eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. To submit an eLetter please go to the article you wish to respond to and click on the link that reads "eLetters: Submit a Response." Submission of eLetters are open to all health care professionals and experts in related fields.

eLetters to:

ARTICLES:
Sheela Sathyanarayana, Catherine J. Karr, Paula Lozano, Elizabeth Brown, Antonia M. Calafat, Fan Liu, and Shanna H. Swan
Baby Care Products: Possible Sources of Infant Phthalate Exposure
Pediatrics 2008; 121: e260-e268 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

eLetters published:

[Read eLetters] Phthalates are Ubiquitous
Mathew George   (8 February 2008)
[Read eLetters] Recommendations
Judy B Galloway   (30 June 2008)

Phthalates are Ubiquitous 8 February 2008
 Next eLetters Top
Mathew George,
Toxicology Fellow
Childrens Hospital Boston

Send letter to journal:
Re: Phthalates are Ubiquitous

mathew.george{at}childrens.harvard.edu Mathew George

Satyanarayana S, et al’s article depicting the ubiquity of the phthalates in baby products is pertinent and well written. As the information about the clinical effects of different ingredients like phthalates is gradually being dispersed, it is worth knowing that many healthcare products also contain phthalates. The list is exhaustive. Weuve J et al was successful in showing that babies in Neonatal ICU had significantly elevated levels of phthalate metabolites which was attributed to the use of healthcare devices made of plasticizer di(2- ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). With this information, it behooves on the healthcare community to incorporate nontoxic alternates to Phthalate in healthcare /medical products, which would go a long way in upholding the primary Hippocratic principle of no harm. There might be another explanation to the relative high Z score in babies of age less than 8 months who are exposed to baby lotion, as depicted in the article; multiple references have suggested that the phthalates are lipophilic which would explain the enhanced the dermal absorption. This effect is, conceivably, multiplied in neonates and infants because of the immature cutaneous system and relatively increased fat content in the skin compared to that of adults. In addition, apart from the fact that baby lotions are being dispatched in phthalate constituted containers, many commercial types of baby lotions contain propylene glycol, other lipids and alcoholic compounds. Emulsions containing propylene glycol has been studied for as an effective vehicle to enhance dermal drug delivery in topical preparations (Subramanyan N et al 2004). In another study, Pellings et al was successful in showing that the rate and extent of phthalate absorption through epidermis was greatly increased (40- to 80- fold) using 50% ethanol/water as receptor fluid compared with using saline as vehicle; it is not uncommon to find alcohol components in many commercial baby products.

1.Weuve J, Sánchez BN, Calafat AM, Schettler T, Green RA, Hu H, Hauser R. Exposure to phthalates in neonatal intensive care unit infants: urinary concentrations of monoesters and oxidative metabolites. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Sep;114(9):1424-31

2.Subramanian N, Ghosal SK, Moulik SP. Topical delivery of celecoxib using microemulsion. Acta Pol Pharm. 2004 Sep-Oct;61(5):335-41

3.http://www.johnsonsbaby.com/product.do?id=24 ( accessed on Feb 4 2008)

4.Pelling D, Phillips JC, Cunningham ME. Absorption of Hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds through epidermal and sub epidermal strata of rat skin in vitro. Toxicology in vitro 1997;12(1):47-55

Conflict of Interest:

None declared

Recommendations 30 June 2008
Previous eLetters  Top
Judy B Galloway,
RN
Baylor Dallas/Post Partum Unit/

Send letter to journal:
Re: Recommendations

gwgjbg{at}kcbi.net Judy B Galloway

You did not mention in the info that I read what products were tested. I would be interested in that info and to see what your recommendations are as part of my role is teaching new moms re: infant care, various products that are available, etc.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared