eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. To submit an eLetter please go to the article you wish to respond to and click on the link that reads "eLetters: Submit a Response." Submission of eLetters are open to all health care professionals and experts in related fields.

eLetters to:

ARTICLE:
Heather J. Chial, Michael Camilleri, Donald E. Williams, Kristi Litzinger, and Jean Perrault
Rumination Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis
Pediatrics 2003; 111: 158-162 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

eLetters published:

[Read eLetters] Rebuttle to some "facts"
Justin K.W. O'Neill   (13 September 2009)

Rebuttle to some "facts" 13 September 2009
  Top
Justin K.W. O'Neill,
Writer
None

Send letter to journal:
Re: Rebuttle to some "facts"

justin.kw.oneill{at}gmail.com Justin K.W. O'Neill

Hello I would like to start by thanking the doctors who made this paper. In a world driven by money and pharmaceutical companies that control the direction of medical science, its nice to see some doctors care about diseases that can't be temporarily fixed with expensive band-aids (medication).

My significant other suffered from rumination for four and a half years. Every doctor told her that she was doing it, was bulimic, or was crazy. It was rather upsetting to know that this was no different in Rochester, where the doctors (Except the GI doctor, the ONLY doctor that needed to see her) made every attempt to convince her that it wasn't rumination. She was diagnosed and taught to breathe. Ironic that the thing she had done all her life was the cure. Upsetting that the doctors couldn't simply ask her to eat something in front of them and immediately diagnose her, no questions asked.

There is something in this paper that truly bothers me. It especially bothers me because doctors that read this will continue to walk around blind to the reality of the situation. You have cited a paper from 1958 that has declared rumination a "benign" disorder. I only can hope that this refers to it not being cancerous (In which case I ask that you specify that in the paper). However, I am more inclined to assume that this means that doctors believe this disorder to be a mere inconvenience.

I do not know who the doctors are speaking for. The patients, or themselves. I can only say that those doctors should go hungry for 4 years no matter how much they eat, and then be told that they are "eating too much". Those doctors should try living 2.75 years (The average time before diagnosis) without keeping down a single meal. When this happens, you may call this disorder benign. Until then, this is a serious condition and should be treated as such. Please remove the benign statement from your papers and do not cite a journal from 1958 that studied a handful of patients.

- Justin O'Neill

Conflict of Interest:

A member of my family suffered from rumination for 4 years. After a week of unnecessary and expensive testing at Mayo Clinic Rochester, she was diagnosed and showing the breathing exercises. Her rumination ceased immediately.