|
|
eLetters is an online forum for ongoing
peer review. To submit an eLetter please go to the article you wish
to respond to and click on the link that reads
"eLetters: Submit a Response." Submission of
eLetters are open to all health care professionals
and experts in related fields.
eLetters to:
-
- ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Agneta Hörnell, Yngve Hofvander, and Elisabeth Kylberg
- Solids and Formula: Association With Pattern and Duration of Breastfeeding
Pediatrics 2001; 107: e38
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
eLetters published:
-
"Associations" are not "Cause and Effect" relationships.
- Mary Fay
(13 April 2001)
-
Re: "Associations" are not "Cause and Effect" relationships.
- A Hörnell, "Y Hofvander, E Kylberg"
(27 July 2001)
|
"Associations" are not "Cause and Effect" relationships. |
13 April 2001 |
|
|
Mary Fay, M.D.
Send letter to journal:
Re: "Associations" are not "Cause and Effect" relationships.
mfay2{at}home.com Mary Fay
|
As the title of this article suggests, there is an association
between feeding infants formula and decreased incidence of breastfeeding.
This association is just that - an association - and not a cause and
effect relationship. Formula feeding does not cause the decrease in
breastfeeding; formula feeding occurs when mothers don't breast feed. Some
food has to take the place of breast milk, but it is not necessarily true
that the food causes the demise of breastfeeding. The only etiology of
why mothers stop breastfeeding contained in this article is the mother’s
belief the child needs more calories than the breast milk is supplying.
Whether or not that perception is accurate isn't clear from the data
supplied, so no conclusion can be drawn.
It may be true that formula feedings will decrease breast milk
production and end it when dealing with a mother-infant pair who are
successfully breast feeding. If a mother introduces formula in place of a
breastfeeding, the infant’s decreased need for breast milk will ultimately
result in decreased output due to less time suckling. This is called
"weaning," but is that occurring in the children looked at in this study?
Are these children normal breastfeeders, or are these children in need of
more calories, as their mothers perceive? This is extremely important
information because the authors imply that practitioners may be able to
increase the incidence of normal breastfeeding simply by counseling
mothers not to use formula. If the infant and mother are healthy and
normal, this will be true, but if the mother is not producing enough
breast milk, or the child has trouble suckling at the breast but can take
fluids more easily through the bottle nipple, it won’t. All too often
I’ve seen a mother who is having trouble nursing successfully bottle feed
a child who is too congested to stay on the breast. Bottle feedings are
easier on the infant, and the mother’s perception about the child needing
more is correct in that the child is frustrated by the slow feedings.
Formula was not the problem.
This sort of mistake about association vs. cause and effect happens
so frequently in the medical literature as to be disturbing. Perhaps not
allowing parents to use formula would insure more children receive breast
milk, but whether or not the mother would be able to supply that breast
milk or would be able to nurse a congested child who can’t latch on well
enough hours in the day has to be considered. Physicians counseling
mothers on feeding practices must never forget that guilt doesn't enhance
the parenting experience, nor, in my experience, is it likely to promote
breastfeeding. Unless you determine a child is receiving enough calories
and nursing is normal, you can't make a blanket statement to a mother
about not giving formula. If a mother feels the child is hungry or
frustrated by breastfeeding, it's more important to address her fears than
forbid her from using formula. She is probably right.
|
|
Re: "Associations" are not "Cause and Effect" relationships. |
27 July 2001 |
|
|
A Hörnell, researcher and senior lecturer Dep. Food and Nutrition, Umeå University, Sweden, "Y Hofvander, E Kylberg"
Send letter to journal:
Re: Re: "Associations" are not "Cause and Effect" relationships.
agneta.hornell{at}kost.umu.se A Hörnell, et al.
|
It is important to increase parents´ and health care personnel´s
knowledge about factors that might influence the milk production. Bottle-
feeding and pacifier use have been associated with decreased breastfeeding
in most studies and there are several physiological ways in which bottles
and pacifiers can intervene with breastfeeding (e.g "nipple-confusion",
less suckling on the breast). This does not necessarily indicate a cause
and effect relationship, since mothers might introduce bottles and
pacifiers with the intention to decrease/stop breastfeeding.
Some children can mix bottlefeeding and/or pacifier use and
breastfeeding, and some can not. Unfortunately, it is not possible to know
beforehand how an individual child will react. Therefore, it is important
that parents who want to continue with breastfeeding and combine it with
bottlefeeding and/or pacifier use, are made aware of the associaton with
decreased breastfeeding, so that they will be more likely to react quickly
if their child shows signs of not being able to cope.
Our research facilitates individual counselling and support to
parents based on informed choices - guilt and forbidding does not come
into it.
|
| |
|