I read with interest the study by Lane and Ben-Shachar (1) who
describe 9 otherwise healthy adolescent patients, mean age 15.5 years,
presenting to the emergency department with acute myocardial infarction
(AMI) according to accepted criteria. 8 of 9 were males and all had normal
coronary angiograms done in all except one, after resolution of chest
pains. No coronary thrombi were found.
Of note was the fact that all had inferior or inferolateral infarctions.
No congenital or acquired diseases were revealed including normal
coagulation workup
and absence of any drug abuse. Followup after hospital discharge showed no
recurrence of anginal pains while on Diltiazem.
In 1993 (2) we reported our experience in the study of a series of
young patients, all males, admitted with acute inferior wall myocardial
infarction preceded by clinically symptomatic pharyngitis and upper
respiratory complaints within a period of 7 days prior to admission. In
contrast to the high prevalence of anterior location of the infarction in
young patients without coronary disease (3),
our patients with preceding infection and AMI and normal coronary arteries
demonstrated a predeliction to inferior location of AMI in young males
similar to the patient population described by the authors (1). Our
patients had minimal or no coronary risk factors and their prognosis was
good. Although our patient population was older, as we provide adult
cardiology services, the similarity regarding gender distribution and
clinical characteristics incuding the site of AMI is striking.
More recently Smeeth et al (4) have shown a significant increase in
the risk of AMI or stroke days after an acute infection. The latter may
induce endothelial dysfunction and platelet activation.
It will be very informative if the authors can provide data
concerning history taking regarding acute infections
in the week preceding the AMI and whether C-reactive protein measurements
are available. Our conclusions then were very similar to their present
ones in that AMI can occur at any age and suggestive chest pains should be
investigated fully including an electrocardiogram and enzymes workup.
Moreover, acute infections preceding the onset of chest pain particularly
in young males should alert the physician as to the possibility of AMI. We
are at a stage where it is justified that queries about acute infections
preceding AMI should be mandatory and part of routine history taking,
particularly in younger age groups(5). The clinical and medicolegal
implications are obvious.
REFERENCES
1. Lane RJ, Ben-Shachar G. Myocardial infarction in
healthy adolescents. J Pediatr. 2007;120(4):e938-e943
2. Abinader EG, Sharif DS, Omary M. Inferior wall
myocardial infarction preceded by acute exudative
pharyngitis in young males. Isr J Med Sci. 1993;29:764-
769
3. Gohlke H, Roskamm H. Myocardial infarction at young
age. A challenge for primary prevention. Heart Beat
1985;3:1-3
4. Smeeth L, Thomas SL, Hall AJ, et al. Risk of myocardial
infarction and stroke after infection or vaccination. N
Engl J Med 2005;351:2611-2618
5. Abinader EG. Acute myocardial infarction and
angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol.
2005;96(12):1755
Conflict of Interest:
None declared