PEDIATRICS Vol. 121 No. 4 April 2008, pp. e936-e944 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2007-1620)
ARTICLE |
Differences in Rates and Short-term Outcome of Live Births Before 32 Weeks of Gestation in Europe in 2003: Results From the MOSAIC Cohort
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, INSERM, UMR S149, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women's Health, and Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, Paris, France
b Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
d Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
e Department of Paediatrics, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
f Department for Mother's and Infant's Health, Hospital S. Giovanni Calibita–Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy
g Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatric University Hospital, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
h Department of Neonatology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, and Study Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology, Flanders, Belgium
i Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Service de Réanimation Néonatale, Hopital Antoine Béclere, Clamart, France
j Department of Neonatology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
k Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Université Paris V Réné Descartes et Maternité de Port-Royal, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
OBJECTIVES. Advances in perinatal medicine increased survival after very preterm birth in all countries, but comparative population-based data on these births are not readily available. This analysis contrasts the rates and short-term outcome of live births before 32 weeks of gestation in 10 European regions.
METHODS. The Models of Organizing Access to Intensive Care for Very Preterm Births (MOSAIC) study collected prospective data on all very preterm births in 10 European regions covering 494463 total live births in 2003. The analysis sample was live births between 24 and 31 weeks of gestation without lethal congenital anomalies (N = 4908). Outcomes were rates of preterm birth, in-hospital mortality, intraventricular hemorrhage grades III and IV or cystic periventricular leukomalacia and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Mortality and morbidity rates were standardized for gestational age and gender.
RESULTS. Live births between 24 and 31 weeks of gestation were 9.9 per 1000 total live births with a range from 7.6 to 13.0 in the MOSAIC regions. Standardized mortality was doubled in high versus low mortality regions (18%–20% vs 7%–9%) and differed for infants 
28 weeks of gestation as well as 28 to 31 weeks of gestation. Morbidity among survivors also varied (intraventricular hemorrhage/periventricular leukomalacia ranged from 2.6% to 10% and bronchopulmonary dysplasia from 10.5% to 21.5%) but differed from mortality rankings. A total of 85.2 very preterm infants per 10000 total live births were discharged from the hospital alive with a range from 64.1 to 117.1; the range was 10 to 31 per 10000 live births for infants discharged with a diagnosis of neurologic or respiratory morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS. Very preterm mortality and morbidity differed between European regions, raising questions about variability in treatment provided to these infants. Comparative follow-up studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of these differences on rates of cerebral palsy and other disabilities associated with preterm birth.
Key Words: very preterm birth • neonatal mortality • neurologic morbidity • bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Abbreviations: BPD—bronchopulmonary dysplasia • MOSAIC—Models of Organizing Access to Intensive Care for Very Preterm Births • GA—gestational age • IVH—intraventricular hemorrhage • PVL—cystic periventricular leukomalacia
Infants who are born very preterm constitute approximately one third of deaths in the perinatal period, and survivors are at high risk for long-term disabling impairments. Previous studies found that between 5% and 10% of infants who were born at <32 weeks of gestation and discharged alive from hospital developed cerebral palsy1–4 and that infants without severe disabilities face twofold or greater risks for developmental, cognitive, and behavioral difficulties in childhood.5,6
Medical advances in neonatal intensive care coupled with programs to regionalize perinatal care have improved survival after very preterm birth, leading to increases in the numbers of infants who are discharged from the hospital after very preterm birth. In some regions, higher survival has been accompanied by increases in short-term morbidity, such as brain hemorrhaging and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).7–9 In others, mortality and morbidity both have decreased, so although more infants are at risk, each infant's individual risk for morbidity is lower.10–13 On a population level, the evidence for how these evolutions affect rates of impairment is not concordant. In some regions, rates of cerebral palsy have risen in parallel with increased survival among very preterm infants,2,14 whereas in others, the same evolutions in practices and survival did not significantly affect cerebral palsy rates.3,15 Almost everywhere, however, the proportion of cerebral palsy cases associated with very preterm birth has risen.2,3,14,15
Despite the public health significance of very preterm infants, data for assessing the evolution of their characteristics, mortality, and short-term morbidity are not readily available. There is wide variability in inclusion criteria and completeness in civil and birth registers for very preterm births, and these sources do not often contain information on morbidity.16 Studies based solely on infants who are admitted to neonatal units are not comparable because of selection biases linked to the participating units and to the exclusion of infants that are not resuscitated at birth. Furthermore, many studies are limited to the use of birth weight as an inclusion criterion (<1500 g or <1000 g), complicating comparisons with studies that are based on gestational age (GA).
The Models of Organizing Access to Intensive Care for Very Preterm Births (MOSAIC) study on models of perinatal care and health outcomes of very preterm infants in Europe collected data using a common protocol on population-based cohorts of very preterm infants from 10 regions covering half a million total births in 2003. One of the study's principal aims was to assess the variability in mortality and short-term morbidity after very preterm birth in European regions.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The MOSAIC study included all stillbirths and live births from 22+0 weeks to 31+6 weeks of gestation in 10 regions in 9 European countries in 2003. Participating regions were Flanders in Belgium, the Eastern Region of Denmark, 6 of 8 districts in the Ile-de-France region of France, Hesse in Germany, Lazio in Italy, the Central and Eastern regions of the Netherlands, Wielkopolska and Lubuskie in Poland, the Northern region of Portugal, and the Northern and Trent regions of the United Kingdom. The MOSAIC regions covered between 30000 and 65000 live births in 2003, with the exception of the larger French region (135000 births). Regions represented different organizational models of perinatal care identified in a previous European collaboration.17 The study's other objectives were to describe the organization of maternity and neonatal units18 and to assess perinatal health outcome with respect to the organization of perinatal care.
The study was conducted on all births from January 1 to December 31, 2003, with the exception of the Ile-de-France region, where births were included from February 1 to August 31, 2003. GA was based on the best obstetric assessment, using information on last menstrual period and ultrasound measures. Ultrasound scans for dating pregnancies are part of routine antenatal care in the MOSAIC regions. Infants were followed until discharge from the hospital or into long-term care or death.
The MOSAIC consortium selected data items with common definitions to be collected on each infant from information available in medical charts using a structured questionnaire. Data were abstracted from charts in the neonatal units for infants who were admitted to neonatal care. For stillbirths and infants who died before admission to a neonatal unit, the questionnaires were filled in from obstetric charts. Data from obstetric charts were also used for infants who were admitted to neonatal care in Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands, and Poland. In the regions in France, the Netherlands, and Trent and Northern regions in the United Kingdom, the questionnaires were filled in by external investigators, whereas in Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Poland, and Portugal, the questionnaires were completed by medical personnel in each unit and verified by investigators working for the study. In Belgium, France, Italy, and Poland, the questionnaire was translated using standard procedures. The MOSAIC questionnaire was pretested in all regions to verify its feasibility, and clarifications were made to the instrument. After data collection, the regional teams cross-checked inclusions in the study with birth registers in each maternity unit. Ethics approval was sought for the collection of these data as required in each of the regions.
This analysis of mortality and morbidity uses a subsample of the total cohort that includes live births between 24 and 31 weeks of gestation without lethal congenital anomalies. Infants who are delivered before 24 weeks of gestation are generally considered below the limit of viability in the MOSAIC regions. Furthermore, despite attempts to ensure completeness, some live births at 22 and 23 weeks may not have been included if the birth occurred outside an obstetric ward or if some infants with signs of life were recorded as stillbirths. In the MOSAIC cohort, mortality after live birth was 100% at 22 weeks and 91% at 23 weeks, resulting in 12 infants who survived to discharge.
Infants with lethal congenital anomalies were also excluded from this analysis. Infants were considered to have a lethal congenital anomaly when the principal cause of death was a congenital anomaly or when they had another principal cause of death in association with a lethal congenital anomaly. Only infants who had lethal congenital anomalies and died during hospitalization were considered. Seven deaths that occurred in the labor ward were excluded from the analysis because they were associated with an anomaly detected during the pregnancy but the cause of death was not clearly defined.
The main outcome variables were in-hospital mortality and neurologic and respiratory morbidity. In-hospital mortality included deaths in the labor ward and during hospitalization in a neonatal unit before discharge home from the hospital or into long-term care. Neurologic morbidity was defined as whether the infant had a diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grades III and IV using the classifications defined by Papile et al19 or cystic periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Respiratory morbidity was BPD, defined as oxygen dependence or ventilation, including nasal continuous positive airway pressure, at 36 weeks of GA. Morbidity rates are presented for the infants who survived to discharge. We also computed the rates of infants who were discharged from hospital with these morbidities with respect to the number of total live births in each region.
Rates in each region are compared with the 10-region average using 95% exact confidence intervals. For simplicity, the 10-region average was not weighted to adjust for the sample sizes within the regions; differences between the weighted and nonweighted averages were slight. Mortality and morbidity rates were standardized for GA and gender using direct standardization, meaning that we applied rates in each GA and gender stratum to the GA and gender distribution within the total cohort. Direct standardization provides the rate that we would expect to find in each region if they all had the same distribution of GA and gender as observed within the total cohort. Analyses were conducted using Stata 8.0 SE (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The MOSAIC cohort included 4908 very preterm infants who were born alive between 24 and 31 weeks without lethal congenital anomalies (Table 1). These very preterm live births represented 9.9 per 1000 total live births. Rates of very preterm live birth were similar in many of the regions, with the exception of the 2 English regions, where rates were significantly higher than the 10-region average (13 per 1000), and the Dutch, Italian, and Portuguese regions, where rates were lower (<8.5 per 1000).
|
Mean GA and birth weight in the cohort were 28.6 weeks and 1208 g, respectively. The Netherlands had a lower proportion of infants born at 24 and 25 weeks and a higher average GA (29.1). In the Polish region, the proportion of infants at 24 and 25 weeks was higher (16% vs 11%), but this difference did not attain statistical significance (P = .1). In the Polish and Dutch cohorts, mean birth weights were significantly higher than the 10-region average, by
35 g; in France, mean birth weights were significantly lower, by 23 g. Differences in the proportion of male infants were not statistically significant, although the proportion ranged from 51% to 58%. There were also differences in maternal age between the regions, with a higher proportion of mothers 
35 in the Italian region and a lower proportion in Flanders and the Northern region of the United Kingdom. Table 2 displays in-hospital mortality rates, for which the 10-region average was 14.2%. Crude mortality rates ranged from 7.9% (Hesse in Germany) to 24.7% (Wielkopolska and Lubuskie region in Poland). Both of these rates were statistically different from the 10-region average. After standardization on GA and gender, Hesse and the Northern region in the United Kingdom had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rates than the regional average (7.3% and 9.2%, respectively), and the Netherlands and the Polish regions had significantly higher mortality rates (21.4% and 21.5%, respectively).
|
Figure 1 presents standardized in-hospital mortality rates for infants 24 to 27 weeks of gestation and those between 28 and 31 weeks of gestation. For infants who were born before 28 weeks of gestation, the 10-region average was 36.3% with mortality rates ranging from lows of 18.3% (Hesse-Germany) and 25.3% (Northern region in the United Kingdom) to 50.8% in the Polish regions and 57.9% in the region from the Netherlands. For infants who were born at
28 weeks of gestation, the 10-region average was 5.2%. In low-mortality countries, 3% died before discharge from the hospital, whereas elsewhere, the proportion was 7%, with a high of 9.6% in the Polish region. In general, patterns were the same for both GA groups, with 2 exceptions. In the Netherlands, mortality after 27 weeks was in line with the 10-region average, whereas extremely preterm mortality was higher. In Denmark, mortality was lower for infants after 27 weeks but within the 10-region average for extremely preterm infants.
|
Figure 2 shows the proportion of survivors to discharge after live birth at 24 to 32 weeks who were born before 28 weeks, subdivided into 2 groups: 24 to 25 weeks and 26 to 27 weeks. Overall, one fifth of all survivors were born before 28 weeks, and most regions had results similar to the 10-regional average. There were several exceptions, however. The region in the Netherlands had a very small proportion of the total cohort <28 weeks and no survivors under 26 weeks, whereas in the Hesse region in Germany and the Northern region in the United Kingdom, a greater proportion of survivors were born before 28 weeks of gestation.
|
Table 3 presents crude and standardized rates of neurologic and respiratory morbidity for infants who survived to discharge. Rates were calculated excluding infants who had missing data on morbidity; in most regions, these cases represented <1.5% of the total. Rates of missing data were higher in the Danish region (7%) and the Northern region in the United Kingdom (5%). In the Danish region, cranial ultrasound scans were not always conducted when infants were considered at low risk, and infants with missing data had higher mean GA (29.8 vs 28.9; P < .05). In the Northern region of the United Kingdom, the mean GA of these infants was similar to other infants.
|
The combined prevalence of IVH grades III and IV and cystic PVL in the 10 regions was 7.4% for infants who survived to discharge, whereas BPD was present for 15.8% of infants. The regions in France and Denmark had significantly lower rates of neurologic morbidity (<4%), whereas those in Italy and Poland had higher rates (11.8% and 15.7%, respectively). The Lazio region of Italy had lower rates of BPD, whereas the Northern region in the United Kingdom had higher rates. Standardized morbidity rates were lower than crude rates in low-mortality regions. The standardized rate of neurologic morbidity decreased from 7.6% to 6.8% and respiratory morbidity from 18.8% to 15.7% in Hesse and from 7.7% to 6.7% and 25.2% to 21.8%, respectively, in the Northern region of the United Kingdom.
Table 4 presents the rates of infants discharged from the hospital after very preterm birth with respect to total live births in each region. Rates are presented for all infants 24 to 31 weeks of gestation and those with a diagnosis of IVH/PVL alone as well as a diagnosis of IVH/PVL and/or BPD. Overall, 85.2 infants per 10000 total births were discharged from the hospital after very preterm birth, with a range from 64.1 to 117.1 between regions. Infants who were discharged with IVH/PVL represented 6.2 per 10000 births, on average, with a range from 2.1 to 10.2. Infants with IVH/PVL and/or BPD represented 17.2 per 10000 with a low of 10.0 and a high of 31.2.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
We found marked differences in very preterm birth rates as well as mortality and short-term morbidity in 10 population-based cohorts of very preterm infants from regions that participated in the MOSAIC study. In the total cohort, 14.2% of infants who were born alive between 22 and 31 weeks of gestation died before discharge from the hospital, but standardized mortality was doubled in high- versus low-mortality regions (18%–20% vs 7%–9%). Morbidity among survivors also varied significantly; the combined prevalence of IVH grades III and IV and cystic PVL ranged from 2.6% to >10% and BPD from 10.5% to 21.5%.
Underascertainment was unlikely to be responsible for these regional variations. A standardized approach to data validation was conducted for all regions; inclusions in the MOSAIC cohort were cross-checked with birth registers to ensure completeness, and the study included the full cohort of late fetal losses and live and still births from 22 weeks of GA, making underreporting for live births at 24 weeks less likely. Furthermore, variability in mortality was observed at later GAs, when underreporting was improbable.
Some of the variability in morbidity could result from different diagnostic practices. For instance, we cannot rule out observer bias in the interpretation of cranial ultrasounds. Oxygen saturation limits may also differ between individual units, affecting decisions related to the use of oxygen and measures of respiratory morbidity20,21; however, the definitions for our indicators of morbidity were established and tested for feasibility before data collection. The diagnosis of IVH grades III and IV was based on cranial ultrasound reporting on the basis of Papile gradings, which are used in all of the regions,19 and infants who had missing cranial ultrasounds were classified as having missing data for this indicator. Missing data were <1.5% for most regions. Another source of differential reporting may be varying lengths of stay between regions. Infants were followed until discharge home from the hospital, and it is possible that if some regions have shorter average lengths of stays, then this could affect ascertainments of our end points occurring after discharge from the hospital; however, we believe this bias to be small because our outcomes (death, severe cranial lesions, and oxygen dependence or ventilation at 36 weeks) occur primarily in-hospital.
Mortality and morbidity data have not previously been compared across population-based samples of very preterm infants in Europe. Our principal aim was to assess current rates of mortality and morbidity and their variations between regions using comparable indicators. The only factors for which we adjusted were GA and gender. Although mean GA did not differ significantly in most of the regions, nonsignificant variations in the GA distribution had an impact on mortality because of the very high mortality at lower gestations. Standardizing on GA and gender did not explain regional differences but tended to accentuate them. In the 2 low-mortality regions, Hesse and the Northern region of the United Kingdom, standardizing for the GA distribution lowered mortality rates. This result suggests that these lower mortality regions may be more active with respect to medically decided preterm deliveries, leading to a greater proportion of extremely preterm live births. Proactive treatment of very preterm infants has been associated with increased preterm birth rates and lower mortality.22 In contrast, in the Netherlands, standardization had the opposite effect of increasing mortality rates, reflecting the lower proportion of live-born infants in the Netherlands at 24 and 25 weeks, when mortality rates are high. The low proportion of live-born infants at early gestations could reflect policies not to intervene, which may result in a greater number of stillbirths. An analysis of stillbirths in the MOSAIC cohort is in preparation to explore this association.
This study found large differences between regions in rates of IVH grades III and IV and PVL as well as BPD among survivors. Data from other population studies have found values within the ranges reported here: between 7% and 10% for neurologic morbidity and 10% and 20% for respiratory morbidity.12,23 Some of the differences in crude morbidity rates between regions were explained by increased survival of more immature infants. Adjusting for the GA distribution slightly lowered morbidity rates in low-mortality regions; however, several regions with similar levels of mortality had markedly different rates of morbidity. This result underscores the importance of including data on morbidity in addition to mortality when evaluating the quality of care provision for very preterm infants.
Differences in ethical decision-making in delivery wards and neonatal units provide one explanation for these variations in outcome.24 In the Netherlands, the very high mortality under 28 weeks of gestation reflects a consensus not to intervene actively for extremely preterm infants25; the consensus on nonintervention was illustrated by the low proportion of infants who were born at <28 weeks and survived to discharge. In this region in 2003, no survivors were born before 26 weeks. This extreme result represents, in part, annual variability, because there were survivors who were born before 26 weeks in this region in other years and also in other regions of the Netherlands in 2003.26 Mortality in the Dutch region was in line with the regional average at 28 to 31 weeks of gestation. Ethical decision-making in the neonatal units could also contribute to differences in rates of morbidity when decisions to withhold or to withdraw treatment are made with respect to the presence of severe brain hemorrhaging or other criteria related to short-term morbidity.27,28
Another explanation may be the role of comorbidities and, in particular, congenital anomalies. We excluded lethal congenital anomalies from this analysis because there are wide differences in screening and termination practices between regions that could affect the proportion of deaths associated with a congenital anomaly,29 a topic on which the MOSAIC group has reported elsewhere; however, the presence of nonlethal congenital anomalies also increases the probability of death.30 This risk factor may be particularly prevalent in Poland, where terminations of pregnancy for congenital anomalies are highly restricted.
Decisions for infants at the limit of viability were unlikely to be the sole explanation for the variability across regions, because disparities persisted for infants who were older than 27 weeks of gestation, when a consensus on intervention is widespread. Congenital anomalies, of potential importance in some regions, nonetheless contribute to a small proportion of mortality and morbidity among very preterm infants without lethal anomalies. These results thus raise essential questions about other causes for regional variations in outcome. The organization of perinatal care for very preterm infants such as the place of delivery and the characteristics of the units where they are hospitalized have been shown in many studies to have an impact on mortality and morbidity.31–35 Medical practices, such as those related to artificial ventilation and oxygen use, for instance, may also affect morbidity.20 Finally, variability in the prevalence of certain complications of pregnancy could also be a contributing factor; risks for short-term morbidity have been related to prenatal infections and hypertension.36,37 Differences in the distribution of maternal age between the regions, for instance, could contribute to a higher prevalence of complications, such as hypertension.
Our results also raise questions about the long-term impact of differences in preterm birth rates, in-hospital mortality, and short-term morbidity. For instance, if 8% of infants who are <32 weeks are estimated to develop cerebral palsy (estimates from 5%–10% in the literature1–4), then the range in population incidence of survivors in the MOSAIC regions per 10000 births (64.1–117.1) would correspond to a low of 5 and a high of 9 expected cases of cerebral palsy per 10000 live births. This difference is substantial when related to observed cerebral palsy rates of 20 per 10000 live births.2,4,38 The regions also differed by the proportion of survivors with a GA of <28 weeks, a key factor associated with higher rates of childhood disabilities1,2,5,39 as well as the prevalence of IVH-PVL and BPD, which are the principal neonatal morbidities associated with a higher risk for impairment in childhood.40–45 Comparative follow-up studies are needed to provide this information and make it possible to evaluate the health impacts of differences in treatment and outcome in the perinatal period.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This project was partially funded by a grant from the European Commission Research Directorate (QLG4-CT-2001-01907) and coordinated by Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris.
The MOSAIC Research Group: Flanders, Belgium (E. Martens, G. Martens, P. Van Reempts); Eastern Denmark (K. Boerch, T. Weber, B. Peitersen); Ile-de-France, France (G. Bréart, J. L. Chabernaud, D. Delmas, P.-H. Jarreau, E. Papiernik); Hesse, Germany (L. Gortner, W. Künzel, R. Maier, B. Misselwitz, S. Schmidt); Lazio, Italy (R. Agostino, D. Di Lallo, R. Paesano); Eastern and Central Netherlands (L. den Ouden, L. Kollée, G. Visser, J. Gerrits, R. de Heus); Wielkopolska and Lubuskie, Poland (G. Breborowicz, J. Gadzinowski, J. Mazela); Northern Region, Portugal (H. Barros, I. Campos, M.Carrapato), Trent Region, United Kingdom (E. Draper, D. Field, J. Konje); Northern Region, United Kingdom (A. Fenton, D. Milligan, S. Sturgiss); INSERM U149, Paris, France (G. Bréart, B. Blondel, H. Pilkington, J. Zeitlin); external contributors (M. Cuttini, S. Petrou); Steering Committee (E. Papiernik, J. Zeitlin, G. Bréart, E. Draper, L. Kollée).
We acknowledge the assistance of the personnel in the maternity and neonatal units in the regions that participated in the MOSAIC project.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Accepted Sep 26, 2007.
Address correspondence to Jennifer Zeitlin, DSc, INSERM U149, Hôpital St Vincent de Paul, 82 av Denfert Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France. E-mail: zeitlin{at}cochin.inserm.fr
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
| What's Known on This Subject Very preterm birth accounts for a large proportion of perinatal deaths and impairments in childhood, but comparative pouplation-based data on the mortality and morbidity of very preterm babies are not readily available.
|
| What This Study Adds Using a common protocol, this study finds large differences in very preterm mortality and neurologic and respiratory morbidity between European regions with similar standards of living and healthcare provision raising questions about variability in treatment decisions and population characteristics.
|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
- Ancel PY, Livinec F, Larroque B, et al. Cerebral palsy among very preterm children in relation to gestational age and neonatal ultrasound abnormalities: the EPIPAGE cohort study.
Pediatrics. 2006;117
(3):828
–835
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Drummond PM, Colver AF. Analysis by gestational age of cerebral palsy in singleton births in north-east England 1970–1994. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2002;16 (2):172 –180[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Topp M, Uldall P, Greisen G. Cerebral palsy births in eastern Denmark, 1987–1990: implications for neonatal care. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15 (3):271 –277[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Himmelmann K, Hagberg G, Beckung E, Hagberg B, Uvebrant P. The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. IX. Prevalence and origin in the birth-year period 1995–1998. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94 (3):287 –294[Web of Science][Medline]
- Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJ. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis.
JAMA. 2002;288
(6):728
–737
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Horwood LJ, Mogridge N, Darlow BA. Cognitive, educational, and behavioural outcomes at 7 to 8 years in a national very low birthweight cohort.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;79
(1):F12
–F20
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Stoelhorst GM, Rijken M, Martens SE, et al. Changes in neonatology: comparison of two cohorts of very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks): the Project On Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants 1983 and the Leiden Follow-up Project on Prematurity 1996–1997.
Pediatrics. 2005;115
(2):396
–405
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Manktelow BN, Draper ES, Annamalai S, Field D. Factors affecting the incidence of chronic lung disease of prematurity in 1987, 1992, and 1997.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;85
(1):F33
–F35
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - de Kleine MJ, den Ouden AL, Kollee LA, et al. Lower mortality but higher neonatal morbidity over a decade in very preterm infants. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21 (1):15 –25[Web of Science][Medline]
- The Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Improved outcome into the 1990s for infants weighing 500–999 g at birth.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;77
(2):F91
–F94
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Darlow BA, Cust AE, Donoghue DA. Improved outcomes for very low birthweight infants: evidence from New Zealand national population based data.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88
(1):F23
–F28
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH, et al. Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991–1999.
Pediatrics. 2002;110
(1 pt 1):143
–151
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Vohr BR, Wright LL, Poole WK, McDonald SA. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants <32 weeks' gestation between 1993 and 1998.
Pediatrics. 2005;116
(3):635
–643
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Suzuki J, Ito M. Incidence patterns of cerebral palsy in Shiga Prefecture, Japan, 1977–1991. Brain Dev. 2002;24 (1):39 –48[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Winter S, Autry A, Boyle C, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Trends in the prevalence of cerebral palsy in a population-based study.
Pediatrics. 2002;110
(6):1220
–1225
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Buitendijk S, Zeitlin J, Cuttini M, Langhoff-Roos J, Bottu J. Indicators of fetal and infant health outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111 (suppl 1):S66 –S77[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Zeitlin J, Papiernik E, Breart G. Regionalization of perinatal care in Europe. Semin Neonatol. 2004;9 (2):99 –110[CrossRef][Medline]
- Van Reempts P, Gortner L, Milligan D, et al. Characteristics of neonatal units that care for very preterm infants in Europe: results from the MOSAIC study. Pediatrics. 2007;120 (4). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/120/4/e815
- Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978;92 (4):529 –534[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Irwig L, Simpson JM. Oxygen-saturation targets and outcomes in extremely preterm infants.
N Engl J Med. 2003;349
(10):959
–967
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Tin W, Milligan DW, Pennefather P, Hey E. Pulse oximetry, severe retinopathy, and outcome at one year in babies of less than 28 weeks gestation.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;84
(2):F106
–F110
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Håkansson S, Farooqi A, Holmgren PA, Serenius F, Hogberg U. Proactive management promotes outcome in extremely preterm infants: a population-based comparison of two perinatal management strategies.
Pediatrics. 2004;114
(1):58
–64
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cust AE, Darlow BA, Donoghue DA. Outcomes for high risk New Zealand newborn infants in 1998–1999: a population based, national study.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88
(1):F15
–F22
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cuttini M, Nadai M, Kaminski M, et al. End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians' self-reported practices in seven European countries. EURONIC Study Group. Lancet. 2000;355 (9221):2112 –2118[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- van der Heide A, van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G, et al. Medical end-of-life decisions made for neonates and infants in the Netherlands. Lancet. 1997;350 (9073):251 –255[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- The Netherlands Perinatal Registry. Perinatal Care in the Netherlands [in Dutch]. Bilthoven, Netherlands: The Netherlands Perinatal Registry; 2006
- De Leeuw R, Cuttini M, Nadai M, et al. Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: an international perspective. J Pediatr. 2000;137 (5):608 –616[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Dehan M, Gold F, Grassin M, et al. Withholding and withdrawing treatment in the perinatal period: importance of a coherent attitude between gyneco-obstetricians and pediatricians [in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001;30 (2):133 –138[Medline]
- Papiernik E, Zeitlin J, Delmas D, et al. Termination of pregnancy among very preterm births and its impact on very preterm mortality: results from 10 European population-based cohorts in the MOSAIC study. BJOG. 2008;115 (3):361 –368[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Linhart Y, Bashiri A, Maymon E, et al. Congenital anomalies are an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity and perinatal mortality in preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000;90 (1):43 –49[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, Phibbs RH. The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality.
JAMA. 1996;276
(13):1054
–1059
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ozminkowski RJ, Wortman PM, Roloff DW. Inborn/outborn status and neonatal survival: a meta-analysis of non randomised studies. Stat Med. 1988;7 (12):1207 –1221[Web of Science][Medline]
- Paneth N, Kiely JL, Wallenstein S, Marcus M, Pakter J, Susser M. Newborn intensive care and neonatal mortality in low-birth-weight infants: a population study. N Engl J Med. 1982;307 (3):149 –155[Abstract]
- Phibbs CS, Baker LC, Caughey AB, Danielsen B, Schmitt SK, Phibbs RH. Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants.
N Engl J Med. 2007;356
(21):2165
–2175
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Synnes AR, Macnab YC, Qiu Z, et al. Neonatal intensive care unit characteristics affect the incidence of severe intraventricular hemorrhage. Med Care. 2006;44 (8):754 –759[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Thorp JA, Jones PG, Clark RH, Knox E, Peabody JL. Perinatal factors associated with severe intracranial hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185 (4):859 –862[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Ancel PY, Marret S, Larroque B, et al. Are maternal hypertension and small-for-gestational age risk factors for severe intraventricular hemorrhage and cystic periventricular leukomalacia? Results of the EPIPAGE cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193 (1):178 –184[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group.
N Engl J Med. 2000;343
(6):378
–384
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Platt MJ, Cans C, Johnson A, et al. Trends in cerebral palsy among infants of very low birthweight (<1500 g) or born prematurely (<32 weeks) in 16 European centres: a database study. Lancet. 2007;369 (9555):43 –50[CrossRef][Medline]
- Grégoire MC, Lefebvre F, Glorieux J. Health and developmental outcomes at 18 months in very preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Pediatrics. 1998;101
(5):856
–860
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Schmidt B, Asztalos EV, Roberts RS, Robertson CM, Sauve RS, Whitfield MF. Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain injury, and severe retinopathy on the outcome of extremely low-birth-weight infants at 18 months: results from the trial of indomethacin prophylaxis in preterms.
JAMA. 2003;289
(9):1124
–1129
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, et al. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993–1994.
Pediatrics. 2000;105
(6):1216
–1226
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Tommiska V, Heinonen K, Kero P, et al. A national two year follow up study of extremely low birthweight infants born in 1996–1997.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88
(1):F29
–F35
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Walsh MC, Morris BH, Wrage LA, et al. Extremely low birthweight neonates with protracted ventilation: mortality and 18-month neurodevelopmental outcomes. J Pediatr. 2005;146 (6):798 –804[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- de Kleine MJ, den Ouden AL, Kollee LA, et al. Development and evaluation of a follow up assessment of preterm infants at 5 years of age.
Arch Dis Child. 2003;88
(10):870
–875
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2008 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E S Draper, J Zeitlin, A C Fenton, T Weber, J Gerrits, G Martens, B Misselwitz, G Breart, and on behalf of the MOSAIC research group Investigating the variations in survival rates for very preterm infants in 10 European regions: the MOSAIC birth cohort Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2009; 94(3): F158 - F163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. N. T. Tich, P.J. Anderson, J.S. Shimony, R.W. Hunt, L.W. Doyle, and T.E. Inder A Novel Quantitative Simple Brain Metric Using MR Imaging for Preterm Infants AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 125 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Kabir, G. N. Connolly, L. Clancy, B. B. Cohen, and H. K. Koh Declining maternal smoking prevalence did not change low birthweight prevalence in Massachusetts from 1989 to 2004 Eur J Public Health, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 65 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
