ARTICLE |
a Departments of Pediatrics
c Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
b Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
d Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Pulmonary hemorrhage was classified as serious when it was treated with increased ventilator support, a higher concentration of oxygen, or transfusion of blood products. The cumulative risk for serious pulmonary hemorrhage was estimated for the first week of life and for the entire NICU stay. Poor outcome at a corrected age of 18 months was death or survival with cerebral palsy, cognitive delay, blindness, and/or deafness.
RESULTS. A total of 123 (10.2%) of 1202 infants developed a serious pulmonary hemorrhage. During week 1, prophylactic indomethacin reduced the risk for serious pulmonary hemorrhage by 35%; however, during the entire NICU stay, the risk for such hemorrhages was decreased by only 23%. A reduced risk for patent ductus arteriosus explained 80% of the beneficial effect of prophylactic indomethacin on serious pulmonary bleeds. The risks for death or for survival with neurosensory impairment were doubled after a serious pulmonary hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS. Extremely low birth weight infants with serious pulmonary hemorrhage have an increased risk for poor long-term outcome. Prophylactic indomethacin reduces the rate of early serious pulmonary hemorrhage, mainly through its action on patent ductus arteriosus. Prophylactic indomethacin is less effective in preventing serious pulmonary hemorrhages that occur after the first week of life.
Key Words: extremely low birth weight pulmonary hemorrhage indomethacin prophylaxis
Abbreviations: PDA—patent ductus arteriosus TIPP—Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms ELBW—extremely low birth weight
Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a risk factor for the development of pulmonary hemorrhage in preterm infants1–3; however, despite halving the incidence of PDA in the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP), prophylactic indomethacin did not reduce the rate of pulmonary hemorrhage in this large sample of 1202 extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.4 We hypothesized after the completion of the TIPP that the inclusion of mild cases of pulmonary hemorrhage may have masked a beneficial effect of prophylactic indomethacin. Mild hemorrhages were characterized prospectively as blood-tinged tracheal aspirates that did not require any change in therapy. Traumatic airway management5 rather than high pulmonary blood flow as a result of a PDA3 may have been responsible for mild cases of pulmonary hemorrhage in the TIPP study population. In this exploratory and posthoc analysis, we excluded all mild cases to determine the effect of prophylactic indomethacin on the cumulative risk for serious pulmonary hemorrhage.
Infants with pulmonary hemorrhage are often very sick and may have worse short- and long-term outcomes than infants without pulmonary hemorrhage. Two retrospective, single-center studies previously reported higher mortality rates but no apparent increases in long-term morbidity after pulmonary hemorrhage in very low birth weight children.6,7 Our second objective was to compare the outcomes at a corrected age of 18 months in infants with and without a serious pulmonary hemorrhage in this large and international data set.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The details of the randomization and intervention have been reported.4 Briefly, eligible infants were randomly assigned soon after birth to receive indomethacin, 0.1 mg/kg body weight (Indocid P.D.A.; Merck Frosst, Kirkland, Quebec, Canada, and Merck, West Point, PA), or an equivalent volume of normal saline. Three drug doses were given during a period of 48 hours. Each dose was infused intravenously during 20 minutes.
Pulmonary Hemorrhage
Pulmonary hemorrhage was a prespecified secondary outcome in the TIPP and diagnosed whenever a blood-tinged tracheal aspirate was obtained.4 Information was also collected about the severity of the bleed. Mild hemorrhages required no changes in the treatment of the infants. Moderate hemorrhages were treated only with increased ventilator and/or oxygen support, whereas severe hemorrhages required the transfusion of blood products. Moderate and severe cases were analyzed together and described as serious pulmonary hemorrhages in this report. A total of 64 infants with mild pulmonary hemorrhage, 35 in the prophylactic indomethacin group and 29 in the placebo group, were classified as having no serious pulmonary hemorrhage in this study.
Patent Ductus Arteriosus
PDA was also a prespecified secondary outcome in the TIPP. PDA was diagnosed by echocardiography, which was requested only when there was a clinical suspicion of the condition. Because clinical signs are not sufficiently accurate, left-to-right shunting through the PDA had to be confirmed by echocardiography with Doppler flow studies before drug or surgical therapy to close the duct was undertaken.8
Outcomes at a Corrected Age of 18 Months
Death before a corrected age of 18 months or survival with neurosensory impairment was the primary outcome in the TIPP. Neurosensory impairment was the presence of
1 of the following: cerebral palsy, cognitive delay, hearing loss requiring amplification, and bilateral blindness.4 All 18-month assessments were performed prospectively according to a standardized protocol. Cerebral palsy was diagnosed when the child had nonprogressive motor impairment characterized by abnormal muscle tone and decreased range or control of movements. Cognitive delay was defined as a mental development index score <70 on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II.9 The score was assumed to be <70 when the child could not be tested because of severe developmental delay. Audiometry was performed to determine the presence or absence of hearing loss. A central adjudication committee that was unaware of the group assignments reviewed the results of audiologic tests for all infants who had potential deafness and whose hearing had not been amplified. Blindness was defined as a corrected visual acuity of <20/200. Follow-up was targeted for a corrected age of 18 months, but the protocol allowed a window of 18 to 21 months (12–21 months for audiometry). Efforts to conduct assessments continued beyond a corrected age of 21 months to maximize ascertainment of the long-term outcome.
Statistical Analysis
Baseline differences between the subgroups of infants with and without a serious pulmonary hemorrhage were compared with a
2 test for categorical variables and a t test for quantitative data. The cumulative risk for serious pulmonary hemorrhage over time since randomization was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier procedure and compared between the prophylactic indomethacin and placebo groups with a Mantel-Haenszel log rank test.10
The effect of prophylactic indomethacin on the prevention of serious pulmonary hemorrhage was estimated from a Cox proportional hazard model.10 Analyses were performed both unadjusted and with adjustment for the following important baseline factors: small for gestational age status,11 gender, gestational age, and use of antenatal steroids. An additional analysis was conducted to determine to what extent this treatment effect could be explained via closure of the PDA. A time-dependent variable was created with an initial value of 0 that was switched to a value of 1 on and after the day of the first echocardiogram showing a left-to-right ductal shunt. The β coefficient associated with prophylactic indomethacin in a Cox model that contained both baseline factors and the time-dependent indicator variable for PDA represented that part of the indomethacin effect on serious pulmonary hemorrhage that could not be explained by an intermediary effect on PDA closure.
The composite outcome at a corrected age of 18 months and its components were dichotomous. The influence of serious pulmonary hemorrhage on 18-month outcomes was estimated using odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression was used to adjust for the following prespecified baseline variables: level of maternal education, use of antenatal steroids, gestational age at birth, gender, and multiple births. All analyses were conducted with SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary NC).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been known for some time that a PDA is a risk factor for pulmonary hemorrhage in preterm infants.1–3 Kluckow et al3 performed a comprehensive and longitudinal echocardiographic study in very preterm infants and reported that pulmonary hemorrhage was associated with large ductal shunts and high estimates of pulmonary blood flow.
In this analysis, a reduced risk for PDA explained most of the favorable effect of prophylactic indomethacin on the prevention of serious pulmonary hemorrhage. This finding confirms the important role of PDA in the pathogenesis of pulmonary hemorrhage. Moreover, these data suggest that ductal closure is the most likely mechanism for the observed risk reduction of serious pulmonary bleeds after indomethacin prophylaxis; however, inability of indomethacin to cause tight constriction of the ductus in some extremely preterm infants may lead to later recurrence of PDA.12 We speculate that such recurrence of large ductal shunts may explain why prophylactic indomethacin was less effective in preventing pulmonary hemorrhages that occurred after the first week of life.
Our data on mortality are consistent with the findings by 2 other groups of investigators who also reported an increased risk for death after a serious pulmonary hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants6,7; however, neither of the 2 previous single-center, retrospective studies reported an increased risk for neurosensory impairments among survivors.6,7 In contrast, we have shown in this analysis that survivors of a serious pulmonary hemorrhage may face substantially increased risks for cerebral palsy and cognitive delay. This is not surprising because infants with serious pulmonary hemorrhage are more likely to acquire neonatal brain injury.13 We suspect that lack of statistical power may account for the failure of previous studies to detect the increased long-term risks: in the TIPP, 64 survivors of a serious pulmonary hemorrhage were assessed at 18 months, compared with 24 survivors in the study by Tomaszewska et al6 and 39 survivors in the report by Pandit et al.7
Although our data were collected prospectively, the limitations of this study include that all analyses were designed posthoc. Our results have generated new hypotheses, but they should not be accepted as conclusive evidence until they have been confirmed in future research studies. Importantly, the unadjusted reduction in the relative risk for serious pulmonary hemorrhage after prophylactic indomethacin was 23%, whereas our study had 80% power to detect a true relative risk reduction of only 40%.
Despite these caveats, we conclude that ELBW infants with serious pulmonary hemorrhage may have an increased risk for death or neurosensory impairment at a corrected age of 18 months. Indomethacin prophylaxis seems to reduce early serious hemorrhage, mainly through its action on PDA; however, indomethacin prophylaxis may be less effective in preventing serious pulmonary hemorrhages that occur after the first week of life.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The TIPP Investigators: Canada: British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver: A. Solimano, M. Whitfield, F. Germain, J. Tomlinson; Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton: A. Peliowski, P. Etches, B. Young; Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton: C.M.T. Robertson; Foothills Hospital and Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary: D. McMillan, R. Sauve, L. Bourcier, H. Christianson; Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon: K. Sankaran, B. Andreychuk; Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg: M. Seshia, O. Casiro, V. Debooy, V. Cook; St Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg: C.M.G. Cronin, D. Moddemann, N. Granke; The Salvation Army Grace Hospital, Windsor: C. Nwaesei, L. St Aubin; St Joseph's Health Centre, London: D. Reid, D. Lee, C. Kenyon, L. Whitty, J. Farrell; Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton: B. Schmidt, S. Saigal, P. Gillie, J. Dix, B. Zhang; Women's College Hospital, Toronto: A. Ohlsson, E. Asztalos, L. Wiley; Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto: A. James; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston: K.F.W. Young Tai, M. Clarke; IWK Grace Health Centre, Halifax: M. Vincer, S. Stone. Australia: King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Perth: R. Kohan, N. French, H. Benninger; Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide: C. Barnett, R. Haslam, J. Ramsay; Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne: P. Davis, L. Doyle, B. Faber, K. Callanan; Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne: S. Fraser; Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW: K. Lui, M. Rochefort, E. McAvoy; Royal Women's Hospital, Brisbane: P. Colditz, M. Pritchard; Mater Mothers Hospital, Brisbane: P. Steer, D.I. Tudehope, V. Flenady, J. Hegarty. New Zealand: National Women's Hospital and Middlemore Hospital, Auckland: L. Mildenhall, W. Smith, L. McCarthy. Hong Kong: Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin: T.F. Fok. United States: NICHD Neonatal Research Network: Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto: D.K. Stevenson, B. Fleisher, B. Ball; University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque: L.A. Papile, G. Laadt, C. Backstrom; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas: J.E. Tyson, S. Broyles, S. Madison; University of Alabama, Birmingham: W.A. Carlo, K. Nelson, M. Collins, S. Johnson; Children's Hospital Michigan, Detroit: S. Shankaran, V. Delaney-Black, G. Muran, D. Driscoll; Emory University, Atlanta: B.J. Stoll, N. Simon, E. Hale; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland: A.A. Fanaroff, D. Wilson, M. Hack, N. Newman; University of Miami, Miami: C.R. Bauer, A.M. Worth, W. Griffin; Brown University, Providence: W. Oh, B.R. Vohr, A. Hensman. Steering Committee: B. Schmidt (Chair), P. Davis, D. Moddemann, A. Ohlsson, R.S. Roberts, S. Saigal, A. Solimano, M. Vincer, L. Wright. External Safety Monitoring Committee: M. Gent, W. Fraser, M. Perlman. BSID II Certification: R. Adkins. Audiology Central Adjudication Committee: L. Elden, C.M.T. Robertson, B.R. Vohr. Consultant Pharmacist: S. Gray. Coordinating and Methods Center: Biostatisticians: R.S. Roberts, K. Thorpe; Trial Coordinator: N. LaPierre.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Barbara Schmidt, MD, Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Ravdin 8, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: barbara.schmidt{at}uphs.upenn.edu
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
This trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT00009646).
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||