Published online October 2, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 4 October 2006, pp. 1692-1702 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0620)

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kuo, A. A. Articles by Halfon, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kuo, A. A. Articles by Halfon, N. Related Collections Office Practice Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

SPECIAL ARTICLE

Rethinking Well-Child Care in the United States: An International Comparison

Alice A. Kuo, MD, PhD^a, Moira Inkelas, PhD^b, Debra S. Lotstein, MD, MPH^a, Kyra M. Samson, MD, MPH^a, Edward L. Schor, MD^c and Neal Halfon, MD, MPH^a,b

^a Department of Pediatrics, Mattel Children’s Hospital at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
^b UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California
^c Commonwealth Fund, New York, New York

BACKGROUND. The increasing scope of health supervision recommendations challenges well-child care delivery in the United States. Comparison of the United States with other countries’ delivery systems may highlight different assumptions as well as structural approaches for consideration.

OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to describe the process of well-child care delivery in industrialized nations and compare it to the US model of child health care.

METHODS. Literature reviews and international experts were used to identify 10 countries with unique features of well-child care delivery for comparison to the United States. Key-informant interviews using a structured protocol were held with child health experts in 10 countries to delineate the structural and practice features of their systems. Site visits produced additional key informant data from 5 countries (Netherlands, England, Australia, Sweden, and France).

RESULTS. A primary care framework was adapted to analyze structural and practice features of well-child care in the 10 countries. Although well-child care content is similar, there are marked differences in the definitions of well-child care and the scope of practice of primary care professionals and pediatricians specifically who provide this care across the 10 countries. In contrast to the United States, none of the countries place all well-child care components under the responsibility of a single primary care provider. Well-child care services and care for acute, chronic, and behavioral/developmental problems are often provided by different clinicians and within different service systems.

CONCLUSIONS. Despite some similarities, well-child care models from other countries differ from the United States in key structural features on the basis of broad financing differences as well as specific visions for effective well-child care services. Features of these models can inform child health policy makers and providers in rethinking how desired improvements in US well-child care delivery might be sought.

---

Key Words: developmental care • preventive services • preventive health care visits

Abbreviations: AAP—American Academy of Pediatrics • MCH—maternal and child health • PMI—Protection Maternelle et Infantile

---

Accepted May 23, 2006.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Manning, A. J. Ariza, T. K. Massimino, H. J. Binns, and for the Pediatric Practice Research Group Health Supervision Visits of Very Young Children: Time Addressing 3 Key Topics Clinical Pediatrics, November 1, 2009; 48(9): 931 - 938. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Radecki, L. M. Olson, M. P. Frintner, J. L. Tanner, and M. T. Stein What Do Families Want From Well-Child Care? Including Parents in the Rethinking Discussion Pediatrics, September 1, 2009; 124(3): 858 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Coker, P. J. Chung, B. O. Cowgill, L. Chen, and M. A. Rodriguez Low-Income Parents' Views on the Redesign of Well-Child Care Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): 194 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Rechel, N. Spencer, C. Blackburn, R. Holland, and B. Rechel Impact of health reforms on child health services in Europe: the case of Bulgaria Eur J Public Health, June 1, 2009; 19(3): 326 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Dubowitz, S. Feigelman, W. Lane, and J. Kim Pediatric Primary Care to Help Prevent Child Maltreatment: The Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) Model Pediatrics, March 1, 2009; 123(3): 858 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Council on Community Pediatrics The Role of Preschool Home-Visiting Programs in Improving Children's Developmental and Health Outcomes Pediatrics, February 1, 2009; 123(2): 598 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Fiks, K. F. Hunter, A. R. Localio, R. W. Grundmeier, and E. A. Alessandrini Impact of Immunization at Sick Visits on Well-Child Care Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): 898 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. O. Ertem, D. G. Dogan, C. G. Gok, S. U. Kizilates, A. Caliskan, G. Atay, N. Vatandas, T. Karaaslan, S. G. Baskan, and D. V. Cicchetti A Guide for Monitoring Child Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 121(3): e581 - e589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Schor Should Children With Special Health Care Needs Have Separate Preventive Care Visits? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2007; 161(12): 1216 - 1218. [Full Text] [PDF]