Skip to main content
Skip to main content

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search »

User menu

  • Login
  • AAP Policy
  • Topic/Program Collections
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Alerts
  • Subscribe
  • aap.org

Menu

  • AAP Grand Rounds
  • AAP News
  • Hospital Pediatrics
  • NeoReviews
  • Pediatrics
  • Pediatrics in Review
  • Current AAP Policy
  • Journal CME
  • AAP Career Center
  • Pediatric Collections
  • AAP Journals Catalog

Sections

    • Login
    • AAP Policy
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Alerts
    • Subscribe
    • aap.org

    Sign up for Insight Alerts highlighting editor-chosen studies with the greatest impact on clinical care.
    Video Abstracts -- brief videos summarizing key findings of new articles
    Happy 70th Birthday, Pediatrics! See top articles through the decades.
    Watch the Features Video to learn more about Pediatrics.

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    Tools and Links

    Pediatrics
    March 2000, VOLUME 105 / ISSUE 3
    Letter to the Editor

    Circumcision—The Debates Goes On

    Gary Preiser
    • Article
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments
    Loading
    Download PDF

    To the Editor.

    The AAP circumcision policy in the March issue ofPediatrics still leaves me with the following questions concerning foreskin and penile hygiene.

    1. What active interventions are recommended to ensure eventual retraction of the foreskin, if indeed such retraction is necessary for intercourse and reproduction? I understand that the production of smegma dissects free the foreskin's adhered epithelial layers over time. Does this process require the help of a caretaker's increasingly vigorous attempts to roll back the foreskin or does the genital play of the infant or masturbation of the older child assist the process? Does the 7-year-old with a long, adhered foreskin and no symptoms require surgical release of these adhesions? I've heard it rumored that “popping” the glans free of the adhered foreskin is a father-son “ritual” in some cultures. It used to be a pediatrician-patient ritual in ours. Finally, even after circumcision, the cut foreskin often readheres to the corona of the glans. One can see pearls of smegma accumulated under the adhesions. Should this rim of adhesions be manually lysed followed by application of antibiotic ointment or perhaps premarin cream, as pediatricians who lyse female labia minora adhesions have done for years (another questionable practice). Does this cause or prevent senechial adhesions between foreskin and glans?

    2. What is meant by penile hygiene? Does this imply rolling back the easily retractable foreskin for a soap and water wash to remove smegma and bacteria, then replacing it to physiologic position? Should the washwater be dried from the glans? Is it possible, teleologically, that smegma by pH or bacteriostatic function has a protective function and normal sterile urine cleanses the redundant foreskin? We recommend against vaginal douching and know the pH of cerumen seems to prevent otitis externa. The AAP statement does not support smegma as carcinogenic, …

    View Full Text

    Log in using your username and password

    Forgot your user name or password?

    Log in through your institution

    You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.

    Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 days for US$25.00

    Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

    Offer Reprints

    PreviousNext

     

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Circumcision—The Debates Goes On
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Pediatrics web site.

    Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Circumcision—The Debates Goes On
    Gary Preiser
    Pediatrics Mar 2000, 105 (3) 681-684; DOI: 10.1542/peds.105.3.681

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Circumcision—The Debates Goes On
    Gary Preiser
    Pediatrics Mar 2000, 105 (3) 681-684; DOI: 10.1542/peds.105.3.681
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Current Policy
    • Early Release
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Policies
    • Overview
    • Features Video
    • Open Access
    • Pediatric Collections
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript

    Subjects

    • Fetus/Newborn Infant
      • Fetus/Newborn Infant
      • Circumcision
    Back to top

                

    Copyright © 2018 by American Academy of Pediatrics

    International Access »

    Terms of Use
    The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) takes the issue of privacy very seriously. See our Privacy Statement for information about how AAP collects, uses, safeguards and discloses the information collected on our Website from visitors and by means of technology.
    FAQ

     

    AAP Pediatrics