One hundred twenty-nine (29%) PICCs were removed for complications.
Occlusion (7%), accidental displacement (8%), and suspicion of sepsis
(8%) were the most common complications. Only 2% of PICCs had
documented catheter-associated sepsis.
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are
frequently used to provide prolonged intravenous (IV) access in both
acute and home care settings. Shaw described PICC use in 1973 as a
method of providing reliable vascular access for total parenteral
nutrition (TPN) in neonates.1,2 PICCs were
subsequently used to provide IV access for administration of prolonged
antibiotic courses in children with cystic fibrosis during pulmonary
exacerbations.3 PICCs lasted twice as long as conventional
peripheral IV cannulae, reducing the number of venipunctures by half
and enabling home therapy.3 PICC utilization has continued
to increase because these catheters are easy to insert and have a low
incidence of complications compared with other surgically placed
central lines.2,4
PICCs are made of biocompatible material, usually polyurethane or
silicone. Insertion is simple and is usually done by nursing personnel
who have completed a recommended certification process.6 The success rate for insertion of PICCs ranges from 78% to
92%.4,5,11,12 Veins of the antecubital fossa are commonly
used; however, the saphenous, axillary, or even scalp veins can be
used.3,6,9 Complications associated with PICC insertion are
infrequent, but include bleeding, tendon or nerve damage, cardiac
arrhythmias, chest pain, catheter malposition, and catheter
embolism.5
Few studies have examined the use of these catheters in a large
pediatric population. We examined PICC utilization in a
university-affiliated children's hospital. Our goals were to describe
the patient population treated with PICCs as well as catheter features
such as average catheter life, completion of therapy, reasons for
removal, and complications. Finally, we compared PICC-related data of
children receiving therapy at home, or at an outside hospital, with
those hospitalized for the entire time of PICC use.
METHODS
Information was prospectively collected on all PICCs inserted at
Seattle Children's Hospital and Medical Center (CHMC) during an
18-month period from January 1994 to July 1995. PICCs were inserted
primarily by the IV nursing team. Referrals for catheter placement
occurred at the discretion of the patient's primary physician and were
made directly to the IV team.
All insertions were done as inpatient procedures. Per-Q-Cath (Gesco
Inc, San Antonio, TX) or L-Cath (Luther Medical Products Inc, Tustin,
CA) catheters of sizes ranging from 2- to 5-French (catheter size
23-gauge to 16-gauge) were used. The size and choice of catheter was
determined by the IV team member inserting the catheter. Anesthesia was
provided with 1% lidocaine local infiltration or EMLA cream (Astra
Pharmaceuticals, Westborough, MA), supplemented when needed with oral
chloral hydrate or IV midazolam.
Patient preparation and insertion techniques were standardized by
hospital protocol. After a suitable vein for insertion was identified,
the area of skin at the proposed insertion site was cleaned with
povidone-iodine solution, and covered with sterile drapes. The IV team
member inserting the catheter wore a cap, mask, sterile gown, and
sterile gloves. After infiltrating the site with 1% lidocaine, the
vein was punctured using the introducer needle. The catheter was then
inserted through the needle, to a premeasured length. The needle was
then removed and the exit site was dressed with dry sterile gauze. The
dressing was changed every week, or earlier if soiled. The location of
the catheter tip was determined radiographically. When the tip was not
easily visible by the plain radiograph, contrast material injected
through the catheter was used to delineate the tip. The tip was
considered to be in a central vein if it was placed in the superior
vena cava (SVC), the inferior vena cava (IVC), or subclavian vein. Afterwards, catheter care was administered by the nurses caring for the
patient. At insertion, patient demographic information was recorded on
a log sheet by the IV team member inserting the catheter. The IV team
monitored these catheters closely and recorded complications for the
duration of catheter use on the log sheet.
PICCs were used for IV fluid therapy, administration of medication, and
blood products. TPN solutions with dextrose concentrations of more than
12.5% were administered through centrally placed catheters. Catheters
were accessed continuously or intermittently. For PICCs accessed
continuously, the use of heparin to maintain line patency was at the
discretion of the primary physician. When PICCs were accessed
intermittently, they were flushed with heparin-containing saline
solution after each use. Insertion and removal complications were
noted. For patients who were discharged home or to another institution
with a catheter in situ, care was given by local nursing personnel,
maintaining telephone contact with the IV team at CHMC.
PICCs were removed for various reasons including: completion of
therapy, occlusion, accidental dislodgement, and suspicion of
catheter-associated infection. The following definitions were used to
define infectious complications: 1) phlebitis was defined as
inflammation tracking along the course of the vein from the insertion
site, with or without a palpable venous cord; 2) exit-site infection
was present when inflammation and purulent discharge were noted at the
insertion site; and 3) catheter-associated sepsis was diagnosed in
patients with fever without another identifiable source, who had a
positive blood or catheter-tip culture (Maki roll technique).
To compare catheter use and function in different age groups, patients
were divided into four groups: 0 to 30 days old; 31 days to 1 year old;
1 to 5 years old; and older than 5 years. Continuous data were compared
with analysis of variance and the t test. Adjustments for
multiple comparisons were done with the Tukey-B test. Categorical data
were compared using the
2 and Fisher's exact tests.
Significance was defined as P < .05.
RESULTS
A total of 444 PICCs were inserted in 390 patients during the
18-month period. Data was complete for 441 of 444 PICC insertions. Demographic information of the study subjects is presented in Table
1. The median age of patients in the group was 3.4 years (range 0 days to 22 years). No complication from insertion was noted.
Catheter size ranged from 2- to 5-French (Table 2).
Three-French catheters were most frequently used in all ages (48%).
Two-French was the most commonly used catheter size in the 0 to 30 day
group (93%) and in infants 31 days to 1 year old (85%), while
3-French was most commonly used in children 1 to 5 years old (60%) and older than 5 years (82%). The veins most commonly accessed were antecubital (89%). The tip was located in a central location in 53%
of insertions and a peripheral location in 47% of insertions.
Antecedent medical diagnosis and services referring patients for PICC
placement are outlined in Tables 3 and 4. Treatment of infectious disease was the most common cause for PICC
insertion (46%). Referral for PICC insertion was most commonly made by
the general pediatric service (20%); however, PICCs were used by most pediatric medical and surgical subspecialty services.
Sixty-one percent of PICCs were used entirely in CHMC, while 39% were
also used at home or in a referring community hospital. The average
catheter life was 13 ± 12 days. Neither patient age nor catheter
lumen size were significantly related to catheter life. Catheter lives
for each lumen size were 2-French (12.9 days), 2.7-French (11 days),
3-French (12.4 days), 4-French (16.6 days), and 5-French (13.4 days).
Completion of therapy was achieved with 69% of catheters.
Significantly fewer PICCs used entirely at CHMC (69%) completed
therapy compared with those used outside the institution (77%),
(P = .01).
A total of 129 PICCs (29%) were removed for complications (Table
5) with accidental dislodgement (8%), suspected
infection (8%), and occlusion (7%) being the most common reasons. No
increase in occlusion rate between home and hospital use was found.
Occlusion was significantly more common with smaller lumen sizes.
Eleven percent of 2-French catheters became occluded compared with 4% of 3- French and 7% of 4-French catheters. Accidental dislodgement was
more common with older infants 31 days to 1 year old and children 1 to
5 years old (17% and 11.3%, respectively) than in those 0 to 30 days
old or children older than 5 years (5.9% and 4.6%, respectively). The
influence of the methods used to secure PICCs on the incidence of
dislodgement could not be determined. Rate of dislodgement did not
differ between out of CHMC use and CHMC use.
|
Table 5.
Reason for Removal of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters:
CHMC vs Outside Use
[View Table]
|
A total of 37 PICCs (8%) were removed for suspected catheter
infection. Fourteen PICCs (3%) were removed because of fever without
another identifiable source. Nine (2%) were associated with a positive
blood or catheter tip culture (catheter-associated sepsis). Of these, 8 PICCs were used only in CHMC, while 1 PICC was used outside CHMC.
Coagulase negative staphylococcus species, enterococcus,
Escherichia coli, and candidia species were the organisms
cultured from blood or catheter tip in patients with documented
catheter-associated sepsis. Eight PICCs (2%) were removed due to
purulent drainage and inflammation at exit site. Of these, 6 PICCs were
used in CHMC and 2 outside. Phlebitis resulted in the removal of 16 PICCs (3.6%)
10 during use at CHMC compared with 6 during outside
use. Patients whose PICCs were removed for exit site infection or
phlebitis did not have fever or other signs of systemic sepsis.
TPN solutions were administered in 34% of catheters. TPN
administration did not decrease catheter life (14.1 days) compared with
catheters not used for TPN administration (12.2 days). Seven cases of
catheter-associated sepsis occurred in children receiving TPN; however,
this association was not statistically significant. No complications
were noted during catheter removal and no deaths were directly
attributed to PICC use.
One infant developed bilateral pleural effusions 1 week after PICC
placement for TPN administration with the catheter tip located in the
SVC. Fluid drained from the pleural space had glucose and triglyceride
levels similar to the TPN administered through the PICC, which was
removed. The pleural effusions did not recur and the infant recovered.
DISCUSSION
Our study demonstrated that PICCs are a safe and reliable IV
access device in neonates and children. They are also safe in the home
setting if parents and home nursing personnel are properly instructed
in catheter care and recognition of catheter complications.
In our study, PICCs were used by a wide range of pediatric
subspecialties, therapy was completed in two thirds of PICCs inserted and the incidence of phlebitis and catheter-associated sepsis was low.
Patients using PICC for therapy outside our institution had similar
catheter life and completion of therapy rates. Complications associated
with PICC use outside were fewer compared with their exclusive hospital
use. This is not surprising because hospitalized children are typically
sicker and have increased risk of nosocomial infections and exposure to
multiple medications, increasing the risk of thrombophlebitis.
Prior reports of therapy completion have ranged from 50% to 96% in
patients with a single PICC.6,8 Our study demonstrated therapy completion in 69% of PICCs. The increased occlusion rate in
smaller- lumen catheters, however, did not significantly lower the rate
of completion of therapy in infants compared with older children. PICCs
in our study were used in many patients who required prolonged IV
access. An average catheter life of almost 2 weeks provided prolonged
uninterrupted IV access. The longest catheter life in our study was 132 days. No limits as to the duration of leaving the catheter in situ have
been established.6,13
No complications were related to catheter insertion. Risks associated
with placement of PICCs are very low; thus, catheters can be replaced
at another site without putting a patient at significant risk.9,10 Furthermore, accessibility of peripheral veins
for compression make control of bleeding easy during insertion.
Therefore, PICCs can be used safely in patients with a bleeding
diathesis to provide central access for therapy.9
About 30% of PICCs in our study were removed for complications.
Occlusion was more common in 2-French catheters (the smallest lumen)
than with others. This finding is similar to the study in adults, where
occlusion was more common in smaller catheters (18-gauge vs
20-gauge).9 Occlusion can sometimes be relieved by flushing
with urokinase.6,8,9 However, excessive force to flush
catheters may result in catheter rupture or cause
thromboembolism.9 Occluded catheters that cannot be
relieved with gentle flushing should be removed and
replaced.9 Although catheters can break or rupture at the
external portion, they can be repaired with the repair kit supplied
without having to replace the catheter.6
Catheter-associated sepsis requires removal of the catheter and
appropriate antibiotic therapy. The incidence of catheter-associated sepsis with PICCs ranged from 0 to 2.2% in previous
studies.6,8,9,12 In our study, the incidence of
catheter-associated sepsis (2%) was similar to previous reports and
lower than catheter-associated infection associated with other central
venous devices (3% to 20%) or peripheral venous catheters (4.6% to
9%).9,10,14,15 The incidence of infections tended to be
higher with PICCs used in the hospital and with TPN administration;
however, this was not statistically significant.
The occurrence of pleural effusion in one patient was a serious
complication of PICC use. Although, no complications were noted with
PICC removal, difficulty with removal attritubable to fibrin deposition
around the catheter may occur as a rare complication.6
In conclusion, PICCs are a reliable method of providing prolonged IV
therapy in children of all ages. Decreased number of catheter
placements, compared with peripheral IV catheters per therapy, can be
expected to decrease patient pain and apprehension.3,4,6 PICCs have fewer insertion and infectious complications compared with
other central venous devices. Furthermore, these catheters allow safe
completion of IV therapy outside the hospital setting, saving continued
expensive hospitalization. Measures to prevent accidental dislodgement
in infants and children younger than 5 years old must be reinforced.
Care givers of patients discharged home with an indwelling catheter
must be taught good aseptic techniques and be advised to seek medical
advice if the patient develops fever or catheter-related pain. PICCs
can provide safe and prolonged IV access for neonates and children
in the hospital or home setting.
Received for publication Apr 19, 1996; accepted Jul 16, 1996.
Address correspondence to: Susan L. Bratton, MD, MPH,
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Children's Hospital and
Medical Center, 4800 Sandpoint Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105.