|
|
eLetters is an online forum for ongoing
peer review. To submit an eLetter please go to the article you wish
to respond to and click on the link that reads
"eLetters: Submit a Response." Submission of
eLetters are open to all health care professionals
and experts in related fields.
eLetters to:
-
- ARTICLE:
Glenn R. Gourley, Zhanhai Li, Bill L. Kreamer, and Michael R. Kosorok
- A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Prophylaxis Against Jaundice Among Breastfed Newborns
Pediatrics 2005; 116: 385-391
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
eLetters published:
-
Details missing
- Nikki Lee
(1 August 2005)
-
conflict of interest
- Valerie W. McClain
(17 September 2005)
|
Details missing |
1 August 2005 |
|
|
Nikki Lee, lactation consultant private practice
Send letter to journal:
Re: Details missing
nleeguitar{at}aol.com Nikki Lee
|
This study goes into great detail about amounts and contents of
supplements, yet there is no mention of how many times a day babies went
to breast.
DeCarvalho (1982) and Yamouchi and Yamanuchi (1990) published
studies showing an inverse relationship between number of breastfeeds in
the first days postpartum, and bililrubin levels. Babies that breastfeed
more than 9-11 times in 24 hours in the first three days are babies that
are kept with their mothers, rooming-in; their bilirubin levels are
significantly lower than babies who feed less than 9-11 times in 24 hours.
While there are studies showing that breastfed babies have more
jaundice, the issue is more of insufficient breastfeeding than anything
else. Dr. Lawrence Gartner has been quoted as calling this "lack of
breastmilk jaundice".
Anecdotally, I have heard that nurseries in Baby-Friendly Hospitals
see very few babies with jaundice. Babies in hospitals with the BFHI
designation are able to feed frequently because they are with their
mothers for enough time. Effective breastfeeding works, in both preventing
jaundice and in preventing re-admission for hyperbilirubinemia.
Breastfeeding is already proven valid and reliable and free, unlike
some new supplement that must be produced and tested, and then sold.
.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared |
|
conflict of interest |
17 September 2005 |
|
|
Valerie W. McClain, lactation consultant private practice
Send letter to journal:
Re: conflict of interest
Vwstarfigh{at}aol.com Valerie W. McClain
|
I do research on the patenting of human milk components and at times
for a change of pace look at infant formula patents. This paper by
Gourley, Li, Kreamer, and Kosorok just happened to look familiar to me.
Glenn R. Gourly and Bill L. Kreamer are inventors to patent #
6,627,213 called "Inhibition of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in breast fed
infants," filed in September 28, 2001. It is a patent "for infant
supplements containing casein, a salt of casein, whey and/or a casein
hydrolysate which are free of carbohydrate, and methods for their use with
breast feeding babies." The patent mentions L-aspartic acid and casein
hydrolysate as reducing jaundice.
It seems to me that having this invention might be considered by some
to be a conflict of interest.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared |
| |
|