ARTICLE |
Newborn Emergency Transport Service, Royal Women's Hospital, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. We conducted a retrospective review of the records of all infants transported between January 1, 2004, and November 1, 2005.
RESULTS. A total of 220 infants were treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure; of these, 13 infants (6%) were intubated before transport, leaving 207 infants transported on a median nasal continuous positive airway pressure of 7 cm H2O. Thirty infants were transported by fixed or rotary wing aircraft and 190 by road. No infants required intubation or bag and mask ventilation during transport. Twenty-eight infants (13%) required intubation within 24 hours of arrival at the receiving hospital, 4 infants (2%) were intubated >24 hours after arrival, 11 infants (5%) were intubated for surgery, and 164 infants (73%) were never intubated. A total of 111 infants (50%) were preterm and <72 hours old at transport, and 32 infants (15%) were
32 weeks' gestational age and <72 hours old at transport. Fraction of inspired oxygen was significantly lower at the end of transport (0.45 vs 0.34).
CONCLUSIONS. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure is effective and has an acceptable safety margin for the road-based transportation of infants with acute respiratory distress. Air transport is feasible but larger studies are required to assess safety.
Key Words: NCPAP transport fixed wing rotary wing neonate
Abbreviations: NCPAP—nasal continuous positive airway pressure NETS—Newborn Emergency Transport Service TCO2—transcutaneous CO2 FIO2—fraction of inspired oxygen RDS—respiratory distress syndrome GA—gestational age
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is a safe and effective mechanism for providing respiratory support for term and preterm infants.1,2 The use of NCPAP in Australia and New Zealand is increasing for all gestations.3 This rise in NCPAP use reflects evidence from animal studies suggesting reduced lung injury with NCPAP compared with mechanical ventilation4 and reports of lower rates of chronic lung disease in infants cared for in units favoring the use of NCPAP over intubation and ventilation.5,6
Until recently there has been little published data on the use of NCPAP in neonatal transport. Simpson et al7 described the use of NCPAP via an infant flow driver in 6 infants during a 1-year period in Scotland. A larger series of 100 infants transported by road on NCPAP has been reported from a team based in Cambridge, United Kingdom.8 Neither of these reports included aeromedical transport of infants on NCPAP. One group from Scotland reports intubating all of the infants on NCPAP requiring aeromedical transport.9 There are limited data on the use of NCPAP in the transport of infants with acute respiratory distress, with the 100 patients in the Cambridge report having a mean age of 28 days and only 3 infants identified as having acute respiratory distress.8
The Victorian Newborn Emergency Transport Service (NETS) is the largest provider of infant and neonatal transport in Australia. NETS serves a population of 5 million people and covers 225000 km2. Approximately 2600 infants are transported each year, of which 1100 are emergency transfers. Transport by fixed and rotary wing aircraft accounts for 15% of transfers. Virtually all of the newborns in Victoria who require either NCPAP or ventilation are cared for in 1 of the 4 NICUs based in Melbourne, Australia. The transport team consists of a neonatal transport nurse and a transport fellow who is usually a senior pediatric trainee. All of the transports are triaged and supervised by consultant neonatologists on-call exclusively for transport. NCPAP is delivered by Hudson prongs connected to a Stephan ventilator, which delivers warmed, humidified gas. The aim of this study was to describe a large cohort of neonates and infants transported on NCPAP including a large number with acute respiratory distress.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For each infant, an initial assessment is made by the transport team, followed by a discussion with the NETS consultant to plan the ongoing management. There are no set criteria used by NETS to determine which infants receive NCPAP and which are intubated and ventilated. The decision on the mode of respiratory support (headbox oxygen, NCPAP, or intubation/ventilation) is made by the NETS consultant on the basis of the transport team's assessment.
Intubation and administration of surfactant with subsequent immediate extubation is not a management strategy routinely used by NETS or any of the tertiary perinatal centers in Victoria during the study period. Thus, none of the infants transported on NCPAP received surfactant before transport.
When NCPAP is commenced, a period of 10 to 20 minutes of observation is undertaken before transfer into the transport incubator to ensure it is adequately tolerated. This study included infants already on NCPAP at he time of referral, as well as those not on respiratory support before transport but deemed suitable for NCPAP. Infants who failed the trial on NCPAP were included on the basis of intention to treat.
NCPAP failure was defined as follows: (1) intubation before transport; (2) intubation during transport; (3) bag and mask ventilation during transport; (4) pulse oxygen saturation <88% despite appropriate O2 therapy (except for those with congenital heart disease); and (5) increase in transcutaneous CO2 (TCO2) >7 mmHg with TCO2 at the end of transport >60 mmHg. An upper limit of appropriate fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) was not set, because the study included infants with bronchiolitis, in whom a high FIO2 would be acceptable, providing blood gas analysis was satisfactory.
Data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA) and MINITAB 13 (MINITAB Inc, State College, PA). Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney U test,
2 test, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Analysis was undertaken for the whole group with secondary analyses undertaken on infants stratified by mode of transport. This study was performed as a quality assurance audit, and consequently ethics committee approval was not required (as per Australian National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines, available at www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/_files/e46.pdf).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Median gestational age (GA) at birth was 34 weeks (23–40 weeks), median age at transport was 1 day (0–175 days), and corrected GA at transport was 35 weeks (25–50 weeks). Median weight at transport was 2746 g (670–6100 g). Demographic characteristics are displayed in Table 1.
|
|
Compared with those who were not intubated within 7 days of transport (n = 164), the infants intubated within 24 hours of arrival had a higher FIO2 at start and end of transport and were less likely to have chronic lung disease (see Table 3). There were no other differences between these groups in their demographics or diagnosis.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NCPAP seems safe for road transports, because only 4% infants had an increase in FIO2 >0.1, and 7% had an increase in TCO2 >7 mmHg with no infants requiring intubation or bag and mask ventilation during transport. Four infants met the failure criteria because of a TCO2 increase. Results of blood gas analysis to confirm the rise in TCO2 were not available. Given that only 1 of these infants subsequently required intubation, the use of this criterion is questionable and highlights the need for additional studies with blood gas analysis immediately before and after transport. With only 30 infants transported by air, additional studies are required to establish the safety of NCPAP in air transports. The reduction in FIO2 during transport confirms the efficacy of NCPAP. It is not surprising that some infants required intubation within 24 hours of arrival at the receiving hospital, because >90% of infants with RDS were transferred within 72 hours of birth. Clearly many of these infants are at risk of worsening RDS but given that the number of infants ultimately needing intubation is far smaller than the number with RDS transported, routine intubation before road transport cannot be justified. Routine intubation is undesirable for several reasons: the infant is subjected to an invasive procedure that is uncomfortable, the procedure would add significantly to the stabilization time, and unnecessary ventilation may result in preventable lung injury.
Neonatal retrieval by air is mainly limited to acutely unwell infants, and this accounts for the lower postnatal age at transport in the air transport group. Because of space restrictions, intubation in the plane or helicopter would be very difficult. The threshold for intubation is, therefore, lower for infants to be transported by air, with the majority of infants <32 weeks' gestation being intubated before transport (in addition, infants in this GA range would be candidates for surfactant therapy). The GA at transport is, thus, higher in the air group.
This is the first study of the use of NCPAP in transport to report follow-up of transported infants. In particular, intubation rates after such transports have not been reported previously. It is reassuring that 83% of infants did not require intubation within 24 hours of transport. The details of exactly when and why infants were intubated were not able to be ascertained from the available data, and a more detailed prospective study of outcome would be useful. The only significant differences between those intubated within 24 hours of arrival and those not intubated in the first week of life were a higher FIO2 and lower rate of chronic lung disease in the intubated group. It was not possible to predict those who required intubation. Prospective studies identifying the timing and reasons for intubation and including arterial blood gas analysis may help predict those infants requiring intubation. Future studies should also address other important outcome measures that we were unable to assess in this retrospective study, including duration of respiratory support, length of hospital stay, pneumothoraces, chronic lung disease, intraventricular hemorrhage, and death.
The intubation rate before transport of 13 (6%) of 220 infants was higher than that reported by Bomont and Cheema8 of 2 (2%) of 100. This likely reflects the lower postnatal age at transport and the increased number of infants with acute respiratory distress included our study.
Previous studies have almost exclusively reported ex-preterm stable infants transferred on NCPAP from a tertiary neonatal unit to a local special care infant unit. In the study by Bomont and Cheema,8 the mean age at transfer was 28 days, and 73 of 84 transfers by the emergency team were for repatriation of infants from a tertiary unit to a local hospital. Because the only units in Victoria managing infants on NCPAP are based in Melbourne, there are no return transfers of infants on NCPAP. The lack of significant numbers of district hospitals undertaking NCPAP also contributes to the relatively large number of infants with acute respiratory distress needing transfer on NCPAP. There is a trend toward increasing numbers of midwife-led delivery units without onsite pediatric staff in many countries, and, thus, there is likely to be an increasing need to transfer infants with acute respiratory distress to tertiary neonatal units. Transport with NCPAP may be an appropriate mode of respiratory support for some of these infants.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Philip G. Murray, MRCPCH, Endocrine Sciences Research Group, 3rd Floor, Core Technology Facility, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9NT, United Kingdom. E-mail: Philip.Murray{at}manchester.ac.uk
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
| What's Known on This Subject The use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure during the road based transport of stable infants who are not in the acute stages of respiratory distress is feasible and safe.
|
| What This Study Adds Nasal continuous positive airway pressure seems to be effective and has an acceptable safety margin for the road based transport of neonates with acute respiratory distress. Air-based transfers on nasal continuous positive airway pressure are feasible.
|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||