|
|
eLetters is an online forum for ongoing
peer review. To submit an eLetter please go to the article you wish
to respond to and click on the link that reads
"eLetters: Submit a Response." Submission of
eLetters are open to all health care professionals
and experts in related fields.
eLetters to:
-
- ARTICLE:
Leonard B. Bacharier, Hengameh H. Raissy, Laura Wilson, Bennie McWilliams, Robert C. Strunk, and H. William Kelly
- Long-Term Effect of Budesonide on Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Function in Children With Mild to Moderate Asthma
Pediatrics 2004; 113: 1693-1699
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
eLetters published:
-
Physiological dose of ACTH
- Brian J Lipworth
(14 June 2004)
-
Response to Dr. Lipworth's Comments
- Leonard B Bacharier, Robert C Strunk, H William Kelly, and Hengameh H. Raissy
(15 June 2004)
|
Physiological dose of ACTH |
14 June 2004 |
|
|
Brian J Lipworth, Professor of allergy and pulmonology Asthma and Allergy Research Group,Ninewells University Hospital,Dundee
Send letter to journal:
Re: Physiological dose of ACTH
b.j.lipworth{at}dundee.ac.uk Brian J Lipworth
|
The authors concluded that budesonide 400ug daily was safe because no
effects were seen on the 250ug ACTH stimulated cortisol response or on 24
hour urinary cortsiol .It is well recognised that the standard dose of
ACTH is 250 times the dose (ie 1ug ) required to elicit a physiological
cortisol response [1,2].Thus when using a supraphysiological 250ug dose of
ACTH ,it is possible that an impaired response may have been missed in
those susceptible children who exhibit increased glucocorticoid receptor
senstivity to systemically absorbed exogenous budesonide. This has
previously been shown with a physiological 1 ug /Kg dose of CRH in
susceptible children taking budesonide 400ug/day [3]. Moreover the use of
24 hour urinary cortisol is likely to be flawed due to compliance with
collections in this age group .
While the results of the CAMP study are on the whole reassuring ,
precribers should still be vigilant when using long term inhaled
cortcosteroids ,particularly in children who are also taking concomitant
intranasal corticosteroid ,which may add to the overall systemic burden in
susceptible individuals.
References
1.Broide J,Soferman R ,Kivity S,et al .Low dose adrenocorticotropin
test reveals impaired adrenal function in patients taking inhaled
corticosteroids .J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:1243-1246
2.Rasmuson S,Olsson T,Hagg E.A low dose ACTH test to assess the
function of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis .Clin Endocrinol
1996;44:151-156
3.Pescollderungg L,Radetti G,Gottardi E, et al .Systemic activity of
inhaled corticosteroid treatment in asthmatic children :corticotrophin
releasing hormone test .Thorax 2003;58:227-30
|
|
Response to Dr. Lipworth's Comments |
15 June 2004 |
|
|
Leonard B Bacharier, Pediatric Allergy/Pulmonary Medicine Washington University/St. Louis Children's Hospital, Robert C Strunk, H William Kelly, and Hengameh H. Raissy
Send letter to journal:
Re: Response to Dr. Lipworth's Comments
bacharier_l{at}kids.wustl.edu Leonard B Bacharier, et al.
|
We concur with Dr. Lipworth that the standard dose of ACTH (250 mcg)
may be less sensitive in detecting subtle levels of adrenal gland
hyporesponsiveness than the low dose ACTH (1 mcg). When CAMP was started
in 1994, the standard dose ACTH test was considered the standard
biochemical approach for assessment of adrenal gland responsiveness.
Furthermore, while the low dose ACTH test may detect lesser degrees of
adrenal suppression (although this is not universally accepted),
interpretation of the low dose test is complicated by a lack of a
threshold which indicates an impaired adrenal response to illness or other
stressors (1). In addition, authors have suggested that mildly abnormal
low-dose ACTH stimulation tests be followed up by either an insulin-
induced hypoglycemia or metyrapone test (2, 3).
We recognized the issues related to 24 hour urine collections, and
for this reason hospitalized these children in the General Clinical
Research Centers to assure appropriate and complete urine collection.
We believe our results are reassuring to the practicing physician,
but remind readers that our findings apply to a subgroup of young children
with mild-moderate asthma treated with low-moderate dose inhaled
corticosteroids. Physicians must remain vigilant for evidence of steroid-
related side effects in other populations with more severe disease or who
use higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids, often in combination with
intranasal corticosteroids.
References:
1. Allen DB. Sense and sensitivity: assessing inhaled corticosteroid
effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Ann Allergy Asthma
Immunol 2002;89(6):537-9.
2. Krasner AS. Glucocorticoid-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency. JAMA
1999;282(7):671-676.
3. Kelly HW. Potential adverse effects of the inhaled
corticosteroids. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;112(3):469-78; quiz 479.
|
| |
|