PEDIATRICS Vol. 122 No. 2 August 2008, pp. 443-444 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1444)
COMMENTARY |
Research to Practice in Pediatric Pain: What Are We Missing?
a Departments of a Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine, California
b Research Department, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California
c Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
Translation of research findings into standard clinical practice continues to be a significant barrier to improved quality of care and patient outcomes. It is not surprising to most pediatric practitioners that a gap between research and practice exists, but the magnitude of this discrepancy is startling. Recent data have suggested that patients typically receive only a fraction of recommended care. In a recent study of the medical care provided to a random sample of >5000 adults in the United States, participants received, on average, only 54.9% of recommended preventative, acute, or chronic care.1 Even more startling figures emerge when we consider the extent to which care can be improved simply by implementing current research findings. For example, it has been estimated that up to a 30% improvement in cancer outcomes could result if current knowledge were applied routinely in clinical settings.2
Pain management in children is certainly not spared from this research-to-practice gap. Significant progress has been made since the first reports of children being undermedicated for pain,3,4 but despite these advances children continue to suffer acute and chronic pain. This is particularly the case in postoperative contexts, in which up to 50% of children experience severe pain in hospital5 and up to 25% of children continue to experience clinically significant pain at home.6,7 The fact that children continue to experience acute pain is not wholly attributable to a lack of effective interventions. Evidence-based practice guidelines for pediatric acute pain have been released from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research8 and the American Academy of Pediatrics.9 Although these policies have been in place for up to 15 years, data indicate that they have not yet crossed the chasm from research/policy to standard practice in many settings. In a Swiss survey of practice, only 37% of anesthesiologists and surgeons reported that they regularly assessed therapeutic success of analgesic administration.10 In a US study of practice in the emergency department, only during 44.5% of children's visits were pain scores documented,11 and in a Canadian study of postoperative pain, only 13% of parents recalled being instructed to use round-the-clock analgesics after their child's surgery.6 These are just a few examples of figures documenting that standard pain care for children lags behind established guidelines.
The fact that research has been synthesized into guidelines but these guidelines still have not been fully incorporated into clinical care highlights the need for active steps to address this issue. Simple dissemination of guidelines or information about interventions is not enough; we know that knowledge does not always translate into practice changes.
As a first step, we must ensure that newly developed clinical interventions are applicable under real-world conditions. To do this, there is a need to go beyond efficacy trials. Randomized trials under tightly controlled experimental conditions, although an important first step, need to be continually followed with effectiveness trials in which interventions are tested under real-world conditions. For example, if a new medication requires multiple 15-minute follow-up assessments by the nursing staff, it is unlikely to be widely adopted by an understaffed unit. Similarly, as efficacious as an analgesic may be, parents may not administer the analgesic at home because of a fear of adverse effects or addiction. As researchers, we must accept that the effectiveness of an intervention is affected by the context in which it is used; an intervention may have efficacy, but it is not effective if it cannot be delivered in the way it is intended. To ensure success in effectiveness trials, we must broaden the scope of research with the aim of understanding the context in which our interventions are implemented. Involving the end users (ie, parents, nurses, physicians) at the outset of intervention trials can help to facilitate this understanding. In pediatric pain, some work has been performed to evaluate the attitudes of nurses12,13 and parents14 about pain management and knowledge of health care professionals.15–17 There is a need, however, for more systematic attention to the barriers and general contextual factors that affect pediatric pain management.
Once effective and contextually relevant interventions have been developed, they must be disseminated to end users. Within pediatric pain, there has been a recent burst of reports that evaluated dissemination efforts.18–20 Most of these studies have been of continuing education efforts or of training programs in pediatric pain management. Although these studies have shown some promising results, it is notable that most have been evaluated for their impact on knowledge and attitudes only, not for their impact on clinical practice.21 The majority of those who evaluate clinical practice do so by self-report rather than observational measures, which subjects results to potential reporting bias. Given that clinical practice is a complex phenomenon and that there are more barriers than simple lack of knowledge, there is a need to go beyond training programs to meaningfully affect pediatric pain care. Innovative methods of dissemination including action research,22 social learning through champions,23,24 and case-study review25 have started to appear in the literature, but there is a need for more systematic evaluations of these techniques. Research designs for evaluating these novel dissemination methods are complex, and replication is required to ensure that these methods are effective across settings. The literature will be further strengthened by theoretical grounding in behavior-change principles such as those outlined by Grol and Wensing.26
There is little question that successfully closing the gap between research and practice in pediatric pain requires a commitment of funding. Some funding agencies have already included knowledge translation in their mandates (eg, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Institutes of Health) and have issued requests for proposals to support this type of work. Coordinated efforts such as these will be required for continued development of a science of knowledge translation and, in turn, application of this science to pediatric pain.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) grants R01-HD037007-04 and R0-1HD048935-01A1.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Accepted May 27, 2008.
Address correspondence to Zeev N. Kain, MD, MA, MBA, FAAP, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Research, 333 City Blvd West, Suite 2150, Orange, CA 92868. E-mail: zkain{at}uci.edu
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.
N Engl J Med. 2003;348
(26):2635
–2645
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control. Draft synthesis report. Available at: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hppb/cscc/pdf/Synthesis_Jan18_e.pdf. Accessed June 2, 2008
- Eland JM, Anderson JE. The experience of pain in children. In: Jacox A, ed. Pain: A Sourcebook for Nurses and Other Health Professionals. Boston, MA: Little Brown; 1977:455–456
- Schechter NL, Allen DA, Hanson K. Status of pediatric pain control: a comparison of hospital analgesic usage in children and adults.
Pediatrics. 1986;77
(1):11
–15
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gauthier JC, Finley GA, McGrath PJ. Children's self-report of postoperative pain intensity and treatment threshold: determining the adequacy of medication. Clin J Pain. 1998;14 (2):116 –120[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Finley GA, McGrath PJ, Forward SP, McNeill G, Fitzgerald P. Parents' management of children's pain following "minor" surgery. Pain. 1996;64 (1):83 –87[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Huth MM, Broome ME. A snapshot of children's postoperative tonsillectomy outcomes at home. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2007;12 (3):186 –195[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clinician's quick reference guide to acute pain management in infants, children, and adolescents: operative and medical procedures. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992;7 (4):229 –242[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Task Force on Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. The assessment and management of acute pain in infants, children, and adolescents.
Pediatrics. 2001;108
(3):793
–797
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Wilder-Smith OH, Möhrle JJ, Martin NC. Acute pain management after surgery or in the emergency room in Switzerland: a comparative survey of Swiss anaesthesiologists and surgeons. Eur J Pain. 2002;6 (3):189 –201[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Drendel AL, Brousseau DC, Gorelick MH. Pain assessment for pediatric patients in the emergency department.
Pediatrics. 2006;117
(5):1511
–1518
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Van Hulle Vincent C. Nurses' perceptions of children's pain: a pilot study of cognitive representations. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;33 (3):290 –301[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Rieman MT, Gordon M. Pain management competency evidenced by a survey of pediatric nurses' knowledge and attitudes. Pediatr Nurs. 2007;33 (4):307 –312[Medline]
- Forward S, Brown TL, McGrath PJ. Mothers' attitudes and behavior toward medicating children's pain. Pain. 1996;67 (2–3):469 –474[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Salantera S, Lauri S, Salmi TT, Helenius H. Nurses' knowledge about pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management in children. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;18 (4):289 –295[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Mortimer JE, Bartlett NL. Assessment of knowledge about cancer pain management by physicians in training. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997;14 (1):21 –27[Medline]
- Horbury C, Henderson A, Bromley B. Influences of patient behavior on clinical nurses' pain assessment: implications for continuing education. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2005;36 (1):18 –24; quiz 46–47[Medline]
- Lawes C, Sawyer L, Amos S, Kandiah M, Pearce L, Symons J. Impact of an education programme for staff working with children undergoing painful procedures. Paediatr Nurs. 2008;20 (2):33 –37[Medline]
- Linkewich B, Sevean P, Habjan S, Poling M, Bailey S, Kortes-Miller K. Educating for tomorrow: enhancing nurses' pain management knowledge. Can Nurs. 2007;103 (4):24 –28
- Ger LP, Chang CY, Ho ST, et al. Effects of a continuing education program on nurses' practices of cancer pain assessment and their acceptance of patients' pain reports. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;27 (1):61 –71[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- MacLaren JE, Cohen LL. Teaching behavioral pain management to healthcare professionals: a systematic review of research in training programs. J Pain. 2005;6 (8):481 –492[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Simons J, MacDonald LM. Changing practice: implementing validated paediatric pain assessment tools.
J Child Health Care. 2006;10
(2):160
–176
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ellis JA, McCleary L, Blouin R, et al. Implementing best practice pain management in a pediatric hospital. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2007;12 (4):264 –277[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Johnston CC, Gagnon A, Rennick J, et al. One-on-one coaching to improve pain assessment and management practices of pediatric nurses. J Pediatr Nurs. 2007;22 (6):467 –478[CrossRef][Medline]
- Dunbar AE 3rd, Sharek PJ, Mickas NA, et al. Implementation and case-study results of potentially better practices to improve pain management of neonates.
Pediatrics. 2006;118
(suppl 2):S87
–S94
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Australia. 2004;180 (6 suppl):S57 –S60
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2008 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Fortier, J. E. MacLaren, S. R. Martin, D. Perret-Karimi, and Z. N. Kain Pediatric Pain After Ambulatory Surgery: Where's the Medication? Pediatrics, October 1, 2009; 124(4): e588 - e595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





