The study by Hughes et al1 amply confirms what Chandra has termed the
“causal relationship between the conjugal pair of famine and pestilence”.2
However, the study also raises a significant question in regard to the
role CD4 cells play in cellular immunity. According to Hughes et al and
all other HIV experts, HIV infection impairs cellular immunity by causing
decreased numbers of CD4 cells (acquired immune deficiency=AID) and the
more severe the AID the higher the probability of developing bacterial,
mycobacterial and fungal infections. In regard to malnutrition they state
“the unusual frequent, and severe infections in children with severe
malnutrition (SM) have been attributed to impairment in cell-mediated
immunity”. Chandra states “It is recognized that malnutrition and
infection are two major obstacles for health, development and survival
worldwide, and that poverty and ignorance are the most significant
contributing factors…malnutrition is the commonest cause of
immunodeficiency worldwide.2 Furthermore, malnourished, immunodeficient
children also have high frequencies of bacterial and fungal infections
including tuberculosis and Pneumocystis carinni pneumonia.3 4 Yet,
although the clinical pictures of malnutrition and AIDS are uncanningly
similar, the Hughes study reported a totally dissimilar picture in regard
to “cell-mediated immunity”. This is a paradox the authors did not
address.
In their study 56 children were hospitalised for SM, 24 HIV-infected
and 32 uninfected. Both groups were treated with milk powder feedings,
micronutrients and “parenteral antibiotics on admission”. Of the 56
children whose CD4 cells were determined at admission, 40 had samples
measured at discharge but only “27 on full nutritional recovery”. They
reported “HIV-uninfected children with SM had normal CD4
counts…Critically, we showed that CD4 percentages tended to fall rather
than rise on nutritional recovery among the HIV-uninfected children…We
propose that the CD4 counts had risen as a result of infection and
returned to baseline after antimicrobial treatment”. In the HIV-infected
group “the prevalence of severe immunosuppression [AID]…rose (from 17% on
admission to 63% by the time of full nutritional recovery)”.
This study raises the following questions:
1. Why are these children’s cellular immune deficiencies disparate in
terms of the numbers of CD4 cells?
2. Why were infections associated with an increase in CD4 cells in
one group but a decrease in the other?
3. Why was the treatment of infections successful in the HIV-infected
individuals at the time their cause, AID, was worsening?
We can think of three possible explanations:
1. Problems in the design of this study.
2. The nature of the “cell-mediated immunity” is different in the two
groups.
3. The numbers of CD4 cells is not an indicator of “cell-mediated
immunity” in any group of patients, including HIV-infected individuals.5-7
We would be grateful for an alternative, more plausible explanation.
REFERENCES
1. Hughes SM, Amadi B, Mwiya M, Nkamba H, Mulundu G, Tomkins A, et
al. CD4 counts decline despite nutritional recovery in HIV-infected
Zambian children with severe malnutrition. Pediatrics 2009;123:e347-51.
Epub 2009 Jan 5.
2. Chandra RK. Nutrition and immunology: from the clinic to cellular
biology and back again. Proc Nutr Soc 1999;58:681-3.
3. Dutz W, Post C, Vessal K, Kohout E. Endemic infantile pneumocystis
carinii infection: the Shiraz study. NCI Monogr 1976;43:31-40.
4. Hughes WT, Price RA, Sisko F, Havron WS, Kafatos AG, Schonland M,
et al. Protein-calorie malnutrition. A host determinant for Pneumocystis
carinii infection. Am J Dis Child 1974;128:44-52.
5. Goodwin JG. OKT3, OKT4, and all that. JAMA 1981;246:947-948.
6. Papadopulos-Eleopopulos E, Turner VF, Papadimitriou JM, Hedland-
Thomas B, Causer D, Page B. A critical analysis of the HIV-T4-cell-AIDS
hypothesis. Genetica 1995;95:5-24.
7. Pandrea IV, Gautam R, Ribeiro RM, Brenchley JM, Butler IF,
Pattison M, et al. Acute loss of intestinal CD4+ T cells is not predictive
of simian immunodeficiency virus virulence. J Immunol 2007;179:3035-46.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared