Dear Sir, to evaluated the presence of asthma as a parameter of
effective response in the three groups of children is a very interesting
approach, but could miss some other more obvious diseases that properly
reflect the improvement in the quality of the health for the low income
children. I feel that by evaluating for example, the presence and number
of episodies of acute respiratory infections (ARI) and acute diarrhea (AD)
could produce more significant values for the group in the low income
bracket.
It is well known that in populations of low income, like the existing
in third world countries or children located in the poverty bracket in
well developed countries, the fact of receiving primary care, yield a
significant reduction in the mortality, hospitalization rate, the
immunization scheme is completed, and the malnutrition is controlled. The
presence of ARI and AD are detected early and yield less complications.
Therefore, I consider that this study if additional parameters were
added and evaluated, could have a more broad impact, and even yield to the
development of similar health care structure as the reported in Colorado
in another locations worldwide.