ARTICLE |
a Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
b Schneider Children's Medical Centre of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel
c Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
d Department of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to systematically review the available evidence on the association of whole-cell pertussis and BCG vaccination with the risk of asthma in childhood and adolescence.
METHODS. The major medical electronic databases (Medline, National Library of Medicine Gateway, and Cochrane Library) were searched, and reference lists of the relevant publications were reviewed for relevant birth-cohort studies and randomized, controlled trials from 1966 to March 2006. Only studies that directly compared vaccinated and unvaccinated children, validated vaccination status by medical charts, and used preset criteria to define asthma were included. Data were abstracted by using a standardized protocol and computerized report form. Results were analyzed by applying a fixed-effect or random-effect model, according to the heterogeneity of the studies. Sensitivity analyses by scoring criteria were performed.
RESULTS. Seven studies of pertussis vaccination (with a total of 186663 patients) and 5 studies of BCG vaccination (with a total of 41479 patients) met our inclusion criteria. No statistically significant association was detected between either whole-cell pertussis or BCG vaccination and incidence rates of asthma during childhood and adolescence. This lack of a significant association proved to be robust on sensitivity analyses for BCG but not for pertussis vaccine.
CONCLUSIONS. Currently available data, based on observational studies, do not support an association, provocative or protective, between receipt of the BCG or whole-cell pertussis vaccine and risk of asthma in childhood and adolescence.
Key Words: vaccination asthma meta-analysis
Abbreviations: DTP—diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis BCG—bacille Calmette-Guérin OR—odds ratio CI—confidence interval Th—T helper
In the past 3 decades we have witnessed a dramatic increase in the prevalence of asthma and allergic disease worldwide, most notably in countries with a Western lifestyle.1 Most cases of asthma first appear in childhood, with 80% to 90% of patients diagnosed by 6 years of age.2 Gene-environment interactions are critical to the pathogenesis of allergic disorders such as asthma, and the susceptibility to asthma was shown to be increased by conditions that are present early in life, including family history of asthma or other manifestations of atopy, male gender, low birth weight, preterm birth, young maternal age, early cessation of breastfeeding, and parental smoking.3
The association between vaccination uptake and the risk of atopic diseases was first proposed by Odent et al4 in a letter published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1994. Thereafter, several studies have suggested either a provocative or protective effect of immunization depending on the specific vaccine, the target population, and the age at which the vaccine was administered.5–7 Whole-cell pertussis (as a component of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis [DTP] vaccines) and bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccines are among the most extensively studied in regard to their suggested effect on risk of atopic diseases.
More-recent systematic reviews have failed to support these findings (although no formal meta-analyses have been conducted, partly because of the heterogeneity of the studies8,9), including 2 independent population-based studies published in 2005 that reported a possible atopy-protective effect of immunization.10,11 It is important that researchers clarify this issue, because unless refuted, the perception that immunization causes asthma may become a significant determinant of parents' attitudes toward routine vaccination of their children.12
The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the possible association of whole-cell pertussis and BCG vaccination in the first year of life with the incidence of asthma in childhood and adolescence and to perform a meta-analysis of the relevant studies.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Selection of Articles
The abstracts of all articles identified were reviewed, and 71 relevant original scientific studies were read in full. In the preliminary assessment, we excluded cross-sectional studies and studies that did not directly compare subjects who were vaccinated with BCG or DTP/whole-cell pertussis vaccine ("pertussis vaccine") with unvaccinated subjects. We also excluded studies in which asthma status in childhood or early adolescence (up to 16 years old) did not serve as an independent outcome measure. When several studies pertained to the same cohort, the study with the longest follow-up period was selected for inclusion. The 24 remaining articles for final assess-ment4,10,11,13–33 were independently reviewed and scored by 2 of us (Drs Balicer and Grotto).
Data Abstraction and Validity Assessment
Two of us (Drs Balicer and Grotto) abstracted information from each of the 24 selected studies. All data were abstracted by using a standardized protocol and computerized report form.
Among these 24 articles, we selected only those that met our preset criteria: randomized, controlled trial or birth-cohort study, either prospective or retrospective (including those with a nested case-control design); assessment of vaccination status using the medical charts; asthma/bronchial hyperresponsiveness diagnosed on the basis of a validated questionnaire or the medical charts; and asthma defined as (1) at least 1 reported or recorded episode of wheezing or bronchial obstruction, (2) reported coughing in the morning or during the day or evening in the autumn and winter and coughing daily for
3 months/year, (3) physician-diagnosed asthma or obstructive bronchitis, or (4) ever-recorded medications for asthma or wheezing. Thirteen articles were eliminated on this basis, which left 11 studies for analysis.
Quantitative Data Synthesis
All analyses were performed separately for pertussis and BCG vaccination. The overall odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for asthma were calculated by using the OR and variance of each study. The overall measure was summarized by the precision-based estimates described by Fleiss34 and Kleinbaum et al,35 which assume a homogeneity of effect between studies (fixed-effect model), and the method of DerSimonian and Laird,36 which factors in both within-study variance and heterogeneity between studies (random-effect model). Heterogeneity of the ORs across n studies was tested with the following formula:
2 heterogeneity =
wiMi2 – (
wiMi)2/
wi, where Mi is an individual measure of association (logarithm of the OR), and wi is a weighting factor equal to the reciprocal of the squared SE (determined by the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI) of the individual measure.34 Statistical significance was evaluated with n – 1 degrees of freedom.
Quality Ranking and Sensitivity Analysis
The studies included in the final assessment were appraised and ranked for methodologic quality within the process of the sensitivity analyses. Criteria concerning the study design merited 1 point for each of the following: group randomization, retrieval of outcome data from medical charts, a relatively large unvaccinated group (>25% of the study population), and studies that performed and reported the results of a multivariate analysis that accounted for gender, family history of asthma and/or allergy, socioeconomic status, parental smoking, low birth weight, young maternal age, and prolonged breastfeeding (1 point for each factor adjusted for). For cases in which a relevant multivariate analysis was not performed or its results were not available, univariate analysis results were used in the meta-analysis and no quality score was granted for adjustment criteria. Studies were scored and ranked according to the sum of points (range: 0–11). In case of equal scores, the study that scored higher in the first 3 above-mentioned study-design criteria was ranked higher. Disagreements or uncertainties were resolved by discussion among all the investigators.
We performed sensitivity analyses in which we excluded studies from the pool to examine their effect on the pooled estimate and CIs.37 First, we removed each one of the studies, and then we excluded the study with the lowest-quality score and then 2 studies with the lowest-quality scores. We also recalculated the pooled estimates, including only studies in which unvaccinated subjects comprised at least 25% of the total cohort, thereby adjusting for several potential bias factors. All computations were performed by using PEPI 3 (USD, Inc, Stone Mountain, GA) for epidemiologic analysis.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
One study assessed both pertussis and BCG vaccines and was included in both analyses.15 The main features of these studies, organized by quality score, are shown in Table 2.
|
2 = 4.89; P = .299); therefore, we used the OR that was calculated according to the fixed-effect model as the overall estimate. The OR was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.88–1.08), which indicates that BCG vaccination had no overall effect on the occurrence of asthma in childhood or adolescence.
|
|
2 = 13.98; P = .03); therefore, the OR was calculated according to the random-effect model to determine the overall estimate. The OR was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.78–1.25), which indicates that pertussis vaccination had no detectable adverse effect on asthma. Additional calculations using the fixed-effect model yielded similar results (OR: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.92–1.13]).
|
2 = 6.62; P = .157). In this case, when we used the fixed-effect model, pertussis vaccination had a borderline significant provocative effect on asthma in childhood (OR: 1.26 [95% CI: 1.04–1.54]). | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our final selection comprised 11 studies that included a total of 227570 subjects (1 of which assessed both vaccines). The results did not support either a protective or provocative effect of BCG or whole-cell pertussis vaccination in the first year of life on the likelihood of acquiring asthma in childhood and adolescence.
In the past 3 decades we have witnessed a spectacular increase in the prevalence of asthma and allergic disease worldwide: >130 million people suffer from asthma, and the numbers are increasing.40 This quadruple increase is most notable in countries with a Western lifestyle. A critical role for environmental factors in driving the expression of asthma and other allergic diseases is considered almost certain.1 Exposure to high amounts of allergens, such as those derived from house dust mites, cannot explain the large intercountry differences in asthma rates or the rising trends. Concerns have been raised that factors that once provided protection from allergic disease may have been lost from the environment.
In 1989, Strachan7 proposed the hygiene hypothesis, which claims that the apparent rise in the prevalence of allergic disease "could be explained if allergic diseases were prevented by infection in early childhood, transmitted by unhygienic contact with older siblings, or acquired prenatally." This hypothesis suggested that modern-day cleanliness has decreased microorganism stimulation of the immune system in infants, leading to the persistence of an immature immune response and, consequently, an imbalance in T-helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 immunity, which may lead to atopy. Persistence of the immature immune response may depend on the presence of certain predisposing genes and specific environmental exposures.
More recently, extensive epidemiologic research has shown that exposure to microorganisms or their products may play a role in allergic disease. Indirect support was provided by findings of a considerably lower prevalence of allergic diseases in developing countries and in rural areas within 1 country.41 The overrepresentation of allergic sensitization in firstborn children and the lower rates in children from large families or attending day care also point to a possible protective effect of a frequent exchange of infections.40 Accordingly, exposure to microbial substances in stables and in unpasteurized (raw) milk was found to be inversely related to the development of atopy, and the endotoxin load in the mattresses of children brought up in a rural environment was inversely related to the occurrence of hay fever and grass sensitization.42
The hygiene hypothesis implies that any interventional factor that reduces childhood infections may potentially be associated with an increased incidence of allergic diseases. Several studies have demonstrated a statistically significant14,24,26 or nonsignificant22 tendency toward a higher risk of atopy in individuals who have been immunized with the whole-cell pertussis vaccine, administered in most cases as a component of the DTP vaccine. Of these 3 components, pertussis toxin was shown to cause an increased production of pertussis-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies in both animal and human models. However, in most cases, this was a transient change that was unrelated to the development of atopic conditions.19 In this analysis we were not able to differentiate the individual effect of the diphtheria and tetanus components on the measured outcomes.
Our finding from this analysis that pertussis vaccination is not related to asthma incidence is in keeping with the only randomized, controlled trial to date that addressed this issue. Nilsson et al13 randomly assigned 667 Swedish children to 4 groups to receive 2- or 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine, whole-cell pertussis vaccine, or DPT vaccine. The cumulative incidence of asthma at 7 years was similar in all groups after adjustment for family history of atopic disease, environmental smoking at home, and other living conditions. Similar findings were noted in other nonrandomized well-controlled studies that compared pertussis-vaccinated and unvaccinated children. One large-scale ecological study even reported a negative correlation of pertussis immunization and wheezing at the population level.43
The selection process and sensitivity analyses used in this study were designed to address several of the methodologic challenges associated with nonrandomized observational studies of vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. To reduce the effect of recall bias, we excluded 9 studies from researchers who failed to validate vaccination status with medical charts. In addition, the unique attributes of specific unvaccinated subpopulations may also act as confounders or introduce misclassification. For example, parents who elect not to vaccinate their child may practice a naturalistic lifestyle, thus introducing various confounding factors. They may also be less likely to seek medical assistance in events of wheezing/asthma and, therefore, will be underrepresented in studies that use only medical charts to assess outcome. McKeever et al28 found that nonvaccinated children visited their general practitioner less often than vaccinated children in the same cohort, and the association between vaccination and asthma varied considerably between the subgroups according to their visit frequency. Therefore, we performed a separate analysis of studies in which the unvaccinated children comprised >25% of the study cohort, because nonvaccination in these cases may not have been limited to secluded individuals. Alternatively, the differences in beliefs and lifestyle of this subgroup and the vaccinated population may not have been as profound as expected. We found that the results of this subgroup analysis were in keeping with the others in our study.
The only borderline significant positive association of vaccination with asthma incidence was noted in the analysis of the 5 studies of the highest methodologic quality score. The results showed that pertussis vaccine had a provocative effect on the occurrence of asthma (OR: 1.26 [95% CI: 1.04–1.54]). This finding highlights the importance of performing additional, adequately designed evidence-based studies.
BCG immunization during infancy has been suggested to protect against atopic diseases and asthma. Unlike the pertussis vaccine, BCG immunization involves the inoculation of live mycobacteria. Therefore, it may have a direct effect on the immune system, similar to that of tuberculosis and other bacterial infections, and provide protection against atopy in accordance with the hygiene theory. In animal models, BCG vaccination has resulted in a preferential proliferation of Th1 cells and inhibited subsequent immunoglobulin E antibody formation and allergen-induced airway inflammation, even in the presence of established allergies.44–48 This protective effect was also suggested in several human studies, although in most cases, it did not reach statistical significance. One exception is the large-scale study of Grüber et al,19 who compared German and Dutch children and demonstrated a moderate (and borderline significant) protective effect of BCG vaccination on childhood asthma.
The results of our meta-analysis do not support these earlier findings. Similar to pertussis, we found no statistically significant association between BCG vaccination and subsequent asthma/wheezing in childhood and adolescence.
It is noteworthy that much of the preliminary evidence of such a protective impact was reported in studies that used the response to purified protein derivative as a surrogate marker for successful BCG inoculation.49,50 We did not include them in our analysis, because it is unclear if the decreased tuberculin responses were induced by atopy or if they contributed to the atopy-related Th2-type immune response. In another study in Spanish schoolchildren, which suggested a weak but significant protective effect of BCG immunization against asthma and hay fever, the BCG vaccination status was not validated against the medical charts.10 Nevertheless, we included it in our analysis because the authors, who were aware of the problem, claimed that the effect of this potential misclassification was nondifferential, so that the statistically significant increase in the calculated risk was probably an underestimate. In view of this rationale, we also performed an analysis including this study, and the overall protective effect of BCG vaccination neared but did not reach statistical significance.
Thus, the currently available evidence does not indicate a protective effect of BCG vaccination on asthma incidence, although a tendency for such an effect can be detected and may be affirmed in future randomized, controlled trials.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The lack of robustness of the results of the sensitivity analyses of pertussis vaccination and the multitude of potential biases in studies that have used a birth-cohort design stress the need for additional adequately controlled, large-scale studies.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Ran D. Balicer, MD, MPH, 27 Hagilgal St, Ramat Gan 52392, Israel. E-mail: rbalicer{at}netvision.net.il
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||