning the infant and clearing secretions.

    Positioning

    The newly born infant should be placed on his or her back or side with the head in a neutral or slightly extended position. If respiratory efforts are present but not producing effective tidal ventilation, often the airway is obstructed; immediate efforts must be made to reposition the head or clear the airway.

    Suctioning

    Healthy, vigorous newly born infants generally do not require suctioning after delivery. If necessary, secretions should be cleared with a suction device (bulb syringe, suction catheter). Aggressive pharyngeal suction can cause laryngeal spasm and vagal bradycardia33 and delay the onset of spontaneous breathing. In the absence of meconium or blood, mechanical suction with a catheter should be limited to a depth of 5 cm from the lips and a duration of 5 seconds. Negative pressure of the suction apparatus should not exceed 100 mm Hg (13.3 kPa).

    Clearing the Airway of Meconium

    When the amniotic fluid is contaminated with meconium, the mouth, pharynx, and nose should be suctioned as soon as the head is delivered (intrapartum suctioning).34 If the fluid contains meconium and the infant has absent or depressed respirations or decreased muscle tone, direct laryngoscopy should be conducted immediately after birth for suctioning of residual meconium from the hypopharynx (under direct vision) and intubation/suction of the trachea.35 ,36 Drying and stimulation generally should be delayed in such infants. Tracheal suctioning can be accomplished by applying suction directly to a tracheal tube as it is withdrawn from the airway. Intubation and suctioning during tracheal tube withdrawal can be repeated until meconium is no longer recovered, providing the infant's heart rate remains at >60 bpm. If the infant's respiration is severely depressed, tracheal reintubation for positive-pressure ventilation may be necessary even though some meconium remains in the airway. There is evidence that tracheal suctioning of the vigorous infant with meconium-stained fluid does not improve outcome and may cause complications.37 ,38

    Tactile Stimulation

    Drying and suctioning are both assessment and resuscitative interventions (see “Response to Stimulation”). If the infant fails to establish spontaneous and effective respirations after brief stimulation, BLS and/or ALS will be required.

    Oxygenation and Ventilation

    Free-Flow Oxygen

    The traditional treatment for central cyanosis is administration of 100% oxygen, either by passive delivery via an oxygen mask or by positive pressure delivered via a resuscitation bag. Although there is some in vitro evidence, a valid biochemical rationale, and preliminary clinical evidence39 to support resuscitation with lower oxygen concentrations, current clinical data are insufficient to justify adopting this as a routine practice.40 ,41Conversely, in settings where availability of oxygen is limited (eg, the developing world), it is reasonable to consider resuscitation with room air. There is some evidence that infants born at high altitude (ie, low ambient Pao 2) have more difficulty establishing normal oxygenation and pulmonary blood flow than infants born at sea level.42 However, the first priority should be to ensure adequate inflation of the fluid-filled lungs, followed by attention to the desired concentration of inspired oxygen.

    Assisted Ventilation

    Indications.

    Assisted ventilation should be initiated after stimulation if the infant remains apneic, is gasping, or the heart rate remains <100 bpm.

    Technique.

    If assisted ventilation is given, higher inflation pressures and longer inflation times may be required for the first several breaths than for subsequent breaths. Some experts suggest very long inflation times (2 to 3 seconds) for initial inflations,17 but this has not been accepted for universal recommendation. The assisted ventilation rate should be 30 to 60 inflations per minute. There is some controversy regarding advantages of lower versus higher rates. Lower rates allow longer inflation times and better coordination with chest compressions; higher rates permit higher minute ventilation. No controlled studies have demonstrated advantages of one versus the other.

    Effectiveness of Ventilation

    Effectiveness of ventilation is judged by watching adequacy of chest rise and improvement in vital signs. Critical adjustments to improve effectiveness include improving the seal between mask and face, ensuring patency of the airway (clearing airway of material, adjusting head position, opening the mouth), increasing inflation pressure on the bag, and optimizing the position of the tracheal tube.

    Mouth-to-Mouth/Nose and Mouth-to-Mask Ventilation

    The best method for initially assisting ventilation is with a bag-valve–mask apparatus.43–45 However, for BLS at birth, when equipment is not available, mouth-to-mouth/nose ventilation is effective. Consensus continues to support initial attempts at ventilation via both the infant's mouth and nose, with creation of a functional seal to ensure adequate chest rise and ventilation. To decrease the risk of infection to the rescuer, maternal blood and other body fluids should first be wiped from the face of the infant. New devices for delivery of mouth-to-mask or barrier resuscitation for the newly born are under development.46 ,47

    Bag-Valve–Mask Ventilation

    Types of Bags.

    Resuscitation bags should be no larger than 750 mL; they can either be self-inflating or require a compressed gas source to inflate (flow-inflating). The former require attachment of an oxygen reservoir to permit delivery of high oxygen concentrations. Those who advocate longer inflation times recommend a minimum bag volume of 500 mL so that inflation pressure can be maintained for at least 1 second. If the device contains a pressure-release valve, it should release at approximately 30 cm H2O pressure and should have an override feature to permit delivery of higher pressures if necessary to achieve good chest expansion.

    Mask Fit.

    Masks should be of appropriate size to seal around the mouth and nose but not cover the eyes or overlap the chin. Therefore, a range of sizes should be available. A round mask with a cushioned rim is preferable.44

    Laryngeal Mask Airway Ventilation

    Masks that fit over the laryngeal inlet have been developed and have been shown to be effective for ventilating newly born full-term infants.48 However, these masks have not been evaluated in small, preterm infants, and relative effectiveness for the suctioning of meconium has not been reported.

    Tracheal Intubation for Ventilation

    Indications.

    Indications for tracheal intubation will vary depending on the presence or absence of meconium, gestational age of the infant, degree of respiratory depression, response to bag-valve–mask ventilation, and skill and experience of the resuscitator. Indications for intubation for meconium are described under “Clearing the Airway of Meconium,” and indications for elective intubation of extremely low birth weight infants are described under “Special Resuscitation Circumstances.” Tracheal intubation should be performed if bag-valve–mask assistance has been unsuccessful or prolonged.

    Equipment.

    Preferred tracheal tubes are of uniform diameter, without a shoulder, with a natural curve, radiopaque, and with a mark to indicate the appropriate depth of insertion. If an introducing stylet is used, care must be taken to prevent the stylet from protruding beyond the tip of the tube. Table 1 provides a guideline for tracheal tube sizes and their depth of insertion. Appropriate size and depth of insertion must always be verified clinically (see “Verification”). A laryngoscope with a straight blade (size 0 [7.5 cm] for premature infants, size 1 [10 cm] for term infants) is preferred.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Guidelines for Tracheal Tube Sizes and Depth of Insertion

    Technique.

    Tracheal intubation by the oral route is recommended. The tip of the laryngoscope should be inserted into the vallecula or on top of the epiglottis and elevated gently to reveal the vocal cords. Cricoid pressure may be helpful. The tube should be inserted to an appropriate depth through the vocal cords, as indicated by a mark on the tube. The tube should be secured with the appropriate centimeter marking located at the upper lip. This depth of insertion should be recorded and maintained. Care providers should be aware that variation in head position alters the depth of insertion and may predispose to unintentional extubation or endobronchial intubation.49 ,50

    Verification.

    In general, positive-pressure inflation sounds should be equal in both axillae and not audible over the stomach. In some special circumstances of resuscitation (eg, unilateral pneumonia, pneumothorax), one may expect asymmetrical breath sounds (see below). Lack of chest rise or symmetry of chest movement and lack of improvement in color and/or heart rate are the best signs of inappropriate tube placement. Some have advocated use of an end-tidal CO2 monitor for verification of correct tube placement in the trachea.51 These devices are associated with some false-negative but few false-positive results.52

    Assisted Circulation

    Indications for Chest Compressions

    The heart rate, the change of heart rate, and the time elapsed after initiation of resuscitative measures should all be considered in deciding when chest compressions should be initiated. Establishment of adequate ventilation will restore vital signs in the vast majority of newly born infants. Because chest compressions may diminish the effectiveness of ventilation, they should not be initiated until effective ventilation has been established. Guidelines for initiation of chest compressions are

    • Absent heart rate at any time

    • Heart rate <60 bpm despite adequate assisted ventilation for 30 seconds

    It is common practice to give compressions if the heart rate is 60 to 100 bpm and the heart rate is not rising. However, the ILCOR working group agrees that ventilation should be the priority in resuscitation of the newly born. Chest compressions are likely to compete with effective ventilation. Because no scientific data suggest an evidence-based resolution of these different council recommendations, the working group recommends a heart rate guideline of 60 bpm based on construct validity (ease of teaching and skill retention).

    Compression Technique

    Compressions should be delivered on the lower third of the sternum.53 ,54 Consensus supports recommendation of a relative rather than absolute depth of compression (eg, compress to approximately one third of the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest rather than 2 to 3 cm) to generate a palpable pulse. Acceptable techniques are 1) two thumbs on the sternum, superimposed or adjacent to each other according to the size of the infant, with fingers surrounding the thorax, and 2) two fingers placed on the sternum at right angles to the chest.55–57 Data suggest that the two-thumb technique may offer some advantages in generating peak systolic and coronary perfusion pressure and in provider preference over the two-finger technique without introducing additional complications.55–60 The two-finger technique may be preferable for a single rescuer. Compressions and ventilations should be coordinated to avoid simultaneous delivery. There should be a 3:1 ratio of compressions to ventilations, with 90 compressions and 30 breaths to achieve approximately 120 “events” per minute. Thus, each event will be allotted approximately 0.5 seconds, with exhalation occurring during the first compression after each ventilation. Reassessment of the heart rate should continue approximately every 60 seconds, and chest compressions should continue until the spontaneous heart rate is >60 bpm.

    Medications

    Indications for Medication Administration

    Drugs are rarely indicated in resuscitation of the newly born infant.61 Administration of epinephrine is not recommended unless the heart rate remains <60 bpm after a minimum of 30 seconds of adequate ventilation and chest compression.62 Volume expansion should be considered when there has been suspected blood loss and/or the infant appears to be in shock (pale, poor perfusion, weak pulse) and has not responded adequately to other resuscitative measures. If the mother has received a narcotic drug and the infant's respiratory drive is considered inadequate, naloxone may be indicated after vital signs have been established. However, support with artificial ventilation should be the priority. Naloxone should not be administered to newly born infants whose mothers are suspected of having recently abused narcotic drugs; naloxone may precipitate abrupt withdrawal signs in such infants. There are insufficient data to recommend routine use of bicarbonate in resuscitation of the newly born, as well as theoretical concerns that its hyperosmolarity and CO2-generating properties may be detrimental to myocardial and/or cerebral function.63–65 If used, it should be given only after adequate ventilation and circulation are ensured. Further use of bicarbonate in persistent metabolic acidosis should be directed by arterial blood gas levels, among other evaluations.

    Routes of Medication Administration

    Epinephrine and naloxone may be given via the endotracheal route, which is generally the most rapidly accessible site of administration. There are concerns that the endotracheal route may not result in as effective a level of epinephrine as does the intravenous (IV) route66–69; however, the data are insufficient to recommend a higher dose via the endotracheal route. The umbilical vein is the most rapidly accessible route for volume expanders and may also be used for epinephrine, naloxone, and/or bicarbonate. Naloxone may be given intramuscularly but only after adequate assisted ventilation has been delivered and the infant is judged to have adequate peripheral circulation. The umbilical artery is not generally recommended for administration of resuscitation drugs, because it is often not rapidly accessible and there are concerns that complications may result if vasoactive or hypertonic drugs (eg, epinephrine or bicarbonate) are given into an artery. Intraosseous lines are not commonly used in newly born infants because of the more readily accessible umbilical vein, the fragility of small bones, and the small intraosseous space in a premature infant.

    Types and Doses of Medications

    Epinephrine.

    The recommended IV or endotracheal dose is 0.1 to 0.3 mL/kg of a 1:10 000 solution (0.01 to 0.03 mg/kg), repeated every 3 to 5 minutes as indicated. The studies in newly born infants are inadequate to recommend routine use of higher doses of epinephrine. Higher doses have been associated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage and myocardial damage in animals.61 ,70

    Volume Expanders.

    Volume expanders include crystalloid (normal saline, Ringer's lactate) and colloid (blood, 4% to 5% albumin, plasma substitute). The initial dose is 10 mL/kg given by slow IV push; the dose may be repeated after further clinical assessment and observation of response. Higher bolus volumes have been recommended for resuscitation of older infants. However, 10 mL/kg is recommended for newly born infants because they already have relatively high blood volumes at the time of birth71 and because of concern about fragility of the germinal matrix in the brains of infants born prematurely.72

    Naloxone.

    The recommended dose is 0.1 mg/kg of a 0.4-mg/mL or 1.0-mg/mL solution given intravenously, endotracheally, or intramuscularly. Concern was expressed that the 1.0-mg/mL concentration requires very small volumes of drug when used in small infants. Because the half-life of naloxone generally will be significantly shorter than that of the narcotic given to the mother, repeated doses may be necessary to prevent recurrent apnea.

    Bicarbonate.

    A dose of 1 to 2 mEq/kg of 0.5-mEq/mL solution may be given by slow IV push after adequate ventilation and perfusion have been established. Higher concentrations have been associated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.73 The choice of buffer medications (4.2% bicarbonate, 8.4% bicarbonate, and THAM [Tris buffer]) differed between councils. There was consensus that issues of adequacy of ventilation, potential for worsening respiratory acidosis, and concerns for hyperosmolarity of solution should influence the selection of buffering agent.

    SPECIAL RESUSCITATION CIRCUMSTANCES

    Several circumstances have unique implications for resuscitation of the newly born infant. Birth attendants are sometimes aware of these special circumstances through prenatal diagnostic information. Although the implications of these circumstances for resuscitation are described below, full consideration and discussion of these entities are beyond the scope of this advisory statement.

    Prematurity

    Some experts recommend early elective intubation of extremely preterm infants (eg, <28 weeks of gestation) to help establish an air-fluid interface,74 while others recommend that this be accomplished with a mask or nasal prongs.75 Other experts recommend that infants younger than 30 to 31 weeks be electively intubated for surfactant administration after the initial stages of resuscitation have been successful.76 Because premature infants have low body fat and a high ratio of surface area to body mass, they are also more difficult to keep warm. Their immature brains and the presence of a germinal matrix predispose them to development of intracranial hemorrhage during resuscitation.

    Congenital Upper Airway Obstruction

    An infant who is pink when crying but cyanotic when quiet should be evaluated for choanal or other upper airway obstruction. An oral airway initially may provide adequate relief of obstruction. Prone positioning and/or placement of a tube in the posterior pharynx may improve airway competence in an infant with a small hypopharynx. Infants with more compromising craniofacial malformations may require tracheal intubation.

    Esophageal Atresia/Tracheoesophageal Fistula

    Copious secretions and intermittent cyanosis and/or bradycardia may signal esophageal atresia, with or without tracheoesophageal fistula. The inability to pass an orogastric tube to the stomach can confirm this diagnosis; positioning of a sump tube in the proximal esophageal pouch and application of intermittent suction may decrease the aspiration of oral secretions. Elevation of the head may decrease aspiration of gastric contents via the fistula.

    Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

    Prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) permits consideration of immediate tracheal intubation, rather than initial bag and mask ventilation, to minimize air entry into the gastrointestinal tract. Breath sounds after tracheal intubation may be expected to be asymmetrical, depending on the location of the CDH. In spontaneously breathing infants with CDH or in those receiving positive-pressure ventilation, a nasogastric tube should be placed to allow intermittent suction to decompress the small bowel and minimize lung compression.

    Pneumothorax

    Unilaterally decreased breath sounds, shift in the point of maximal cardiac impulse, and persistent cyanosis may indicate the presence of a pneumothorax. Needle thoracentesis can be both diagnostic and therapeutic.

    Pleural Effusions/Ascites (Fetal Hydrops)

    Pleural effusions and ascites present at birth may interfere with initial lung expansion. After an airway has been secured, thoracentesis and/or paracentesis may improve ventilation and oxygenation. Fluid shifts to the extravascular space may necessitate early consideration of intravascular volume expansion.

    Pneumonia/Sepsis

    Congenital pneumonia may be characterized by very poor lung compliance, necessitating high ventilation pressures/rates in the delivery room. Capillary leak may lead to a shock state, with early need for volume expansion.

    Congenital Heart Disease

    Infants who remain cyanotic despite adequate ventilation, oxygenation, and circulation may have cyanotic congenital heart disease or persistent pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiographic evaluation in such cases will be helpful.

    Multiple Births

    Multiple births are more frequently associated with a need for resuscitation because abnormalities of placentation, compromise of cord blood flow, and/or mechanical complications during delivery are more likely to be encountered. Monozygotic multiple fetuses may also have abnormalities of blood olume resulting from interfetal vascular anastomoses.

    Maternofetal Hemorrhage

    Vaginal bleeding before birth may be a sign of abruptio placenta or placenta previa. Although most of the blood loss in such conditions will be maternal, if even a small portion is fetal the fetus is likely to be hypovolemic because of the relatively smaller blood volume. In such cases, volume expanders may be required before the infant will respond to resuscitative measures.

    POSTRESUSCITATION ISSUES

    Continuing Care of the Newly Born Infant After Resuscitation

    After resuscitation with ALS, ongoing supportive care, monitoring, and appropriate diagnostic evaluation must be provided. Once adequate ventilation and circulation have been established, the infant who has required resuscitation is still at risk and should be maintained in or transferred to an environment in which close monitoring and anticipatory care can be provided. This should include oxygen saturation and heart rate monitoring with blood gas measurement as indicated. Blood pressure should be documented and blood glucose level checked during stabilization after resuscitation. Glucose is consumed more rapidly during conditions of anaerobic metabolism and therefore infants who require resuscitation are more likely to have low glycogen stores; hypoglycemia is often encountered after resuscitation. An infant who has experienced perinatal compromise or with ongoing respiratory distress may have experienced an insult to the gastrointestinal tract. Special consideration should be given to parenteral versus enteral hydration and nutrition for several days.

    Continuing Care of the Family

    The mother continues to be a patient herself, with physical and emotional needs. Mothers with acute or chronic medical problems will need ongoing monitoring and treatment in the postpartum period.

    The team caring for the newly born infant should inform the parents of the infant's condition at the earliest opportunity. If resuscitation has been necessary, the parents should be informed of the procedures undertaken and their indications; parental questions should be solicited and answered as frankly and honestly as possible. Every effort should be made to enable the parents to have contact with the newly born infant.

    ETHICS

    Initiation of Resuscitation

    The delivery of extremely immature infants and those with severe congenital anomalies raises questions about initiation of resuscitation.77–81 In such cases, initiation of resuscitation at delivery does not mandate continued support. Noninitiation of support and later withdrawal of support are generally considered to be ethically equivalent; however, the latter approach allows time to gather more complete clinical information and to provide counseling to the family. Possible exceptions include infants with anencephaly and extremely immature infants for whom there is no possibility of survival. In general, there is no advantage to delayed, graded, or partial support; if the infant survives, outcome may be worsened as a result of this approach.

    Discontinuation of Resuscitation

    It is reasonable to consider discontinuation of resuscitative efforts if the infant with cardiorespiratory arrest has not responded with a spontaneous circulation in 15 minutes. Both survival and quality of survival deteriorate precipitously at this point in term infants; other data in preterm infants of very low birth weight suggest that survival is negligible if there are no signs of life after 10 minutes of appropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation.82 ,83 Local discussions are recommended to formulate guidelines consistent with local resources and outcome data.

    DOCUMENTATION OF RESUSCITATION

    It is essential for good clinical care, for communication, and for medicolegal concerns that the findings at each assessment and the actions taken in resuscitation are fully documented. The Apgar scores quantify and summarize the response of the newly born infant to the extrauterine environment and to resuscitation.84 ,85 An Apgar score is used to assess and record breathing, heart rate, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color at 1 and 5 minutes after birth and then sequentially every 5 minutes until vital signs have stabilized. These scores should not be used to dictate appropriate resuscitative actions, nor should interventions for depressed infants be delayed until the 1-minute assessment. Complete documentation must also include a narrative description of interventions performed and their timing. An alternative is the use of a standard resuscitation record, which is suitable for use in both BLS and ALS settings. Such a standardized form offers the further advantage of uniform data collection to facilitate study and comparison of resuscitation techniques and outcomes.

    AREAS OF CONTROVERSY AND NEED FOR ADDITIONAL RESEARCH

    The ILCOR Pediatric Working Group recognizes the difficulty in creating advisory statements for universal application. After careful review of the rationale for current guideline recommendations from among the constituent resuscitation councils (Table 2), the working group identified the following areas of controversy regarding resuscitation of the newly born infant. The group believes that additional research is required in these areas before more specific, evidence-based universal ALS guidelines for newly born infants can be developed.

    • Under what conditions should newly born infants with meconium staining receive tracheal suctioning?

    • Is intraosseous infusion of fluids and medications effective for resuscitation of the newly born?

    • What is the optimal concentration of oxygen to provide during resuscitation?

    • What is the optimal, practical, and evidence-based indication for initiating chest compressions?

    • What is the optimal frequency and depth for delivery of chest compressions?

    • What is the optimal dose of epinephrine?

    • What is the appropriate dose and what are the appropriate indications for volume expansion?

    • What are the appropriate indications for bicarbonate administration in resuscitation of newly born infants?

    • Is there a role for localized cerebral cooling and/or use of pharmacologic agents for neuroprotection of asphyxiated newly born infants?

    • Is there a consistent marker of poor prognosis or duration of unsuccessful resuscitation that can be used to guide initiation and/or termination of newly born resuscitation?

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Examples of Similarities and Minor Differences in Recommendations for Newly Born ALS Among the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics (AHA/AAP), the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC), the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa (RCSA), and the Australian Resuscitation Council (ARC)

    SUMMARY

    Scientific justification of each component of current resuscitation council guidelines is difficult because of the paucity of outcome data specifically addressing interventions in the newly born. Rapid transitions from intrauterine to extrauterine physiology further complicate the interpretation of findings and make education of trained birth attendants more complex. Assessment, stimulation, and provision of the first breaths of life are simultaneous critical steps in initial resuscitation of the newly born. The ILCOR advisory statement on pediatric resuscitation6 highlighted areas of consensus, conflict, or controversy and provided recommendations of the working group after consideration and debate of the relevant international resuscitation literature in the areas of pediatric BLS, pediatric ALS, and BLS for the newly born. In the present document, the ILCOR Pediatric Working Group, joined by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program Steering Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, and World Health Organization, extends its advisory recommendations beyond BLS to ALS for the newly born. Careful review and comparison of current guidelines from constituent organizations and current international literature form the basis for initial evidence-based discussion of critical resuscitative interventions. A high degree of uniformity exists in current guidelines for resuscitation of newly born infants at birth, with controversies arising mostly from local and regional preferences, training networks, customs, and equipment/medication availability rather than scientific evidence. Areas of active research and evolving controversy (eg, induced cerebral hypothermia in birth asphyxia, if and when to suction meconium) are identified. Evidence-based evaluation of these advisory statements and the impact of their implementation on newly born, neonatal, and pediatric resuscitation training and resuscitation outcomes will be topics of discussion at future international resuscitation guideline conferences.

    PEDIATRIC AND NEONATAL ILCOR PARTICIPANTS AND EXPERT REVIEWERS

    Walter Kloeck, MD; Efraim Kramer, MD; Jelka Zupan, MD; Amelia Reis, MD; David Burchfield, MD; David Boyle, MD; Waldemar Carlo, MD; Linda McCollum, RN; Susan E. Denson, MD; Martha Mullett, MD; Alfonso Solimano, MD; Michael Speer, MD; Jeffrey Perlman, MD; Robert Berg, MD; Robert Hickey, MD; Amy Davis, RN; Jay Deshpande, MD; Thomas Terndrup, MD; Lisa Carlson, RN; Mary E. Fallat, MD; Dianne Atkins, MD; Sally Reynolds, MD; Charles Schleien, MD; Tres Scherer, MD; Pip Mason; Petter Steen, MD; Richard O. Cummins, MD; Mary Fran Hazinski, RN, MSN; and Jerry Potts, PhD.

    APPENDIX 1

    Examples of Risk Factors Associated With the Need for Resuscitation in the Newly Born Infant

    Maternal

    Premature/prolonged rupture of membranes

    Bleeding in second or third trimester

    Severe pregnancy-induced hypertension

    Chronic hypertension

    Substance abuse

    Pharmacologic therapy (eg, lithium, magnesium, adrenergic blocking agents)

    Diabetes mellitus

    Chronic illness (eg, anemia, cyanotic congenital heart disease)

    Maternal infection

    Heavy sedation

    Previous fetal or neonatal death

    No prenatal care

    Fetal

    Multiple gestation

    Preterm gestation (especially <35 weeks)

    Postterm gestation (≥42 weeks)

    Size-date discrepancy

    Growth restriction (retardation)

    Rhesus isoimmunization/hydrops fetalis

    Polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios

    Reduced fetal movement before onset of labor

    Congenital abnormalities

    Intrauterine infection

    Intrapartum

    Fetal distress

    Abnormal presentation

    Prolapsed cord

    Prolonged rupture of the membranes

    Prolonged labor (or prolonged second stage of labor)

    Precipitous labor

    Antepartum hemorrhage (abruptio placenta, placenta previa)

    Thick meconium staining of amniotic fluid

    Nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns

    Narcotic administration to mother within 4 hours of delivery

    Forceps delivery

    Vacuum-assisted (Ventouse) delivery

    Cesarean section

    APPENDIX 2

    Recommended Equipment and Drugs for Resuscitation of the Newly Born Infant

    Equipment

    Firm, padded resuscitation surface

    Overhead warmer or other heat source

    Light source

    Clock (timer optional)

    Warmed linens (infant hat optional)

    Stethoscope

    Suction catheter (6F, 8F, 10F, 12F)

    Meconium suction device (to apply suction directly to endotracheal tube)

    Feeding tube (8F) and 20-mL syringe for gastric decompression

    Oxygen supply (flow rate of up to 10 L/min) with flowmeter and tubing

    Portable oxygen cylinders

    Face masks (various sizes)

    Oropharyngeal airways (sizes 0 and 00)

    Resuscitation system for positive-pressure  ventilation (any one)

     Face mask with T-piece

     Face mask with self-inflating bag and oxygen reservoir

     Face mask with flow-inflating bag, valve, and manometer

    Laryngeal mask airway (optional)

    Laryngoscopes with straight blade, spare bulbs, and batteries

    Endotracheal tubes (sizes 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4 mm ID)

    Stylet

    Supplies for fixation of endotracheal tubes and IVs (eg, scissors, tape, alcohol sponges)

    Feeding tube or umbilical catheter (5F) shortened for surfactant administration

    Umbilical vein catheterization tray

    Syringes with needles (assorted sizes)

    IV cannulas (assorted sizes)

    Electrocardiograph with cardiotachometer (optional)

    Pulse oximeter (optional)

    End-tidal CO2 indicator (optional confirmation for intubation)

    Drugs

    Epinephrine: 1:10 000 concentration (0.1 mg/mL)

    Volume expanders: Normal saline, 4% to 5% albumin-saline, Ringer's lactate, blood

    Naloxone hydrochloride: 1.0 mg/mL or 0.4 mg/mL solution

    Sodium bicarbonate: 0.5 mEq/mL solution (4.2% concentration)

    Dextrose: 5% and 10% solutions

    Footnotes

      • Received January 14, 1999.
      • Accepted January 14, 1999.
    • Reprint requests to (J.K.) University of Virginia Health System, Department of Pediatrics, Box 386, Charlottesville, VA 22908.

    • “Resuscitation of the Newly Born Infant” is being copublished in Circulation, Pediatrics, Resuscitation,and European Journal of Pediatrics. Joint copyright is held by the American Heart Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, European Resuscitation Council, and Springer-Verlag.

    REFERENCES

    1. ↵
      1. Cummins RO,
      2. Chamberlain DA,
      3. Abramson NS,
      4. et al.
      (1991) Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Utstein style. A statement for health professionals from a task force of the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Australian Resuscitation Council. Circulation. 84:960–975.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. Cummins RO,
      2. Chamberlain DA,
      3. Hazinski MF,
      4. et al.
      (1997) Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: the in-hospital “Utstein style.” A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Australian Resuscitation Council, and the Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa. Circulation. 95:2213–2239.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Zaritsky A,
      2. Nadkarni V,
      3. Hazinski MF,
      4. et al.
      (1995) Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of pediatric advanced life support: the pediatric Utstein style. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Heart Association, and the European Resuscitation Council. Circulation. 92:2006–2020.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      1. Idris AH,
      2. Becker LB,
      3. Ornato JP,
      4. et al.
      (1996) Utstein-style guidelines for uniform reporting of laboratory CPR research. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the American Heart Association, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American College of Cardiology, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Institute of Critical Care Medicine, the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation. 94:2324–2336.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Cummins RO,
      2. Chamberlain DA
      (1997) Advisory statements of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation. 95:2172–2273.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Nadkarni V,
      2. Hazinski MF,
      3. Zideman D,
      4. et al.
      (1997) Pediatric resuscitation: an advisory statement from the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation. 95:2185–2195.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and Subcommittees of the American Heart Association
      (1992) Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care, IV: pediatric basic life support. JAMA. 268:2276–2281.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      Bloom RS, Cropley C, for the AHA/AAP Neonatal Resuscitation Program Steering Committee. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 1994
    9. ↵
      Kloeck WGJ, Kramer E. Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa guidelines: new recommendations for BLS in adults, children and infants. Trauma Emerg Med. 1997;14:13–31:40–67
    10. ↵
      Advanced Life Support Committee of the Australian Resuscitation Council. Pediatric advanced life support: Australian Resuscitation Council guidelines. Advanced Life Support Committee of the Australian Resuscitation Council. Med J Aust. 1996;165:199–201, 204–206
    11. ↵
      1. European Resuscitation Council
      (1998) Pediatric basic life support: to be read in conjunction with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Pediatric Working Group Advisory Statement (April 1997). Resuscitation. 37:97–100.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. European Resuscitation Council
      (1998) Pediatric advanced life support: to be read in conjunction with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Pediatric Working Group Advisory Statement (April 1997). Resuscitation. 37:101–102.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. European Resuscitation Council
      (1998) Recommendations on resuscitation of babies at birth: to be read in conjunction with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Pediatric Working Group Advisory Statement (April 1997). Resuscitation. 37:103–110.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Saugstad OD
      (1998) Practical aspects of resuscitating newborn infants. Eur J Pediatr. 157((suppl 1)):S11–S15.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Palme-Kilander C
      (1992) Methods of resuscitation in low-Apgar-score newborn infants: a national survey. Acta Pediatr. 81:739–744.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      World Health Report, 1995. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1997:21
    17. ↵
      1. Vyas H,
      2. Milner AD,
      3. Hopkin IE,
      4. Boon AW
      (1981) Physiologic responses to prolonged slow-rise inflation in the resuscitation of the asphyxiated newborn infant. J Pediatr. 99:635–639.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Vyas H,
      2. Field D,
      3. Milner AD,
      4. Hopkin IE
      (1986) Determinants of the first inspiratory volume and functional residual capacity at birth. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2:189–193.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      Jobe A. The respiratory system. In: Fanaroff AA, Martin RJ, eds. Neonatal Perinatal Medicine. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1997:991–1018
    20. ↵
      1. Gregory GA,
      2. Gooding CA,
      3. Phibbs RH,
      4. Tooley WH
      (1974) Meconium aspiration in infants: a prospective study. J Pediatr. 85:848–852.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      Peliowski A, Finer NN. Birth asphyxia in the term infant. In: Sinclair JC, Bracken MB, eds. Effective Care of the Newborn Infant. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1992:249–273
    22. ↵
      1. Cave P,
      2. Fletcher G
      (1968) Resistance of nasotracheal tubes used in infants. Anesthesiology. 29:588–590.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Hatch DJ
      (1978) Tracheal tubes and connectors used in neonates: dimensions and resistance to breathing. Br J Anaesth. 50:959–964.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Ginsberg HG,
      2. Goldsmith JP
      (1998) Controversies in neonatal resuscitation. Clin Perinatol. 25:1–15.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Gandy GM,
      2. Adamson SK Jr,
      3. Cunningham N,
      4. Silverman WA,
      5. James LS
      (1964) Thermal environment and acid-base homeostasis in human infants during the first few hours of life. J Clin Invest. 43:751–758.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Dahm LS,
      2. James LS
      (1972) Newborn temperature and calculated heat loss in the delivery room. Pediatrics. 49:504–513.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      Vannucci RC, Perlman JM. Interventions for perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 1997:100:1004–1014
    28. ↵
      1. Edwards AD,
      2. Wyatt JS,
      3. Thoreson M
      (1998) Treatment of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage by moderate hypothermia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 78:F85–F88.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      1. Gunn AJ,
      2. Gluckman PD,
      3. Gunn TR
      (1998) Selective head cooling in newborn infants after perinatal asphyxia: a safety study. Pediatrics. 102:885–892.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      Dawes GF. Fetal and Neonatal Physiology: A Comparative Study of the Changes at Birth. Chicago, IL: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1968:149–151
    31. ↵
      1. Whitelaw CC,
      2. Goldsmith LJ
      (1997) Comparison of two techniques for determining the presence of a pulse in an infant. Acad Emerg Med. 4:153–154. Letter.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Theophilopoulos DT,
      2. Burchfield DJ
      (1998) Accuracy of different methods for heart rate determination during simulated neonatal resuscitation. J Perinatol. 18:65–67.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Cordero L Jr,
      2. Hon EH
      (1971) Neonatal bradycardia following nasopharyngeal suction. J Pediatr. 78:441–447.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Carson BS,
      2. Losey RW,
      3. Bowes WA Jr,
      4. Simmons MA
      (1976) Combined obstetric and pediatric approach to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 126:712–715.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Greenough A
      (1995) Meconium aspiration syndrome: prevention and treatment. Early Hum Dev. 41:183–192.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Wiswell TE,
      2. Bent RC
      (1993) Meconium staining and the meconium aspiration syndrome: unresolved issues. Pediatr Clin North Am. 40:955–981.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    37. ↵
      1. Wiswell TE,
      2. for the Meconium in the Delivery Room Trial Group
      (1998) Delivery room management of the apparently vigorous meconium-stained neonate: results of the multicenter collaborative trial. Pediatr Res. 43:203A. Abstract.
      OpenUrl
    38. ↵
      1. Linder N,
      2. Aranda JV,
      3. Tsur M,
      4. et al.
      (1988) Need for endotracheal intubation and suction in meconium-stained neonates. J Pediatr. 112:613–615.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    39. ↵
      Saugstad OD, Rootwell T, Aalen O. Resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn infants with room air or oxygen: an international controlled trial: the Resair 2 Study. Pediatrics. 1998;102(1). URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/102/1/e1
    40. ↵
      1. Lundstrøm KE,
      2. Pryds O,
      3. Greisen G
      (1995) Oxygen at birth and prolonged cerebral vasoconstriction in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 73:F81–F86.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    41. ↵
      1. Ramji S,
      2. Ahuja S,
      3. Thirupuram S,
      4. Rootwelt T,
      5. Rooth G,
      6. Saugstad OD
      (1993) Resuscitation of asphyxic newborn infants with room air or 100% oxygen. Pediatr Res. 34:809–812.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    42. ↵
      1. Gamboa R,
      2. Marticorena E
      (1971) Pulmonary artery pressure in the newborn at high altitude. Arch Inst Biol Andina. 4:55–66.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    43. ↵
      1. Hoskyns EW,
      2. Milner AD,
      3. Hopkin IE
      (1987) A simple method of face mask resuscitation at birth. Arch Dis Child 62:376–378.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    44. ↵
      1. Palme C,
      2. Nystrom B,
      3. Tunell R
      (1985) An evaluation of the efficiency of face masks in the resuscitation of the newborn infant. Lancet. 1:207–210.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    45. ↵
      1. Kanter RK
      (1987) Evaluation of mask-bag ventilation in resuscitation of infants. Am J Dis Child. 141:761–763.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    46. ↵
      1. Milner AD,
      2. Stokes GM,
      3. Tunell R,
      4. McKeugh M,
      5. Martin H
      (1992) Laboratory assessment of Laerdal mouth tube mask prototype resuscitation device. Med Biol Eng Comput. 30:117–119.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    47. ↵
      1. Massawe A,
      2. Kilewo C,
      3. Irani S,
      4. et al.
      (1996) Assessment of mouth-to-mask ventilation in resuscitation of asphyxic newborn babies: a pilot study. Trop Med Int Health. 1:865–873.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    48. ↵
      1. Paterson SJ,
      2. Byrne PJ,
      3. Molesky MG,
      4. Seal RF,
      5. Finucane BT
      (1994) Neonatal resuscitation using the laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology. 80:1248–1253.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    49. ↵
      1. Todres ID,
      2. deBros F,
      3. Kramer SS,
      4. Moylan FM,
      5. Shannon DC
      (1976) Endotracheal tube displacement in the newborn infant. J Pediatr. 89:126–127.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    50. ↵
      1. Rotschild A,
      2. Chitayat D,
      3. Puterman ML,
      4. Phang MS,
      5. Ling E,
      6. Baldwin V
      (1991) Optimal positioning of endotracheal tubes for ventilation of preterm infants. Am J Dis Child. 145:1007–1012.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    51. ↵
      1. Rich GF,
      2. Sconzo JM
      (1991) Continuous end-tidal CO2 sampling within the proximal endotracheal tube estimates arterial CO2 tension in infants. Can J Anaesth. 38:201–203.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    52. ↵
      1. Rozycki HJ,
      2. Sysyn GD,
      3. Marshall MK,
      4. Malloy R,
      5. Wiswell TE
      (1998) Mainstream end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 101:648–653.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    53. ↵
      1. Orlowski JP
      (1986) Optimum position for external cardiac compression in infants and young children. Ann Emerg Med. 15:667–673.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    54. ↵
      1. Phillips GW,
      2. Zideman DA
      (1986) Relation of infant heart to sternum: its significance in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lancet. 1:1024–1025.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    55. ↵
      1. Thaler MM,
      2. Stobie GHC
      (1963) An improved technique of external cardiac compression in infants and young children. N Engl J Med. 269:606–610.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    56. ↵
      1. David R
      (1988) Closed chest cardiac massage in the newborn infant. Pediatrics. 81:552–554.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    57. ↵
      1. Todres ID,
      2. Rogers MC
      (1975) Methods of external cardiac massage in the newborn infant. J Pediatr. 86:781–782.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    58. ↵
      1. Ishimine P,
      2. Menegazzi J,
      3. Weinstein D
      (1998) Evaluation of two-thumb chest compression with thoracic squeeze in a swine model of infant cardiac arrest. Acad Emerg Med. 5:397. Abstract.
      OpenUrl
    59. ↵
      1. Slywka B,
      2. Whitelaw C,
      3. Goldsmith L
      (1998) Comparison of the two-finger vs the two-thumb method of chest compressions. Acad Emerg Med. 5:397. Abstract.
      OpenUrl
    60. ↵
      1. Houri PK,
      2. Frank LR,
      3. Menegazzi JJ,
      4. Taylor R
      (1997) A randomized controlled trial of two-thumb vs two-finger chest compression in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care 1:65–67.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    61. ↵
      1. Burchfield DJ,
      2. Berkowitz ID,
      3. Berg RA,
      4. Goldberg RN
      (1993) Medications in neonatal resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med. 22:435–439.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    62. ↵
      1. Sims DG,
      2. Heal CA,
      3. Bartle SM
      (1994) The use of adrenaline and atropine in neonatal resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 70:F3–F10.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    63. ↵
      1. Nakanishi T,
      2. Seguchi M,
      3. Tsuchiya T,
      4. Yasukouchi S,
      5. Takao A
      (1990) Effect of acidosis on intracellular pH and calcium concentration in the newborn and adult rabbit myocardium. Circ Res. 67:111–123.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    64. ↵
      1. Chen F,
      2. Wetzel GT,
      3. Friedman WF,
      4. Klitzner TS
      (1996) Developmental changes in the effects of pH on contraction and Ca2+ current in rabbit heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 28:635–642.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    65. ↵
      1. Hein HA
      (1993) The use of sodium bicarbonate in neonatal resuscitation: help or harm? Pediatrics. 91:496–497.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    66. ↵
      1. Jonmarker C,
      2. Olsson AK,
      3. Jögi P,
      4. Forsell C
      (1996) Hemodynamic effects of tracheal and intravenous adrenaline in infants with congenital heart anomalies. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 40:927–931.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    67. ↵
      1. Lindemann R
      (1984) Resuscitation of the newborn: endotracheal administration of epinephrine. Acta Paediatr Scand. 73:210–212.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    68. ↵
      1. Lucas VW,
      2. Preziosi MP,
      3. Burchfield DJ
      (1994) Epinephrine absorption following endotracheal administration: effects of hypoxia-induced low pulmonary blood flow. Resuscitation. 27:31–34.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    69. ↵
      1. Mullett CJ,
      2. Kong JQ,
      3. Romano JT,
      4. Polak MJ
      (1992) Age-related changes in pulmonary venous epinephrine concentration and pulmonary vascular response after intratracheal epinephrine. Pediatr Res. 31:458–461.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    70. ↵
      1. Hornchen U,
      2. Lussi C,
      3. Schuttler J
      (1993) Potential risks of high-dose epinephrine for resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation in a porcine model. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 7:184–187.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    71. ↵
      1. Usher R,
      2. Lind J
      (1965) Blood volume of the newborn premature infant. Acta Paediatr Scand. 54:419–431.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    72. ↵
      1. Funato M,
      2. Tamai H,
      3. Noma K,
      4. et al.
      (1992) Clinical events in association with timing of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 121:614–619.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    73. ↵
      1. Papile LA,
      2. Burstein J,
      3. Burstein R,
      4. Koffler H,
      5. Koops B
      (1978) Relationship of intravenous sodium bicarbonate infusions and cerebral intraventricular hemorrhage. J Pediatr. 93:834–836.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    74. ↵
      1. Poets CF,
      2. Sens B
      (1996) Changes in intubation rates and outcome of very low birth weight infants: a population study. Pediatrics. 98:24–27.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    75. ↵
      1. Avery ME,
      2. Tooley WH,
      3. Keller JB,
      4. et al.
      (1987) Is chronic lung disease in low birth weight infants preventable? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics. 79:26–30.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    76. ↵
      1. Kattwinkel J
      (1998) Surfactant: evolving issues. Clin Perinatol. 25:17–32.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    77. ↵
      1. Byrne PJ,
      2. Tyebkhan JM,
      3. Laing LM
      (1994) Ethical decision-making and neonatal resuscitation. Semin Perinatol. 18:36–41.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    78. ↵
      1. Davies JM,
      2. Reynolds BM
      (1992) The ethics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, I: background to decision making. Arch Dis Child. 67:1498–1501.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    79. ↵
      1. Landwirth J
      (1993) Ethical issues in pediatric and neonatal resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med. 22:502–507.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    80. ↵
      1. Davis DJ
      (1993) How aggressive should delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation be for extremely low birth weight neonates? Pediatrics. 92:447–450.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    81. ↵
      1. Sood S,
      2. Giacoia GP
      (1992) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in very low birthweight infants. Am J Perinatol. 9:130–133.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    82. ↵
      1. Jain L,
      2. Ferre C,
      3. Vidyasagar D,
      4. Nath S,
      5. Sheftel D
      (1991) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of apparently stillborn infants: survival and long-term outcome. J Pediatr. 118:778–782.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    83. ↵
      1. Lantos JD,
      2. Miles SH,
      3. Silverstein MD,
      4. Stocking CB
      (1988) Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in babies of very low birth weight: is CPR futile therapy? N Engl J Med. 318:91–95.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    84. ↵
      1. Apgar V,
      2. James LS
      (1962) Further observations of the newborn scoring system. Am J Dis Child. 104:419–428.
      OpenUrl
    85. ↵
      1. Chamberlain G,
      2. Banks J
      (1974) Assessment of the Apgar score. Lancet. 2:1225–1228.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    • Copyright © 1999 American Academy of Pediatrics
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics
    Vol. 103, Issue 4
    1 Apr 1999
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    An Advisory Statement From the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    An Advisory Statement From the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    John Kattwinkel, Susan Niermeyer, Vinay Nadkarni, James Tibballs, Barbara Phillips, David Zideman, Patrick Van Reempts, Martin Osmond
    Pediatrics Apr 1999, 103 (4) e56; DOI: 10.1542/peds.103.4.e56

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    An Advisory Statement From the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    John Kattwinkel, Susan Niermeyer, Vinay Nadkarni, James Tibballs, Barbara Phillips, David Zideman, Patrick Van Reempts, Martin Osmond
    Pediatrics Apr 1999, 103 (4) e56; DOI: 10.1542/peds.103.4.e56
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • PURPOSE
      • BACKGROUND
      • ANTICIPATION OF RESUSCITATION NEED
      • TECHNIQUES OF RESUSCITATION
      • SPECIAL RESUSCITATION CIRCUMSTANCES
      • POSTRESUSCITATION ISSUES
      • ETHICS
      • DOCUMENTATION OF RESUSCITATION
      • AREAS OF CONTROVERSY AND NEED FOR ADDITIONAL RESEARCH
      • SUMMARY
      • PEDIATRIC AND NEONATAL ILCOR PARTICIPANTS AND EXPERT REVIEWERS
      • APPENDIX 1
      • APPENDIX 2
      • Footnotes
      • REFERENCES
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • A randomised trial of placing preterm infants on their back or left side after birth
    • Advances in neonatal resuscitation: supporting transition
    • Improved techniques reduce face mask leak during simulated neonatal resuscitation: study 2
    • Outcomes following prolonged preterm premature rupture of the membranes
    • Pinching, electrocution, ravens' beaks, and positive pressure ventilation: a brief history of neonatal resuscitation.
    • Neonatal resuscitation 2: an evaluation of manual ventilation devices and face masks
    • Does the use of 50% oxygen at birth in preterm infants reduce lung injury?
    • Neonatal resuscitation 1: a model to measure inspired and expired tidal volumes and assess leakage at the face mask
    • Neonatal resuscitation 3: manometer use in a model of face mask ventilation
    • Neonatal Resuscitation: Beyond the Basics
    • The laryngeal mask airway: potential applications in neonates
    • Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial
    • Evaluation of the role of the neonatal nurse practitioner in resuscitation of preterm infants at birth
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Overview of the Evidence
    • Technical Report: Reduction of the Influenza Burden in Children
    • Spontaneous Arousals in Supine Infants While Swaddled and Unswaddled During Rapid Eye Movement and Quiet Sleep
    Show more ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Fetus/Newborn Infant
      • Fetus/Newborn Infant
      • Neonatology

    Keywords

    • resuscitation
    • newborn
    • birth
    • neonatal resuscitation
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors/Reviewers
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Open Access
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    • RSS
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics