Opdal and Rognum [1] present an excellent and thorough review of
candidate genes that have been proposed to be involved in the sudden
infant death syndrome (SIDS). However, the proponents of these genes seem
to have “overlooked the forest for the trees.” They apparently focused on
the individual SIDS cases they genotyped and not on the SIDS gestalt [the
pattern of a biological phenomenon constituting a functional unit not
derivable by summation of its parts] because all these genes are either
autosomal or mitochondrial [2]. All alleles of autosomal genes have equal
probability of being inherited by a male or a female infant because each
parent transfers one copy. Mitochondrial DNA is maternally inherited so
both genders receive it with equal probability. Therefore the alleles of
these genes have a theoretical male to female ratio of 1:1. However, SIDS
has a 50% male excess in all developed countries in periods with high
standards of autopsy [3]. This includes Norway from 1986 to 2002 where
there was a 5.6% male live-birth excess, and 598 male and 353 female SIDS
cases [4]. This male excess of 60.4% per 1,000 live births of each gender
is not significantly different from the prediction of 50% (p = 0.32) [3].
There is presently no published explanation for this consistent male
excess in SIDS other than absence of a heretofore undiscovered X-linkage
of a protective dominant allele with frequency of 1/3 that predicts a 50%
male excess in SIDS [3] and other respiratory causes of death [5,6]. For
example, infant death in the U.S. from 1979 to 2001 by accidental
inhalation of food or other object, causing obstruction of the respiratory
tract (9ICD 911, 912; 10ICD W79, W80) had 1,388 male and 899 female cases
[7]. Given the U.S. 5.0% male excess live birth rate, this is a male
excess of 47% per 1,000 live births of each gender, again not
significantly different from 50%
(p = 0.67). We reason that accidental inhalation of food and other objects
by infants is gender independent, so we expect that an equal number of
males and females per 1,000 live births must have inhaled such potentially
fatal items. However, because some 50% more males than females died from
this cause, the females who survived must have had a protective factor
against cerebral hypoxia that the males and females who died did not have.
This factor appears to have allowed emergency treatments to resuscitate
them successfully. We propose that the precipitating factor in SIDS could
be the absence of the same dominant X-linked allele that may be protective
against cerebral hypoxia caused by accidental gender-independent
respiratory obstruction [6].
In summary, if it is likely that SIDS may be polygenic, involving
mitochondrial or autosomal “SIDS genes” [1], at least one additional
necessary SIDS gene must be X-linked in order to explain the consistent
50% male SIDS excess.
1. Opdal SH, Rognum TO. The sudden infant death syndrome gene: does
it exist? Pediatrics. 2004;114(4) e506-512.
2. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM (TM). McKusick-Nathans
Institute for Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD)
and National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of
Medicine (Bethesda, MD), 2000. World Wide Web URL:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim/
3. Mage DT, Donner M. A genetic basis for the sudden infant death
syndrome sex ratio. Med Hypotheses. 1997;48(2):137-42.
4. http://statbank.ssb.no//statistikkbanken/ Accessed October 8,
2004.
5. Finnström, O. A genetic reason for male excess in infant
respiratory mortality? Acta Paediatr. 2004;93(9):1154-5.
6. Mage DT, Donner EM. The fifty percent male excess of infant
respiratory mortality. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93(9):1210-5.
7. United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS),
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for
Health Statistics (NCHS), Office of Analysis, Epidemiology, and Health
Promotion (OAEHP), Compressed Mortality File (CMF) compiled from CMF 1968-
1988, Series 20, No. 2A 2000, CMF 1989-1998, Series 20, No. 2E 2003 and
CMF 1999-2001, Series 20, No. 2G 2004 on CDC WONDER On-line Database.
Accessed October 9, 2004.