To the Editor
Bassan et al1 have described a clear method of defining territories,
categorising and subsequently scoring the extent of brain injury from PVHI
which can be easily replicated in other centres. They have also commented
on the topography and evolution of PVHI in preterm infants, and have
concluded that higher severity scores predict worse outcome.
However, the recent EPIPAGE cohort study2 concluded that although
severe cranial ultrasound abnormality predicted motor disability, one
third of infants with cerebral palsy had no ultrasound abnormalities. In
light of this study, we think that concluding higher severity scores
predict worse outcome is too broad. We feel that abnormal cranial
ultrasound scans cannot be used to guide clinicians regarding management
decisions such as the withdrawal of care in neonates.
In addition, although the authors provide data on the percentage of
infants with abnormal neurological examination at each score and breakdown
the specific types of motor abnormality found on examination, it would
have been interesting to see if the severity of neurological examination
correlated with the highest scores.
We suggest that more clinically applicable conclusions would be
obtained if a study is done to compare risk factors and outcomes in two
different groups; those with suspected PVHI and those with apparently
normal cranial ultrasound scans.
REFERENCES
1. Haim Bassan, Carol B. Benson, Catherine Limperopoulos et al.
Ultrasonographic Features and Severity Scoring of Periventricular
Hemorrhagic Infarction in Relation to Risk Factors and Outcome.
Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 2111 - 2118.
2. Pierre-Yves Ancel, Florence Livinec, Béatrice Larroque, et al.
Cerebral Palsy Among Very Preterm Children in Relation to Gestational Age
and Neonatal Ultrasound Abnormalities: The EPIPAGE Cohort Study.
Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 828-835.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared