The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has advanced the
health and well-being of adolescents through its new recommendations to
screen for depression during primary care visits.1
We were surprised, though, to see the summary statement on treatment with
antidepressant medications that stated, “There is convincing evidence that
there are harms with SSRIs (i.e. suicidality)” (emphasis added). This
evaluation conflicts with the results of the meta-analysis detailed in the
USPTF assessment,2 with methodological critiques of the randomized
clinical trial data,3 with data from many observational studies,4 with
additional statements later in the summary recommendations,1 and with the
reading of the evidence presented in the USPSTF’s accompanying review of
the evidence.2 Noting that there were no completed suicides in any of the
trials, the available evidence supports a more qualified estimate of the
risk of suicidal ideation/suicide attempt associated with SSRI treatment
in adolescents. In our view, it is not yet clear whether SSRIs promote or
prevent suicidal ideation or behavior in representative samples of
depressed adolescents. It is clear that depressed adolescents are at
increased risk of suicide and suicidal behavior and that they should be
carefully monitored regardless of what treatment they receive.
The USPSTF’s assertion that there is convincing evidence about the
suicidal ideation/suicide attempt risks of SSRI treatment, despite
evidence of benefit over harm from our work5 and that of others,6-8 will
likely fuel the continued decline in effective treatments for
adolescents.9 This may result in the greater public health risk, which is
untreated depression.
K Kelleher, J Greenhouse, J Bridge, W Gardner, J Klima, T McInerny
1. Pediatrics. Apr 2009;123(4):1223-1228.
2. Pediatrics. Apr 2009;123(4):e716-735.
3. Stat Med. May 20 2008;27(11):1801-1813.
4. Int Rev Psychiatry. Apr 2008;20(2):209-214.
5. JAMA. 2007;297:1683-1696.
6. Am J Psychiatry. Jul 2007;164(7):1044-1049.
7. JAMA. Feb 27 2008;299(8):901-913.
8. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(1):41-47.
9. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:884-891.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared