The authors find that there is a greatly increased chance of
internationally adopted children in Denmark entering into precocious
puberty. The obvious explanation is that the children concerned are older
than the age on their birth certificate. The authors reject this
possibility after making what they call the worst-case assumption that
children aged over two at the time of adoption are one year older than
their official age and finding there is still an increased risk. The
authors do not, however, explain why they think that a one year age gap is
a maximum; there are higher probable age gaps recorded (eg, A. Carli,
Latin American children adopted in Norway, in P. Selman, ed Intercountry
Adoption, London, BAAF, 2000) and the true maximum is more likely to be
two or even three years. When the age of a child is unknown, adoption
agencies are often responsible for assigning an age themselves. Given
that most adoptive parents have a prior preference for young children,
there is a temptation to systematically underestimate dates of birth.
The authorsEfinding that the older the child is at the age of
adoption the more likely they are to experience precocious puberty exactly
corroborates the suggestion that this apparent precocity is actually due
to the under-recording of the age of the child. The older the child at
the age of adoption, the greater the plausible gap between their true age
and their assigned age. Babies are obviously babies, but how old is a
child who is said to be four? The finding that there is no evidence of an
increased risk of precocious puberty amongst children adopted from Korea
provides further corroboration, as 99% of these children were aged under
two at adoption.
If this explanation of precocious puberty is correct, the
implications of the article lie not with exploring the early life
experiences of the children concerned, but rather with how best to counsel
them. A child can be reassured that they are probably not exceptionally
early in reaching puberty after all. However, the child is then faced
with coming to terms with the educational and legal disjuncture between
their official age and their probable true age.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared