eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. To submit an eLetter please go to the article you wish to respond to and click on the link that reads "eLetters: Submit a Response." Submission of eLetters are open to all health care professionals and experts in related fields.

eLetters to:

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Theresa A. Schlager, Maureen Clark, and Susan Anderson
Effect of a Single-Use Sterile Catheter for Each Void on the Frequency of Bacteriuria in Children With Neurogenic Bladder on Intermittent Catheterization for Bladder Emptying
Pediatrics 2001; 108: e71 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

eLetters published:

[Read eLetters] The question is, why do this study?
Richard W CHIU   (2 October 2001)
[Read eLetters] Re: The question is, why do this study?
Amy A Egan   (22 August 2003)
[Read eLetters] Preliminary studies should not be used to change patient care policies
theresa a schlager   (2 September 2003)

The question is, why do this study? 2 October 2001
 Next eLetters Top
Richard W CHIU,
Paediatric Nephrologist
Paediatrics, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China

Send letter to journal:
Re: The question is, why do this study?

rwchiu{at}hku.hk Richard W CHIU

Dear Dr Schlager,

Having read your paper "Bacteriuria in children with neurogenic bladder treated with intermittent catheterization: Natural history" (J PEDIATR 1995;126:490-6) when it was published, I am very convinced that asymptomatic bacteriuria in patients with neuropathic bladder treated with intermittent clean catheterisation is rather benign and does not need treatment. Why do you want to do a study to reduce asymptomatic bacteriuria in this group of patients?

I must acknowledge how much we were indebted to your original paper in 1995.

Yours sincerely, Richard W Chiu

Re: The question is, why do this study? 22 August 2003
Previous eLetters Next eLetters Top
Amy A Egan,
RN

Send letter to journal:
Re: Re: The question is, why do this study?

kkaspurr{at}cox.net Amy A Egan

I work for a Medicaid insurance company and have been noticing excess when it comes to requesting intermittent/ straight catheters with the paraplegia population. The arguement we had is in needing a new catheter each time versus cleaning the catheters between catheterization. I believed in the home environment cleaning between use was appropriate, but received arguement from case management in that patient will have higher frequency of UTI. This article will help back up my arguement. Thank you.

Preliminary studies should not be used to change patient care policies 2 September 2003
Previous eLetters  Top
theresa a schlager,
MD
Univ Virginia

Send letter to journal:
Re: Preliminary studies should not be used to change patient care policies

tas8n{at}virginia.edu theresa a schlager

Our study examined the frequency of bacteriuria in the same patient using sterile single-use catheters for voiding versus reused clean catheters. Bacteriuria and urinary tract infection were defined. The 10 adolescents enrolled in the study had myelomeningocele, lived outside hospital and had normal upper urinary tracts. We found that use of a sterile single-use catheter for each void did not decrease the high frequency of bacteriuria. Of note, the number of urinary tract infections was too small to compare between groups. As a result, we were unable to address whether sterile single-use catheters decreased urinary tract infection in this population. A study with a larger number of patients would be required to answer this question. It is unclear whether Escherichia coli detected in the urine of patients on intermittent catheterization originates from the periurethra or from chronic colonization of the bladder mucosa. Further investigation is required to elucidate the cause of chronic bacteriuria in this population. Any policies regarding catheter use cannot be derived from this study. To do so would be unscientific and in hospitalized patients, potentially dangerous.