Dear Editor,
The article by Chong et al attracted our interest as we anticipated
it might influence our practice.(1) The main findings of this
retrospective data analysis were a decreasing use of surfactant over the
study period and an increased incidence of chronic lung disease in the
surfactant treated group. As the authors conclude, these findings are
difficult to reconcile at face value. We believe that this paper creates
misleading generalisations because of missing data and incomplete analysis
of sub-groups.
We are dismayed that in a study of extremely premature infants of
birth weight < 1000g there is no comparative data of the patients who
died, nor is any rationale for this omission offered. This exclusion from
the analysis makes the validity of the study questionable.
We understand that more than 1235 Neonatal Units contribute to the
Alere database and acknowledge that part of the strength of such an
analysis could lie in the number of infants studied. However, no
information is presented regarding the criteria for surfactant
administration, the dose of surfactant, ventilation strategies or any
indication of the comparative performance of the various neonatal units.
Data of neonatal co-morbidities are displayed in Table 3; however
details and statistics are inadequate to compare surfactant treated and
untreated sub-groups. We believe that patent arterial duct (PDA) has a
more direct relevance to the development of chronic lung disease and
should be analysed independently of the other co-morbidities.(2) We
strongly disagree with the authors’ comment, “It is also concerning that
common neonatal morbidities such as PDA, IVH, ROP and sepsis were
associated with surfactant use”. These complications are more prevalent in
preterm populations of lesser gestation, particularly in the group where
clinicians would choose to use surfactant prophylactically. Implying a
causative association between these pathologies and surfactant is an over
interpretation of available data.
Although the authors make brief mention of maternal chorioamnionitis
in their concluding paragraph, there is no attempt to analyse this or any
other antenatal factors relevant to chronic lung disease.
We are uncertain why Figure 5, which graphically displays the
relationship of chronic lung disease in the surfactant treated and
untreated groups, uses different scales on the ordinates of the Bar charts
A and B; this is visually misleading.
This study includes a large cohort of infants and we suggest the
available data could be analysed more comprehensively, or that more
comparable data from a smaller number of neonatal units is examined.
References:
1. Chong E et al. Changing use of Surfactant over 6 years and its
relationship to Chronic Lung Disease. Pediatrics 2008:122:e917-921
2. Bancalari E. Changes in the pathogenesis and prevention of chronic
lung disease of prematurity. Am J Perinatol. 2001; 18(1): 1-9.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared