This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lalwani, K.
Right arrow Articles by McGraw, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lalwani, K.
Right arrow Articles by McGraw, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 3 September 2001, pp. 817-817

Concerns/Questions About Sedation and Computed Tomography Scans

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

To the Editor.

We offer our comments regarding the article "Rectal Methohexital Sedation for Computed Tomography Imaging of Stable Pediatric Emergency Department Patients" published in Pediatrics.1

In the "Methods" section, the exclusion criteria include patients with altered mental status. However, in the "Results" section we read that "the most common indication for computed . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?