Skip to main content
Skip to main content

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search »

User menu

  • Login
  • AAP Policy
  • Topic/Program Collections
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Alerts
  • Subscribe
  • aap.org

Menu

  • AAP Grand Rounds
  • AAP News
  • Hospital Pediatrics
  • NeoReviews
  • Pediatrics
  • Pediatrics in Review
  • Current AAP Policy
  • Journal CME
  • AAP Career Center
  • Pediatric Collections
  • AAP Journals Catalog

Sections

    • Login
    • AAP Policy
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Alerts
    • Subscribe
    • aap.org

    Get Involved! Pediatrics is accepting nominations for Editorial Board positions.

    Sign up for Insight Alerts highlighting editor-chosen studies with the greatest impact on clinical care.
    Video Abstracts -- brief videos summarizing key findings of new articles
     

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    Tools and Links

    Pediatrics
    September 2016, VOLUME 138 / ISSUE 3
    Special Article

    Evidence-Informed Expert Recommendations for the Management of Celiac Disease in Children

    John Snyder, J. Decker Butzner, Amy R. DeFelice, Alessio Fasano, Stefano Guandalini, Edwin Liu, Kimberly P. Newton
    • Article
    • Figures & Data
    • Supplemental
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments
    Loading
    Download PDF

    Abstract

    Although the need for effective long-term follow-up for patients with celiac disease (CD) has been recognized by many expert groups, published practice guidelines have not provided a clear approach for the optimal management of these patients. In an attempt to provide a thoughtful and practical approach for managing these patients, a group of experts in pediatric CD performed a critical review of the available literature in 6 categories associated with CD to develop a set of best practices by using evidence-based data and expert opinion. The 6 categories included the following: bone health, hematologic issues, endocrine problems, liver disease, nutritional issues, and testing. Evidence was assessed by using standardized criteria for evaluating the quality of the data, grade of evidence, and strength of conclusions. Over 600 publications were reviewed, and 172 were chosen for inclusion. The thorough review of the results demonstrated that the quality of the data available was often insufficient to provide unequivocal best practices. However, using the available data and the clinical experience of the panel, a practical framework for the management of children with CD was created. These recommendations were developed by our expert panel and do not necessarily reflect the policy of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The potential usefulness of these best practices is underscored by the fact that consensus, measured by the outcome of anonymous voting, was reached by the panel for 24 of the 25 questions. We hope that these best practices may be useful to the pediatric gastroenterology and larger general pediatric communities.

  • Abbreviations:
    ALT —
    alanine aminotransferase
    AST —
    aspartate aminotransferase
    CBC —
    complete blood cell
    CD —
    celiac disease
    ESPGHAN —
    European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
    GFD —
    gluten-free diet
    Ig —
    immunoglobulin
    MNT —
    medical nutritional therapy
    NASPGHAN —
    North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
    T1DM —
    type 1 diabetes mellitus
    tTG —
    tissue transglutaminase
  • Celiac disease (CD) is a systemic immune-mediated illness triggered by gluten in genetically susceptible persons and affects ∼1% of the world’s population.1–4 Although great progress has been made in the diagnosis and management of CD in recent years,1–6 important problems still exist. One of the most pressing is the lack of effective long-term management programs to optimize the treatment of CD and the diagnosis and management of associated disease states.7,8 The need for effective long-term follow-up to improve compliance and outcomes for patients with CD has been recognized by many expert groups for several reasons.3–6 Patients with CD who do not carefully adhere to the gluten-free diet (GFD) appear to have an increased risk of mortality and lower quality of life assessments.9–11 In addition, patients with CD often have important nutritional deficiencies and are at increased risk for a variety of associated diseases.1–4

    Despite this clearly recognized need for effective follow-up for CD, recent reports indicate that such optimal follow-up care is not being provided.7,8 Although many practice guidelines have been published in North America and Europe,3–6,12 they have not generated a consensus on when and how to provide effective management of these patients. This is likely due to the fact that few evidence-based data were available to support such management guidelines. The absence of clear recommendations on management may also have been influenced by the extremely dynamic nature of the field of gluten-related disorders in general, and of CD in particular. To help address these issues, a best practices conference was convened to review the available evidence and to provide recommendations about how to follow-up these patients. These recommendations were developed by our expert panel and do not necessarily reflect the policy of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

    Methods

    Six acknowledged experts in pediatric CD were chosen to provide a thorough assessment of the data and to develop best practices in 6 topic areas: bone disease, endocrine problems, hematologic issues, liver issues, nutritional problems, and testing to monitor CD activity. The assignment of 1 panel member to each topic area was made by the organizer and moderator (Dr Snyder) based on that person’s recognized knowledge of the topic and was made in consultation with North American senior experts in pediatric gastroenterology who were not part of the panel. Each panel member researched and summarized their topic area. The panel met and thoroughly reviewed each topic before evaluating and voting on each best practice. In addition to their expertise, the panel members were chosen to provide a geographic representation of the major pediatric CD programs in the United States and Canada. The number of experts chosen was also influenced by logistic and financial considerations because the project was funded by a nonrestricted grant from a nonprofit organization, the Celiac Disease Program of Children’s National Health System. The meeting was convened at Children’s National Health Center in Washington, DC, on January 25 and 26, 2013. The goal was to provide a critical review of the management of pediatric CD in North America and to develop a practical set of best practices for the Children's National Health System Celiac Program by using evidence-based data and expert opinion.

    Literature Search and Grading the Articles for Quality of Evidence

    Each expert completed a thorough literature search combining the term “celiac disease” with multiple terms specific to their section using accessible databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, BioSciences Information Services Previews, EBM Reviews, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus. The search included publications from 1973 to January 2013 and included publications of all types that presented or reviewed data on CD in patients younger than 20 years old. Publications were assessed by using criteria including study design, sample size, data analysis, synthesis of results, potential bias, and limitations.

    The search identified over 600 unique publications. Of these 600 articles, 172 were included after exclusion of publications that did not present relevant evidence, that did not present sufficient evidence for pediatric patients, or were commentaries, case reports, abstracts, or nonsystematic reviews. Reviews of the literature were used to find additional primary research references and to provide summaries of data, references for pathophysiology, and to point our team to more extensive background reading. Reviews were also used to support introductory statements. The review articles and guidelines are identified in the References. Only original clinical studies were used to develop the “Best Practice” management questions.

    Voting on Best Practice Statements and Grading the Statements for Quality of Evidence

    Details about mechanism for anonymous voting, assessment of quality of data, use of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system to evaluate the available evidence, and strength of recommendation are included in the Supplemental Information, Part 1.13

    Best Practices

    A. Bone Health

    Background

    CD can affect the bone health of children in several ways with a variety of signs and symptoms including bone pain, rickets, tetany, osteomalacia, osteopenia, osteoporosis, fractures associated with minimal trauma, or growth failure with or without symptoms of malabsorption.14–16 With the exception of osteopenia or osteoporosis identified by the evaluation of bone mineral density, these are now rarely the presenting signs and symptoms of CD in children because of the widespread use of CD serological testing to assist in diagnosis.14–16 Initiation of a GFD rapidly restores bone mass to normal levels in almost all children and some adolescents.17–27 Instruction on age-appropriate intake of calcium, vitamin D, and the need for exercise to promote bone health should be provided during nutritional counseling at the time of diagnosis.23,28,29

    Detailed information on the mechanisms of bone injury, bone mineral density, fracture risk, effect of the GFD, and calcium and vitamin D intake are included in the Supplemental Information, Part 2A.14–49

    Best Practice 1

    Should routine screening for bone health by using calcium, PO4, alkaline phosphatase, ± parathyroid hormone (excluding vitamin D) be done routinely for all children being evaluated for CD at the time of diagnosis?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: C

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS: DISAGREE

    • Agree, 2 (29%). 2A

    • Disagree, 5 (71%). 1D-, 3D, 1D+

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: WEAK

    Comment

    With the advent of serological testing, children now present with a variety of milder symptoms and associated conditions.1,5,6 Abnormalities of the above tests most often occur with presentations that are associated with severe malabsorption, prolonged delay in diagnosis, or clinical presentations suggestive of bone disease including bone pain, rickets, osteomalacia, tetany, or fractures caused by minimal trauma.21–28,30,33–35 With these presentations, screening with the tests listed above should be conducted. If abnormalities are detected, patients should be treated with dietary calcium and vitamin D including supplements if necessary.26–30 Annual serial follow-up should be conducted until results normalize.28,33,48

    Best Practice 2

    Should screening for vitamin D status be done routinely for all children being evaluated for CD at the time of diagnosis?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: C

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: LOW

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS: AGREE

    • Agree, 5 (71%). 1A+, 3A, 1A-

    • Disagree, 2 (29%). 2D

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: WEAK

    Comment

    Small case-control studies exist that differ in patient age, geographic location, time of year of measurement, clinical presentation, and results. Some demonstrate vitamin D deficiency.18,25,27,30,35 Furthermore, many children and adolescents do not receive adequate dietary calcium or vitamin D.26,28–30 Additional data on vitamin D status for children and adolescents with CD from multiple geographic areas across North America that control for sunlight exposure are needed to further define which children require vitamin D testing.

    Best Practice 3

    Should screening using imaging studies (bone density) evaluating bone health be done routinely for all children and adolescents with CD when they are seen at 1-year follow-up?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: C

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS: DISAGREE

    • Agree, 1 (14%). 1A+

    • Disagree, 6 (86%). 5D-, 1D+

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: WEAK

    Comment

    When CD is diagnosed at a young age with a short duration of symptoms, bone density recovers rapidly and completely to normal values for age and size.17–21,23–27 Routine follow-up bone density testing is not required or cost-effective. More data about bone density recovery in adolescents with various presentations of CD on a strict GFD are required. Abnormalities of bone density are likely to occur with presentations that are associated with severe malabsorption, prolonged delay in diagnosis, or clinical presentations suggestive of bone disease, including bone pain, rickets, osteomalacia, tetany, or fractures caused by minimal trauma. With these presentations, bone mineral density is the test of choice to obtain at diagnosis. If abnormalities are detected, serial follow-up every 1 to 2 years should be conducted until results normalize.28,33,48 This is especially true for adolescents where recovery may be slower and dietary compliance may be more problematic.

    Best Practice 4

    Should instructions on age-appropriate intake of calcium and vitamin D, including information on the impact of geographic region and season of the year, be provided during the initial GFD counseling?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: HIGH

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS: AGREE

    • Agree, 7. 4A+, 2A, 1A-

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    Data from multiple geographic regions demonstrate that children and adolescents consume diets deficient in vitamin D and calcium.26,28,29,35,36 Additional studies have revealed that recovery of bone mineral density will occur in children if a GFD with adequate nutrition is provided.17–21,23–27 In some geographic areas, this can be accomplished by GFD alone. However, in other areas, vitamin D supplementation will likely be required.23,28,29

    Best Practice 5

    Should screening using imaging studies (bone density) to evaluate bone health be done routinely for selected patients with CD who do not adhere to a GFD?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: HIGH

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS: AGREE

    • Agree, 7 (100%). 4A+, 3A

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    Maximum bone density is accrued in adolescence, late teens, and early 20s, the ages when adherence to a GFD is most difficult.25,28,48 At these ages, symptoms may not develop with poor dietary control and a reduction in bone density may occur that increases fracture risk and can result in early onset osteoporosis. If abnormalities in bone mineral density are identified, caregivers should provide an explanation of increased risk of bone disease, as well as dietary counseling, which includes instructions about calcium and vitamin D intake and supplementation.

    B. Hematologic Problems

    Background

    CD has been associated with a variety of hematologic disorders, of which anemia is by far the most common. In fact, anemia may be the only clinical abnormality identified in many patients and can be the presenting feature of CD, especially in older children and adults.50–54 Anemia in children with CD can be the end result of several different, and sometimes interrelated causes; however, the single most common type of anemia is iron deficiency.50

    Detailed information on anemia, folate deficiency, vitamin B12 deficiency, anemia of chronic disease, platelet abnormalities, thromboembolic problems, coagulation abnormalities, immunoglobulin (Ig)A deficiency, and splenic dysfunction are included in the Supplemental Information, Part 2B.50–72

    Best Practice 6

    Should screening for anemia using a combination of tests including a complete blood cell (CBC) count (CBC plus evaluation of mean cell volume), ferritin, iron, and total iron-binding capacity be done routinely for all children being evaluated for CD at the time of diagnosis?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B+

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: HIGH

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS: AGREE

    • Agree, 7. 2A+, 3A, 2A-

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    There is abundant evidence in the literature about the prevalence of anemia, especially iron-deficient, in children with CD at the time of diagnosis.50–53,58 This group unanimously supports the measurement of “iron studies” as reported above as an appropriate screening tool, in light of the possible need for replacement.

    Best Practice 7

    Should a CBC count be obtained routinely for all children undergoing follow-up evaluation for CD?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: C+

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: LOW

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS: AGREE

    • Agree, 6 (86%). 1A+, 3A, 2A-

    • Disagree, 1 (14%). 1D+

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: WEAK

    Comment

    Although a consensus was reached by our group on the question, the evidence to support this position comes from studies of small populations, comprising a variety of ages and clinical presentations.50–53

    Best Practice 8

    Should screening for folate deficiency be done routinely for all children being evaluated for CD at the time of diagnosis?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: C

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: VERY LOW

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS DISAGREE

    • Agree, 2 (29%). 2A-

    • Disagree, 5 (71%). 1D+, 1D, 3D-

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: WEAK

    Comment

    A consensus was reached by our group on the lack of need to routinely test for folate deficiency. However, again the available data come from small, case report studies addressing various ages and clinical presentations.58–60

    C. Endocrine-associated Disorders in CD

    Background

    Endocrine disorders frequently cooccur with CD, primarily due to their shared HLA predisposition, but the association is also affected by shared non-HLA variants.73 Autoimmune thyroid disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are the most common autoimmune diseases that occur with CD but Addison disease, parathyroid disorders, and growth hormone deficiency have also been reported74–76; however, they are much less common.

    The frequency at which CD is diagnosed in individuals with type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroid disorders ranges from 3% to 12% for type 1 diabetes and up to 7% for autoimmune thyroid diseases; this has led expert panels from the 2 largest pediatric gastroenterology societies, North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN), to recommend that CD be routinely screened for in patients with these disorders.5,6 However, the reverse recommendation has not been made because there are insufficient data to support screening for associated endocrine disorders in individuals with an existing diagnosis of CD.

    Nine sets of recent reviews and guidelines, all published since 2005, mention screening for CD in individuals with endocrine disorders such as T1DM and thyroid disease.3–6,77–81 Three also mention screening in individuals with Addison disease.3,78,80 All of these guidelines also recommended additional screening for CD for children with short stature or delayed puberty.

    Detailed information on autoimmune thyroid disease and T1DM are included in the Supplemental Information, Part 2C.73–80,82–98

    Best Practice 9

    Should individuals with CD be screened for T1DM or prediabetes with tests including islet autoantibodies?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS DISAGREE

    • Agree, 0

    • Disagree, 7 (100%). 5 D+, 2D

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    Insufficient data exist to establish the risk of diabetes in this population. Furthermore, because no preventative strategies exist, it is not recommended to screen for a prediabetic state outside of the research setting.95–98

    Best Practice 10

    Given the slightly increased risk of diabetes in individuals with CD, should counseling for signs and symptoms of diabetes be recommended?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: D

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: LOW

    • VOTING: MAJORITY AGREE

    • Agree, 4 (57%). 2A+, 2A

    • Disagree, 3 (43%). 3D

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: WEAK

    Comment

    The recommendation was based on panel’s judgment of the limited risk of counseling. However, evidence for the effectiveness of counseling on preventing morbidity or mortality is not available.

    Best Practice 11

    Should thyroid disease be screened at the time of diagnosis in children with CD?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 7 (100%). 4A+, 3A

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    A significantly elevated overall risk of autoimmune thyroid disease, especially Hashimoto’s disease, exists in those with CD.84–88,90 Screening with thyrotropin is recommended in those with type 1 diabetes, and should be used also in CD.80 The serum thyrotropin assay is accurate and widely available to screen for all common forms of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism. In addition, effective therapies for thyroid disease are available.

    Best Practice 12

    Should thyroid disease be screened for at the time of follow-up evaluation for children with CD?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 6 (86%). 1A+, 4A, 1A-

    • Disagree, 1 (14%). 1D-

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: INTERMEDIATE

    Comment

    Although thyroid disease has been determined to be a coexisting condition, the actual prevalence of thyroid disease in established CD has not been determined.84–88

    Best Practice 13

    Should screening for thyroid disease be performed in children with CD by using antithyroid antibodies?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS DISAGREE

    • Agree, 0

    • Disagree, 7 (100%). 5D+, 1D, 1D-

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    The natural history of thyroid autoimmunity and its relationship with the development of clinical thyroid disease has not been determined.89,90

    D. The Liver and CD

    Background

    The liver can be 1 of the major sites for extraintestinal manifestations of CD. A spectrum of liver abnormalities has been described, ranging from elevated aminotransferases (cryptogenic hypertransaminasemia) to celiac hepatitis to autoimmune liver disease.99–109 Detailed information on celiac hepatitis and response to hepatitis B vaccine are included in the Supplemental Information, Part 2D.99–120

    Best Practice 14

    Should screening for liver disease using tests including aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) be done routinely for all children being evaluated for CD at the time of diagnosis?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: A

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: HIGH

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 5 (71%). 2A+, 1A, 2A-

    • Disagree, 2 (29%). 1D-, 1D

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: MODERATE

    Comment

    Many studies identify celiac hepatitis as a possible presenting sign of CD.99–109 The hepatitis usually resolves with a GFD.

    Best Practice 15

    Should routine screening for hepatitis B immunization status be done for all children being evaluated for CD at the time of diagnosis?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 6 (86%). 2A, 4A-

    • Disagree, 1 (14%). 1D

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: MODERATE

    Comment

    The current literature estimates that 30% to 70% of patients with CD are nonresponsive to hepatitis B vaccine before treatment.112–120 If this is accurate, a serious public health concern exists. More large-scale studies are needed to validate this estimate.

    E. Nutritional Problems and CD

    Background

    Nutritional problems in CD can occur as a result of intestinal inflammation from the disease process itself and as a consequence of medical nutritional therapy (MNT) with the GFD. It is important to consider this dynamic situation, as nutritional issues at the time of diagnosis may change after implementation of the GFD. Detailed information on anthropometric impact, micronutrient impact, and medical nutrition therapy are included in the Supplemental Information, Part 2E.121–155

    Best Practice 16

    Should assessment of height, weight, and BMI or weight for height ratio in children younger than 3 years old be done routinely for all children being evaluated for CD at the time of diagnosis and follow-up?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: HIGH

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 7 (100%). 7A+

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    The assessment of anthropometric parameters is important in all children, but particularly important in children with CD who often have a suboptimal nutritional status at the time of diagnosis.121,123,126–129,131,132 Monitoring response in growth on the GFD is essential to assure normal growth and development.

    Best Practice 17

    Should all children being evaluated and treated for CD have access to an experienced dietitian who is knowledgeable about CD?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: HIGH

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 7 (100%). 7A+

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    The only treatment of CD is MNT with a strict GFD. Therefore, referral to an experienced registered dietitian, knowledgeable about CD, is the optimal way to provide thorough nutritional assessment and education related to the GFD.149,151,155

    Best Practice 18

    Should screening for zinc and other trace elements (besides iron) be routinely obtained for all patients being evaluated for CD at the time of diagnosis?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: C

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS DISAGREE

    • Agree, 0

    • Disagree, 7 (100%). 3D-, 1D, 3D+

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: WEAK

    Comment

    The evidence to support or refute the practice of routine screening for Zn and trace elements is weak, as it comes from studies of small populations, comprising a variety of ages and clinical presentations.139–142 More research is needed.

    Best Practice 19

    Should multivitamin supplementation be offered routinely to all children with CD at the time of diagnosis?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: D

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 7 (100%). 1A+, 2A, 4A-

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: WEAK

    Comment

    Although a consensus was reached by our group on the basis of expert opinion and practice, there are no well-designed studies evaluating the clinical benefit of providing a gluten-free multivitamin to children newly diagnosed with CD.155

    F. Testing and Monitoring

    Diagnostic Tests and Monitoring

    Several tests are used to diagnose and monitor CD, including serologic tests, genetic testing, and histology.1–6 The current diagnostic algorithm for CD includes initial screening serological tests, followed by a confirmatory small intestinal biopsy revealing the autoimmune insult typical of CD in children and adults.3–6 The relative merits of these tests in various situations, including detailed information on initial diagnosis: serology, serology in IgA deficient patients, histology, use of HLA testing, monitoring successful compliance to the GFD, and current guidelines are included in the Supplemental Information, Part 2F.156–172

    Best Practice 20

    Should quantitative IgA and IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody be obtained routinely as the initial screening tests for all children being evaluated for CD?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: HIGH

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 7 (100%). 7A+

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    Most of the studies published, including population studies and studies specifically focused at comparing commercially available assays, report extremely high specificity.156–160 However, well-designed studies to assess sensitivity have not been performed. These studies should be based on the use of endoscopy and histologic analysis as primary standard to validate the sensitivity of these tests.

    Best Practice 21

    Should IgA anti-tTG antibody be obtained for all children diagnosed with CD at periodic intervals after diagnosis to help monitor compliance with the GFD?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 7 (100%). 7A+

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    There have been several reports with variable data revealing that tTG IgA antibody titers tend to decrease or completely return within normal limits after 6 to 12 months after the implementation of a GFD.171,172 However, while tTG IgA ELISA is a validated assay for the diagnosis of CD, this assay has not been validated for monitoring.164

    Best Practice 22

    Should the use of the antiendomysial antibody be limited to patients with comorbidities that increase the chance of false-positive tTG antibodies?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 6 (100%). 1A+, 1A, 4A-

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    There are several reports in the literature revealing that low tTG IgA titers are often detected in patients affected by autoimmune diseases other than CD, including type 1 diabetes and autoimmune liver disease.160,163

    Best Practice 23

    A negative serologic evaluation cannot rule out CD.

    • QUALITY OF DATA: A

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: HIGH

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 6 (100%). 5A+, 1A

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    There is strong evidence in the literature that ∼10% of celiac cases can test falsely negative to the tTG IgA test.160

    Best Practice 24

    Should HLA typing be considered in the evaluation of children at risk for CD who have negative serology?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 5 (83%). 3A+, 2A

    • Disagree, 1 (17%). 1D-

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    Several studies suggested that screening for HLA DQ2/8 in at-risk children, who test negative for tTG IgA antibodies, can be cost-effective in deciding whether to continue (HLA compatible) or not continue (HLA not compatible) monitoring for CD in these children over time.169,170

    Best Practice 25

    Should the use of HLA typing be considered for use in patients regarded as diagnostic dilemmas, including children who have already been placed on a GFD?

    • QUALITY OF DATA: LEVEL B

    • GRADE OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE

    • VOTING: CONSENSUS AGREE

    • Agree, 6 (100%). 4A+, 2A-

    • Disagree, 0

    • STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: STRONG

    Comment

    In the ever growing situation in which children have been placed on a GFD before confirming the diagnosis of CD, the assessment of HLA status can be of great assistance in deciding whether to perform a gluten challenge.1,172

    Summary

    Serious concerns have been raised about the lack of effective long-term management programs to optimize the treatment of CD and the diagnosis and management of associated disease states.7,8 Recent reports indicate that optimal follow-up care is not being provided.7,8 In an attempt to provide thoughtful and effective best practices for managing CD and associated disorders in children, a group of experts in the field were convened to critically review and discuss the available data to provide an evidenced-based approach to optimal care. When the quality of evidence was not sufficient, expert opinion was used.

    The thorough review of the data in these 6 categories of care demonstrated that the quality of the data available is insufficient to provide unequivocal best practices in most areas. However, using the available data and the clinical experience of the panel, we have attempted to provide a practical framework and useful approach to the management of children with CD. The potential usefulness of these best practices is underscored by the fact that consensus, measured by anonymous voting, was reached by the panel for 24 of the 25 questions and that unanimous agreement was found for 15 of the questions. These recommendations, which were developed by our expert panel, do not necessarily reflect the policy of the American Academy of Pediatrics. We hope that these best practices may be useful to the pediatric gastroenterology and larger general pediatric communities.

    A condensed summary of the best practices is found in Table 1.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Summary of Consensus Best Practices

    Acknowledgments

    John Snyder, MD, Chief of the Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition at Children’s National Health System in Washington, DC, passed away suddenly in July, 2016 after sustaining a critical injury in a biking accident while traveling in France.

    Dr Snyder was board certified in pediatrics and pediatric gastroenterology and nationally recognized for his contributions to GI research in areas like H. pylori/ peptic ulcer disease and celiac disease. He developed and led Children’s pre-eminent multidisciplinary pediatric Celiac Disease program and served as Professor of Pediatrics at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dr Snyder also worked extensively in the fields of infant nutrition and international child health. He was part of a team that set the international research priorities to reduce global mortality from childhood diarrhea and a respected international consultant on the use of culturally acceptable, simple, and inexpensive foods and fluids to treat diarrhea and malnutrition in community settings. He published extensively, and was a contributing author to several important textbooks in his field. His passionate advocacy for children was also realized in his work with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization.

    Dr Snyder’s legacy of clinical and research expertise, and his commitment to his patients and to teaching the next generation will continue to inspire his colleagues for many years to come.

    The authors thank Dr Sona Long for her help in researching and evaluating the information in the section on hematology.

    Footnotes

      • Accepted June 23, 2016.
    • Address correspondence to J. Decker Butzner, MD FRCPC, Paediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta, Cananda, T3B 6A8. E-mail: butzner{at}ucalgary.ca
    • The guidelines/recommendations in this article are not American Academy of Pediatrics policy, and publication herein does not imply endorsement.

    • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

    • FUNDING: Supported by an unrestricted grant from the Children’s National Health System’s Celiac Disease Program.

    • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Fasano receives payment for lectures including service on speakers bureaus for Mead Johnson Nutrition, has stock/stock options with Alba Therapeutics, and is a consultant for Pfizer; the other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    • COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2016-1311.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Fasano A,
      2. Catassi C
      . Clinical practice. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(25):2419–2426pmid:23252527
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Schuppan D,
      2. Junker Y,
      3. Barisani D
      . Celiac disease: from pathogenesis to novel therapies. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(6):1912–1933pmid:19766641
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Rostam A,
      2. Murray JA,
      3. Kagnoff MF
      . American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1981–2002pmid:17087937
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Celiac Disease, June 28-30, 2004. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S1–S9pmid:15825115
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Husby S,
      2. Koletzko S,
      3. Korponay-Szabó IR, et al; ESPGHAN Working Group on Coeliac Disease Diagnosis; ESPGHAN Gastroenterology Committee; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition
      . European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(1):136–160pmid:22197856
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Hill ID,
      2. Dirks MH,
      3. Liptak GS, et al; North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
      . Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40(1):1–19pmid:15625418
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      1. Herman ML,
      2. Rubio-Tapia A,
      3. Lahr BD,
      4. Larson JJ,
      5. Van Dyke CT,
      6. Murray JA
      . Patients with celiac disease are not followed up adequately. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(8):893–899.e1pmid:22610009
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Silvester JA,
      2. Rashid M
      . Long-term follow-up of individuals with celiac disease: an evaluation of current practice guidelines. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007;21(9):557–564pmid:17853949
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Fasano A,
      2. Berti I,
      3. Gerarduzzi T, et al
      . Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(3):286–292pmid:12578508
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Biagi F,
      2. Klersy C,
      3. Balduzzi D,
      4. Corazza GR
      . Are we not over-estimating the prevalence of coeliac disease in the general population? Ann Med. 2010;42(8):557–561pmid:20883139
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Mustalahti K,
      2. Catassi C,
      3. Reunanen A, et al; Coeliac EU Cluster, Project Epidemiology
      . The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: results of a centralized, international mass screening project. Ann Med. 2010;42(8):587–595pmid:21070098
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Murch S,
      2. Jenkins H,
      3. Auth M, et al; BSPGHAN
      . Joint BSPGHAN and Coeliac UK guidelines for the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease in children. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(10):806–811
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Guyatt GH,
      2. Oxman AD,
      3. Vist GE, et al; GRADE Working Group
      . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–926pmid:18436948
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Mora S
      . Celiac disease in children: impact on bone health. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2008;9(2):123–130pmid:18247120
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Bianchi ML,
      2. Bardella MT
      . Bone in celiac disease. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(12):1705–1716pmid:18418638
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Bianchi ML
      . Inflammatory bowel diseases, celiac disease, and bone. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;503(1):54–65pmid:20599670
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Scotta MS,
      2. Salvatore S,
      3. Salvatoni A, et al
      . Bone mineralization and body composition in young patients with celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(8):1331–1334pmid:9260800
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      1. Turner J,
      2. Pellerin G,
      3. Mager D
      . Prevalence of metabolic bone disease in children with celiac disease is independent of symptoms at diagnosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49(5):589–593pmid:19644400
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Mora S,
      2. Barera G,
      3. Ricotti A,
      4. Weber G,
      5. Bianchi C,
      6. Chiumello G
      . Reversal of low bone density with a gluten-free diet in children and adolescents with celiac disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67(3):477–481pmid:9497193
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Mora S,
      2. Barera G,
      3. Beccio S, et al
      . Bone density and bone metabolism are normal after long-term gluten-free diet in young celiac patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(2):398–403pmid:10022636
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      1. Barera G,
      2. Beccio S,
      3. Proverbio MC,
      4. Mora S
      . Longitudinal changes in bone metabolism and bone mineral content in children with celiac disease during consumption of a gluten-free diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(1):148–154pmid:14684411
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Mora S,
      2. Barera G,
      3. Beccio S, et al
      . A prospective, longitudinal study of the long-term effect of treatment on bone density in children with celiac disease. J Pediatr. 2001;139(4):516–521pmid:11598597
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      1. Rea F,
      2. Polito C,
      3. Marotta A, et al
      . Restoration of body composition in celiac children after one year of gluten-free diet. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996;23(4):408–412pmid:8956176
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Kavak US,
      2. Yüce A,
      3. Koçak N, et al
      . Bone mineral density in children with untreated and treated celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003;37(4):434–436pmid:14508213
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. Tau C,
      2. Mautalen C,
      3. De Rosa S,
      4. Roca A,
      5. Valenzuela X
      . Bone mineral density in children with celiac disease. Effect of a gluten-free diet. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60(3):358–363pmid:16319837
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      1. Sdepanian VL,
      2. de Miranda Carvalho CN,
      3. de Morais MB,
      4. Colugnati FA,
      5. Fagundes-Neto U
      . Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in children and adolescents with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet in São Paulo, Brazil. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003;37(5):571–576pmid:14581799
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Zanchi C,
      2. Di Leo G,
      3. Ronfani L,
      4. Martelossi S,
      5. Not T,
      6. Ventura A
      . Bone metabolism in celiac disease. J Pediatr. 2008;153(2):262–265pmid:18534236
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    21. ↵
      1. Blazina S,
      2. Bratanic N,
      3. Campa AS,
      4. Blagus R,
      5. Orel R
      . Bone mineral density and importance of strict gluten-free diet in children and adolescents with celiac disease. Bone. 2010;47(3):598–603pmid:20601293
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Mager DR,
      2. Qiao J,
      3. Turner J
      . Vitamin D and K status influences bone mineral density and bone accrual in children and adolescents with celiac disease. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(4):488–495pmid:21970944
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Hartman C,
      2. Hino B,
      3. Lerner A, et al
      . Bone quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density in children with celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;39(5):504–510pmid:15572890
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Tilg H,
      2. Moschen AR,
      3. Kaser A,
      4. Pines A,
      5. Dotan I
      . Gut, inflammation and osteoporosis: basic and clinical concepts. Gut. 2008;57(5):684–694pmid:18408105
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Jansson UH,
      2. Kristiansson B,
      3. Magnusson P,
      4. Larsson L,
      5. Albertsson-Wikland K,
      6. Bjarnason R
      . The decrease of IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3 and bone alkaline phosphatase isoforms during gluten challenge correlates with small intestinal inflammation in children with coeliac disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;144(4):417–423pmid:11275953
      OpenUrlAbstract
    24. ↵
      1. Kalayci AG,
      2. Kansu A,
      3. Girgin N,
      4. Kucuk O,
      5. Aras G
      . Bone mineral density and importance of a gluten-free diet in patients with celiac disease in childhood. Pediatrics. 2001;108(5). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/108/5/e89pmid:11694673
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Szathmári M,
      2. Tulassay T,
      3. Arató A,
      4. Bodánszky H,
      5. Szabó A,
      6. Tulassay Z
      . Bone mineral content and density in asymptomatic children with coeliac disease on a gluten-free diet. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;13(4):419–424pmid:11338073
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Margoni D,
      2. Chouliaras G,
      3. Duscas G, et al
      . Bone health in children with celiac disease assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry: effect of gluten-free diet and predictive value of serum biochemical indices. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(5):680–684pmid:22094895
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Rizzoli R,
      2. Bianchi ML,
      3. Garabédian M,
      4. McKay HA,
      5. Moreno LA
      . Maximizing bone mineral mass gain during growth for the prevention of fractures in the adolescents and the elderly. Bone. 2010;46(2):294–305pmid:19840876
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Bianchi ML
      . Osteoporosis in children and adolescents. Bone. 2007;41(4):486–495pmid:17706477
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Baim S,
      2. Leonard MB,
      3. Bianchi ML, et al
      . Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Position Development Conference. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11(1):6–21pmid:18442749
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Clark EM,
      2. Tobias JH,
      3. Ness AR
      . Association between bone density and fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2006;117(2). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/117/2/e291pmid:16452336
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Jatla M,
      2. Zemel BS,
      3. Bierly P,
      4. Verma R
      . Bone mineral content deficits of the spine and whole body in children at time of diagnosis with celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48(2):175–180pmid:19179879
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Mora S,
      2. Weber G,
      3. Barera G, et al
      . Effect of gluten-free diet on bone mineral content in growing patients with celiac disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;57(2):224–228pmid:8424392
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Olmos M,
      2. Antelo M,
      3. Vazquez H,
      4. Smecuol E,
      5. Mauriño E,
      6. Bai JC
      . Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on the prevalence of fractures in coeliac disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40(1):46–53pmid:18006396
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Ludvigsson JF,
      2. Michaelsson K,
      3. Ekbom A,
      4. Montgomery SM
      . Coeliac disease and the risk of fractures - a general population-based cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(3):273–285pmid:17269989
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Moreno ML,
      2. Vazquez H,
      3. Mazure R, et al
      . Stratification of bone fracture risk in patients with celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(2):127–134pmid:15017617
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Sánchez MI,
      2. Mohaidle A,
      3. Baistrocchi A, et al
      . Risk of fracture in celiac disease: gender, dietary compliance, or both? World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(25):3035–3042pmid:21799650
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Cellier C,
      2. Flobert C,
      3. Cormier C,
      4. Roux C,
      5. Schmitz J
      . Severe osteopenia in symptom-free adults with a childhood diagnosis of coeliac disease. Lancet. 2000;355(9206):806pmid:10711931
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Motta ME,
      2. Faria ME,
      3. Silva GA
      . Prevalence of low bone mineral density in children and adolescents with celiac disease under treatment. Sao Paulo Med J. 2009;127(5):278–282pmid:20169276
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Fouda MA,
      2. Khan AA,
      3. Sultan MS,
      4. Rios LP,
      5. McAssey K,
      6. Armstrong D
      . Evaluation and management of skeletal health in celiac disease: position statement. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012;26(11):819–829pmid:23166906
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Lombardi F,
      2. Franzese A,
      3. Iafusco D, et al
      . Bone involvement in clusters of autoimmune diseases: just a complication? Bone. 2010;46(2):551–555pmid:19815104
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. ↵
      1. Bottaro G,
      2. Cataldo F,
      3. Rotolo N,
      4. Spina M,
      5. Corazza GR
      . The clinical pattern of subclinical/silent celiac disease: an analysis on 1026 consecutive cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(3):691–696pmid:10086653
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Harper JW,
      2. Holleran SF,
      3. Ramakrishnan R,
      4. Bhagat G,
      5. Green PH
      . Anemia in celiac disease is multifactorial in etiology. Am J Hematol. 2007;82(11):996–1000pmid:17636474
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Kolho KL,
      2. Färkkilä MA,
      3. Savilahti E
      . Undiagnosed coeliac disease is common in Finnish adults. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33(12):1280–1283pmid:9930391
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    30. ↵
      1. Lo W,
      2. Sano K,
      3. Lebwohl B,
      4. Diamond B,
      5. Green PH
      . Changing presentation of adult celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48(2):395–398pmid:12643621
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    31. ↵
      1. Hin H,
      2. Bird G,
      3. Fisher P,
      4. Mahy N,
      5. Jewell D
      . Coeliac disease in primary care: case finding study. BMJ. 1999;318(7177):164–167pmid:9888912
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Zanini B,
      2. Caselani F,
      3. Magni A, et al
      . Celiac disease with mild enteropathy is not mild disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(3):253–258pmid:23022697
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Logan RF,
      2. Howarth GF,
      3. West J,
      4. Shepherd K,
      5. Robinson MH,
      6. Hardcastle JD
      . How often is a positive faecal occult blood test the result of coeliac disease? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15(10):1097–1100pmid:14501618
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Mant MJ,
      2. Bain VG,
      3. Maguire CG,
      4. Murland K,
      5. Yacyshyn BR
      . Prevalence of occult gastrointestinal bleeding in celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(4):451–454pmid:16616349
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      1. Howard MR,
      2. Turnbull AJ,
      3. Morley P,
      4. Hollier P,
      5. Webb R,
      6. Clarke A
      . A prospective study of the prevalence of undiagnosed coeliac disease in laboratory defined iron and folate deficiency. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55(10):754–757pmid:12354801
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Savage DG,
      2. Lindenbaum J,
      3. Stabler SP,
      4. Allen RH
      . Sensitivity of serum methylmalonic acid and total homocysteine determinations for diagnosing cobalamin and folate deficiencies. Am J Med. 1994;96(3):239–246pmid:8154512
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    33. ↵
      1. Snow CF
      . Laboratory diagnosis of vitamin B12 and folate deficiency: a guide for the primary care physician. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(12):1289–1298pmid:10386505
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Kemppainen TA,
      2. Kosma VM,
      3. Janatuinen EK,
      4. Julkunen RJ,
      5. Pikkarainen PH,
      6. Uusitupa MI
      . Nutritional status of newly diagnosed celiac disease patients before and after the institution of a celiac disease diet--association with the grade of mucosal villous atrophy. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67(3):482–487pmid:9497194
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Haapalahti M,
      2. Kulmala P,
      3. Karttunen TJ, et al
      . Nutritional status in adolescents and young adults with screen-detected celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40(5):566–570pmid:15861017
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Shaw S,
      2. Jayatilleke E,
      3. Meyers S,
      4. Colman N,
      5. Herzlich B,
      6. Herbert V
      . The ileum is the major site of absorption of vitamin B12 analogues. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989;84(1):22–26pmid:2912026
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Bergamaschi G,
      2. Markopoulos K,
      3. Albertini R, et al
      . Anemia of chronic disease and defective erythropoietin production in patients with celiac disease. Haematologica. 2008;93(12):1785–1791pmid:18815191
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Ludvigsson JF,
      2. Welander A,
      3. Lassila R,
      4. Ekbom A,
      5. Montgomery SM
      . Risk of thromboembolism in 14,000 individuals with coeliac disease. Br J Haematol. 2007;139(1):121–127pmid:17854316
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Saibeni S,
      2. Lecchi A,
      3. Meucci G, et al
      . Prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia in adult gluten-sensitive enteropathy at diagnosis: role of B12, folate, and genetics. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3(6):574–580pmid:15952099
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Cavallaro R,
      2. Iovino P,
      3. Castiglione F, et al
      . Prevalence and clinical associations of prolonged prothrombin time in adult untreated coeliac disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16(2):219–223pmid:15075998
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Fisgin T,
      2. Yarali N,
      3. Duru F,
      4. Usta B,
      5. Kara A
      . Hematologic manifestation of childhood celiac disease. Acta Haematol. 2004;111(4):211–214pmid:15153713
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Djuric Z,
      2. Zivic S,
      3. Katic V
      . Celiac disease with diffuse cutaneous vitamin K-deficiency bleeding. Adv Ther. 2007;24(6):1286–1289pmid:18165211
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Cataldo F,
      2. Marino V,
      3. Ventura A,
      4. Bottaro G,
      5. Corazza GR
      . Prevalence and clinical features of selective immunoglobulin A deficiency in coeliac disease: an Italian multicentre study. Italian Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology (SIGEP) and “Club del Tenue” Working Groups on Coeliac Disease. Gut. 1998;42(3):362–365pmid:9577342
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. O’Grady JG,
      2. Stevens FM,
      3. Harding B,
      4. O’Gorman TA,
      5. McNicholl B,
      6. McCarthy CF
      . Hyposplenism and gluten-sensitive enteropathy. Natural history, incidence, and relationship to diet and small bowel morphology. Gastroenterology. 1984;87(6):1326–1331pmid:6489698
      OpenUrlPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Corazza GR,
      2. Frisoni M,
      3. Vaira D,
      4. Gasbarrini G
      . Effect of gluten-free diet on splenic hypofunction of adult coeliac disease. Gut. 1983;24(3):228–230pmid:6826107
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. ↵
      1. Smyth DJ,
      2. Plagnol V,
      3. Walker NM, et al
      . Shared and distinct genetic variants in type 1 diabetes and celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(26):2767–2777
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    36. ↵
      1. Fichna M,
      2. Fichna P,
      3. Gryczyńska M,
      4. Walkowiak J,
      5. Zurawek M,
      6. Sowiński J
      . Screening for associated autoimmune disorders in Polish patients with Addison’s disease. Endocrine. 2010;37(2):349–360pmid:17148709
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Maida MJ,
      2. Praveen E,
      3. Crimmins SR,
      4. Swift GL
      . Coeliac disease and primary hyperparathyroidism: an association? Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(974):833–835pmid:16988097
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    37. ↵
      1. Giovenale D,
      2. Meazza C,
      3. Cardinale GM, et al
      . The prevalence of growth hormone deficiency and celiac disease in short children. Clin Med Res. 2006;4(3):180–183pmid:16988097
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    38. ↵
      1. Fasano A,
      2. Araya M,
      3. Bhatnagar S, et al; Celiac Disease Working Group, FISPGHAN
      . Federation of International Societies of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition consensus report on celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;47(2):214–219pmid:18664878
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    39. ↵
      1. Rubio-Tapia A,
      2. Hill ID,
      3. Kelly CP,
      4. Calderwood AH,
      5. Murray JA; American College of Gastroenterology
      . ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(5):656–676, quiz 677pmid:23609613
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    40. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Recognition and assessment of coeliac disease. Available at: nice.org.uk/cg86. Accessed July 13, 2016
    41. ↵
      1. American Diabetes Association
      . ADA standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(suppl 1):S11–S61
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    42. ↵
      1. Bai JC,
      2. Fried M,
      3. Corazza GR, et al; World Gastroenterology Organization
      . World Gastroenterology Organisation global guidelines on celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(2):121–126
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    43. ↵
      1. Collin P,
      2. Reunala T,
      3. Pukkala E,
      4. Laippala P,
      5. Keyriläinen O,
      6. Pasternack A
      . Coeliac disease--associated disorders and survival. Gut. 1994;35(9):1215–1218pmid:7959226
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Ventura A,
      2. Neri E,
      3. Ughi C,
      4. Leopaldi A,
      5. Città A,
      6. Not T
      . Gluten-dependent diabetes-related and thyroid-related autoantibodies in patients with celiac disease. J Pediatr. 2000;137(2):263–265pmid:10931424
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    44. ↵
      1. Cassio A,
      2. Ricci G,
      3. Baronio F, et al
      . Long-term clinical significance of thyroid autoimmunity in children with celiac disease. J Pediatr. 2010;156(2):292–295pmid:19846116
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Meloni A,
      2. Mandas C,
      3. Jores RD,
      4. Congia M
      . Prevalence of autoimmune thyroiditis in children with celiac disease and effect of gluten withdrawal. J Pediatr. 2009;155(1):51–55
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Diamanti A,
      2. Ferretti F,
      3. Guglielmi R, et al
      . Thyroid autoimmunity in children with coeliac disease: a prospective survey. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(11):1038–1041pmid:21862521
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Ansaldi N,
      2. Palmas T,
      3. Corrias A, et al
      . Autoimmune thyroid disease and celiac disease in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003;37(1):63–66pmid:12827007
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    45. ↵
      1. Oderda G,
      2. Rapa A,
      3. Zavallone A,
      4. Strigini L,
      5. Bona G
      . Thyroid autoimmunity in childhood celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35(5):704–705pmid:12454591
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    46. ↵
      1. Kowalska E,
      2. Wasowska-Królikowska K,
      3. Toporowska-Kowalska E
      . Estimation of antithyroid antibodies occurrence in children with coeliac disease. Med Sci Monit. 2000;6(4):719–721pmid:11208398
      OpenUrlPubMed
    47. ↵
      1. Elfström P,
      2. Montgomery SM,
      3. Kämpe O,
      4. Ekbom A,
      5. Ludvigsson JF
      . Risk of thyroid disease in individuals with celiac disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(10):3915–3921pmid:18611971
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Rapoport MJ,
      2. Bistritzer T,
      3. Vardi O,
      4. Broide E,
      5. Azizi A,
      6. Vardi P
      . Increased prevalence of diabetes-related autoantibodies in celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996;23(5):524–527pmid:8985839
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Ventura A,
      2. Magazzù G,
      3. Greco L; SIGEP Study Group for Autoimmune Disorders in Celiac Disease
      . Duration of exposure to gluten and risk for autoimmune disorders in patients with celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 1999;117(2):297–303pmid:10419909
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Sategna Guidetti C,
      2. Solerio E,
      3. Scaglione N,
      4. Aimo G,
      5. Mengozzi G
      . Duration of gluten exposure in adult coeliac disease does not correlate with the risk for autoimmune disorders. Gut. 2001;49(4):502–505pmid:11559646
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Toscano V,
      2. Conti FG,
      3. Anastasi E, et al
      . Importance of gluten in the induction of endocrine autoantibodies and organ dysfunction in adolescent celiac patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(7):1742–1748pmid:10925978
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    48. ↵
      1. Peretti N,
      2. Bienvenu F,
      3. Bouvet C, et al
      . The temporal relationship between the onset of type 1 diabetes and celiac disease: a study based on immunoglobulin a antitransglutaminase screening. Pediatrics. 2004;113(5). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/113/5/e418pmid:15121983
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Valerio G,
      2. Maiuri L,
      3. Troncone R, et al
      . Severe clinical onset of diabetes and increased prevalence of other autoimmune diseases in children with coeliac disease diagnosed before diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2002;45(12):1719–1722pmid:12488963
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Simell S,
      2. Hoppu S,
      3. Simell T, et al
      . Age at development of type 1 diabetes- and celiac disease-associated antibodies and clinical disease in genetically susceptible children observed from birth. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):774–779pmid:20056952
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    49. ↵
      1. Ludvigsson JF,
      2. Ludvigsson J,
      3. Ekbom A,
      4. Montgomery SM
      . Celiac disease and risk of subsequent type 1 diabetes: a general population cohort study of children and adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(11):2483–2488pmid:17065689
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    50. ↵
      1. Rubio-Tapia A,
      2. Murray JA
      . The liver in celiac disease. Hepatology. 2007;46(5):1650–1658pmid:17969053
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Hagander B,
      2. Berg NO,
      3. Brandt L,
      4. Nordén A,
      5. Sjölund K,
      6. Stenstam M
      . Hepatic injury in adult coeliac disease. Lancet. 1977;2(8032):270–272pmid:69880
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Bardella MT,
      2. Fraquelli M,
      3. Quatrini M,
      4. Molteni N,
      5. Bianchi P,
      6. Conte D
      . Prevalence of hypertransaminasemia in adult celiac patients and effect of gluten-free diet. Hepatology. 1995;22(3):833–836pmid:7657290
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Bonamico M,
      2. Pitzalis G,
      3. Culasso F, et al
      . Hepatic damage in celiac disease in children [in Italian]. Minerva Pediatr. 1986;38(21):959–962pmid:3807839
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Volta U
      . Pathogenesis and clinical significance of liver injury in celiac disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2009;36(1):62–70pmid:18496773
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Kaukinen K,
      2. Halme L,
      3. Collin P, et al
      . Celiac disease in patients with severe liver disease: gluten-free diet may reverse hepatic failure. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(4):881–888pmid:11910339
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Farre C,
      2. Esteve M,
      3. Curcoy A, et al
      . Hypertransaminasemia in pediatric celiac disease patients and its prevalence as a diagnostic clue. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(12):3176–3181pmid:12492207
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Novacek G,
      2. Miehsler W,
      3. Wrba F,
      4. Ferenci P,
      5. Penner E,
      6. Vogelsang H
      . Prevalence and clinical importance of hypertransaminasaemia in coeliac disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11(3):283–288pmid:10333201
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Sainsbury A,
      2. Sanders DS,
      3. Ford AC
      . Meta-analysis: coeliac disease and hypertransaminasaemia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(1):33–40pmid:21545472
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Ludvigsson JF,
      2. Elfström P,
      3. Broomé U,
      4. Ekbom A,
      5. Montgomery SM
      . Celiac disease and risk of liver disease: a general population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(1):63–69.e1pmid:17161656
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    51. ↵
      1. Duggan JM,
      2. Duggan AE
      . Systematic review: the liver in coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(5):515–518pmid:15740533
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Hepatitis B Foundation
      . Hepatitis B Vaccine Information. Available at: www.hepb.org/hepb/vaccine_information.htm. Accessed July 24, 2016
      1. Hepatitis B Foundation
      . Vaccine non-responders. Available at: www.hepb.org/professionals/vaccine_non-responders.htm. Accessed July 24, 2016
    52. ↵
      1. Alper CA,
      2. Kruskall MS,
      3. Marcus-Bagley D, et al
      . Genetic prediction of nonresponse to hepatitis B vaccine. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(11):708–712pmid:2528067
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Zingone F,
      2. Morisco F,
      3. Zanetti A, et al
      . Long-term antibody persistence and immune memory to hepatitis B virus in adult celiac patients vaccinated as adolescents. Vaccine. 2011;29(5):1005–1008pmid:21129395
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Leonardi S,
      2. Spina M,
      3. Spicuzza L,
      4. Rotolo N,
      5. La Rosa M
      . Hepatitis B vaccination failure in celiac disease: is there a need to reassess current immunization strategies? Vaccine. 2009;27(43):6030–6033pmid:19682619
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Park SD,
      2. Markowitz J,
      3. Pettei M, et al
      . Failure to respond to hepatitis B vaccine in children with celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44(4):431–435pmid:17414139
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Urganci N,
      2. Kalyoncu D
      . Response to hepatitis A and B vaccination in pediatric patients with celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56(4):408–411pmid:23132166
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Nemes E,
      2. Lefler E,
      3. Szegedi L, et al
      . Gluten intake interferes with the humoral immune response to recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in patients with celiac disease. Pediatrics. 2008;121(6). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/121/6/e1570pmid:18519462
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Noh KW,
      2. Poland GA,
      3. Murray JA
      . Hepatitis B vaccine nonresponse and celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(10):2289–2292pmid:14572581
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Ertem D,
      2. Gonen I,
      3. Tanidir C, et al
      . The response to hepatitis B vaccine: does it differ in celiac disease? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22(7):787–793pmid:19584738
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    53. ↵
      1. Ertekin V,
      2. Tosun MS,
      3. Selimoglu MA
      . Is there need for a new hepatitıs B vaccine schedule for children with celiac disease? Hepat Mon. 2011;11(8):634–637pmid:22140387
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    54. ↵
      1. Fasano A
      . Clinical presentation of celiac disease in the pediatric population. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S68–S73pmid:15825129
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Botero-López JE,
      2. Araya M,
      3. Parada A, et al
      . Micronutrient deficiencies in patients with typical and atypical celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53(3):265–270pmid:21865972
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    55. ↵
      1. Assiri AM
      . Isolated short stature as a presentation of celiac disease in Saudi children. Pediatr Rep. 2010;2(1):e4pmid:21589840
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Cacciari E,
      2. Salardi S,
      3. Volta U, et al
      . Can antigliadin antibody detect symptomless coeliac disease in children with short stature? Lancet. 1985;1(8444):1469–1471pmid:2861409
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Hashemi J,
      2. Hajiani E,
      3. Shahbazin HB,
      4. Masjedizadeh R,
      5. Ghasemi N
      . Prevalence of celiac disease in Iranian children with idiopathic short stature. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(48):7376–7380pmid:19109872
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    56. ↵
      1. Meazza C,
      2. Pagani S,
      3. Laarej K, et al
      . Short stature in children with coeliac disease. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2009;6(4):457–463pmid:19550380
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Troncone R,
      2. Kosova R
      . Short stature and catch-up growth in celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(suppl 3):S137–S138pmid:21088537
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Barera G,
      2. Mora S,
      3. Brambilla P, et al
      . Body composition in children with celiac disease and the effects of a gluten-free diet: a prospective case-control study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(1):71–75pmid:10871563
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    57. ↵
      1. Carbone MC,
      2. Pitzalis G,
      3. Ferri M, et al
      . Body composition in coeliac disease adolescents on a gluten-free diet: a longitudinal study. Acta Diabetol. 2003;40(suppl 1):S171–S173pmid:14618464
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Mäki M,
      2. Kallonen K,
      3. Lähdeaho ML,
      4. Visakorpi JK
      . Changing pattern of childhood coeliac disease in Finland. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1988;77(3):408–412pmid:3389134
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    58. ↵
      1. Roma E,
      2. Panayiotou J,
      3. Karantana H, et al
      . Changing pattern in the clinical presentation of pediatric celiac disease: a 30-year study. Digestion. 2009;80(3):185–191pmid:19776583
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    59. ↵
      1. Reilly NR,
      2. Aguilar K,
      3. Hassid BG, et al
      . Celiac disease in normal-weight and overweight children: clinical features and growth outcomes following a gluten-free diet. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53(5):528–531pmid:21670710
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Venkatasubramani N,
      2. Telega G,
      3. Werlin SL
      . Obesity in pediatric celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(3):295–297pmid:20479683
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Arikan C,
      2. Zihni C,
      3. Cakir M,
      4. Alkanat M,
      5. Aydogdu S
      . Morphometric analysis of small-bowel mucosa in Turkish children with celiac disease and relationship with the clinical presentation and laboratory findings. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52(9):2133–2139pmid:17406838
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Reinken L,
      2. Zieglauer H,
      3. Berger H
      . Vitamin B6 nutriture of children with acute celiac disease, celiac disease in remission, and of children with normal duodenal mucosa. Am J Clin Nutr. 1976;29(7):750–753pmid:180789
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Kumar J,
      2. Muntner P,
      3. Kaskel FJ,
      4. Hailpern SM,
      5. Melamed ML
      . Prevalence and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in US children: NHANES 2001-2004. Pediatrics. 2009;124(3). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/124/3/e362pmid:19661054
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Lerner A,
      2. Shapira Y,
      3. Agmon-Levin N, et al
      . The clinical significance of 25OH-Vitamin D status in celiac disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2012;42(3):322–330pmid:21210250
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Villanueva J,
      2. Maranda L,
      3. Nwosu BU
      . Is vitamin D deficiency a feature of pediatric celiac disease? J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2012;25(5-6):607–610pmid:22876568
      OpenUrlPubMed
    60. ↵
      1. Altuntaş B,
      2. Filik B,
      3. Ensari A,
      4. Zorlu P,
      5. Teziç T
      . Can zinc deficiency be used as a marker for the diagnosis of celiac disease in Turkish children with short stature? Pediatr Int. 2000;42(6):682–684pmid:11192528
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Högberg L,
      2. Danielsson L,
      3. Jarleman S,
      4. Sundqvist T,
      5. Stenhammar L
      . Serum zinc in small children with coeliac disease. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(2):343–345pmid:19006534
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Rawal P,
      2. Thapa BR,
      3. Prasad R,
      4. Prasad KK,
      5. Nain CK,
      6. Singh K
      . Zinc supplementation to patients with celiac disease--is it required? J Trop Pediatr. 2010;56(6):391–397pmid:20176568
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    61. ↵
      1. Singhal N,
      2. Alam S,
      3. Sherwani R,
      4. Musarrat J
      . Serum zinc levels in celiac disease. Indian Pediatr. 2008;45(4):319–321pmid:18451454
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Bonamico M,
      2. Vania A,
      3. Monti S, et al
      . Iron deficiency in children with celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1987;6(5):702–706pmid:3694363
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Kapur G,
      2. Patwari AK,
      3. Narayan S,
      4. Anand VK
      . Iron supplementation in children with celiac disease. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70(12):955–958pmid:14719782
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Yüce A,
      2. Demir H,
      3. Temizel IN,
      4. Koçak N
      . Serum carnitine and selenium levels in children with celiac disease. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2004;23(3):87–88pmid:15250563
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Rujner J,
      2. Socha J,
      3. Syczewska M,
      4. Wojtasik A,
      5. Kunachowicz H,
      6. Stolarczyk A
      . Magnesium status in children and adolescents with coeliac disease without malabsorption symptoms. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(5):1074–1079pmid:15380898
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Rashid M,
      2. Cranney A,
      3. Zarkadas M, et al
      . Celiac disease: evaluation of the diagnosis and dietary compliance in Canadian children. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/116/6/e754pmid:16322131
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Olsson C,
      2. Hörnell A,
      3. Ivarsson A,
      4. Sydner YM
      . The everyday life of adolescent coeliacs: issues of importance for compliance with the gluten-free diet. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2008;21(4):359–367pmid:18754144
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    62. ↵
      1. Hopman EG,
      2. le Cessie S,
      3. von Blomberg BM,
      4. Mearin ML
      . Nutritional management of the gluten-free diet in young people with celiac disease in The Netherlands. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43(1):102–108pmid:16819385
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Mariani P,
      2. Viti MG,
      3. Montuori M, et al
      . The gluten-free diet: a nutritional risk factor for adolescents with celiac disease? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;27(5):519–523pmid:9822315
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    63. ↵
      1. Ohlund K,
      2. Olsson C,
      3. Hernell O,
      4. Ohlund I
      . Dietary shortcomings in children on a gluten-free diet. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010;23(3):294–300pmid:20337845
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Caponio F,
      2. Summo C,
      3. Clodoveo ML,
      4. Pasqualone A
      . Evaluation of the nutritional quality of the lipid fraction of gluten-free biscuits. Eur Food Res Technol. 2008;227(1):135–139
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Thompson T
      . Thiamin, riboflavin, and niacin contents of the gluten-free diet: is there cause for concern? J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99(7):858–862pmid:10405688
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Thompson T
      . Folate, iron, and dietary fiber contents of the gluten-free diet. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100(11):1389–1396pmid:11103663
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    64. ↵
      1. American Dietetic Association
      . Celiac disease (CD). Evidence-based Nutrition Practice Guideline. Chicago, IL: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2009
    65. ↵
      1. Zintzaras E,
      2. Germenis AE
      . Performance of antibodies against tissue transglutaminase for the diagnosis of celiac disease: meta-analysis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006;13(2):187–192pmid:16467324
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Giersiepen K,
      2. Lelgemann M,
      3. Stuhldreher N, et al; ESPGHAN Working Group on Coeliac Disease Diagnosis
      . Accuracy of diagnostic antibody tests for coeliac disease in children: summary of an evidence report. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(2):229–241pmid:22266486
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Tonutti E,
      2. Visentini D,
      3. Picierno A, et al
      . Diagnostic efficacy of the ELISA test for the detection of deamidated anti-gliadin peptide antibodies in the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease. J Clin Lab Anal. 2009;23(3):165–171pmid:19455636
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Swallow K,
      2. Wild G,
      3. Sargur R, et al
      . Quality not quantity for transglutaminase antibody 2: the performance of an endomysial and tissue transglutaminase test in screening coeliac disease remains stable over time. Clin Exp Immunol. 2013;171(1):100–106pmid:23199329
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    66. ↵
      1. Rashtak S,
      2. Ettore MW,
      3. Homburger HA,
      4. Murray JA
      . Combination testing for antibodies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: comparison of multiplex immunoassay and ELISA methods. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28(6):805–813pmid:19145736
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Wang N,
      2. Hammarström L
      . IgA deficiency: what is new? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;12(6):602–608pmid:23026772
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Kurien M,
      2. Leeds JS,
      3. Hopper AD, et al
      . Serological testing for coeliac disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus: is immunoglobulin A level measurement necessary? Diabet Med. 2013;30(7):840–845pmid:23461783
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    67. ↵
      1. Bai JC,
      2. Fried M,
      3. Corazza GR, et al
      . World Gastroenterology Organization. World Gastroenterology Organization: global guidelines on celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:121–126
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    68. ↵
      1. Shahnaz A,
      2. Maguire G,
      3. Parker R,
      4. Heuschkel RB,
      5. Zilbauer M
      . Tissue transglutaminase antibody levels predict IgA deficiency. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(11):873–876pmid:23928648
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Green PHR,
      2. Cellier C
      . Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(17):1731–1743pmid:17960014
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Tosco A,
      2. Salvati VM,
      3. Auricchio R, et al
      . Natural history of potential celiac disease in children. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(4):320–325, quiz e36pmid:20851213
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Kurppa K,
      2. Ashorn M,
      3. Iltanen S, et al
      . Celiac disease without villous atrophy in children: a prospective study. J Pediatr. 2010;157(3):373–380, 380.e1pmid:20400102
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Catassi C,
      2. Fasano A
      . Celiac disease diagnosis: simple rules are better than complicated algorithms. Am J Med. 2010;123(8):691–693pmid:20670718
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    69. ↵
      1. Megiorni F,
      2. Pizzuti A
      . HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 in celiac disease predisposition: practical implications of the HLA molecular typing. J Biomed Sci. 2012;19:88pmid:23050549
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    70. ↵
      1. Busch R,
      2. De Riva A,
      3. Hadjinicolaou AV,
      4. Jiang W,
      5. Hou T,
      6. Mellins ED
      . On the perils of poor editing: regulation of peptide loading by HLA-DQ and H2-A molecules associated with celiac disease and type 1 diabetes. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2012;14:e15pmid:22805744
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    71. ↵
      1. Nachman F,
      2. Sugai E,
      3. Vázquez H, et al
      . Serological tests for celiac disease as indicators of long-term compliance with the gluten-free diet. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23(6):473–480pmid:21537123
      OpenUrlPubMed
    72. ↵
      1. Sugai E,
      2. Nachman F,
      3. Váquez H, et al
      . Dynamics of celiac disease-specific serology after initiation of a gluten-free diet and use in the assessment of compliance with treatment. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42(5):352–358pmid:19679520
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    • Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext

     

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Evidence-Informed Expert Recommendations for the Management of Celiac Disease in Children
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Pediatrics web site.

    Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Evidence-Informed Expert Recommendations for the Management of Celiac Disease in Children
    John Snyder, J. Decker Butzner, Amy R. DeFelice, Alessio Fasano, Stefano Guandalini, Edwin Liu, Kimberly P. Newton
    Pediatrics Sep 2016, 138 (3) e20153147; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3147

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Evidence-Informed Expert Recommendations for the Management of Celiac Disease in Children
    John Snyder, J. Decker Butzner, Amy R. DeFelice, Alessio Fasano, Stefano Guandalini, Edwin Liu, Kimberly P. Newton
    Pediatrics Sep 2016, 138 (3) e20153147; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3147
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Current Policy
    • Early Release
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Features Video
    • Open Access
    • Pediatric Collections
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript

    Subjects

    • Administration/Practice Management
      • Quality Improvement
      • Administration/Practice Management
    Back to top

                

    Copyright © 2019 by American Academy of Pediatrics

    International Access »

    Terms of Use
    The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) takes the issue of privacy very seriously. See our Privacy Statement for information about how AAP collects, uses, safeguards and discloses the information collected on our Website from visitors and by means of technology.
    FAQ

     

    AAP Pediatrics