eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. To submit an eLetter please go to the article you wish to respond to and click on the link that reads "eLetters: Submit a Response." Submission of eLetters are open to all health care professionals and experts in related fields.

eLetters to:

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS:
Theodore A. Kastner and Committee on Children with Disabilities
Managed Care and Children With Special Health Care Needs
Pediatrics 2004; 114: 1693-1698 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

eLetters published:

[Read eLetters] CSHCN's under Medicaid are categorically defined already by statute
Freya J. Schultz   (2 December 2004)

CSHCN's under Medicaid are categorically defined already by statute 2 December 2004
  Top
Freya J. Schultz,
Staff Research and Program Development Analyst
Santa Barbar County Social Services

Send letter to journal:
Re: CSHCN's under Medicaid are categorically defined already by statute

f.schultz{at}sbcsocialserv.org Freya J. Schultz

Discussion of the topic of children with special health care needs and managed care needs to include some information for physicians and administrators regarding the fact that under Medicaid, Federal law already defines certain groups of children as "children with special health care needs" by virtue of their membership in certain publicly-funded service populations. You do not need to establish a prospective health problem in order to screen and assess these children, and since foster children, one of the groups so defined, are generally seeking care related to their prior history of maltreatment, time is of the essence in getting them screened adequately to assure the best treatment outcome.

This problem should not have to be resolved by local advocacy, county by county across all the states, which is what is happening now. It should be a "given" element of the system of care: these kids already qualify for comprehensive screening and assessment services, including behavioral health assessment services, before you even see them for the first time.

This is important because it is the screening and case-finding function which is most lacking, largely because many states have not informed managed care providers, public and private, that services to these groups of children should be based on the assumption that they need (at least) thorough, timely assessment - - whether or not the "magic words" deemed to establish medical necessity for a course of treatment are pronounced by the social services case manager on behalf of these children in attempting access services through the mental health services case managers' access/entry system.

Children receiving Title IV-E services, that is, public child welfare or foster care services, are one of the most prominent groups defined by Federal statute as children with special health care needs. There are several other groups, in addition.

These children are categorically defined as children with special health care needs on a group or “categorical” basis, without regard to whether any individual child has an identified specific special health care need at any particular time.

The availability, timeliness, and appropriateness of care for these children with regard to mental health services has already been the subject of various studies at the state and national levels which have found wide-spread, serious problems in accessing care for these children, some of whom are probation wards in addition to the larger group who are the subject of child protective services intervention for maltreatment.

Children removed from the home because of parental neglect or maltreatment have already experienced conditions which would adversely affect almost any child, and often for a long period before actual removal from their parents. The poor behavioral outcomes for children in foster care are not only the result of shortcomings in the foster care system or the poor genetics of their parents. They result also from serious inadequacies in the publicly-financed health care system where they should be receiving effective treatment for the effects of parental maltreatment and adversity.

Your article does not mention that medical and behavioral health providers need be alert to these priority service populations whether or not any one child they may see comes into care with an identified specific health need or condition. Federal Medicaid law already clearly establishes the presumption that any child in these categories needs timely and complete assessment and treatment whether the particular state Medicaid agency access regulations OR a specific managed care contract specifically says so.

I refer you to the excellent reports by UCLA School of Public Health <http://www.healthychild.ucla.edu/Publications/ChildrenFosterCare/Documents/Mental%20health%20brief%20final%20for%20distribution.pdf>

and by the General Accounting Office on this subject, at <http://www.gao.gov/docsearch/abstract.php?rptno=GAO-01-749> and related reports

HEHS-00-169 "Medicaid Managed Care: States' Safeguards for Children With Special Needs Vary" <http://www.gao.gov/new.items/he00169.pdf> and

HEHS-00-37 "Medicaid Managed Care: Challenges in Implementing Safeguards for Children With Special Health Care Needs" <http://www.gao.gov/new.items/he00037.pdf>)

and to the superb resources on contracting for publicly-funded managed care services at Georgetown University's School of Public Health - Center for Health Services Research and Policy - at <http://www.gwhealthpolicy.org/chsrp/>