PEDIATRICS Vol. 99 No. 2 February 1997, pp. 289-299

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS:
Therapy for Children With Invasive Pneumococcal Infections

Committee on Infectious Diseases

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Methods Recommendation References

This statement provides guidelines for therapy of children with serious infections possibly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Resistance of invasive pneumococcal strains to penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone has increased over the past few years. Reports of failures of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone in the treatment of children with meningitis caused by resistant S pneumoniae necessitates a revision of Academy recommendations. For nonmeningeal infections, modifications of the initial therapy need to be considered only for patients who are critically ill and those who have a severe underlying or potentially immunocompromising condition or patients from whom a highly resistant strain is isolated. Because vancomycin is the only antibiotic to which all S pneumoniae strains are susceptible, its use should be restricted to minimize the emergence of vancomycin-resistant organisms. Patients with probable aseptic (viral) meningitis should not be treated with vancomycin. These recommendations are subject to change as new information becomes available.

	ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN STREPTOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE

Epidemiology of Antimicrobial Resistance

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggest that the same nomenclature used to define resistance for other bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, be used for S pneumoniae. All organisms with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) equal to or greater than that defined for the intermediate category of resistance will be classified as nonsusceptible (Table 1). Resistant organisms will have an MIC equal to or greater than that defined for the resistant category. These latter organisms were formerly known as highly resistant. Strains in the resistant category for the penicillins, cephalosporins, and other -lactam antibiotics are of particular concern, because they are generally also resistant to most other antibiotics, including the cephalosporins, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline.¹ In children older than 2 months, Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common cause of invasive bacterial infections. The prevalence of infections caused by penicillin-nonsusceptible S pneumoniae for all ages has increased in the United States during the last 5 years (Figure).^2-6 In recent years, in children, the proportion of penicillin-nonsusceptible invasive isolates has varied from 0% to 41%. Of these nonsusceptible isolates, 5% to 21% were resistant (Table 1). The incidence of cefotaxime- and ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible isolates has increased to 20% in some areas (Table 2).^7-25

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   Prevalence of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1979-1995. (Adapted from Doern GV. Mediguide to Infectious Diseases. 1995;15:1-4).

Mechanism of Antimicrobial Resistance

Penicillins, cephalosporins, and other -lactam antibiotics kill S pneumoniae by binding irreversibly to high molecular weight enzymes located in the bacterial cell wall. These enzymes, also known as penicillin-binding proteins, are responsible for synthesizing peptidoglycan for new cell wall formation. Chromosomal gene changes can alter the structure of these enzymes, thereby decreasing the binding affinity for penicillin and the cephalosporins and resulting in resistance.²⁶ Resistance of S pneumoniae to penicillin and cephalosporins is not mediated by -lactamase enzymes. Consequently, treatment of pneumococcal infections resistant to these antibiotics with -lactamase-resistant drugs, such as extended spectrum cephalosporins or combinations of broad spectrum penicillins plus clavulanate or sulbactam, offers no advantage.

The highest levels of resistance reported have been MICs of 8 to 16 µg/mL for penicillin²⁷ and 16 to 32 µg/mL for cefotaxime and ceftriaxone.^28-30 Although uncommon, resistance also has been described for clindamycin, rifampin, and imipenem.

	METHODOLOGY

Top Abstract Methods Recommendation References

In developing this statement, the Committee reviewed all available information relative to several areas: (1) prevalence of -lactam-resistant pneumococcal disease in children in the United States; (2) optimal laboratory diagnosis of drug-resistant pneumococci; (3) in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of nonsusceptible pneumococci, particularly those using time-kill methods; (4) pharmacokinetic and efficacy studies of antimicrobials for the treatment of meningitis in animal models; (5) pharmacokinetic studies of antimicrobials alone and in combination in children with meningitis; (6) case reports; (7) retrospective and prospective studies of nonsusceptible pneumococcal infections in children examining both bacteriologic and clinical outcome variables; and, (8) the effect of dexamethasone on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) antimicrobial concentrations in animal models and in children.

A med-line search initially identified 250 articles for review. Additional articles published during the time of statement development as well as lectures and abstracts presented at regional and national meetings during this time were included in the Committee's deliberations. Additional articles were identified from personal files of Committee members, CDC reports, and bibliographies of articles. After evaluating all the articles for relevance and validity, 160 were selected for complete review.

The recommendations were drawn from an analysis of this literature and were augmented by expert consensus opinion. In areas for which the literature did not provide strong scientific evidence to support specific recommendations, the Committee used nominal group process to achieve consensus.

Expert consultants, including all of the Committee liaison representatives, reviewed the recommendations on several occasions. They were also reviewed by the AAP Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine and The CDC Drug Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Therapeutic Working Group.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Pneumococci, which are nonsusceptible to penicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and other antimicrobial agents, are divided into the categories of intermediate and resistant based on the predicted ability of these drugs to treat pneumococcal infections effectively (Table 1).³¹ -Lactam antibiotic concentrations in CSF adequate to treat nonsusceptible organisms may not be achieved consistently.³² Serum concentrations of antibiotics after parenteral administration are much higher. Therefore, for nonmeningeal infections, organisms usually may be treated successfully with those -lactam antibiotics to which they are nonsusceptible.³³ For some resistant organisms, however, a change of antimicrobial may be necessary depending on the clinical course.

All pneumococcal isolates from normally sterile body sites should be tested for penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone susceptibility using the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS).³¹

Manual agar or broth dilution techniques provide the most accurate quantitative results and should be used whenever possible.³⁴ Many hospital laboratories are not equipped to perform these techniques and will depend on the E test (Epsilometric test, AB Biodisk North America Inc., Culver City, CA). The E test is a plastic strip containing an antimicrobial concentration gradient. It is simple to use and reasonably reliable for determining MIC values.^25,34 However, the separation between susceptible, intermediate, and resistant categories may not always be distinct, and interpretation may vary with the observer.^34,35 If the patient is not responding as well as anticipated, the possibility that the E test could have been misread by one MIC value should be considered. Other test methods approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the quantitative susceptibility testing of pneumococci include Microtech, Pasco, or Sensititre. Other automated test methods are not reliable and should not be used.³⁶

Most laboratories using NCCLS guidelines for susceptibility testing will need 48 to 72 hours to provide results for pneumococcal antibiotic susceptibilities.³¹ To abbreviate this process, when the CSF smear shows characteristic gram-positive diplococci, some laboratories place the penicillin and cefotaxime (or ceftriaxone) E test strips directly on the agar plates at the time of CSF inoculation. This procedure is not standardized, and the results should be confirmed using the standard NCCLS protocols.

When quantitative testing methods are not available, the qualitative screening test using a 1-µg oxacillin disk reliably identifies all penicillin-susceptible pneumococci that have a disk zone diameter of 20 mm or greater. For organisms with an oxacillin disk zone size less than 20 mm, indicating potential nonsusceptibility to penicillin, additional quantitative susceptibility testing must be performed. Up to 40% of these organisms will be susceptible to penicillin (although resistant to oxacillin), and the size of the zone around the disk does not accurately distinguish between organisms with an MIC defined as intermediate or resistant (Table 1).^14,37

If the organism is penicillin-nonsusceptible by any form of testing, additional quantitative susceptibility testing should be performed for cefotaxime or ceftriaxone. The MIC results for either drug adequately parallel each other; thus, only one needs to be tested. Strains resistant to penicillin are more likely to be resistant to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. Furthermore, clones of pneumococci have been isolated that are much more resistant to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone than to penicillin.^23,29,30 Susceptibility testing also should be determined for other clinically relevant drugs for meningitis treatment, which should include vancomycin, meropenem, and rifampin. For nonmeningeal invasive infections, susceptibility testing should be performed for erythromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, cefuroxime and potentially imipenem, meropenem and chloramphenicol (Table 1). Strains resistant to erythromycin are also resistant to the related antibiotics clarithromycin and azithromycin.

Isolation of S pneumoniae with a vancomycin MIC greater than 1 µg/mL should be reported immediately to the state health department. Because no isolates of S pneumoniae with an MIC this high have been identified, the state health department will arrange for confirmation testing. Identification of such isolates is critical for both local and national surveillance programs and for providing feedback to area physicians. For the same reasons, organisms resistant to penicillin and cefotaxime, or ceftriaxone should also be reported to the state health department.

	MENINGITIS

Distinguishing Aseptic (Viral) From Bacterial Meningitis

Many more cases of aseptic meningitis occur than pneumococcal meningitis. In 1993, 12 848 cases of aseptic meningitis were reported to the CDC.³⁸ Because most physicians do not report such cases, it is probable that a more accurate annual incidence figure would be at least threefold higher, or approximately 30 000 cases per year. The estimated incidence of pneumococcal meningitis for all age groups is 1 to 2 cases per 100 000 population.³⁹ For the population of the United States, this represents approximately 3000 to 5000 cases per year. Thus, there will be 6 to 10 cases of aseptic meningitis for every case of pneumococcal meningitis, particularly during the summer and fall.

To prevent the development of vancomycin-resistant S pneumoniae, it is imperative that use of vancomycin be minimized. Children with suspected or proved aseptic meningitis should not receive vancomycin. For children pretreated with antibiotics or those for whom the clinical and CSF findings are equivocal, the decision of whether to begin antibiotic therapy is more difficult.⁴⁰ Several indices may be helpful in reaching a decision. For younger children with pneumococcal meningitis, 90% to 100% of the time, the Gram-stained smear of the CSF is positive.⁴¹ In older children and adults, only 50% to 68% of Gram-stained smears of CSF are positive.^42,43 The latex agglutination test using CSF is more rapid and more sensitive than Gram-staining,⁴⁴ but a negative test does not rule out a diagnosis of pneumococcal meningitis. Preceding antibiotic therapy is unlikely to change CSF parameters sufficiently to interfere with the ability to distinguish viral from suspected bacterial meningitis.^45-47 For the young infant, the distinction between aseptic and bacterial meningitis may be particularly difficult.⁴⁸ A total protein concentration of 100 mg/dL or greater is rare in infants with aseptic meningitis and may be helpful in separating bacterial from viral meningitis.

In some circumstances, distinguishing between viral and early bacterial meningitis in children older than 1 month continues to be difficult. In most settings, a bacterial cause will be responsible in less than half of these children. The likelihood of children having bacterial meningitis caused by S pneumoniae resistant to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone is less than 20% in most areas. If previously administered oral or intramuscular antibiotics suppress the presence of the organism on a Gram-stained smear, resistance of the causative organism to the high doses of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone administered for meningitis will be unlikely.

Initial Therapy for Children With Bacterial Meningitis

Optimal management of bacterial meningitis requires treatment with antimicrobial agents at dosages that achieve concentrations providing bactericidal activity in CSF diluted 1:8.⁴⁹

Antimicrobials of Potential Use for the Treatment of Pneumococcal Meningitis

Penicillin The recommended dosage of penicillin G for pneumococcal meningitis is 250 000 to 400 000 U/kg/d (150 to 240 mg), given intravenously (IV) in four to six divided doses (Table 3). A dose of 250 000 U/kg/d (150 mg) given in six divided doses results in mean CSF concentrations of 0.8 µg/mL sustained throughout the 4 hours between infusions.⁵⁰ For penicillin-susceptible pneumococci (MIC 0.06 µg/mL), this concentration of penicillin approaches the desired bactericidal concentration in the CSF. However, for penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci (MIC 0.1 µg/mL), penicillin concentrations in the CSF will be inadequate to kill the organism.

Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone In patients with meningitis caused by penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci, the treatment drug of choice is cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, providing the organism is susceptible. All other cephalosporins have higher MICs for penicillin-nonsusceptible organisms and should not be administered for meningitis. In a recent study, concentrations of ceftriaxone in the CSF were 0.9 to 30 µg/mL 2.8 hours after administration of recommended IV doses.³² These concentrations are high enough for successful therapy of meningitis caused by susceptible organisms.

Vancomycin A limited number of alternatives are available for the treatment of meningitis caused by pneumococci that are nonsusceptible to penicillin and cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. In children, vancomycin enters the CSF in the presence of inflamed meninges to provide concentrations of 2.0 to 5.9 µg/mL within 2.8 hours of an IV dose.³² Although all strains of pneumococci currently tested have been susceptible in vitro to vancomycin, failures of vancomycin to treat meningitis or to prevent its development or progression have been reported when dosages less than 60 mg/kg/d were administered.^59,60 These reports are supported by studies in a rabbit model that suggest bactericidal levels of vancomycin in the CSF may be difficult to maintain.⁶¹ For these reasons, vancomycin should not be used alone for therapy of meningitis.

Combination Vancomycin-Cefotaxime (or Ceftriaxone) Therapy For pneumococci that are nonsusceptible to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, combination therapy of vancomycin plus cefotaxime or ceftriaxone produces a synergistic effect in vitro,⁶² in the animal model,⁶¹ and in the CSF of children with meningitis.³² Thus, for initial empirical therapy, this combination should be highly effective and may prevent the emergence of resistance to either drug alone.⁶³

Rifampin and Combination Therapy Using Rifampin With Vancomycin or Cefotaxime (or Ceftriaxone) Rifampin is active against most, but not all, penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci.²⁶ Rifampin should never be used alone, because strains resistant to rifampin have been isolated, and in some settings, resistance can develop rapidly during therapy.⁶⁴ Whereas -lactam antibiotics are rapidly bactericidal, rifampin is only slowly bactericidal against S pneumoniae in vitro.⁶² In one rabbit model of meningitis, the combination of vancomycin and rifampin was slowly bactericidal, and 13 of 15 animals had sterile CSF cultures after 24 hours.⁶¹ For the combination of ceftriaxone and rifampin in the same model, a bactericidal effect was achieved in 24 hours, even against a strain resistant to ceftriaxone (MIC of 4 µg/mL).⁶⁵ In this model, the addition of rifampin to ceftriaxone was as effective as the addition of vancomycin to ceftriaxone in treating cefotaxime- and ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible pneumococcal meningitis.

Chloramphenicol Chloramphenicol, when administered at 50 to 100 mg/kg/d IV in four divided doses, achieves effective concentrations in the CSF for penicillin-susceptible pneumococci. For children with penicillin-nonsus-ceptible, chloramphenicol-susceptible pneumococcal strains, however, treatment with chloramphenicol has often not been successful.⁶⁷ These failures may occur, because strains having chloramphenicol MICs indicating susceptibility may have minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of 8 µg/mL or greater, indicating resistance to killing. Adequate bactericidal activity cannot be achieved in the CSF when the MBC values are this high. Thus, chloramphenicol should not be used to treat penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci unless the causative strain is known to have a chloramphenicol MBC value of 4 µg/mL or less.⁶⁷ Most laboratories need at least 3 to 4 days to obtain this information, because the organism must be sent to a reference laboratory. Inadequate data are available to support the use of chloramphenicol in combination with other antimicrobial agents for management of penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococcal meningitis.

Imipenem and Meropenem Imipenem is a carbapenem antibiotic with a broad spectrum of activity against a variety of organisms, including penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci. Although most strains of S pneumoniae are susceptible to imipenem, resistant strains have been isolated.^19,25 The potential epileptogenic properties of imipenem in patients with disease of the central nervous system, including meningitis, preclude routine use of this antibiotic.⁶⁸

Use of Dexamethasone for Patients With Pneumococcal Meningitis

Current recommendations suggest that dexamethasone be considered for children with pneumococcal meningitis.⁷⁰ The effectiveness of dexamethasone for preventing sequelae of pneumococcal meningitis is unproved, and expert opinion is divided on its use.^71-73 No large, single prospective controlled study of the use of dexamethasone to prevent hearing loss or other sequelae in children with pneumococcal meningitis has been performed.

Cell wall components from organisms that have been rapidly lysed by antibiotics are believed to induce the release of cytokines into the subarachnoid space. These cytokines seem to play a seminal role in the initial events of meningeal inflammation.⁷¹ To prevent or modify cytokine release in pneumococcal meningitis, dexamethasone, if used should be given shortly before or at the time of antibiotic administration.^71,72

In the rabbit model of meningitis, dexamethasone interferes with the penetration of ceftriaxone and vancomycin into the CSF when either is administered alone.^43,65 When the antibiotics were given together with dexamethasone in one model, the combination was effective against a pneumococcal strain with a ceftriaxone MIC of 1 µg/mL.⁶⁵ For a resistant strain, however, dexamethasone reduced the bactericidal efficacy of the combination. Dexamethasone did not affect the penetration of rifampin, and the combination of ceftriaxone plus rifampin effectively eradicated this same resistant strain.⁶⁵

The penetration of ceftriaxone and vancomycin into the CSF in children³² is better than that demonstrated in the rabbit model.⁶⁵ In children with bacterial meningitis receiving dexamethasone, the CSF ceftriaxone concentrations have been reported to be 0.9 to 30 µg/mL³² and 0.7 to 9.2 µg/mL.⁷⁴ These concentrations are similar to those reported previously in the absence of dexamethasone.⁷⁵ The vancomycin levels in the CSF were 2.0 to 5.9 µg/mL and represent 20% of serum levels,³² much better than the 3% penetration reported for the animal model.⁶⁵ Rifampin levels in the CSF were 0.3 to 1.9 µg/mL.³² The CSF of children who received dexamethasone and the antibiotic combinations of ceftriaxone plus vancomycin or ceftriaxone plus rifampin, when incubated in vitro with pneumococcal strains resistant to ceftriaxone, had significantly enhanced bactericidal activity when compared with the CSF from a child who received dexamethasone and ceftriaxone alone, indicating a significantly enhanced effect from either combination.³²

Dexamethasone therapy can decrease fever, giving a false impression of clinical improvement, even though CSF sterilization has not been achieved.^9,25,51 If dexamethasone is administered, careful and frequent observation of the patient is indicated.^28,51,59

Assessment of Efficacy of Therapy After 24 to 48 Hours

Penicillin-nonsusceptible organisms do not cause disease of greater severity than disease caused by penicillin-susceptible strains.³³ To assess the efficacy of therapy, the clinical course should be followed closely. A positive blood culture 24 to 36 hours after initiating therapy can indicate a hidden focus of infection, a resistant organism, or continued bacterial replication in the CSF. Another lumbar puncture should be considered within 24 to 48 hours to document eradication of the pathogen, particularly if (1) the organism is demonstrated to be potentially nonsusceptible to penicillin by quantitative (MIC) or oxacillin disk testing, the cefotaxime or ceftriaxone susceptibility results are not yet available, and the clinical condition has not improved or has worsened; or (2) the child has received dexamethasone, which might interfere with the interpretation of the clinical response. Some experts believe that a second lumbar puncture is not necessary if therapy was initiated with vancomycin plus cefotaxime (or ceftriaxone), and the clinical response has been good, particularly if dexamethasone was not used.

Continuation of Antimicrobial Therapy

To curtail continued emergence of antimicrobial resistance, it is imperative that antibiotic therapy be reviewed as soon as the quantitative susceptibility test results are available (Table 4). If the organism is susceptible to penicillin, cefotaxime, or ceftriaxone, vancomycin should be discontinued and penicillin, cefotaxime, or ceftriaxone continued for the usual course of therapy.⁴⁰ If resistance to penicillin and cefotaxime and ceftriaxone is documented, vancomycin plus cefotaxime or ceftriaxone should be continued for the full course of therapy. If the patient's clinical condition has not improved or has worsened while receiving this combination of antibiotics or if a follow-up CSF examination indicates failure to reduce the number of organisms substantially or to eradicate the organism, some experts would add rifampin to the vancomycin and cefotaxime or ceftriaxone combination.¹¹ Other experts would discontinue vancomycin and continue therapy with ceftriaxone plus rifampin, providing the organism is susceptible to rifampin.¹⁰

	NONMENINGEAL INVASIVE INFECTIONS

Immunocompetent Host

Although more than 100 nonmeningeal invasive infections (excluding otitis media) caused by penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci have been reported since 1977,^{7,15,33,76-78} reports of treatment failures using standard therapy have been exceedingly rare. This is most likely a result of the high concentrations of antibiotics achieved in serum. This is particularly true for cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, in which serum concentrations after recommended doses often exceed by 100-fold the MIC for S pneumoniae strains with an MIC of 0.1 to 1 µg/mL for these antibiotics.³²

Only one prospective study comparing the outcomes of nonmeningeal invasive infections caused by both susceptible and nonsusceptible pneumococci has been performed in children. In this study, the outcome of nonmeningeal infections caused by penicillin-nonsusceptible organisms correlated with the severity of the illness on admission and the presence of underlying disease and not on the susceptibility of the organism to penicillin.³³ This finding may result from the fact that most of the reported infections were caused by organisms with an MIC of 0.1 to 1 µg/mL. Of interest, four patients with pneumonia attributable to organisms with MICs in this range received only oral amoxicillin (peak serum levels of 6 to 14 µg/mL), and the disease in all patients responded rapidly.³³ Some infections caused by resistant pneumococci with an MIC of 4 µg/mL or greater have responded to ampicillin (100 mg/kg/d, IV).³³ Carefully controlled prospective studies evaluating outcome variables for patients with nonmeningeal infections caused by pneumococci nonsusceptible to the -lactam antibiotics are needed.

For immunocompetent patients with possible invasive pneumococcal infections who do not have meningitis and are not critically ill on admission, standard antibiotic therapy that may include cefuroxime should continue to be used. Therapy does not need to be altered if the organism is reported to have a penicillin MIC of 0.1 to 1 µg/mL and the patient is responding well. If the organism is resistant to penicillin (MIC  2.0 µg/mL), changes in antimicrobial therapy should be based on the clinical response and not on the MIC value. Additional initial antibiotic coverage for potential penicillin-nonsusceptible strains could be considered for patients who are critically ill, including those with myopericarditis, severe multilobar pneumonia with hypoxia, or hypotension.

Immunocompromised Host

Immunocompromised children may be at increased risk for severe infections caused by drug-nonsusceptible pneumococci, because they often receive frequent courses of antimicrobials for therapy or prophylaxis, allowing for the selection of resistant strains. Immunocompromising conditions that place children at risk for severe pneumococcal disease include sickle cell disease, other hemoglobinopathies, congenital or acquired immunoglobulin deficiencies, agammaglobulinemia, nephrotic syndrome, human immunodeficiency virus infection, immunosuppressive medications, or congenital or acquired asplenia.

For children who are immunocompromised as a result of asplenia or other altered immune function, it is not yet known whether serum levels of penicillin, cefotaxime, or ceftriaxone are adequate to treat nonmeningeal pneumococcal infections caused by nonsusceptible strains. For critically ill children who are immunocompromised, some experts would initiate empiric therapy with vancomycin and cefotaxime or ceftriaxone until susceptibility results are available.⁷⁹ Subsequent therapy should be based on test results for antibiotic susceptibility and the patient's clinical course.

Neonatal Infection

Invasive pneumococcal infections are rare but well described in neonates.⁸⁰ Two neonates with penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococcal infections have been reported.^33,81 The initial empirical antibiotic regimen for neonatal sepsis and meningitis should be adequate for all pneumococcal infections with the exception of meningitis caused by a cefotaxime- or ceftriaxone- and penicillin-nonsusceptible strain. For patients in this age group with CSF smears that show gram-positive diplococci and bacterial antigen tests supporting a diagnosis of pneumococcal meningitis, consideration should be given to the initial empirical addition of vancomycin to the therapeutic regimen.

	INFECTION CONTROL MEASURES

Nosocomial acquisition of pneumococcal infections by children and their caregivers is rare in the United States. Antimicrobial-nonsusceptible pneumococcal infections are transmitted by the same routes as susceptible organisms. The CDC recommends Standard Precautions for all patients with invasive pneumococcal infections.⁸² Standard Precautions synthesize the major features of the former categories of Universal Precautions and Body Substance Isolation. They apply to blood, all body fluids except sweat, nonintact skin, and mucous membranes and "are designed to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms from both recognized and unrecognized sources of infection in hospitals."⁸² Airborne, Droplet and Contact Precautions are not recommended for invasive pneumococcal infections. For the details of the use of Standard Precautions, the CDC guidelines⁸² or an Infection Control Practitioner should be consulted. Nasopharyngeal cultures of family members or intimate contacts are not indicated.

	RECOMMENDATIONS

Top Abstract Methods Recommendation References

Susceptibility Testing

1.  Children with moderate to severe bacterial infections should have cultures obtained from appropriate, potentially infected, normally sterile body fluids to determine the cause of the infection and allow for susceptibility testing of the organism.
2.  Quantitative (ie, MIC) susceptibility testing for penicillin and cefotaxime or ceftriaxone should be performed on all pneumococci isolated from normally sterile body fluids whenever possible. If the patient has meningitis and the organism is nonsusceptible to penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone, disk or MIC susceptibility testing for vancomycin, meropenem, and rifampin should be performed. If the patient has a nonmeningeal infection and the organism is resistant to penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone, disk, or MIC susceptibility testing for vancomycin, rifampin, clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin, imipenem, meropenem, and chlor-amphenicol should be considered.

If quantitative susceptibility testing is not available in the laboratory, screening for penicillin resistance using the 1-µg oxacillin disk and NCCLS guidelines should be performed for all pneumococcal isolates from normally sterile body sites. Organisms with an oxacillin disk zone size less than 20 mm should be referred for quantitative susceptibility testing.3 Isolation of S pneumoniae with a vancomycin MIC greater than 1 µg/mL should be reported immediately to the state health department.

Management of Children With Bacterial Meningitis Possibly Caused by S pneumoniae

4.  Vancomycin plus cefotaxime or ceftriaxone should be administered initially to all children older than 1 month with definite or probable bacterial meningitis. (Some experts believe that vancomycin need not be used if there is compelling evidence that the cause is an organism other than S pneumoniae, such as Gram-negative diplococci on a smear of CSF during an outbreak of meningococcal disease.)

Because pneumococcal meningitis may occur in infants younger than 1 month, consideration should be given to the addition of vancomycin to the usual antibiotic combination for neonatal sepsis especially if: (1) the CSF smear shows characteristic Gram-positive diplococci or (2) bacterial antigen testing supports a diagnosis of pneumococcal meningitis.

For children with immediate hypersensitivity to the -lactam antibiotics, the combination of vancomycin plus rifampin should be considered.5 A lumbar puncture should be considered after 24 to 48 hours to evaluate therapy if (1) the organism is penicillin-nonsusceptible by quantitative (MIC) or oxacillin disk testing, the results from cefotaxime and ceftriaxone quantitative susceptibility testing are not yet available, and the child's condition has not improved or has worsened or (2) the child has received dexamethasone, which might interfere with the ability to interpret the clinical response.

6 Once the results of susceptibility testing are available, modifications of therapy should be made as indicated in Table 4. If the organism is susceptible to penicillin or cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, vancomycin should be discontinued, and penicillin or cefotaxime or ceftriaxone should be continued. Vancomycin plus cefotaxime or ceftriaxone should be continued only if the organism is nonsusceptible to penicillin and to cefotaxime or ceftriaxone.

7 Addition of rifampin or substitution of rifampin for vancomycin after 24 to 48 hours of therapy could be considered if the organism is susceptible to rifampin and if (1) after 24 to 48 hours, despite therapy with vancomycin plus cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, the clinical condition has worsened; (2) the follow-up Gram-stained smear or culture of CSF indicates failure to eradicate or to substantially reduce the number of organisms; or (3) the organism has an unusually high cefotaxime or ceftriaxone MIC of 4 µg/mL or greater. Consultation with an infectious disease specialist should also be considered.

Management of Children With Probable Aseptic Meningitis

8.  During the summer and fall, children will be hospitalized for severe headache, vomiting, fever, a stiff neck, and CSF pleocytosis caused by enteroviruses. Although antibiotics are not always indicated, some practitioners will choose to treat these children with ceftriaxone or cefotaxime until the CSF and blood cultures are negative even when all laboratory results suggest aseptic meningitis. Vancomycin should not be used under these circumstances unless the child appears toxic and/or is hypotensive.

Management of Nonmeningeal Invasive Pneumococcal Infections Requiring Hospitalization  

 9.  For nonmeningeal invasive infections in the previously well child who is not critically ill, antimicrobials currently in use to treat S pneumoniae and other potential pathogens should be initiated at usually recommended doses.
10.  For a select group of children with invasive infections potentially attributable to S pneumoniae who are critically ill, additional initial antibiotic coverage for possible penicillin- and cefotaxime- or ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible strains could be considered. Such patients might include those with myopericarditis or severe multilobar pneumonia with hypoxia or hypotension. If vancomycin is administered, it should be discontinued as soon as antibiotic susceptibilities demonstrate effective alternative agents.
11.  If the organism has an MIC of 2 µg/mL or greater to penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone, therapy should be adjusted based on the clinical response, susceptibilities to other antimicrobials, and results of follow-up cultures of blood and other body fluids. The local, county, and state health departments should be notified of these organisms and the help of an infectious disease specialist considered.
12.  For the child with severe -lactam allergy, initial management for a potential pneumococcal infection could include vancomycin or clindamycin, in addition to antimicrobial coverage for other potential pathogens as indicated. Continuation of therapy should be guided by the results of susceptibility testing. Vancomycin should not be continued if the organism is susceptible to other appropriate, non--lactam antibiotics. Consultation with an infectious disease specialist should be considered.

Management of Nonmeningeal Invasive Pneumococcal Infections in the Immunocompromised Host

13.  No modifications need to be made to the current management of possible pneumococcal infections in immunocompromised children, providing they are not critically ill. For critically ill patients, consideration should be given to initiating therapy with vancomycin and cefotaxime or ceftriaxone. Vancomycin should be discontinued as soon as susceptibility results indicate effective alternative antimicrobials.

Use of Vancomycin

14.  At the time vancomycin therapy is initiated in children, urinalysis should be performed, and serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen concentrations should be determined. Renal function should then be followed closely and appropriate dosage modifications made if renal function is compromised.
15.  Physicians should consider determining trough serum concentrations for children who have renal impairment, are critically ill, are receiving concurrent ototoxic or nephrotoxic drugs, or are younger than 3 months. Trough concentrations of vancomycin, which can be obtained before the third dose, should be 10 to 15 µg/mL or less.
16.  A peak serum vancomycin concentration can be obtained 30 to 60 minutes after completion of a 30-minute infusion for the patient whose condition does not improve or for the patient with an organism resistant to penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone. Therapeutic peak serum vancomycin concentrations for meningitis fall within the range of 35 to 40 µg/mL.

COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995 TO 1996
Neal A. Halsey, MD, Chairperson
P. Joan Chesney, MD
Michael A. Gerber, MD
Donald S. Gromisch, MD
Steve Kohl, MD
S. Michael Marcy, MD
Melvin I. Marks, MD
Dennis L. Murray, MD
James C. Overall, Jr, MD
Larry K. Pickering, MD
Richard J. Whitley, MD
Ram Yogev, MD

EX-OFFICIO
Georges Peter, MD

CONSULTANT
Caroline B. Hall, MD

LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES
Robert Breiman, MD
National Vaccine Program Office
Stephen C. Hadler, MD
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
M. Carolyn Hardegree, MD
Food and Drug Administration
Richard F. Jacobs, MD
American Thoracic Society
Noni E. MacDonald, MD
Canadian Paediatric Society
Walter A. Orenstein, MD
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
N. Regina Rabinovich, MD
National Institutes of Health
Benjamin Schwartz, MD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CONSULTANTS
George H. McCracken, Jr, MD
Sheldon L. Kaplan, MD
James H. Jorgensen, PhD

	FOOTNOTES

The recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.

	ABBREVIATIONS

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid. IV, intravenously. MBC, minimal bactericidal concentration. NCCLS, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

	REFERENCES

Top Abstract Methods Recommendation References

1. Spratt B Resistance to antibiotics mediated by target alterations. Science 1994; 264:388-393 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Doern GV, Brueggemann A, Holley HP Jr, Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30 center national surveillance study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40:1208-1213 [Abstract]
3. Barry AL, Pfaller MA, Fuchs PC, Packer RR In vitro activities of 12 orally administered antimicrobial agents against four species of bacterial respiratory pathogens from US medical centers in 1992 and 1993. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38:2419-2425 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Thornsberry C, Brown SD, Yee C, Increasing penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae in the US: effect on susceptibility to oral cephalosporins. Infect Med 1993; 93(suppl):15-24
5. Jorgensen JH, Doern GV, Maher LA, Howell AW, Redding JS Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34:2075-2080 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Spika JS, Facklam RR, Plikaytis BD, Oxtoby MJ, The Pneumococcal Surveillance Working Group Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1979-1987. J Infect Dis 1991; 163:1273-1278 [Medline]
7. Kaplan SL, U.S. Pediatric Multicenter Pneumococcal Surveillance Group. Surveillance of pneumococcal infections in children. In: Program and Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (New Orleans, LA). Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1996:252 #K16
8. Hofmann J, Cetron MS, Farley MM, The prevalence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Atlanta. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:481-486 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Friedland IR, Shelton S, Paris M, Dilemmas in diagnosis and management of cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1993; 12:196-200 [Medline]
10. McCracken GH Jr Emergence of resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: a problem in pediatrics. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:424-428 [Medline]
11. Paris MM, Ramilo O, McCracken GH Jr Management of meningitis caused by penicillin-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39:2171-2175 [Medline]
12. Paris MM, Medley F, Pastor P, Murphy TV. Population-based surveillance for penicillin-and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Dallas County. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (San Francisco, CA). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1995:89
13. Orenstein JB Invasive pneumococcal injection in a community hospital, 1993 to 1995. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996; 150:809-814 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Mason EO, Kaplan SL, Lamberth LB, Tillman J Increased rate of isolation of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in a children's hospital and in vitro susceptibilities to antibiotics of potential therapeutic use. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992; 36:1703-1707 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Tan TQ, Mason EO, Kaplan SL Systemic infections due to a Streptococcus pneumoniae relatively resistant to penicillin in a children's hospital: clinical management and outcome. Pediatrics 1992; 90:928-933 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Stanek RJ, Mufson MA Emergence of penicillin-resistant invasive pneumococci in a single American community. Am J Med Sci 1995; 310:150-155 [Medline]
17. Rathore MH, Jenkins SG Epidemiology of resistant (R) S. pneumoniae (Sp): a six year prospective study. Pediatr Res 1994; 35:120A
18. Thompson JW, Lewno MJ, Schutze GE Antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal disease at Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1990 to 1993. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994; 13:408-409 [CrossRef][Medline]
19. Leggiadro RJ, Davis Y, Hill B, Facklam RR, Tenover FC. Increasing rates of invasive drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (DRSP) in Memphis. In: Abstracts of the Infectious Disease Society of America 33rd Annual Meeting (San Francisco, CA). September 16-18, 1995:72
20. Quinonez JM, Mancao MY Retrospective review of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia at the University of South Alabama Children's and Women's Hospital 1992-1994. J Invest Med 1996; 44:11A
21. Hagland LA, Istre GR, Pickett DA, Welch DF, Fine DP, The Pneumococcus Study Group Invasive pneumococcal disease in central Oklahoma: emergence of high-level penicillin resistance and multiple antibiotic resistance. J Infect Dis 1993; 168:1532-1536 [Medline]
22. Zangwill KM, Vadheim CM, Eriksen E, Epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease in the Southern California Kaiser-Permanente patient population (SCKP). Pediatr Res 1994; 35:123A
23. Welby PL, Keller DS, Cromien JL, Tebas P, Storch GA Resistance to penicillin and non-beta-lactam antibiotics of Streptococcus pneumoniae at a children's hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994; 13:281-287 [Medline]
24. Fairchok, MP, Ashton WS, Fischer GW Carriage of penicillin-resistant pneumococci in a military population in Washington, DC: risk factors and correlation with clinical isolates. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 22:966-972 [Medline]
25. Pikis A, Akram S, Donkersloot JA, Campos JM, Rodriguez WJ Penicillin-resistant pneumococci from pediatric patients in the Washington, DC area. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995; 149:30-35 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Klugman KP Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics. Clin Microbiol Rev 1990; 3:171-196 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Coffey TJ, Dowson CG, Daniels M, Horizontal transfer of multiple penicillin-binding protein genes, and capsular biosynthetic genes, in natural population of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol. 1991; 5:2255-2260 [Medline]
28. Bradley JS, Connor JD Ceftriaxone failure in meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to beta lactam antibiotics. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10:871-873 [Medline]
29. Sloas MM, Barrett FF, Chesney PJ, Cephalosporin treatment failure in penicillin and cephalosporin resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992; 11:662-666 [Medline]
30. McDougal LK, Rasheed JK, Biddle JW, Tenover FC Identification of multiple clones of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39:2282-2288 [Abstract]
31. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In: Sixth Informational Supplement: NCCLS Document M100-S6. Villanova, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1995;15(14)
32. Klugman K, Friedland IR, Bradley JS Bactericidal activity against cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in cerebrospinal fluid of children with acute bacterial meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39:1988-1992 [Abstract]
33. Friedland IR Comparison of the response to antimicrobial therapy of penicillin-resistant and penicillin-susceptible pneumococcal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:885-890 [Medline]
34. Macias EA, Mason EO Jr, Ocera HY, LaRocco MT Comparison of E test with standard broth microdilution for determining antibiotic susceptibilities of penicillin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32:430-432 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Skulnick M, Small GW, Lo P, Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of E test for susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33:2334-2337 [Abstract]
36. Nolte FS, Metchock B, Williams T, Diem L, Bressler A, Tenover FC Detection of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with commercially available broth microdilution panels. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33:1804-1806 [Abstract]
37. Block SL, Harrison CJ, Hedrick JA, Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in acute otitis media: risk factors, susceptibility patterns and antimicrobial management. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:751-759 [Medline]
38. Centers for Disease Control Summary of notifiable diseases. United States, 1993. MMWR. 1994; 42:3
39. Wenger JD, Hightower AW, Facklam RR, Bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1986: report of a multistate surveillance study. J Infect Dis 1990; 162:1316-1323 [Medline]
40. Feigin RD, McCracken GH Jr, Klein JO Diagnosis and management of meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992; 11:785-814 [Medline]
41. Bonadio WA The cerebrospinal fluid: physiologic aspects and alterations associated with bacterial meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992; 11:423-432 [Medline]
42. Bonadio WA, Mannenbach M, Krippendorf R Bacterial meningitis in older children. Am J Dis Child 1990; 144:463-465 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Cabellos C, Martinez-Lacasa J, Martos A, Influence of dexamethasone on efficacy of ceftriaxone and vancomycin therapy in experimental pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39:2158-2160 [Abstract]
44. Schaad UB, Krucko J, Pfenninger J An extended experience with cefuroxime therapy of childhood bacterial meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1984; 3:410-416
45. Blazer S, Berant M, Alon U Bacterial meningitis: effect of antibiotic treatment on cerebrospinal fluid. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 80:386-387 [Medline]
46. Roine I, Foncea LM, Ledermann W, Peltola H Slow recovery of cerebrospinal fluid glucose and protein concentrations distinguish pneumococcal from Haemophilus influenzae and meningococcal meningitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:905-907 [Medline]
47. Bohr V, Rasmussen N, Hansen B, 875 cases of bacterial meningitis. II. Diagnostic procedures and the impact of preadmission antibiotic therapy. J Infect 1983; 7:193-202 [CrossRef][Medline]
48. Rorabaugh ML, Berlin LE, Heldrich F, Aseptic meningitis in infants younger than 2 years of age: acute illness and neurologic complications. Pediatrics 1993; 92:206-211 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Schaad UB, McCracken GH Jr, Loock CA, Thomas ML Pharmacokinetics and bacteriological efficacy of moxalactam, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, and rocephin in experimental bacterial meningitis. J Infect Dis 1981; 143:156-163 [Medline]
50. Hieber JP, Nelson JD A pharmacologic evaluation of penicillin in children with purulent meningitis. N Engl J Med 1977; 297:410-413 [Abstract]
51. Kleiman MB, Weinberg GA, Reynolds JK, Allen SD Meningitis with beta-lactam resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: the need for early repeat lumbar puncture. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1993; 12:782-784 [Medline]
52. John CC Treatment failure with use of a third-generation cephalosporin for penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 18:188-193 [Medline]
53. Leggiadro RJ, Barrett FF, Chesney PJ, Davis Y, Tenover FC Invasive pneumococci with high-level penicillin and cephalosporin resistance at a mid-south children's hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994; 13:320-323 [Medline]
54. Tan TQ, Schutze GE, Mason EO, Kaplan SL Antibiotic therapy and acute outcome of meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae considered intermediately susceptible to broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38:918-923 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Yogev R, Shulman ST, Chadwick EG, David AT, Glogowski W Once daily ceftriaxone for central nervous system infections and other serious pediatric infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1986; 5:298-303
56. Congeni BL, Bardley J, Hammerschlag MR Safety and efficacy of once daily ceftriaxone for the treatment of bacterial meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1986; 5:293-297
57. Bradley JS, Kaplan SL, Klugman KP, Leggiadro RJ Consensus: management of infections in children caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae with decreased susceptibility to penicillin. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:1037-1041 [Medline]
58. Viladrich PF, Cabellos C, Pallares R, High doses of cefotaxime in treatment of adult meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae with decreased susceptibilities to broad spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40:218-220 [Abstract]
59. Viladrich PF, Gudiol F, Linares J, Evaluation of vancomycin for therapy in adult pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991; 35:2467-2472 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Chesney PJ, Davis Y, English BK, Wang WC Occurrence of Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis during vancomycin and cefotaxime therapy of septicemia in a patient with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:1013-1015 [Medline]
61. Friedland IR, Paris MM, Ehrett S, Hickey SM, Olsen KD, McCracken GH Jr Evaluation of antimicrobial regimens for treatment of experimental penicillin and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37:1630-1636 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Friedland IR, Paris MM, Shelton S, McCracken GH Jr Time-kill studies of antibiotic combinations against penicillin-resistant and-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 1994; 34:231-237 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Munoz M, Valderrabanos ES, Diaz E, Appearance of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics during therapy for Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. J Pediatr 1995; 127:98-99 [CrossRef][Medline]
64. Boswell TC, Smith EG, Ayres JG Problems in the management of penicillin-resistant pneumococci. J Hosp Infect 1995; 30:233-240 [CrossRef][Medline]
65. Paris MM, Hickey SM, Uscher MI, Shelton S, Olsen KD, McCracken GH Jr Effect of dexamethasone on therapy of experimental penicillin-and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38:1320-1324 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
66. Tubau F, Cabellos C, Linares J Lack of correlation between in vitro and in vivo studies of combinations of rifampin plus vancomycin or -lactam antibiotics against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40:1573-1574 [Medline]
67. Friedland IR, Klugman KP Failure of chloramphenicol therapy in penicillin resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Lancet 1992; 1:405-408
68. Wong VK, Wright HT, Ross LA, Mason WH, Inderlied CB, Sikkim K Imipenem/cilastatin treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10:122-125 [Medline]
69. Klugman KP, Dagan R, The Meropenem Meningitis Study Group Randomized comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39:1140-1146 [Abstract]
70. Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics. Sect 5. Antimicrobials and related therapy. In: Peter G, ed. 1997 Red Book. Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 24th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1997;000:000
71. Prober CG The role of steroids in the management of children with bacterial meningitis. Pediatrics 1995; 95:29-31 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
72. Long SS Dexamethasone for bacterial meningitis. Pediatrics 1996; 332:893-894
73. Arditi M, The US Pediatric Multicenter Pneumococcal Surveillance Group (PMPSG). Clinical and microbiological characteristics of pneumococcal meningitis in children. In: Program and abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (New Orleans, LA). Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1996:251 #K10
74. Gaillard JL, Abadie V, Cheron G, Concentrations of ceftriaxone in cerebrospinal fluid of children with meningitis receiving dexamethasone therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38:1209-1210 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
75. Latif R, Dajani AS Ceftriaxone diffusion into cerebrospinal fluid of children with meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1983; 23:46-48 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
76. Pallares R, Linares J, Vadillo M, Resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin and mortality from severe pneumococcal pneumonia in Barcelona, Spain. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:474-480 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
77. Jackson MA, Shelton S, Nelson JD, McCracken GH Jr Relatively penicillin-resistant pneumococcal infections in pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1984; 3:129-132
78. Willett LD, Dillon HC Jr, Gray BM Penicillin-intermediate pneumococci in a children's hospital. Am J Dis Child 1985; 139:1054-1057 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
79. Chesney PJ, Wilimas JA, Presbury G, Penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing sepsis and meningitis in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr 1995; 127:526-532 [CrossRef][Medline]
80. Simpson JM, Patel JS, Ispahani P Streptococcus pneumoniae invasive disease in the neonatal period: an increasing problem? Eur J Pediatr 1995; 154:563-566 [CrossRef][Medline]
81. Pavis A, Cortey A, Lozniewski A, Wever M, Vert P Early-onset septicemia in a newborn due to a penicillin resistant pneumococcus probably transmitted during delivery. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1995; 14:68-69 [CrossRef][Medline]
82. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention and the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. II. Recommendations for isolation precautions in hospitals. Am J Infect Control 1996; 24:32-52 [Medline]